spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 1, 2006


Development 133, 1002e (2006)
© The Company of Biologists Limited
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In this issue

Neuronal migration makes contact


Figure 1

Neuronal migration occurs through contact-dependent mechanisms [requiring cell-adhesion molecules (CAMs)] and contact-independent mechanisms (involving diffusible molecules). Classic cadherins are calcium-dependent homophilic CAMs with roles in neuronal development and in the migration of non-neuronal cells; Murakami and colleagues now provide the first evidence (on p. 1923) that they also contribute to contact-dependent neuronal migration. The authors focused on the lateral reticular nucleus (LRN) and external cuneate nucleus (ECN) neurons that relay information to the cerebellum. They showed that cadherin mRNAs (specifically CAD6, CAD8, CAD11 and NCAD) are expressed in the migratory streams of LRN and ECN neurons in vivo, and that dominant-negative NCAD perturbs neuron migration in vitro and in vivo. But through what mechanism? Dominant-negative cadherin does not change the responsiveness of neurons to the attractive guidance molecules arising from the floor plate; neither does it affect TAG1, known to be involved in their migration. Instead, the authors suggest that cadherins' adhesive properties are required to promote the mobility of migrating neurons.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in Development:

Classic cadherins regulate tangential migration of precerebellar neurons in the caudal hindbrain
Hiroki Taniguchi, Daisuke Kawauchi, Kazuhiko Nishida, and Fujio Murakami
Development 2006 133: 1923-1931. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?