spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)



Fig. 4. 92/546 acts as a strong DPP response element in COS cells. The expression of luciferase under the control of the lab550 enhancer or derivatives thereof was analyzed in COS cells after co-transfection with combinations of MAD-, MEDEA- and TKVQD-expressing plasmids. Cells were transfected with 4 µg of the reporter plasmids lab1-550luc (A) or its derivatives, schematically represented at the bottom of the graph, and (B) co-transfected with 2 µg of each indicated expression plasmids. enhancerless: parental luciferase plasmid pt81-luc. The amount of transfected DNA was kept constant (10 µg) by addition of psG5 plasmid. Bars represent the luciferase activity of transfected cell extracts (mean±s.e.m. of three to ten independent experiments, each carried out in duplicate), expressed as -fold activation over the basal activity of the reporter construct. Values were normalized by co-transfection of 0.1 µg of a pCMV-ß-gal plasmid as an internal standard. lab550 activity is increased 70-fold after the co-transfection of all four plasmids. (A) Although MAD and MEDEA together also stimulated expression of lab550 (14-fold), the addition of TKVQD further increased expression fivefold; TKV did not stimulate lab550 expression in the absence of co-transfected MAD and MEDEA. In contrast to lab550, the activity of HOMRE (B) was increased only threefold by DPP signaling. DPPRE activity was increased 84-fold and the activity of DPPRE carrying mutation 300, which allowed for a strong DPP response in the endoderm, was increased 32-fold. Thus, mutation 300 did not show a stimulatory effect in COS cells but rather somewhat reduced the DPP response. The reduced induction of 92/546m300 when compared with 92/546 was due to a higher basal level of 92/546; the measured activity levels after induction were similar (data not shown).





Right arrow Return to article