spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online March 7, 2005


Development 132, 704e (2005)
© The Company of Biologists Limited
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In this issue

Evolving the finding and binding of Hox targets



Hox proteins are transcriptional regulators that specify segmental identity along the anteroposterior axis of multicellular animals. In Drosophila, Hox proteins bind to DNA in association with the Extradenticle (Exd) and Homothorax (Hth) co-factors. The Hox DNA-binding selectivity model proposes that distinct Hox/Exd/Hth complexes select different consensus DNA-binding sites to initiate different developmental programs. On p. 1591, Ebner and colleagues question this model. By screening the Drosophila genome for the consensus Lab/Exd/Hth-binding sequence, the authors have discovered a new target gene regulated by the Hox protein Labial (Lab). Surprisingly, the regulation of this gene by Lab does not depend on the Lab/Exd-binding consensus site but on a strongly divergent sequence. The researchers conclude that more complexity needs to be built into the Hox DNA-binding selectivity model to accommodate their findings. On p. 1567, Hersh and Carroll consider how Hox genes regulate development from an evolutionary point of view. The researchers identify the knot gene as a direct target of the Hox protein Ultrabithorax (Ubx) in the developing Drosophila haltere and find that the minimal element for knot repression by Ubx is not conserved between Drosophila species. They conclude that Hox cis-regulatory regions, the evolutionary selection of which underlies how Hox proteins direct the production of different metazoan body forms, are more diffuse and larger than previously thought.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in Development:

Direct regulation of knot gene expression by Ultrabithorax and the evolution of cis-regulatory elements in Drosophila
Bradley M. Hersh and Sean B. Carroll
Development 2005 132: 1567-1577. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Recognition of distinct target sites by a unique Labial/Extradenticle/Homothorax complex
Andreas Ebner, Clemens Cabernard, Markus Affolter, and Samir Merabet
Development 2005 132: 1591-1600. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?