spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 3. Phenotype of p63–/–cervicovaginal epithelium (CVE). I. Epithelial morphology. The p63–/– CVE was columnar and developed deep inclusions or glands (black arrows). The p63–/–cervicovaginal grafts in the ovariectomized hosts showed uterine-like epithelial morphology (A). When the hosts were treated with E2, the glandular p63–/– CVE remained columnar but became hyperplastic (B). II. Cervicovaginal epithelial markers. Markers for squamous differentiation [p63 (C,D) and K14 (E,F)] and keratinization [K10 (G,H) and involucrin (I,J)] were assessed in p63+ (C,E,G,I) and p63–/– (D,F,H,J) cervicovaginal grafts by IHC. The p63–/– CVE failed to express squamous and keratinization markers. III. Common markers for uterine and cervicovaginal epithelia. Markers common for UtE and CVE [ER{alpha} (K,L) and p130 (M,N)] were examined in p63+ (K,M) and p63–/– (L,N) cervicovaginal grafts by IHC. Both p63+ and p63–/– CVE strongly expressed ER{alpha} and p130. IV. Regulation of PR by E2. Expression of PR was assessed by IHC in p63+ (O,Q) and p63–/– (P,R) cervicovaginal grafts in the ovariectomized (–E2, O and P) or E2-treated ovariectomized (+E2, Q and R) hosts. In the p63+ CVE, PR was detectable only when the host was treated with E2 (compare O with Q). By contrast, p63–/– CVE expressed a high level of PR in the absence of E2 (P), which is a unique phenotype of uterine epithelium. V. VgM/UtE tissue recombination. Tissue recombinants were made with UtE and VgM from E17 p63–/– and p63+ embryos. Expression of p63 was examined in the tissue recombinants. The p63+ UtE developed into normal vaginal epithelium and expressed p63 when it was recombined with p63–/– VgM (S). By contrast, p63–/– UtE recombined p63+ VgM failed to undergo squamous differentiation (T). Scale bar: 50 µm.





Right arrow Return to article