|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online June 8, 2006
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.02412
1 Max-Planck-Institut für Entwicklungsbiologie, Spemannstrasse 35, 72076
Tuebingen, Germany.
2 Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Zoologisches Institut I, Zell- und
Neurobiologie, Haid-und-Neu-Strasse 9, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
3 Institut für Mikro- und Nanotechnologie, Interstaatliche Hochschule
für Technik Buchs NTB, Werdenbergstrasse 4, CH-9471 Buchs,
Switzerland.
4 Labor für Mikro- und Nanotechnologie, Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232
Villigen-PSI, Switzerland.
* Authors for correspondence (e-mail: friedich.bonhoeffer{at}tuebingen.mpg.de; bastmeyer{at}bio.uka.de)
Accepted 19 April 2006
 |
SUMMARY |
|---|
 TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Key words: Axon guidance, Microcontact printing, Retinotectal projection, Chick
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
). Indeed,
gradients can provide positional information over a comparatively large area
and are therefore suitable for the establishment of topographic maps
(McLaughlin and O'Leary,
2005).
One of the best-studied examples of gradient-dependent axonal guidance is
the retinotectal projection. In the chick, retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) from
the temporal half of the retina project to the anterior part of the optic
tectum, whereas nasal RGCs project to the posterior part. This topographic
order has been shown to be mediated by a nasal to temporal expression gradient
of EphA receptors in the retina and a complementary anterior to posterior
expression gradient of repellent ephrinA ligands in the tectum
(Drescher et al., 1995;
Cheng et al., 1995;
Connor et al., 1998).
Although extensive in-vitro and in-vivo data exist about this mode of
topographic mapping (Brown et al.,
2000; Feldheim et al.,
2000; Feldheim et al.,
2004), it is still poorly understood how retinal growth cones read
gradients of repellent guidance molecules such as ephrinAs and integrate the
information into a meaningful response. Several theoretical models have
addressed the question of how growth cones read gradients and recognize their
specific target areas in order to form a topographic map
(Gierer, 1983;
Honda, 1998;
Goodhill and Urbach, 1999;
Löschinger et al.,
2000).
Experimentally, axonal guidance has been studied previously in diffusible
gradients of soluble, secreted molecules, which induce growth cone turning
(Lohof et al., 1992;
Song et al., 1997), and in
three-dimensional collagen gels (Rosoff et
al., 2004). There is evidence that growth cones can adjust their
sensitivity to various concentrations of guidance factors in diffusible
gradients (Ming et al., 2002;
Piper et al., 2005). This
continuous adaptation process, however, raises the question of how growth
cones know when to stop in a gradient of repellent molecules. Moreover, in the
in-vivo situation, RGC axons have to invade the repulsive ephrinA gradient in
the tectum up to a certain point to find their target region rather than
respond with negative turning angles as observed in the diffusible in-vitro
gradients of repellents.
Few data exist about substrate-bound gradients, which represent an
in-vivo-like experimental setup for ephrins, because their membrane attachment
and/or clustering is required for proper Ephreceptor activation
(Davis et al., 1994;
Egea et al., 2005).
In the present study, we used microcontact printing (µCP) of proteins to
produce geometrically defined gradients of substrate-bound recombinant
ephrinA5 in a reproducible and precise manner. By contrast to diffusible
gradients, and in a similar way to gradients in collagen gels
(Rosoff et al., 2004),
microcontact-printed gradients are stable over a long time and can be designed
in various shapes. This makes it possible to address directly the crucial
question of how growth cones evaluate different parameters of a gradient, such
as slope, local concentration and the total amount of encountered repellent
molecules, and detect where to stop within the repellent gradient.
While Baier and Bonhoeffer first proposed that growth inhibition of
temporal RGC axons is correlated with the maximal slope of a gradient
(Baier and Bonhoeffer, 1992),
subsequent experiments suggested, by contrast, that axons avoid a certain
threshold concentration when they are faced with gradients of repellent
membrane material (Rosentreter et al.,
1998).
Our results indicate that growth cones integrate the slope and the local concentration in a gradient of repellent molecules. Based on these findings, we hypothesize that a combination of summation of encountered ephrin and adjustment to the local ephrin concentration enables the growth cone to read positional information and react to it in a meaningful way.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
Correspondingly, the gradients with the relative steepness 1/3 consisted of gaps of 2 µm between stretches of protein with a length of 1 µm, etc. (compare Fig. 1).
Three non-graded patterns with stripes of constant width (0.3 µm, 0.6 µm and 1.8 µm) were designed. As in the gradients, the lower edges of the stripes had the constant distance of 7.5 µm.
Stamping protein pattern fields
For µCP (Bernard et al.,
2000; Quist et al.,
2005), silicon masters with patterns described above were
fabricated by low voltage electron beam lithography using a positive tone
resist (David and Hambach,
1999). The resulting resist pattern was inverted using a lift-off
process and reactive ion etching (David and
Souvorov, 1999) to yield a master with rectangular, 650-nm-deep
holes in the silicon surface.
Cuboids of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) were coated with ephrin solution, incubated for 20-30 minutes at 37°C, washed twice in ddH2O and dried with a stream of N2. The protein-covered cuboid surface was then placed onto the silicon master and removed immediately. This way, the pattern of the master was transferred to the PDMS cuboid, which was then used as a stamp on glass coverslips. After the printing process, the coverslips were coated with 20 µg/ml laminin (Invitrogen) in PBS for 30 minutes, washed in Hanks' medium and equilibrated with F12 medium.
As ink for µCP, a PBS solution containing 8 µg/ml recombinant ephrinA5-Fc chimera protein (R&D Systems) clustered with 24 µg/ml Alexa Fluor 488 anti-human Fc antibody (Molecular probes) was used. Alternatively, 16 µg/ml ephrinA5-Fc was clustered with 48 µg/ml antibody. To obtain less concentrated ephrin solutions (2 and 4 µg/ml), the clustered 8 µg/ml standard solution was diluted with antibody clustered Fc. Clustered Fc at 8 µg/ml was also used for control experiments.
For single experiments, recombinant ephrinA2-Fc chimera protein (R&D Systems) was used instead of ephrinA5.
The ephrin concentration per surface area in µCP gradients can be varied by either variation of the geometry of the gradient pattern or variation in the concentration of the printing ink. In the range of 2-8 µg/ml, the fluorescence intensity of stamped ephrin increases roughly linear with the printing ink concentration. However, we cannot determine if the concentration of the printing ink is directly proportional to the amount of functional ephrin transferred to the coverslip. We therefore evaluate data from different printing ink concentrations separately.
Preparation, fixation and staining of retinal ganglion cell cultures
RGCs were dissected and cultured according to the method previously
described (Walter et al.,
1987). Briefly, retinae of embryonic day (E) 6-7 chick embryos
were dissected in Hanks' medium and cut along the dorsoventral axis in
275-µm-wide stripes. The retinal stripes from either the temporal or the
nasal half of the retina were placed approximately 700-µm in front of the
protein patterns on the coverslips and grown in F12 medium containing 0.4%
methylcellulose, 2% chicken serum and 5% fetal calf serum (FCS).
After 24 hours, the RGC cultures were fixed for 30 minutes in 4% paraformaldehyde/0.1% glutaraldehyde in PBS containing 0.3 mol/l sucrose and stained with Alexa Fluor 594 phalloidin (Molecular Probes). Cultures were embedded in mowiol and photographed with an inverted phase contrast microscope (Axiovert 10, Zeiss) and a color video camera (Sonic CCD) using Analysis D software (Soft Imaging Systems). The acquired pictures were further processed with Photoshop CS software (Adobe).
Time-lapse microcopy
For time-lapse microscopy, µCP was performed onto surface-treated
polystyrene cell culture dishes (Nunc). Time-lapse films were recorded with
the microscope using 20x and 63x objectives and the camera system
described above.
Quantitative evaluation of axonal growth
The acquired pictures were further processed with Photoshop CS software, to
combine phase contrast pictures and pictures of fluorescently stained protein
or two pictures with different fluorescence stainings.
For quantitative evaluation of axonal growth, the fluorescence of the anti-Fc antibody labeling the substrate-bound ephrin and the fluorescence of the phalloidin-stained axons were measured in a 495 µm x 375 µm field containing the stamped pattern and a 100-µm-long area preceding the pattern. For this, a 10-µm-high measuring rectangle extending over the whole width of the field (495 µm) was moved in 0.65-µm steps in the direction of axonal growth, i.e. rectangular to the gradient over the field, resulting in 553 data points along the vertical axis for each ephrin and axonal fluorescence. The intensity of axonal fluorescence was plotted against the distance overgrown by the axons, resulting in curves that reflected the distribution of axons and growth cones in the printed pattern and in the preceding area. After subtraction of the background fluorescence, curves were smoothened by calculation of the rolling average over 61 data points and were normalized for better comparison.
|
ANOVA was applied to the mean stop points in gradients with different slope and non-graded patterns with different stripe widths, respectively. Student's t-test was used to compare the mean stop points in gradients with the same slope but printed with two different ephrin concentrations (4 and 8 µg/ml).
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
The steepest gradient produced in this way consisted of an array of protein-covered stripes with constantly increasing width (0.3 µm per stripe) (Fig. 1D,E). The distance between the upper edges of the stripes was constant (7.5 µm). Shallower gradients were created by interruptions of the stripes (Fig. 1C,E). Microcontact-printed ephrin gradients are highly reproducible, stable and biologically active. The ephrin coverage at different positions of the gradient could be easily quantified by measuring the fluorescence intensity of the antibody used for clustering. In Fig. 1F, the average fluorescence intensities within a 20-µm measuring field were plotted against the longitudinal axis of the two gradients shown in Fig. 1D,E. In both gradients, the fluorescence intensity increased in a linear way with distance and was directly proportional to the ephrin coverage given by the geometry of the graded pattern. As the average diameter of a chick RGC growth cone is 15-20 µm, it can be assumed that a growth cone overgrowing these discontinuous gradients faces a more or less linear increase of ephrin coverage.
Temporal RGC growth cones form defined stop zones in ephrin gradients
RGC axons from the nasal retinal half grew over the ephrin gradient without
being repelled or displaying a stop reaction. In cultures fixed after 24
hours, nasal growth cones were distributed evenly over the gradient and
decreased only slightly in density with increasing distance from the retinal
explant (Fig. 2A).
By contrast, growth cones from the temporal retina invaded the beginning of
the gradient, but did not advance beyond a distinct range. They built up a
stable stop zone consisting of a dense meshwork of axons, growth cones and
thickened axons shafts (Fig.
2B). Around 5-10% of the temporal axons did not stop in the ephrin
gradient. As in earlier studies
(Rosentreter et al., 1998;
Monschau et al., 1997), no
graded response was visible along the naso-temporal axis of the temporal half
of the retina.
In control experiments, where Fc protein was used instead of ephrin for fabrication of the gradient, both temporal and nasal axons crossed the gradient without stopping (data not shown).
The reaction of individual temporal growth cones within ephrin gradients was observed by time-lapse microscopy (Fig. 3; see Movie 1 in the supplementary material). Temporal growth cones invaded shallow gradients without major changes in morphology (Fig. 3A). Within the gradient, phases of transient retraction alternated with phases of elongation until the growth cone stopped at a defined position. While pausing in that relatively small area, the growth cone constantly rearranged its filopodia and lamellipodia, actively exploring its environment. In the steepest ephrin gradient, reactions of temporal growth cones were more pronounced (Fig. 3B). Nasal growth cones grew over ephrin patterns without pausing or retracting. The same was true for temporal growth cones growing within Fc gradients (data not shown).
These findings suggest: (1) that temporal growth cones can detect patterns as gradients, although they are discontinuous at the microscale, and are able to integrate patchy ephrin distributions in the range of several micrometers; and (2) that substrate-bound ephrin provokes not only repulsion and retraction, but can also elicit growth cone stop at a defined position within the gradient.
|
). After
adding 500 ng/ml soluble ephrinA5-Fc protein to temporal RGCs growing on
laminin, we observed transient growth cone collapse followed by retraction
during the first 0.5-1 hours. After this time, growth cones resumed forward
elongation at the same rate as before addition of ephrin (data not shown).
When temporal axons were grown from the beginning in medium containing 250-500
ng/ml soluble ephrin, stop zones never formed and cultures were
indistinguishable from Fc controls (data not shown). We next added soluble
ephrinA5 at a concentration of 500 ng/ml to cultures of temporal axons a few
hours after a visible stop zone had formed. After 1 hour, a subset of axons
overshot the stop zone, which disappeared almost completely after 2 hours.
During disappearance of the stop zone, axons with stationary growth cones
resumed elongation and stop reactions of newly advancing growth cones were
abolished. Addition of 500 ng/ml soluble Fc did not affect the stop reaction
(data not shown). These findings demonstrate that the growth cones pausing within the stop zone remain active and that the stop reaction is reversible.
Temporal RGC axons elongate differently in ephrin gradients of different slope
Given that temporal growth cones stop reproducibly at a defined zone in
ephrin gradients, we further addressed the question of how the position of
this stop zone would vary in gradients of different slope and in gradients
containing different amounts of ephrinA5. The geometrical design of the
printing stamps allowed us to fabricate five linear gradients with relative
slopes of 1, 2/3, 1/2, 1/3 and 1/6. The absolute concentration of ephrinA5 in
the gradients was varied by using different ephrin concentrations (2, 4, 8 and
16 µg/ml) in the printing ink. In some experiments, ephrinA5 was replaced
by ephrinA2. As we did not observe any obvious differences in the axonal
reaction (data not shown), only ephrinA5 was further used throughout the
study.
Fig. 4A shows three gradients with the relative slopes of 1, 2/3 and 1/3 printed with 8 µg/ml ephrinA5. With decreasing slope, the stop zone proceeded deeper into the gradient. For a precise quantification of the distribution of growth cones and the position of the stop zone in the gradient, the actin in growth cones and axons was stained with fluorescently labelled phalloidin. The fluorescence intensity was measured in a standardized field encompassing the gradient and was plotted against the distance traveled by the axons. The resulting curves reflect the density of axons and growth cones at each point along the gradient (Fig. 4B). The position of the axonal stop zone was defined as the point along the axis of the gradient where the axonal fluorescence drops below the arithmetic mean of the overall axonal fluorescence for the first time (for details see Materials and methods). As shown in Fig. 4, the position of the stop zone determined in this way corresponded well with the stop zone position estimated by visual inspection. As the even distribution of temporal axons growing on Fc protein gradients led to curves that were roughly equal to the arithmetic mean line (Fig. 5A), we chose the arithmetic mean as a reference.
|
An increase of the printing ink concentration to 16 µg/ml did not significantly change the stop zone positions observed for 8 µg/ml (data not shown), suggesting that either maximal reactivity of the axons or maximal surface coverage is reached in 8-µg/ml gradients.
The magnitude of axonal outgrowth did not affect the stop point position in our experimental setup (data not shown).
These results show that temporal growth cones can distinguish different slopes and discriminate between different protein concentrations of ephrinA5 at given slopes.
Temporal axons stop in non-graded ephrin patterns
Starting from the observation that stop zone positions depend on the slope
of the gradient and the ephrin concentration, we asked what determines the
position of the stop zone in an individual gradient and what are common
parameters of all stop zone positions in the different gradients. In the
simplest case, one would envisage that growth cones stop at a fixed local
concentration, which is reached earlier in steeper gradients and later in
shallower gradients. To test this hypothesis, three discontinuous non-graded
patterns were built by an array of stripes with the constant thickness of 0.3,
0.6 and 1.8 µm. If only the local ephrin concentration determines the stop
reaction, temporal axons would either not enter these patterns or continue
their growth without being affected. Surprisingly, temporal axons reacted to
non-graded ephrin patterns as to linear gradients. After overgrowing a certain
distance in the pattern, growth cones stopped and formed a distinct stop zone
(Fig. 6A). The thicker the
stripes of the pattern, or the higher the printing ink concentration, the
earlier the axons formed a stop zone (Fig.
6B).
The observed axonal stop reaction in non-graded ephrin patterns indicates that the local ephrin concentration does not solely determine the stop point position and suggests an additional summation mechanism within a growth cone. We therefore estimated the total amount of ephrin a growth cone has encountered on its way to the stop zone by summing the area of the ephrin covered spots in a 15 µm wide rectangle spanning from the beginning of the pattern up to the stop zone (Fig. 7A, left). In addition, the local ephrin concentration at the stop zone position was determined as the percentage of ephrin coverage in a measuring square of 15x15 µm (Fig. 7A, right). Both the local ephrin concentration and the total amount of ephrin encountered on the way to the stop zone varied, depending on the pattern. When these two parameters were plotted against each other for all graded and non-graded patterns (Fig. 7B), a linear correlation became apparent. Equations for the linear smoothing functions are: y=2.8x + 13.0 with the correlation coefficient R=0.89 (8 µg/ml), y=4.4x + 33.5, R=0.81 (4 µg/ml) (Fig. 7B) and y=9.7x + 58.8, R=0.97 (2 µg/ml) (data not shown). In shallow gradients, as well as in non-graded patterns with thin stripes, both the local ephrin concentration and the total encountered ephrin-covered area were lower than in steep gradients and non-graded patterns with thick stripes. From this we conclude that the pattern in which ephrin is presented to the growth cone influences the efficiency of the transmitted stop signal.
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
By contrast to continuous gradients with smooth transitions between
different concentrations, discontinuous gradients of substrate-bound ephrinA5
consist of submicron-sized protein-covered spots that vary with respect to
their sizes and spacing but do contain the same amount of ephrin per surface
unit. Although quantitative measurements of in-situ signals for ephrinAs give
the impression of a continuous gradient within the tectum
(Drescher et al., 1995;
Cheng et al., 1995), retinal
axons might in vivo be confronted with gradients of guidance molecules
discontinuous on a microscale. Studies in the regenerating visual system of
goldfish suggest that the tectal ephrinA2 gradient is built by increasing
numbers of ephrinA2-expressing tectal cells with similar ephrin expression
levels (King et al., 2004). In
the chick tectum, growth cones are confronted with intermingled processes of
neurons, glial cells and radial glial endfeed, which express ephrinAs at
different levels (Davenport et al.,
1998).
Proper EphA/ephrinA signaling is dependent on cleavage and internalization
of ephrinA (Hattori et al.,
2000; Janes et al.,
2005). As this cleavage has been shown recently to occur in trans
(Janes et al., 2005), it can
be assumed to take place in our system, where ephrinA5 is bound to the
surface.
Topographic mapping is thought to be based on a graded responsiveness of
retinal growth cones towards ephrin along the naso-temporal axis of the retina
(McLaughlin and O'Leary,
2005). However, we found, in accordance with previous in-vitro
studies (Baier and Bonhoeffer,
1992; Walter et al.,
1987), that all temporal growth cones reacted as a uniformly
responsive population and all nasal growth cones were unresponsive. In our
experimental system, fiber-fiber interaction/competition among growth cones
might be reduced compared to the in-vivo situation. As competition of retinal
axons has been implicated in topographic mapping
(Prestige and Willshaw, 1975;
Brown et al., 2000;
Feldheim et al., 2000;
Feldheim et al., 2004;
Honda, 2003;
Honda, 2004), we cannot rule
out that the omission of axon competition gives rise to the uniform behavior
of all temporal axons in our experimental setup. The observed uniform behavior
is more compatible with models in which gradients of ephrinAs in the target
field act to sort out temporal and nasal axons, whereas retinotectal mapping
is later produced by topographically specific interstitial branching
(McLaughlin and O'Leary,
2005).
|
|
). EphrinA2 inhibited growth at high concentrations but
promoted growth at low concentrations. The transition from promotion to
inhibition varied along the naso-temporal axis of the retina. The experimental
designs in this study differed at various points from the ones used here. Most
notably, Hansen and co-workers cultured retinal explants directly on a
uniformly covered ephrin substrate, whereas in our work RGC axons were
confronted with a graded distribution of ephrinA5 after elongation on an
ephrin-free stretch of way.
We found that both gradient slope and absolute ephrin concentration
affected the position of the stop zone in a significant and reproducible way.
In an earlier study, temporal axons were confronted with linear gradients of
repellent membrane fragments from either caudal tectum or ephrinA-expressing
cell lines (Rosentreter et al.,
1998). Here growth cones reacted to an apparent threshold
concentration of repellent material that was independent of slope
(Rosentreter et al., 1998).
However, by contrast to the present study, axons did not stop once they
reached the threshold concentration, but rather continued elongation on areas
covered with low amounts of membrane material. The influence of the slope may
be seen only after the precise quantification of the guidance molecules, which
is possible in gradients fabricated by µCP.
Although addition of soluble, dimeric ephrin leads to transient growth cone
collapse and retraction, it is not sufficient for the more enduring stop
observed in the patterns of substrate-bound ephrin. When added to an already
formed stop zone, soluble ephrin caused the breakup of the stop zone and
inhibited further stopping in the gradient. These observations might be
explained in two ways. Firstly, in the signaling complexes of stopped growth
cones, Eph receptors are continuously replaced by new receptors to ensure
proper signaling. Soluble ephrin would then compete with substrate-bound
ephrin for the EphA receptors on the growth cone. Secondly, soluble dimeric
ephrin might induce a different axonal response from that of substrate-bound
clustered ephrin. In both cases, signaling cascades of Eph receptors induced
by higher order clusters (substrate-bound ephrin) and by soluble dimeric
ephrin should differ, a phenomenon that has recently been demonstrated for the
EphA4 receptor (Egea et al.,
2005).
The local concentration at the stop zone varies in the different ephrin patterns, and therefore it cannot be claimed that it is the sole cause of the stop reaction. The same is true for the total amount of ephrin that a growth cone had encountered when it stopped at the stop zone. Interestingly, we find the local ephrin concentration and the total encountered ephrin-covered area at the stop point position correlated in a linear way for all tested ephrin patterns and printing ink concentrations (Fig. 7B). Based on these findings, we suggest a model where the local ephrin concentration and the total encountered ephrin-covered area have opposite effects on growth cone advance (Fig. 7C). We hypothesize that the stop tendency of the growth cone increases with the total encountered ephrin-covered area, whereas the local ephrin concentration is proportional to an adjustment process preventing the stop reaction. As soon as these parameters reach a certain ratio, the growth cone stops. On the intracellular level, summation of the overgrown ephrin and adjustment to the local ephrin concentration should be regulated via two different signal transduction pathways, which have opposite effects on a molecular switch (Z) regulating growth cone stop (Fig. 7C). Summation occurs via a component X, which is inactivated slowly and therefore accumulates. Adjustment, by contrast, is based on a component Y, which is rapidly inactivated, and so has levels that reflect the local ephrin concentration. The rise in levels of Y should be temporally delayed upon activation of EphA receptors, compared with levels of X.
A model that includes summation and adjustment mechanisms explains why axons stop at lower local concentrations in shallow gradients than in steep gradients and why stop zones form at all in non-graded discontinuous patterns. A temporal delay in the adjustment pathway could account for cycles of growth cone retraction/pausing alternating with elongation observed with time-lapse microscopy (Fig. 3A). This temporal delay can also explain why the ratio between the local ephrin concentration and the total encountered ephrin-covered area deviates noticeably from the linear smoothing function for gradients with the relative slope 1 printed with 4 and 8 µg/ml (Fig. 7B marked with stars), because in the steepest gradients the adaptation level may lag behind the actual local concentration.
Explorative forward movements alternating with retraction/pausing may be
equivalent to the observed cycles of desensitization/resensitization, which
have been conceptualized as a mode of adaptation
(Ming et al., 2002;
Piper et al., 2005). It should
be noted, however, that recent work from the lab of G. Goodhill has questioned
the requirement of adaptation for the response of axons to molecular gradients
(Xu et al., 2005).
In a system in which the local ephrin concentration and the total encountered ephrin-covered area are integrated, the slope of the gradient has less impact on the overgrown distance than in a scenario in which growth cones would stop either at a fixed local concentration or after a fixed overgrown sum. In the in-vivo situation, such integrative mechanisms would be advantageous, as a moderate change in the gradient slope would not affect substantially the stop zone position, making the system robust and less susceptible to variances in ephrin expression levels.
In summary, we found that retinal growth cones can detect and integrate
discontinuous gradients of substrate-bound ephrinA5 by forming a distinct stop
zone within the gradient. The axonal reaction is controlled by a combination
of the local ephrin concentration and the total encountered ephrin. Whether
similar mechanisms are involved in the formation of the retinotopic map in
vivo remains to be elucidated. Here growth cones are confronted with a much
more complex environment, not only consisting of a single ephrinA5 gradient
but also superimposed graded distributions of other ephrins and counter
gradients of Eph-receptors (Connor et al.,
1998; Feldheim et al.,
2004). Gradients produced by microcontact printing, on all
accounts, proved to be a useful tool to explore possible modes of gradient
detection and integration by growth cones and other migrating cell types.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material for this article is available at
http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/133/13/2487/DC1
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Baier, H. and Bonhoeffer, F. (1992). Axon
guidance by gradients of a target-derived component.
Science 255,472
-475.
Bernard, A., Renault, J. P., Michel, B., Bosshard, H. R. and Delamarche, E. (2000). Microcontact printing of proteins. Adv. Mat. 12,1067 -1070.[CrossRef]
Brown, A., Yates, P. A., Burrola, P., Ortuno, D., Vaidya, A., Jessel, T. M., O'Leary, D. D. M. and Lemke, G. (2000). Topographically mapping from the retina to the midbrain is controlled by relative but not absolute levels of EphA receptor signaling. Cell 102,77 -88.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cheng, H. J., Nakamoto, M., Bergemann, A. D. and Flanagan, J. G. (1995). Complementary gradients in expression and binding of ELF-1 and Mek4 in development of the topographic retinal projection map. Cell 82,371 -381.[CrossRef][Medline]
Connor, R. J., Menzel, P. and Pasquale, E. B. (1998). Expression and tyrosine phosphorylation of Eph receptors suggests multiple mechanisms in patterning the visual system. Dev. Biol. 193,21 -35.[CrossRef][Medline]
Davenport, R. W., Thies, E., Zhou, R. and Nelson, P. G.
(1998). Cellular localization of ephrin-A2, ephrin-A5, and other
functional guidance cues underlies retinotopic development across species.
J. Neurosci. 18,975
-986.
David, C. and Hambach, D. (1999). Line width control using a defocused low voltage electron beam. Microelec. Eng. 46,219 -222.[CrossRef]
David, C. and Souvorov, A. (1999). High-efficiency Bragg-Fresnel lenses with 100 nm outermost zone width. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70,4168 -4173.
Davis, S., Gale, N. W., Aldrich, T. H., Maisonpierre, P. C.,
Lhotak, V., Pawson, T., Goldfarb, M. and Yancopoulos, G. D.
(1994). Ligands for EPH-related receptor tyrosine kinases that
require membrane attachment or clustering for activity.
Science 266,816
-819.
Dickson, B. J. (2002). Molecular mechanisms of
axon guidance. Science
298,1959
-1964.
Drescher, U., Kremoser, C., Handwerker, C., Löschinger, J., Noda, M. andBonhoeffer, F. (1995). In vitro guidance of retinal ganglion cell axons by RAGS, a 25kDa tectal protein related to ligands for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 82,359 -370.[CrossRef][Medline]
Egea, J., Nissen, U. V., Dufour, A., Sahin, M., Greer, P., Kullander, K., Mrsic-Flogel, T. D., Greenberg, M. E., Kiehn, O., Vanderhaeghen, P. et al. (2005). Regulation of EphA4 kinase activity is required for a subset of axon guidance decisions suggesting a key role for receptor clustering in Eph function. Neuron 47,515 -528.[CrossRef][Medline]
Feldheim, D. A., Kim, Y. I., Bergemann, A. D., Frisen, J., Barbacid, M. and Flanagan, J. G. (2000). Genetic analysis of ephrin-A2 and ephrin-A5 shows their requirement in multiple aspects of retinocollicular mapping. Neuron 25,563 -574.[CrossRef][Medline]
Feldheim, D. A., Nakamoto, M., Osterfield, M., Gale, N. W.,
DeChiara, T. M., Rohatgi, R., Yancopoulos, G. D. and Flanagan, J.
G. (2004). Loss-of-function analysis of EphA receptors in
retinotectal mapping. J. Neurosci.
24,2542
-2550.
Gierer, A. (1983). Model for the retino-tectal projection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 218, 77-93.[Medline]
Goodhill, G. J. and Urbach, J. S. (1999). Theoretical analysis of gradient detection by growth cones. J. Neurobiol. 41,230 -241.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hansen, M. J., Dallal, G. E. and Flanagan, J. G. (2004). Retinal axon response to ephrin-As shows a graded, concentration-dependent transition from growth promotion to inhibition. Neuron 42,717 -730.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hattori, M., Osterfield, M. and Flanagan, J. G.
(2000). Regulated cleavage of a contact-mediated axon repellent.
Science 289,1360
-1365.
Honda, H. (1998). Topographic mapping in the retinotectal projection by means of complementary ligand and receptor gradients: a computer simulation study. J. Theor. Biol. 192,235 -246.[CrossRef][Medline]
Honda, H. (2003). Competition between retinal
ganglion axons for targets under the servomechanism model explains abnormal
retinocollicular projection of Eph receptor-overexpressing or ephrin-lacking
mice. J. Neurosci. 23,10368
-10377.
Honda, H. (2004). Competitive interactions between retinal ganglion axons for tectal targets explain plasticity of retinotectal projection in the servomechanism model of retinotectal mapping. Dev. Growth Differ. 46,425 -437.[CrossRef][Medline]
Janes, P. W., Saha, N., Barton, W. A., Kolev, M. V., Wimmer-Kleikamp, S. H., Nievergall, E., Blobel, C. P., Himanen, J. P., Lackmann, M. and Nikolov, D. B. (2005). Adam meets Eph. An ADAM substrate recognition module acts as a molecular switch for ephrin cleavage in trans. Cell 123,291 -304.[CrossRef][Medline]
King, C., Lacey, R., Rodger, J., Barlett, C., Dunlop, S. and Beazley, L. (2004). Characterization of tectal ephrin-A2 expression during optic nerve regeneration in goldfish: implications for restoration of topography. Exp. Neurol. 187,380 -387.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lohof, A. M., Quillan, M., Dan, Y. and Poo, M. (1992). Asymmetric modulation of cytosolic cAMP activity induces growth cone turning. J. Neurosci. 12,1253 -1261.[Abstract]
Löschinger, J., Weth, F. and Bonhoeffer, F. (2000). Reading of concentration gradients by axonal growth cones. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 355,971 -982.[CrossRef][Medline]
McLaughlin, T. and O'Leary, D. D. M. (2005). Molecular gradients and development of retinotopic maps. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28,327 -355.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ming, G., Wong, S. T., Henley, J., Yuan, X., Song, H. J., Spitzer, N. C. and Poo, M. (2002). Adaptation in the chemotactic guidance of nerve growth cones. Nature 417,411 -418.[CrossRef][Medline]
Monschau, B., Kremoser, C., Ohta, K., Tanaka, H., Kaneki, T., Yamada, T., Handwerker, C., Hornberger, M. R., Löschinger, J., Pasquale, E. B. et al. (1997). Shared and distinct functions of RAGS and ELF-1 in guiding retinal axons. EMBO J. 16,1258 -1267.[CrossRef][Medline]
Piper, M., Salih, S., Weinl, C., Holt, C. E. and Harris, W. A. (2005). Endocytosis-dependent desensitization and protein synthesis-dependent resensitization in retinal growth cone adaptation. Nat. Neurosci. 8,179 -186.[CrossRef][Medline]
Prestige, M. C. and Willshaw, D. J. (1975). On a role for competition in the formation of patterened neural connexions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 190, 77-98.[Medline]
Quist, A. P., Pavlovic, E. and Oscarsson, S. (2005). Recent advances in microcontact printing. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 381,591 -600.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rosentreter, S. M., Davenport, R. W., Löschinger, J., Huf, J., Jung, J. and Bonhoeffer, F. (1998). Response of retinal ganglion cell axons to striped linear gradients of repellent guidance molecules. J. Neurobiol. 37,541 -562.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rosoff, W. J., Urbach, J. S., Esrick, M. A., McAllister, R. G., Richards, L. J. and Goodhill, G. J. (2004). A new chemotaxis assay shows the extreme sensitivity of axons to molecular gradients. Nat. Neurosci. 7,678 -682.[CrossRef][Medline]
Song, H. J., Ming, G. and Poo, M. (1997). cAMP-induced switching in turning direction of nerve growth cones. Nature 388,275 -279.[CrossRef][Medline]
Walter, J., Kern-Veits, B., Huf, J., Stolze, B. and Bonhoeffer,
F. (1987). Recognition of position-specific properties of
tectal cell membranes by retinal axons in vitro.
Development 101,685
-696.
Weinl, C., Drescher, U., Lang, S., Bonhoeffer, F. and Löschinger, J. (2003). On the turning of Xenopus retinal axons induced by ephrin-A5. Development 130, 1643.
Xu, J., Rosoff, W. J., Urbach, J. S. and Goodhill, G. J.
(2005). Adaptation is not required to explain the long-term
response of axons to molecular gradients. Development
132,4545
-4552.
Related articles in Development:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Lackmann and A. W. Boyd Eph, a Protein Family Coming of Age: More Confusion, Insight, or Complexity? Sci. Signal., April 15, 2008; 1(15): re2 - re2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. C. von Philipsborn, S. Lang, Z. Jiang, F. Bonhoeffer, and M. Bastmeyer Substrate-Bound Protein Gradients for Cell Culture Fabricated by Microfluidic Networks and Microcontact Printing Sci. Signal., November 27, 2007; 2007(414): pl6 - pl6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
s t-test was applied to
compare the mean stop points in gradients with the same slope but printed with
8 µg/ml and 4 µg/ml: P<0.002 (gradient slope 1/6),
P<0.006 (1/3), P<0.003 (1/2), P<0.001
(2/3), P<0.002 (1).
t), a second,
rapidly degrading component Y leads to an adjustment of the sensitivity to the
local ephrin concentration, counteracting the output of X. The activity of X
is postulated to be proportional to the total encountered ephrin, whereas the
activity of Y is proportional to the local ephrin concentration. The growth
cone stops when both activities are proportionable.