spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 4. Binding of SEM-4 to the mec-3 and egl-5 promoters. (A) Binding to the mec-3 promoter. The indicated changes were made to inactivate the sites in the specific competitor oligonucleotides for the gel shift. The addition of SEM-4 to radiolabeled probe produced four complexes (arrows). Binding decreased substantially in the presence of 100-fold and 50-fold molar excess of cold specific competitor. Binding did not decrease as much when mutated competitor was added. Mutation of m3-1, from AGACAA to AGCTAG, restored some of the binding; mutation of both m3-1 (to AGCTAG) and m3-2 (from ACACAA to ACCTAG), restored more of the binding. The sequence of m3-3 is ACACAA. (B) Binding to a region of the egl-5 promoter close to the translation start site. Control protein was prepared from cells transformed with the pGEX6P-1 vector, lacking the sem-4 cDNA insert. The addition of SEM-4 to radiolabeled probe produced three complexes (arrows). Binding decreased substantially in the presence of 100-fold molar excess of cold specific competitor. Mutation of e5-1 (from TTGTGT to CTAGGT), e5-2 (from TTGTCT to CTAGCT) and e5-3 (from ACACAA to ACCTAG), in the specific competitor restored binding of complexes 1 and 3. (C) Ectopic T lineage expression of PV6CREgfp in sem-4 animals and of PV6CRE{delta}100gfp in wild-type animals. PV6CREgfp in wild-type animals shows only occasional, faint T lineage expression (top). Scale bar: 10 µm. Arrows indicate T.pa and T.pp cells expressing GFP. (D) Binding to V6CRE. The addition of SEM-4 to radiolabeled probe produced two complexes (arrows). Binding decreased substantially in the presence of 100-fold molar excess of cold specific competitor. Mutation of e5-4 and e5-5 as indicated in the specific competitor restored binding of complexes 1 and 3. Mutation of e5-T1 as indicated did not restore binding. Mutation of e5-4, e5-5 and e5-T1 produced the same restoration of binding as mutation of e5-4 and e5-5.





Right arrow Return to article