spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 5. Mad and Zen proteins interact. (A) Schematic representation of the full-length and truncated forms of Zen proteins used in the in vitro protein interaction assays. Black bars represent the homeodomain of Zen (amino acids 90-149) (Rushlow et al., 1987) and the hatched bar conatins the putative Mad-Zen interaction domain (amino acids 152-199). (B) Autoradiogram of 5% of the amounts of 35S-labeled in vitro translated Zen proteins used in each binding reaction. Lane 1, full-length Zen; lanes 2-7, truncated Zen proteins a-f. (C) Results of GST pull-down assays with full-length and truncated Zen proteins. Odd-numbered lanes were reactions using GST protein (negative controls). Even-numbered lanes were reactions using GST-MadN with the following Zen proteins: lane 2, full length; lane 4, a; lane 6, b; lane 8, c; lane 10, d; lane 12, e; lane 14, f; lane 16, Zen-Del. Results are also summarized on the right side of A. Zen-Del has background binding with GST alone. In repeated experiments, the difference between GST and GST-MadN lanes for Zen-Del was somewhat variable and consistently insignificant.





Right arrow Return to article