spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)



Fig. 3. Flow cytometric analysis of whole embryo cell suspensions. (A,B) Flow cytometric quantification of total cell number (unbroken line) and 95% confidence interval (broken lines) from pooled wild-type (A, n=65) and Igf2+m/-p (B, n=84) embryos dated by seminal plugs and using a quadratic line of best fit (Minitab). Inserts show linear plots of loge cell number versus age (days). (C) Box plots of normalised (100%) cell number (subtracting sub-G1) of each embryo relative to the mean cell number of the respective genotype in each litter (box=interquartile range, vertical line=95% confidence interval, horizontal line=median). Insert shows pooled values. (D) Ratios of mean cell numbers per litter for Igf2+m/-p (-p) over wild-type (+p) embryos matched per litter and aged by the mean cell number of wild-type embryos in each litter (blue diamonds, n=15 litters, 140 embryos, P=0.005 at E11, Student’s t-test). Line shows linear regression of all data points. (E) Somite number plotted against loge cell number for wild type (blue, n=65) and Igf2+m/-p (red, n=84). (F) Ratios of mean somite numbers and line of best fit for Igf2+m/-p (-p) over wild type (+p) embryos matched per litter and aged by the mean cell number of wild-type embryos in each litter (n=10 litters, 124 embryos). Litters with at least two embryos of each genotype were used.





Right arrow Return to article