spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 6. In vitro analyses of the NCE identify two Krox20 binding sites. (A) Both the upper (left) and the lower (right) strand of the 247 bp fragment #17 (Fig. 3) were analysed for Krox20 binding sites in DNase I footprinting assays using extracts from control or Krox20-expressing bacteria. Two doses of DNase I were used (0.2 and 0.5 units). The G+A reaction is included for both strands. The position of the two Krox20 footprints and the range of sequence analysed are indicated for both strands. (B) Control and Krox20-expressing bacterial extracts were analysed in bandshift assays using either the wild-type (upper) or Krox20 binding site mutant (lower) fragment #17 as a probe. The volume of bacterial extract was varied between 0.5-2.0 µl. To identify specific complexes, unlabelled competitor oligonucleotides corresponding to a high affinity Krox20 binding site (wt) or a mutant version (mt) were included in the binding reaction at 50-200-fold molar excess (Sham et al., 1993). Specific complexes are indicated with brackets. The different mobility protein-DNA complexes are likely a result of the presence of two Krox20 binding sites, one of which is asymetrically localised (Fig. 5). FP, free probe.





Right arrow Return to article