Click on image to view larger version.

Fig. 2. Synchronous patterns of spontaneous network activity in the hippocampal CA1
region emerge after birth. (A-E) Correlation network analysis of the CA1
hippocampal region at E16. (A,B) Paired photomicrographs showing the same
field viewed under fura-2 fluorescence (A) and DIC optics (B) illustrating
dozens of cells loaded with the Ca2+ indicator. Black squares
indicate cells with spontaneous changes of fura-2 fluorescence signal over
time. (C) Raster plot representing the activity profile of each of the 12
spontaneously active cells shown in A and B over 800 seconds. The activity
profiles of individual cells are represented by horizontal lines and each tick
mark labels the onset of each Ca2+ transient. Dotted lines indicate
simultaneous onset of [Ca2+]i oscillations of at least two cells of
the plot. Note the small number of co-activations at E16 (e.g. cells no. 6 and
no. 11). (D) Spatiotemporal correlation map illustrating all the active cells
shown in A-C, in which pairs of cells with statistically significant
correlation coefficients are linked by lines. Only 5 out of 12 active cells,
located in the stratum oriens and in the pyramidal layer, show significant
synchrony. The P value reflects the probability that the overall
degree of synchronous correlation present in this network is caused by chance
(see E). (E) Distribution of pair-wise correlations found in the real data
(arrow) and in 1,000 simulations obtained by the Monte Carlo test (bell-shaped
curve) of the active cells shown in A-D (see Materials and Methods). In this
case, the number of correlated events in the real data set (arrow) does not
exceed that expected by chance in simulated data, P=0.25. (F-I)
Correlation network analysis of the CA1 hippocampal region at P1-P2. (F) CA1
region of a P2 hippocampal slice viewed with fura-2 fluorescence. Note the
greater number of active cells (squares) than at E16 (A). (G) Raster plot
illustrating the activity profile of each of the 70 cells shown in F. Highly
synchronous activity patterns, in which network oscillations involve virtually
the entire population of active neurons, are easily recognized. (H)
Spatiotemporal correlation map of the CA1 region of a P1 slice illustrating
complex synchronous networks, which recruit vast populations of active cells.
Note the greater overall complexity than at E16. Furthermore, the lines
connecting co-active cells are thicker than at E16, indicating higher degrees
of correlation. The P value reflecting the probability that the
overall degree of synchronous correlation present in this network is caused by
chance is 0 (see I). (I) The number of simultaneous co-activations present in
the network represented in H (arrow) exceeds the frequency distribution of
random experiments created by Monte Carlo simulation. (J) Percentages of
active cells involved in synchronous correlated networks at different ages
(E16-P5). (K) Average of P values representing network correlation
during development. The number of cases with significant synchronous
correlated networks (P<0.05) in relation to the total number of
cases analyzed is shown at the top of each bar. (L) Graph illustrating the
correlation between the rise in network synchrony (P values, left,
solid line) and the increase in the number of active cells (dotted line; see
Fig. 1D) in the hippocampal CA1
region during development. Values in J and K are given as mean ± s.e.m.
Scale bars, 40 µm. Abbreviations as in
Fig. 1.