spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 2. FGFR-ERK1/2 signaling is activated in migrating PGCs. (A) Whole-mount dp-ERK1/2 (red) staining in transverse slices from E9.5 OCT4{Delta}PE:GFP embryos; germ cells are shown in green. To show the specificity of the dp-ERK1/2 antibody, trunk regions of embryos were cultured with (right) or without (center) MEK inhibitor (50 µM of U0120) for 4 hours, fixed, sliced and stained for dp-ERK1/2. Slices in which the primary antibody was left out of the protocol (left) were used as negative controls. (B-D) Higher magnification views of hind gut regions of the embryos shown in A. Confocal sections reveal that cytoplasmic staining observed in PGCs of the control slice (arrowheads in C) was diminished in the U0126-treated slice (D) and the negative control slice (B). (E-H) The percentage of dp-ERK1/2-positive PGCs was dramatically affected by 4-hour treatments of FGFs (FGF7 and FGF2) or FGFR inhibitor (SU5402). (E) Dp-ERK1/2 staining of control embryo cultured with DMSO. The numbers of dp-ERK1/2-positive PGCs (red; arrows) were increased in embryos incubated with (F) 10 ng/ml of FGF7 or (G) 10 ng/ml of FGF2, and decreased in embryos treated with (H) 5 µM of SU5402. (B-H) dp-ERK1/2 images are on the right; GFP overlaid image, left. (I) The percentage of dp-ERK1/2-positive PGCs obtained from each treatment is summarized. Error bars show the s.e.m. Asterisks indicate the degree of statistical significance (P<0.01), of increase (*) and decrease (**) compared with the controls. Scale bars: in A, 200 µm; in B, 20 µm for B-D; in E, 40 µm for E-H.





Right arrow Return to article