(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.

Fig. 7. The Esr1 enhancer does not require E-boxes and responds to Notch
through two loci. (A) Luciferase activity of Esr1/RV and Hin3
fragments co-transfected with activated Notch (ICD) plus or minus
Xngnr1 (ngn). (B) Luciferase activity of Esr1/RV and
Esr1/Hin3 vectors co-transfected with ICD compared with proximal
elements from mouse Hes1
(Jarriault et al., 1995) and
Xenopus Hairy2 (Davis et al.,
2001), Esr10/Dra and a vector containing eight
multimerized Su(H) sites (Ling et al.,
1994). Cells were transfected simultaneously with equal levels of
ICD (100 ng/well) relative to the reporter (100 ng/well). (C) Luciferase
activity of Esr1/RV co-transfected with increasing (25 ng/well and
100 ng/well) levels of ICD compared with a construct in which all upstream
Su(H) sites are mutant (Esr1/RVmS3-5) or the Esr1/Hin3
deletion mutant. Unlike the wild-type reporter, luciferase activity of the
Su(H) and Hin3 mutant constructs saturates at low (25 ng) ICD levels. (D) An
S4 mutation results in loss of transcription similar to
Esr1/RVmS-35.