(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.

Fig. 8. Effects of full-length and deleted ds constructs on wing PCP
and crossvein spacing. Normal polarity is indicated by blue arrows and
abnormal polarity by red arrows. Proximodistal crossvein spacing in wild type
(A) is indicated by a horizontal black double arrow, and is compared with
abnormal spacing (red double arrow) in E-H. (A) Wild type. (B)
ds05142. (C,D) Partial rescue of
ds05142 PCP defects, especially in distal wing blade, by
tub-gal4 and UAS-ds (C) or
UAS-ds
ICD (D). (E-G) Expression of UAS-ds
(E), UAS-ds
ICD (F) or
UAS-ds
ECD (G) with tub-gal4
did not induce PCP defects, but reduced crossvein spacing. (H) The
crossvein spacing defect induced by UAS-ds
ECD was
stronger using en-gal4, but there were no PCP defects at the sharp
boundary of misexpression between L3 and L4. (I-L) PCP in the posterior wing.
(I) Wild type. (J,K) Expression of UAS-ds (J) or
UAS-ds
ICD (K) in the central region of the wing using
sal-gal4 results in the orientation of hairs away from the region of
misexpression. (L) sal-gal4 and
UAS-ds
ECD has no effect on PCP.