spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 4. Zen binding is enhanced in the presence of Mad. (A) Schematic representation of the 42 bp wild-type (wt-42) and mutant oligonucleotides that eliminate the core Smad-(Sm-42) or Zen-(Zm-42) binding sites, and the 128 bp DNA fragment from the Race enhancer used in electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) showing Medea-(blue circle), Mad-(blue ovals) and Zen-(red ovals) binding sites. (B) DNA binding requires the core consensus sites. 32P-labeled wild type (lanes 1-4) and mutant oligonucleotides (Sm-42, lanes 5-8; Zm-42, lanes 9-12) were incubated with no protein (lanes 1,5,9); and 100 ng Mad (lanes 2,6,10), 100 ng Medea (lanes 3,7,11) or 10 ng Zen (lanes 4,8,12). Mad and Medea produce a single complex of bound probe, whereas Zen produces two complexes. The slower migrating Zen complex could be due to a Zen/Zen/DNA complex. Mutant Sm-42 (or Zm-42) eliminated the binding of Mad/Medea (or Zen) without affecting the binding of Zen (or Mad/Medea). (C) 32P-labeled wild-type DNA fragments were incubated with no protein (lanes 1 and 5), increasing amounts of Mad (1 ng, 2 ng, and 5 ng in lanes 2-4, respectively), increasing amounts of Zen (0.1 ng, 0.3 ng, and 1 ng in lanes 6-9, respectively) or increasing amounts of Zen in the presence of 1 ng of Mad (lanes 10-13). The amounts of Zen in lanes 10-13 were the same as in lanes 6-9. More Zen complexes are shifted in lanes 10-13 compared with lanes 6-9. In lane 13, a supershifted complex (arrow) is visible above the Zen complex (arrowhead) that may be due to the formation of a Mad/Zen/DNA complex or a Zen/Zen/DNA complex. (D) Similar experiment as in C, except that Zen-Del was used instead of wild-type Zen. The same amounts of proteins were used as in C. Enhancement of Zen binding by Mad was not observed.





Right arrow Return to article