QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 8 December 2005
doi: 10.1242/dev.02194

This Article Summary Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material All Versions of this Article: dev.02194v1 133/2/251    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schruff, M. C. Articles by Scott, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schruff, M. C. Articles by Scott, R. J.

The AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 2 gene of Arabidopsis links auxin signalling, cell division, and the size of seeds and other organs

¹ Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
² Department of Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: bssrjs{at}bath.ac.uk)

Accepted 1 November 2005

	SUMMARY

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Control of seed size involves complex interactions among the zygotic embryo and endosperm, the maternally derived seed coat, and the parent plant. Here we describe a mutant in Arabidopsis, megaintegumenta (mnt), in which seed size and weight are dramatically increased. One factor in this is extra cell division in the integuments surrounding mnt mutant ovules, leading to the formation of enlarged seed coats. Unusually for integument mutants, mnt does not impair female fertility. The mnt lesion also has pleiotropic effects on vegetative and floral development, causing extra cell division and expansion in many organs. mnt was identified as a mutant allele of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 2 (ARF2), a member of a family of transcription factors that mediate gene expression in response to auxin. The mutant phenotype and gene expression studies described here provide evidence that MNT/ARF2 is a repressor of cell division and organ growth. The mutant phenotype also illustrates the importance of growth of the ovule before fertilization in determining final size of the seed.

Key words: MEGAINTEGUMENTA, AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 2, Arabidopsis, Integuments, Ovule, Seed size

	INTRODUCTION

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Despite the importance of seeds, little is known about the genetic mechanisms that determine their final size and weight. Seed development in flowering plants involves a double fertilization that generates two zygotic products: the embryo, which gives rise to the daughter plant, and the endosperm, which transmits nutrients from the seed parent to the embryo during embryogenesis or germination (Lopes and Larkins, 1993). The third major component of the seed, the seed coat or testa, differentiates after fertilization from maternally derived tissues including the integuments, which enclose the embryo sac. In most monocot species a persistent endosperm forms the bulk of the mature seed, while in most eudicots the endosperm is transient and is replaced by the growing embryo. Therefore, while seed size in monocots such as maize and wheat is often attributable to the extent of endosperm growth (Reddy and Daynard, 1983; Chojecki et al., 1986), in eudicot seeds such as peas and beans, cotyledon cell number has been directly linked to final seed size (Davies, 1975; Davies, 1977). However, in pea, the extent of mitosis in cotyledons is correlated with the extent of invertase activity in the seed coat (Weber et al., 1996), and in the model eudicot Arabidopsis thaliana, endosperm proliferation is correlated with seed weight and embryo size, although the mature seed contains only a single layer of endosperm cells (Scott et al., 1998; Garcia et al., 2003). Therefore, in eudicots as well as monocots, the embryo is not the only factor in determining seed size.

The genetic regulation of seed size has been investigated in plants including tomato, soybean, maize, and rice using quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping. Relatively few loci show significant effects on seed weight in these experiments, and so far none of the corresponding genes have been cloned (Doganlar et al., 2000; Cui et al., 2002; Hyten et al., 2004). In A. thaliana, seed weight can vary up to 3.5-fold among accessions (Krannitz et al., 1991), providing an opportunity for QTL analysis of seed size in this species. Alonso-Blanco et al. (Alonso-Blanco et al., 1999) identified 11 loci affecting seed weight and/or length in crosses between the accessions Ler and Cvi, with the larger size of Cvi seeds attributed mainly to faster and prolonged growth of the seed coat and endosperm.

Mutations and misexpression experiments have revealed few genes affecting seed size. miniature1 mutants of maize produce small endosperms, and consequently small seeds, due to lesions in a gene encoding a cell wall invertase involved in sugar transport (Cheng et al., 1996). In Arabidopsis, the small seed size of haiku mutants is correlated with premature arrest of endosperm proliferation; inhibited cell division in the embryo and cell expansion in the seed coat were considered to be indirect effects (Garcia et al., 2003). Mutations in some TRANSPARENT TESTA loci, which affect flavonoid pigmentation in the seed coat, also alter seed growth, usually reducing seed weight (Debeaujon et al., 2000). Large seeds in Arabidopsis can be generated by mutation of the APETALA2 (AP2) transcription factor (Jofuku et al., 2005; Ohto et al., 2005) or by expression of an antisense DNA methyltransferase gene in the seed parent resulting in DNA hypomethylation (Adams et al., 2000). The size of many organs, including seeds, is increased by ectopic expression of the AINTEGUMENTA (ANT) transcription factor (Krizek, 1999; Mizukami and Fischer, 2000).

To improve our understanding of the processes controlling seed size, we screened a population of mutagenized Arabidopsis for large seeds. We recovered a mutation, now termed megaintegumenta (mnt), which increases seed size as well as affecting growth of other aerial organs. The earliest difference we detected in mnt compared with wild-type seed development was the presence of extra cells in the integuments before fertilization. Many mutants affecting integuments have been identified in Arabidopsis, but these usually reduce female fertility (reviewed by Skinner et al., 2004); by contrast, mnt mutants are female fertile. Ectopic cell division and/or expansion were also observed in leaves, stems and some floral organs of mnt mutants. Cloning of the MNT locus showed it to encode AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 2 (ARF2), one of a family of transcription factors that bind to auxin-responsive elements (AuxREs) in the promoters of auxin-regulated genes (Ulmasov et al., 1997; Ulmasov et al., 1999a; Ulmasov et al., 1999b; Liscum and Reed, 2002; Hagen and Guilfoyle, 2002) and possibly other genes (Okushima et al., 2005a; Ellis et al., 2005). Recent studies of arf2 mutants have reported a pleiotropic phenotype, including: restoration of differential cell elongation and apical hook formation in hookless1 mutant seedlings; increased growth of aerial organs; inhibition of floral bud opening; and delays in flowering, leaf senescence, floral organ abscission and silique ripening and dehiscence (Li et al., 2004; Okushima et al., 2005b; Ellis et al., 2005). Here we present the first evidence that an ARF is a general repressor of cell division, one of many processes regulated by auxin. The mnt/arf2 mutant phenotype also illustrates the importance of growth of the ovule before fertilization in determining final size of the seed.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Plant growth and stocks
Seeds were stratified for 3-5 days at 4°C in 0.15% agar and germinated on Levingtons F2 compost. Plants were grown in a glasshouse at a temperature of 24°C (day) and 17.5°C (night), or in a Sanyo controlled environment room with a daylength of 16 hours, 23°C (day) and 18°C (night). To test for kanamycin resistance, seeds were surface-sterilized and plated on fullstrength M+S with Gamborgs Vitamins (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK), 1% sucrose, 0.8% Phyto Agar (Duchefa, Haarlem, Netherlands), 50 µg/ml kanamycin. Wild-type Col-3 seeds and Col-3 mutagenized with ethane methyl sulfonate (EMS) were obtained from Lehle Seeds (Round Rock, Texas, US). Col-0, Ler, and Salk_108995 (http://signal.salk.edu/cgi-bin/tdnaexpress) (Alonso et al., 2003) were obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC), UK. mnt mutants were outcrossed three times to Col-3 before phenotypic analysis.

Pollinations and seed weights
For cross-pollinations, flowers were emasculated before anther dehiscence and pollinated 2-3 days later. For manually pollinated arf2 mutants, buds were opened early in development to avoid crushing of the stigmatic papillae due to the elongated gynoecium. Seeds were weighed with a Mettler UMT2 microbalance (Mettler-Toledo, Leicester, UK). Statistical analysis was performed with Minitab 12.2 software (State College, Pennsylvania, USA).

Sample preparation and microscopy
For analysis of whole-mount seeds, seeds were dissected from siliques and placed in a drop of clearing solution (8 g chloral hydrate, 11 ml water, 1 ml glycerol). Samples were photographed under a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope with differential interference contrast optics using a SPOT RT Color camera (Diagnostics Instruments Inc., Michigan, USA). Digital images were processed using Adobe Photoshop software and measurements were taken with Visilog 5.0.2 software (Noesis, Les Ulis, France).

For sections, plant material was fixed overnight at RT in 4% paraformaldehyde, 25 mmol/l KHPO₄ buffer pH 7.0, 0.1% Tween-20, washed in buffer, dehydrated through a graded ethanol series to 95% ethanol, and embedded in JB-4 glycol methacrylate resin (Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA), or dehydrated to 100% ethanol and embedded in Technovit 7100 resin (Heraeus Kulzer, Germany). Five-micrometre sections were cut in ribbons using glass knives made from microscope slides on a Leica RM2145 microtome, according to Ruzin (Ruzin, 1999). Samples were stained in 0.1% Toluidine Blue in 25 mmol/l KHPO₄ buffer pH 5.5, mounted under coverslips in DPX (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK), and photographed under an Olympus BH-2 microscope with a Nikon Coolpix 4500 digital camera. Digital images were processed using Adobe Photoshop software and measurements were taken with Scion Image 4.0.2 software (Scion Corp., Maryland, USA).

For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), siliques were slit open and fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.05 mol/l sodium cacodylate buffer pH 6.8 overnight at 4°C, postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 mol/l buffer pH 7.0 for 4 hours at RT, rinsed in buffer, dehydrated through an acetone series, and critical point dried. Ovules were sputter-coated with gold and examined using a JEOL JSM6310 scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

For confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), Feulgen-stained seeds were processed and imaged as in Bushell et al. (Bushell et al., 2003). GFP fluorescence and chlorophyll autofluorescence were detected in water-mounted samples using an argon ion laser at 488 nm excitation, 505-530 nm emission, and a HeNe543 laser at 543 nm excitation, 585 nm emission, respectively.

For analysis of floral organs, floral buds were photographed under a Leica MZ6 dissecting microscope with a Nikon Coolpix 4500 digital camera. Floral organs were measured using a graticule eyepiece. For analysis of epidermal cells, casts were made of floral organs in clear nail varnish on a microscope slide, and photographed under an Olympus BH-2 microscope as above. Measurements were taken on digital images using Visilog 5.0.2 software.

Statistical analysis was performed with Minitab 12.2 software.

Mapping and sequencing
A recombinant mapping population was generated by crossing mnt homozygotes in the Col-3 background with wild-type Ler. Seven hundred and eighty nine plants with the mutant floral phenotype were selected from the F2 generation and their genomic DNA was scored for published CAPS and SSLP markers (http://www.arabidopsis.org) and for CAPS markers generated in our laboratory (available on request). Genomic and cDNA for sequencing was PCR amplified using proofreading KOD Hi-fi Polymerase (Merck, Nottingham, UK) and cloned into the pGEMT vector (Promega, Southampton, UK). Two independent PCR products were sequenced using internal primers on both sense and antisense strands. Sequences were aligned using Genedoc 2.6.02 software (http://www.psc.edu/biomed/genedoc).

Complementation and allelism test
The region of BAC MTG10 identified by fine mapping as containing the MNT locus was restricted with appropriate enzymes to isolate each of the 16 annotated genes. The gel-purified fragments were cloned into shuttle vector ST36 (a modified form of BJ36 in which an XbaI-SpeI fragment spanning the OCS terminator was removed) and subcloned into the NotI sites of binary vector BJ40 (BJ36 and BJ40 were gifts of Bart Janssen, Hort+Research New Zealand). The shuttle vector was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101. mnt mutants were transformed via the floral dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998) and T1 seeds were selected on kanamycin as above.

To genotype the Salk_108995 T-DNA insertion mutant, primers 108995-R (5'-CAACTGATGCGTCTCTCCAA-3') and left border primer Lba1 (5'-TGGTTCACGTAGTGGGCCATCG-3') were used to identify the T-DNA insertion in the ARF2 gene. Primers 108995-F (5'-GGGCTCACTGTTTTGCTCAT-3') and 108995-R were used to identify the wild-type ARF2 allele in the insertion line. Homozygous insertion mutants were crossed to mnt homozygotes and the F1 progeny were assayed for the mnt mutant phenotype and hemizygosity for the T-DNA insertion.

pARF2::GFP
A 2.5 kb region of genomic DNA 5' to the ARF2 coding region was amplified by PCR using the primers pARF2-F (5'-AAAGTCGACACACAAGAAAATAGAAGAG-3') and pARF2-R (5'-TCTAGACTTAACCAGAGGTAGTCAAAACTC-3'), and cloned into the SalI and XbaI sites of the plasmid GFP_DME_NLS (Choi et al., 2002).

Expression analysis
`Young' and `mature' rosette leaves were harvested from wild-type Col-3, arf2-8, and mnt/arf2-9 plants at 16 and 39 days after germination (dag), respectively. For `young' stem, primary inflorescence stems were harvested when they reached 5 cm, approximately 29 dag for wild type and up to 32 dag for arf2 mutants. `Mature' stem was harvested from plants at 39 dag (wild type) or 43 dag (mutants). For the mature stem base, 10 cm was measured from the rosette, and for the apex, 10 cm was measured from the cluster of buds at the apex of the inflorescence. All flowers, siliques and axillary shoots were removed from primary inflorescence stems. Total RNA was extracted using TRIZOL (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK).

Five hundred nanograms of total RNA was used for semiquantitative RT-PCR using a Reverse-iT kit (Abgene, Epsom, UK) following the manufacturer's instructions. GapC was used as an internal control. Primers and PCR conditions were: ARGOS (At3g59900), forward 5'-ATCCTCTGTTTCTGAATCGTGGG-3' and reverse 5'-ATGCCGTTAGACCAACCAATAGG-3' (26 cycles, annealing temperature 62°C); ANT (At4g37750), forward 5'-ATGAAGTCTTTTTGTGATAATGATG-3' and reverse 5'-TTGTGTTGTTGTGATGGGTCC-3' (26 cycles, annealing temperature 55°C); CYCD3;1 (At4g34160), forward 5'-CAAGATTTGTTCTGGGAAGATG-3' and reverse 5'-CAATGGAGGTTGTTGCTGC-3' (27 cycles, annealing temperature 56°C); GAPC (At3g04120), forward 5'CACTTGAAGGGTGGTGCCAAG-3' and reverse 5'-CCTGTTGTCGCCAACGAAGTC-3' (22-24 cycles, annealing temperature 62°C).

	RESULTS

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Identification of themntmutant
In a screen for mutations affecting seed size, approximately 77,000 M2 seeds from an EMS mutagenized population in the Col-3 accession were sieved through a gradient of wire meshes with different apertures (S. A. Adams, PhD Thesis, University of Bath, 2002). Seeds from wild-type controls were retained only in 250-and 300-µm aperture meshes while the mutant seeds were retained in a broader range, from 200 to 355 µm. Inheritance of the phenotype in candidate seed size mutants was tested by weighing seed from M3 plants. A parental group producing seeds larger than controls (Fig. 1A,B), and also containing larger embryos (Fig. 1C,D) was selected for further study; this line was later named megaintegumenta (mnt) to reflect increased size of the integuments (see below). Apart from the seed phenotype, mnt mutants have a variety of abnormalities in vegetative and reproductive development (see below), including failure of flowers to open. This trait was found to co-segregate with the large seed phenotype and was subsequently used for scoring mutant plants. The mnt floral phenotype segregates as a single gene recessive mutation (62 wild-type and 23 mnt mutant plants were scored in F2 populations following crosses between wild-type and mutant parents; for a 3:1 segregation ²=0.192, P>0.05).

Adult mnt mutants have a pleiotropic phenotype: inflorescence stems are thick and twisted; plants flower approximately 1 week late with more rosette leaves than wild-type plants grown simultaneously under long day conditions, and the leaves are larger (Fig. 1E; see also below). The mutants have a low degree of self-fertility associated with the failure of floral bud opening (Fig. 1F,G), but female fertility is normal following manual crosses with either mnt or wild-type pollen parents, indicating that self-sterility is due to mechanical failure of pollination. However, the last few flowers on a mutant plant self-pollinate and set seed (not shown).

View larger version (78K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Pleiotropic effects of the mnt mutation. (A-D) Mature seeds (A,B) and embryos (C,D) from self-pollinated wild-type Col-3 (A,C) and mnt mutant plants (B,D). (E) Wild-type (left) and mnt (right) plants, showing the mnt stem phenotype. (F,G) Inflorescences from wild-type (F) and mnt plants (G); insets show flowers at similar stages.

View larger version (140K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Seed development in wild-type and mnt mutant plants. (A-J) Cleared seeds imaged with differential contrast optics; (A-E) wild-type and (F-J) mnt seeds at similar stages of embryogenesis. Scale bar: 100 µm. (K) CLSM images of Feulgen-stained seeds at 5 dap. Scale bars: 20 µm in embryo and chalazal endosperm; 25 µm in peripheral endosperm.

In Arabidopsis, large seeds resulting from an increased ratio of paternal to maternal genomes in the seed (`paternalized'), or DNA hypomethylation of the seed parent, show characteristic endosperm phenotypes, including delayed cellularization of the peripheral endosperm and hypertrophy of the chalazal endosperm and associated nodules (Scott et al., 1998; Adams et al., 2000). There was not a strong trend of late endosperm cellularization in mnt mutants. We measured the maximum cross-sectional area of the chalazal cyst plus nodules at 6 dap, a stage at which differences are apparent between wild-type and paternalized endosperms (Scott et al., 1998). Mean areas were 2690 µm² (±s.e.m. 328) for wild-type seeds (n=4) and 2537 µm² (±416) for mnt seeds (n=5), and there was no significant difference between the mutant and wild-type endosperms (two-tailed Student's t-test, P=0.79). Therefore, we concluded that mnt endosperms do not have the overgrowth phenotype associated with paternal excess. However, it is possible that eventually more cells are formed in the peripheral endosperm of mnt seeds to fill the larger seed cavity.

The increased volume of mnt mutant ovules is due to extra cell division in the integuments
As mnt mutant seeds were larger than wild-type even at the earliest stage examined, we next compared ovule development in mutant and wild-type plants to investigate the origins of the size difference. Ovule development has been described in detail for Arabidopsis (Schneitz et al., 1995; Baker et al., 1997). Early in ovule formation three regions are defined along the proximal-distal axis: the funiculus, which connects the ovule to the mother plant; the chalaza; and the nucellus, which harbours the megaspore mother cell and later the embryo sac. The inner and outer integuments initiate on the flanks of the chalaza and elongate to enclose the nucellus. The integuments divide to a greater extent on the abaxial side, contributing to the curvature of the ovule.

Both mnt and wild type followed the pattern previously described for nearly the entire duration of ovule development (Fig. 3A-F; later stages not shown). Female gametophyte development in mnt mutants also appeared normal, culminating in a Stage 3-VI embryo sac [staging according to Schneitz et al. (Schneitz et al., 1995)] (Fig. 3G,H). However, at this stage mnt mutant ovules were larger and more curved than wild type and the integuments contained more cells in each layer, as well as a partial extra layer in some ovules (Fig. 3H, arrow).

Two layers of the abaxial integuments were examined in more detail: oi2, the outer layer of the outer integument; and ii1', a layer of the inner integument that spans part of the embryo sac (Schneitz et al., 1995; Beeckman et al., 2000). For both layers, mnt integuments were longer and contained significantly more cells than wild-type Col-3 (Fig. 3I,J; Table 1). We measured cell length along the proximal-distal axis; for layer ii1' the cell width (abaxial-adaxial axis) was also measured, as cell expansion in this layer coincides with seed growth after fertilization (Beeckman et al., 2000) (Fig. 3K, Table 1). There was no significant difference between wild type and mutant in cell lengths or widths (Table 1). The above evidence indicates that the greater size of integuments in mnt ovules is due to extra anticlinal cell divisions in both inner and outer integuments. We also observed extra cells in mnt mutant seed coats (data not shown). The pointed shape of mnt mutant seeds appears to be due to extension of the seed coat at the micropylar pole combined with overgrowth of the adaxial layers of the seed coat.

View larger version (116K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Ovule development in wild-type and mnt mutant plants. (A-F) Early ovule development in wild type (A,C,D) and mnt (B,E,F). (A,B) SEMs of stage 1-II ovules. (C,E) Sections of stage 2-III ovules showing megaspore mother cell (arrow) and initiating inner integument (*). (D,F) SEMs of later stage 2 ovules showing integuments beginning to extend over nucellus. (G,H) Sections of mature wild-type (G) and mnt (H) ovules. The arrow in (H) shows an extra cell layer. Scale bars: 10 µm in A-F; 20 µm in G,H. (I-K) Comparison of number of cells (I), total length of integument (J) and mean size of cells (K) in the abaxial oi2 and ii1' layers of wild-type and mnt integuments. Error bars: s.e.m. n=4 wild type, 8 mnt.

We found that the genotype of the seed parent is a factor in the overall size, shape and weight of the seed. For both treatments, [mnt x mnt] and [mnt xwild type] seeds were larger and more pointed than seeds from crosses using a wild-type mother (cf. Fig. 3A,B,E,F and Fig. 3C,D,G,H). [mnt x mnt] seeds generated by Treatment 1 (`Secondary shoots') were 46% heavier than [wild type x wild type], and [mnt x wild type] 35% heavier than [wild type x mnt]. However, the weight difference between the two classes decreased when seed set was restricted by removing secondary shoots (Fig. 4I; Table 2A); for example, Treatment 2 (`No secondary shoots') raised [mnt x mnt] seed weight by 9% while [wild type x wild type] seed weight increased by 36%. However, although increasingly restricted seed set narrowed the gap between them, [mnt x mnt] seed was still 16% heavier than [wild type x wild type], and this difference was significant (Student's t-test, H₀ mnt>wild type, P=0.0002). We subsequently identified another allele of mnt, the T-DNA insertion allele arf2-8 (see below), and incorporated this allele in two repetitions of the seed weight assay using Treatment 2 and self-pollinations only (Table 2B,C). In each of these replicates both mnt and arf2-8 mutant plants produced significantly heavier seeds (P<0.0005) than wild-type (Table 2B,C), with arf2-8 seeds weighing up to 21% more than wild type even when seed set was severely restricted to control for the reduced fertility of the mutants. We concluded that the difference in seed weights observed between self-pollinated arf2 mutants and wild-type plants is likely to have two components: direct effects of the mutations on seed development, and an indirect effect due to low self-fertility of the mutants. For both arf2 alleles tested, in three separate experiments homozygous mutant plants produced significantly heavier seeds than wild-type controls even when the number of siliques on each plant was held constant.

View larger version (99K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Comparison of seeds generated by wild-type and mnt mutant plants. (A-D) Seeds from pollinations where all secondary shoots were allowed to set seed; (E-H) seeds from pollinations where secondary shoots were removed (see text). (A,E) [wild type x wild type]; (B,F) [wild type x mnt]; (C,G) [mnt x mnt]; (D,H) [mnt x wild type]. Scale bar: 250 µm. (I) Comparison of seed weights following the two treatments. Error bars: s.e.m.

View larger version (49K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Floral and vegetative phenotypes of mnt. (A) Alignment of buds from wild-type and mnt inflorescences, approximately stage 12-16. In each part of the figure the bottom row of buds shows the top row partially dissected. (B) Lengths of floral organs in stage 13 flowers. (C) Nail varnish casts of epidermis from carpel valve (left) and medial sepal (right) of wild-type and mnt stage 13 flowers. In each pair the wild type is on the left. (D) Transverse sections of inflorescence stem between nodes 2 and 3 from the base: (top) wild-type, (bottom) mnt. (E) Largest leaf from a wild-type (left) and mnt mutant (right) rosette. Scale bars: 1 mm in A; 50 µm in C; 200 µm in D, left; 100 µm in D, right. G, gynoecium (excluding stigma); P, petal; Se, medial sepal; St, long stamen.

The diameter of the primary inflorescence stem of wild-type and mutant plants was measured between the first and second nodes from the base when the stems were 15 to 22 cm in length. mnt mutant stems had a significantly greater diameter (mean diameter, mnt 1.55 mm ± s.e.m. 0.03, n=11; wild type 1.31 ± 0.02, n=10; two-tailed Student's t-test, P=0.0000). Transverse sections of the primary inflorescence stem (Fig. 5D) showed that stem morphology was normal in mutants but there were extra cells of many types. In addition, stem epidermal cells were longer in the mutant (not shown). mnt mutants produced approximately 30% more rosette leaves than wild-type plants (mean number of leaves per rosette, mnt 15.1 ± s.e.m. 0.4, n=14; wild type 11.5 ± 0.5, n=13). In 5-week-old plants we found a significant difference in surface area of the largest leaf (Fig. 5E) (mean area, mnt 592.8 mm² ± s.e.m. 32, n=14; wild type 440.2 mm² ± 22, n=13; two-tailed Student's t-test, P=0.0007). Examination of leaf epidermal cells indicated that, as for sepals, the greater size of mnt leaves is most likely due to a combination of extra cell division and expansion (not shown).

mnt is an allele of ARF2
The MNT locus was mapped to a 60.9-kb interval on chromosome 5 containing 16 annotated genes on the MTG10 BAC (http://www.arabidopsis.org) (Fig. 6A). Genomic DNA corresponding to the coding region for each gene, along with 5' and 3' flanking regions, was transformed into mnt mutant plants, and progeny assayed for the wild-type phenotype. Simultaneously, lines with T-DNA insertions in these genes (http://signal.salk.edu) (Alonso et al., 2003) were investigated for similarity to the mnt mutant. Homozygous mutants from Salk _108995, which carries an insertion in gene At5g62000, resembled mnt mutants in stem, floral and seed phenotype (Fig. 6B; Table 2B,C). An allelism test between mnt and Salk_108995 mutants produced F1 plants with the mutant phenotype (Fig. 6B), and the complementation experiment showed that only a genomic fragment including At5g62000 rescued mnt mutants (Fig. 6C). Therefore mnt is an allele of At5g62000, which encodes ARF2 (Ulmasov et al., 1999a; Li et al., 2004; Okushima et al., 2005a; Okushima et al., 2005b; Ellis et al., 2005). The Salk_108995 allele was previously designated arf2-8 (Okushima et al., 2005a); the mnt allele is arf2-9 (Fig. 6D).

We sequenced genomic DNA from mnt/arf2-9 mutants for the predicted ARF2 coding region plus 4371 bases of the 5' and 525 bases of the 3' flanking regions. A single base change with respect to the wild-type Col-0 sequence (http://www.arabidopsis.org), from G to A, was identified at position 665 from translational start, at the end of intron 3. This was predicted to affect splicing by changing the 3' splice site from the consensus AG sequence to AA. We sequenced the first 837 bases of the mnt/arf2-9 cDNA from start of translation, and the same region from wild-type Col-3 cDNA, confirming that four bases are deleted from the beginning of exon 4 in the mutant cDNA (Fig. 6E). Based on the cDNA sequence, we predicted the mnt/arf2-9 mutant protein has a frameshift from amino acid position 123 and a premature stop codon at position 167 (Fig. 6F). These changes both occur in the DNA-binding domain of ARF2 (Fig. 6G) and probably cause a complete loss of function.

ARF2 expression in reproductive organs
RNA gel blot analysis has shown that ARF2 is expressed in roots, leaves, flowers and siliques (Ulmasov et al., 1999b). To investigate the pattern of ARF2 gene expression in reproductive organs we generated a reporter construct consisting of 2.5 kb of the ARF2 5' flanking sequence fused to a nuclear-localized GFP gene (Choi et al., 2002). Consistent with the mnt mutant phenotype, GFP was expressed in floral organs and ovules (Fig. 7A,B). As the ovule matured, expression remained high in the funiculus and gradually declined in the integuments. In mature ovules there was strong signal in the small group of nucellar cells remaining at the chalazal pole (Beeckman et al., 2000) (Fig. 7A, arrow). After fertilization no expression was detected in the seed coat, although signal was seen in embryos dissected from mature seeds (not shown). In floral organs, GFP was observed in the gynoecium at floral stages 8-9 and 12 (Fig. 7B, left), and the signal continued in siliques after fertilization (not shown). GFP was also strongly expressed in other floral organs at stages 8-9, but had largely disappeared by stage 12 (Fig. 7B).

View larger version (31K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Mapping and sequencing MNT. (A) mnt mutations were mapped to BAC MTG10 on chromosome V. Figures below the marker names show the number of recombination events in 1578 chromosomes scored. (B) Scoring of an allelism test between mnt mutants and Salk_108995 T-DNA insertion mutants by floral phenotype. (C) Scoring of complementation by floral and seed phenotype. mnt + ARF2=T1 progeny of an mnt mutant transformed with the wild-type ARF2 gene and flanking genomic DNA. This construct restored wild-type floral (left) and seed phenotypes (right) to the mutant. (D) The ARF2 gene with the positions of the mnt/arf2-9 and Salk_108995/arf2-8 mutations marked. (E) Alignment of a fragment of wild-type ARF2 cDNA with the mutated region in mnt/arf2-9 showing a 4-bp deletion. (F) Alignment of the N-terminal portion of the wild-type ARF2 and mutant mnt/arf2-9 proteins, showing an early frameshift and stop codon. (G) The ARF2 protein marked with the position of the stop codon generated by the mnt/arf2-9 lesion. DBD, DNA binding domain; MR, variable middle region; III and IV, domains involved in dimerization with other ARFs or with Aux/IAAs (Liscum and Reed, 2002).

View larger version (120K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Expression of nuclear-localized GFP under control of the ARF2 promoter. (A) Expression in ovules; SEMs show ovules at similar stages. (B) Expression in floral organs.

	DISCUSSION

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
arf2 mutations increase seed size and weight through `integument-led' seed growth
In a screen for Arabidopsis mutants producing large seeds we identified the mnt mutant, which contains a lesion in the ARF2 gene likely to cause complete loss of function. We found that arf2 mutants generate seeds up to 46% heavier than wild-type seed parents, regardless of the pollination partner. mnt/arf2-9 seed coats contain more cells than wild type, due to the production of extra cells in the integuments before fertilization (Fig. 3; Table 1). These observations suggest that the arf2 mutations have a maternal effect on seed size, primarily due to enlarged integuments. However, the reported trade-off between seed number and size in many species (Harper et al., 1970), including Arabidopsis (Alonso-Blanco et al., 1999; Meyer et al., 2004), led us to investigate this further by restricting pollination to allow equivalent seed set in wild-type and arf2 mutant plants. This showed that a component of the difference initially found between arf2 and wild-type seeds is explained by low seed set in self-pollinated arf2 plants. Significantly, however, arf2 mutant seeds were up to 21% heavier than wild type, even when seed set was held constant (Fig. 4; Table 2). Therefore reduced seed set in arf2 mutants accounts for only part of the increased seed size. Similarly, recent reports show that ap2 mutations increase seed size partly because of reduced fertility but also through a separate maternal effect on seed growth (Jofuku et al., 2005; Ohto et al., 2005).

View larger version (26K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 8. Comparison of ARGOS, ANT and CYCD3;1 transcript levels in young and mature organs of wild-type and mutant plants. See Materials and methods for explanation of developmental staging.

Mutations affecting integument size often have pleiotropic effects, particularly on flower development (Skinner et al., 2004). arf2 mutants fit this pattern but are otherwise unusual among integument mutants, as most others reduce female fertility. aberrant testa shape (ats) and ap2 mutants are reported to have normal female fertility; however, in these mutants the seed coats are irregularly shaped and display loss of cell layers or structures (Léon-Kloosterziel et al., 1994; Jofuku et al., 1994; Debeaujon et al., 2000). By contrast, the seed coat in mnt/arf2-9 mutants appears structurally normal, with only a minor effect on shape.

Alonso-Blanco et al. (Alonso-Blanco et al., 1999) reported that growth of the seed coat and endosperm accounted for the larger size of Cvi seeds compared with Ler, and that as ovules were longer in Ler than Cvi before fertilization, ovule size differences could not explain the final variation. However, a QTL for seed length was mapped to a region at the bottom of chromosome 5 that contains ARF2, and it would be interesting to determine whether ARF2 corresponds to this locus. Weber et al. (Weber et al., 1996), investigating small- and large-seeded genotypes of broad bean, concluded that the number of cells in the integuments before fertilization could not explain the size differences. The maternal effect of ap2 mutations on seed size may involve the seed coat (Ohto et al., 2005), but the mechanism for this is not known. Garcia et al. (Garcia et al., 2005) reported that overexpression of the cell cycle inhibitor KRP2 decreased the number of cells in seed coat without decreasing seed size, and concluded that cell division and cell elongation in the seed coat compensate for each other. However, the effects of increasing cell number in the seed coat were not investigated. The results presented here reveal a mechanism not previously described for increasing seed size within a species, the production of extra cells in the integuments before fertilization.

ARF2 is a general repressor of cell division
The mnt/arf2-9 mutation causes a variety of phenotypes in the adult plant, including thick stems, large rosette leaves and failure of floral bud opening (Figs 1, 5). These phenotypes were reported for other arf2 mutant alleles by Li et al. (Li et al., 2004), Okushima et al. (Okushima et al., 2005b) and Ellis et al. (Ellis et al., 2005); here we show they are associated with extra cell division and expansion. Expression of ARF2 throughout the plant (Ulmasov et al., 1999b) and, within reproductive organs, in floral buds and ovules (Fig. 7), is consistent with the pleiotropy of the mutant phenotype.

Auxin is involved in many processes, including pattern formation, cell division and cell expansion (Leyser, 2002; Vandenbussche and Van Der Straeten, 2004). Single and double mutant phenotypes for other ARFs include disturbances to organ patterning, cell expansion or division, response to light or gravity, auxin homeostasis or flower maturation (Berleth and Jürgens, 1993; Sessions and Zambryski, 1995; Liscum and Briggs, 1996; Przemeck et al., 1996; Sessions et al., 1997; Watahiki and Yamamoto, 1997; Hardtke and Berleth, 1998; Stowe-Evans et al., 1998; Harper et al., 2000; Hardtke et al., 2004; Tian et al., 2004; Nagpal et al., 2005; Okushima et al., 2005a; Wang et al., 2005; Wilmoth et al., 2005). We observed that the mnt/arf2-9 mutation increases cell division in several organs without producing a major effect on morphology, and two mutant alleles of arf2 had prolonged expression in stem and rosette leaf of CYCD3;1, a D-type cyclin involved in cell cycle entry, and ANT, a transcription factor involved in organ growth and cell division control. We conclude that ARF2 is a general repressor of cell division in many aerial organs of the plant.

Cell division is not the only process affected by ARF2. Li et al. (Li et al., 2004) reported that ARF2 regulates differential cell elongation in seedlings, and our observations of stem, leaf and floral phenotypes in mnt/arf2-9 mutants also indicate that ARF2 plays a role in cell expansion. In addition it has been proposed that ARF2 promotes developmental transitions such as flowering, floral organ abscission, silique ripening and leaf senescence (Okushima et al., 2005b; Ellis et al., 2005). In this context, extra cell division in mnt/arf2-9 mutants could result from a delay in transition from the proliferative to the fully differentiated state. Our observations that integument cells in mutant ovules divide for a longer period rather than more rapidly, and that ANT and CYCD3;1 expression is sustained in mature organs rather than increased in young ones, are consistent with this interpretation. However, the timing of cell division and expression of relevant genes need to be investigated in more organs to determine whether extra cell division in arf2 mutants is generally due to extended proliferation.

Effects of ARF2 on gene expression
The predominant view of ARFs is that they bind to auxin response elements (AuxREs) in the promoters of auxin-regulated genes, and mediate auxin signalling by activating or repressing gene transcription. It is proposed that auxin influences ARF function through its effects on gene expression and protein turnover of Aux/IAAs, short-lived nuclear proteins that contain AuxREs and are both induced and degraded in response to auxin. Aux/IAAs can dimerize with ARFs, and repress the ability of ARFs to activate gene expression in protoplast transfection assays (Abel and Theologis, 1996; Ulmasov et al., 1997; Leyser, 2002; Liscum and Reed, 2002; Hagen and Guilfoyle, 2002; Tiwari et al., 2003). We found that expression of ANT and CYCD3;1 is prolonged in leaves and stems of arf2 mutants (Fig. 8), but the mechanism by which this occurs remains to be discovered.

Expression of ANT and CYCD3;1 is also sustained in mature leaves of plants overexpessing ARGOS (Hu et al., 2003). ARGOS is induced by auxin, and overexpression leads to enlargement of aerial plant organs due to increased cell division (Hu et al., 2003). However, we did not find that arf2 mutations affected ARGOS expression in young or mature organs (Fig. 8), suggesting that ARF2 does not mediate ANT or CYCD3;1 expression through effects on ARGOS expression.

ARF2 represses transcription of reporter genes under the control of synthetic AuxREs both in vitro and in vivo (Tiwari et al., 2003; Li et al., 2004). Surprisingly, arf2 mutations have not been found to affect global expression of auxin-regulated genes (e.g. Aux/IAAs) in seedlings, or expression of specific IAA genes in flowers (Okushima et al., 2005b; Ellis et al., 2005). However, there is increasing evidence that ARF2 affects expression of other types of genes: in addition to prolonging expression of ANT and CYCD3;1 in mature stems and leaves (Fig. 8), loss of ARF2 function inhibits expression of three members of the ACS gene family (involved in ethylene biosynthesis) in flowers (Okushima et al., 2005b) and SENESCENCE ASSOCIATED GENE 12 (SAG12) in senescing leaves (Ellis et al., 2005). It has been proposed that ARF2 does not conform to the canonical auxin response model but may, for example, bind promoters of genes not directly regulated by auxin (the AuxRE motif is highly represented in the Arabidopsis genome), or interact with proteins not directly participating in auxin signalling (Okushima et al., 2005b; Ellis et al., 2005). Identification of the direct targets of ARF2 and its dimerization partners will clarify the mechanism of ARF2 function.

Supplementary material
Supplementary material for this article is available at http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/133/2/251/DC1

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
We are grateful to NASC for Col-0, Ler and Salk_108995 seed (also the Salk Institute for the latter); to Robert Fischer for the GFP_DME_NLS vector; to Bart Janssen (Hort+Research New Zealand) for the BJ36 and BJ40 vectors; to Michael Mogie for assistance with statistical analysis; to Ursula Potter for help with SEM; to Jason Reed for sharing unpublished data; and to Richard Hooley for helpful discussions. M.C.S., M.S., S.T. and N.F. were funded by Sulis Innovation; and S.A. by the BBSRC.

	REFERENCES

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

Abel, S. and Theologis, A. (1996). Early genes and auxin action. Plant Physiol. 111, 9-17.

Adams, S., Vinkenoog, R., Spielman, M., Dickinson, H. G. and Scott, R. J. (2000). Parent-of-origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana require methylation. Development 127, 2493-2502.

Alonso, J. M., Stepanova, A. N., Leisse, T. J., Kim, C. J., Chen, H., Shinn, P., Stevenson, D. K., Zimmerman, J., Barajas, P., Cheuk, R. et al. (2003). Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301, 653-657.

Alonso-Blanco, C., Blankestijn-De Vries, H., Hanhart, C. J. and Koornneef, M. (1999). Natural allelic variation at seed size loci in relation to other life history traits of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 4710-4717.

Baker, S. C., Robinson-Beers, K., Villanueva, J. M., Gaiser, J. C. and Gasser, C. S. (1997). Interactions among genes regulating ovule development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 145, 1109-1124.

Beeckman, T., De Rycke, R., Viane, R. and Inzé, D. (2000). Histological study of seed coat development in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Res. 113, 139-148.

Berleth, T. and Jürgens, G. (1993). The role of the monopteros gene in organising the basal body region of the Arabidopsis embryo. Development 118, 575-587.

Bushell, C., Spielman, M. and Scott, R. J. (2003). The basis of natural and artificial postzygotic hybridization barriers in Arabidopsis species. Plant Cell 15, 1-14.

Cheng, W.-H., Taliercio, E. W. and Chourey, P. S. (1996). The Miniature1 seed locus of maize encodes a cell wall invertase required for normal development of endosperm and maternal cells in the pedicel. Plant Cell 8, 971-983.

Choi, Y., Gehring, M., Johnson, L., Hannon, M., Harada, J. J., Goldberg, R. B., Jacobsen, S. E. and Fischer, R. L. (2002). DEMETER, a DNA glycosylase domain protein, is required for endosperm gene imprinting and seed viability in Arabidopsis. Cell 110, 33-42.

Chojecki, A. J. S., Bayliss, M. W. and Gale, M. D. (1986). Cell production and DNA accumulation in the wheat endosperm, and their association with grain weight. Ann. Bot. 58, 809-817.

Clough, S. J. and Bent, A. F. (1998). Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16, 735-743.

Cui, K.-H., Peng, S.-B., Xing, Y.-Z., Yu, S.-B. and Xu, C.-G. (2002). Molecular dissection of relationship between seedling characteristics and seed size in rice. Acta Botanica Sinica 44, 702-707.

Davies, D. R. (1975). Studies of seed development in Pisum sativum. I. Seed size in reciprocal crosses. Planta 124, 303-309.

Davies, D. R. (1977). DNA contents and cell number in relation to seed size in the genus Vicia. Heredity 39, 153-163.

Debeaujon, I., Léon-Kloosterziel, K. M. and Koornneef, M. (2000). Influence of the testa on seed dormancy, germination, and longevity in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 122, 403-413.

Doganlar, S., Frary, A. and Tanksley, S. D. (2000). The genetic basis of seed-weight variation: tomato as a model system. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100, 1267-1273.

Ellis, C. M., Nagpal, P., Young, J. C., Hagen, G., Guilfoyle, T. J. and Reed, J. W. (2005). AXIN RESPONSE FACTOR1 and AXIN RESPONSE FACTOR2 regulate senescence and floral abscission in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 132, 4563-4574.

Garcia, D., Saingery, V., Chambrier, P., Mayer, U., Jürgens, G. and Berger, F. (2003). Arabidopsis haiku mutants reveal new controls of seed size by endosperm. Plant Physiol. 131, 1661-1670.

Garcia, D., Fitz Gerald, J. N. and Berger, F. (2005). Maternal control of integument cell elongation and zygotic control of endosperm growth are coordinated to determine seed size in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17, 52-60.

Hagen, G. and Guilfoyle, T. (2002). Auxin-responsive gene expression: genes, promoters and regulatory factors. Plant Mol. Biol. 49, 373-385.

Hardtke, C. S. and Berleth, T. (1998). The Arabidopsis gene MONOPTEROS encodes a transcription factor mediating embryo axis formation and vascular development. EMBO J. 19, 4997-5006.

Harper, J. L., Lovell, P. H. and Moore, K. G. (1970). The shapes and sizes of seeds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1, 327-356.

Harper, R. M., Stowe-Evans, E. L., Luesse, D. R., Muto, H., Tatematsu, K., Watahiki, M. K., Yamamoto, K. and Liscum, E. (2000). The NPH4 locus encodes the auxin response factor ARF7, a conditional regulator of differential growth in aerial Arabidopsis tissue. Plant Cell 12, 757-770.

Hu, Y., Xie, Q. and Chua, N.-H. (2003). The Arabidopsis auxin-inducible gene ARGOS controls lateral organ size. Plant Cell 15, 1951-1961.

Hyten, D. L., Pantalone, V. R., Sams, C. E., Saxton, A. M., Landau-Ellis, D., Stefaniak, T. R. and Schmidt, M. E. (2004). Seed quality QTL in a prominent soybean population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 552-561.

Jofuku, K. D., den Boer, B. G. W., Van Montagu, M. and Okamuro, J. K. (1994). Control of Arabidopsis flower and seed development by the homeotic gene APETALA2. Plant Cell 6, 1211-1225.

Jofuku, K. D., Omidyar, P. K., Gee, Z. and Okamuro, J. K. (2005). Control of seed mass and seed yield by the floral homeotic gene APETALA2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3117-3122.

Krannitz, P. G., Aarssen, L. W. and Dow, J. M. (1991). The effect of genetically based differences in seed size on seedling survival in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 78, 446-450.

Krizek, B. A. (1999). Ectopic expression of AINTEGUMENTA in Arabidopsis plants results in increased growth of floral organs. Dev. Genet. 25, 224-236.

Léon-Kloosterziel, K. M., Keijzer, C. J. and Koornneef, M. (1994). A seed shape mutant of Arabidopsis that is affected in integument development. Plant Cell 6, 385-392.

Leyser, O. (2002). Molecular genetics of auxin signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53, 377-398.

Li, H., Johnson, P., Stepanova, A., Alonso, J. M. and Ecker, J. R. (2004). Convergence of signaling pathways in the control of differential cell growth in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell 7, 193-204.

Liscum, E. and Briggs, W. E. (1996). Mutations of Arabidopsis in potential transduction and response components of the phototropic signaling pathway. Plant Physiol. 112, 291-296.

Liscum, E. and Reed, J. W. (2002). Genetics of Aux/IAA and ARF action in plant growth and development. Plant Mol. Biol. 49, 387-400.

Lopes, M. A. and Larkins, B. A. (1993). Endosperm origin, development, and function. Plant Cell 5, 1383-1399.

Meyer, R. C., Törjék, O., Becher, M. and Altmann, T. (2004). Heterosis of biomass production in Arabidopsis. Establishment during early development. Plant Physiol. 134, 1813-1823.

Mizukami, Y. and Fischer, R. L. (2000). Plant organ size control: AINTEGUMENTA regulates growth and cell numbers during organogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 942-947.

Nagpal, P., Ellis, C. M., Weber, H., Ploense, S. E., Barkawi, L. S., Guilfoyle, T. J., Hagen, G., Alonso, J. M., Cohen, J. D., Farmer, E. E. et al. (2005). Auxin response factors ARF6 and ARF8 promote jasmonic acid production and flower maturation. Development 132, 4107-4118.

Oakenfull, E. A., Riou-Khamlichi, C. and Murray, J. A. H. (2002). Plant D-type cyclins and the control of G1 progression. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357, 749-760.

Ohto, M., Fischer, R. L., Goldberg, R. B., Nakamura, K. and Harada, J. J. (2005). Control of seed mass by APETALA2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3123-3128.

Okushima, Y., Overvoorde, P. J., Arima, K., Alonso, J. M., Chan, A., Chang, C., Ecker, J. R., Hughes, B., Lui, A., Nguyen, D. et al. (2005a). Functional genomic analysis of the AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR gene family members in Arabidopsis thaliana: unique and overlapping functions of ARF7 and ARF19. Plant Cell 17, 444-463.

Okushima, Y., Mitina, I., Quach, H. L. and Theologis, A. (2005b). AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 2 (ARF2): a pleiotropic developmental regulator. Plant J. 43, 29-46.

Przemeck, G. K. H., Mattsson, J., Hardtke, C. S., Sung, Z. R. and Berleth, T. (1996). Studies on the role of the Arabidopsis gene MONOPTEROS in vascular development and plant cell axialization. Planta 200, 229-237.

Reddy, V. M. and Daynard, T. B. (1983). Endosperm characteristics associated with rate of grain filling and kernel size in corn. Maydica 28, 339-355.

Ruzin, S. E. (1999). Plant Microtechnique and Microscopy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schneitz, K., Hülskamp, M. and Pruitt, R. E. (1995). Wild-type ovule development in Arabidopsis thaliana: a light microscope study of cleared whole-mount tissue. Plant J. 7, 731-749.

Scott, R. J., Spielman, M., Bailey, J. and Dickinson, H. G. (1998). Parent-of-origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 125, 3329-3341.

Sessions, A., Nemhauser, J. L., McCall, A., Roe, J. L., Feldmann, K. A. and Zambryski, P. C. (1997). ETTIN patterns the Arabidopsis floral meristem and reproductive organs. Development 124, 4481-4491.

Sessions, R. A. and Zambryski, P. C. (1995). Arabidopsis gynoecium structure in the wild type and in ettin mutants. Development 121, 1519-1532.

Skinner, D. J., Hill, T. A. and Gasser, C. S. (2004). Regulation of ovule development. Plant Cell 16, S32-S45.

Smyth, D. R., Bowman, J. L. and Meyerowitz, E. M. (1990). Early flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2, 755-767.

Stowe-Evans, E. L., Harper, R. M., Motchoulski, A. V. and Liscum, E. (1998). NPH4, a conditional modulator of auxin-dependent differential growth responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 118, 1265-1275.

Tian, C., Muto, H., Higuchi, K., Matamura, T., Tatematsu, K., Koshiba, T. and Yamamoto, K. T. (2004). Disruption and overexpression of auxin response factor 8 gene of Arabidopsis affect hypocotyl elongation and root growth habit, indicating its possible involvement in auxin homeostasis in light condition. Plant J. 40, 333-343.

Tiwari, S. B., Hagen, G. and Guilfoyle, T. (2003). The roles of auxin response factor domains in auxin-responsive transcription. Plant Cell 15, 533-543.

Ulmasov, T., Hagen, G. and Guilfoyle, T. (1997). ARF1, a transcription factor that binds to auxin response elements. Science 276, 1865-1868.

Ulmasov, T., Hagen, G. and Guilfoyle, T. (1999a). Activation and repression of transcription by auxin-response factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5844-5849.

Ulmasov, T., Hagen, G. and Guilfoyle, T. (1999b). Dimerization and DNA binding of auxin response factors. Plant J. 19, 309-319.

Vandenbussche, F. and Van Der Straeten, D. (2004). Shaping the shoot: a circuitry that integrates multiple signals. Trends Plant Sci. 9, 499-506.

Wang, J.-W., Wang, L.-J., Mao, Y.-B., Cai, W.-J., Xue, H.-W. and Chen, X.-Y. (2005). Control of root cap formation by microRNA-targeted auxin response factors in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17, 2204-2216.

Watahiki, M. K. and Yamamoto, K. T. (1997). The massugu1 mutation of Arabidopsis identified with failure of auxin-induced growth curvature of hypocotyl confers auxin insensitivity to hypocotyl and leaf. Plant Physiol. 115, 419-426.

Weber, H., Borisjuk, L. and Wobus, U. (1996). Controlling seed development and seed size in Vicia faba: a role for seed coat-associated invertases and carbohydrate state. Plant J. 10, 823-834.

Wilmoth, J. C., Wang, S., Tiwari, S. B., Joshi, A. D., Hagen, G., Guilfoyle, T. J., Alonso, J. M., Ecker, J. R. and Reed, J. W. (2005). NPH4/ARF7 and ARF19 promote leaf expansion and auxin-induced lateral root formation. Plant J. 43, 118-130.

This article has been cited by other articles: