QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 5 January 2006
doi: 10.1242/dev.02217

This Article Summary Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material All Versions of this Article: dev.02217v1 133/3/471    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in Development Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Callejo, A. Articles by Guerrero, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Callejo, A. Articles by Guerrero, I. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Hedgehog lipid modifications are required for Hedgehog stabilization in the extracellular matrix

Ainhoa Callejo^*, Carlos Torroja^*,, Luis Quijada and Isabel Guerrero

Centro de Biología Molecular `Severo Ochoa', C.S.I.C., Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain.

Author for correspondence (e-mail: iguerrero{at}cbm.uam.es)

Accepted 22 November 2005

	SUMMARY

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The Hedgehog (Hh) family of morphogenetic proteins has important instructional roles in metazoan development. Despite Hh being modified by Ct-cholesterol and Nt-palmitate adducts, Hh migrates far from its site of synthesis and programs cellular outcomes, depending on its local concentrations. We show that in the receiving cells of the Drosophila wing imaginal disc, lipid-unmodified Hh spreads across many more cell diameters than the wild type and this spreading leads to the activation of low but not high threshold responses. Unlipidated Hh forms become internalized through the apical plasma membrane, while wild-type Hh enters through the basolateral cell surface - in all cases via a dynamin-dependent mechanism. Full activation of the Hh pathway and the spread of Hh throughout the extracellular matrix depend on the ability of lipid-modified Hh to interact with heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG). However, neither Hh-lipid modifications nor HSPG function are required to activate the targets that respond to low levels of Hh. All these data show that the interaction of lipid-modified Hh with HSPG is important both for precise Hh spreading through the epithelium surface and for correct Hh reception.

Key words: Hedgehog gradient, Drosophila imaginal discs, Hedgehog lipids, HSPG, Extracellular matrix

	INTRODUCTION

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The proteins of the Hedgehog (Hh) family are powerful signaling molecules that act as morphogens, controlling growth and patterning in certain tissues of a range of different organisms at different developmental stages (Ingham and McMahon, 2001). Although the Hh signal molecule was first described as a morphogen in the segmental patterning of the Drosophila larva cuticle (Heemskerk and DiNardo, 1994), the Hh morphogen gradient across the wing imaginal disc has provided a unique Hh signaling read out (reviewed by Torroja et al., 2005). In mammals, the function of Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) - one of the three members of the Hh protein family (Shh, Indian Hh and Desert Hh) - as a morphogen has been thoroughly characterized (Echelard et al., 1993) (reviewed by McMahon et al., 2003). Shh has been shown to act as a morphogen in patterning the ventral neural tube (Briscoe et al., 2001) (reviewed by McMahon et al., 2003) and in specifying vertebrate digit identities (Ahn and Joyner, 2004; Harfe et al., 2004). Recent works have also revealed an unexpected role of Shh in the control of axon guidance in the developing nervous system (Charron et al., 2003) (reviewed by Charron and Tessier-Lavigne, 2005).

Establishing the molecular mechanisms that generate the Hh gradient is essential for our understanding of how the Hh signal elicits multiple responses in a temporally and spatially specific manner. The Hh spreading mechanism is especially intriguing, because Hh is a lipid-modified molecule. Normally, lipid-modified peptides appear firmly tethered to membranes (Peters et al., 2004). Both in vertebrates and in Drosophila, Hh is synthesized as a precursor protein that undergoes a series of post-translational modifications within the secretory pathway that lead to the presentation at the cell surface of the mature and signaling-active Hh (reviewed by Mann and Beachy, 2004). Following cleavage of a N-terminal signal peptide upon entering the secretory pathway, the Hh protein undergoes an autocatalytic processing reaction that involves internal cleavage between Gly-Cys-specific residues (Lee et al., 1994; Tabata and Kornberg, 1994; Bumcrot, 1995). A cholesteryl adduct then covalently binds to the N-terminal product of this cleavage (Lee et al., 1994; Tabata and Kornberg, 1994; Bumcrot, 1995; Marti et al., 1995; Porter et al., 1996a; Porter et al., 1996b). The C-terminal domain of the Hh precursor mediates this autoprocessing reaction between Gly-Cys-specific residues (Lee et al., 1994; Tabata and Kornberg, 1994; Bumcrot, 1995). The second lipid adduct that modifies the Hh protein is palmitic acid, which attaches to the N-terminal cysteine exposed after signal peptide cleavage (Pepinsky et al., 1998). This acylation is catalyzed by the product of the sightless gene, also designated skinny hedgehog, central missing or raspberry (Amanai and Jiang, 2001; Chamoun et al., 2001; Lee and Treisman, 2001; Micchelli et al., 2002). The doubly lipid-modified Hh is the fully active signaling molecule (Lee et al., 2001). Although much of the Hh maturation process has been determined in Drosophila, all the metazoan species examined so far show the same biochemical and functional mechanisms.

The importance of lipid modifications has been demonstrated by evaluating the diffusion and signaling properties of different forms of Hh that lack lipid modifications in several animal models. These forms include HhN or ShhN (without the cholesterol moiety) and Hhc85s or Shhc25s (lacking the palmitate modification). Although the loss of cholesterol reduces the signaling capabilities in vertebrate models (Porter et al., 1996a; Lewis et al., 2001; Zeng et al., 2001), minor effects have been reported in Drosophila wing disc (Burke et al., 1999). However, a detailed analysis in the embryo revealed an essential role for the activation of a specific subset of Hh targets in the embryo (Gallet et al., 2003). The lack of N-terminal acylation dramatically reduces signaling potential, both in Drosophila and vertebrates (Chamoun et al., 2001; Kohtz et al., 2001; Lee et al., 2001; Lewis and Eisen, 2001; Gallet et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2004; Tian et al., 2005). The diffusion of Drosophila HhN, however, differs from that of their vertebrate counterparts. Although cholesterol-free Hh is able to diffuse longer distances in Drosophila wing imaginal disc (Burke et al., 1999), but not in Drosophila embryos (Gallet et al., 2003), both forms of lipid-unmodified Shh show reduced activity and diffusion properties as measured by analyzing target gene activation and protein distribution (Lewis et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2004; Tian et al., 2005). These differences between Drosophila and vertebrates, and also in Drosophila between the wing imaginal disc and the embryonic epidermis are not well understood, though the effects of lipids on Hh have not yet been systematically explored in Drosophila wing imaginal disc cells. The molecular mechanisms through which a lipid-modified Hh protein is able to diffuse long distances are also unclear.

Extracellular matrix proteins such as heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) have been attributed a regulatory role in the signaling activity of secreted morphogen molecules. Thus, the Drosophila EXT family of proteins, encoded by the genes tout velu (ttv), brother of tout velu and sister of tout velu, which are essential for the synthesis of HSPGs, are required for the diffusion of lipid-modified Hh (Bellaiche et al., 1998; Bornemann et al., 2004; Takei et al., 2004), yet do not affect the spread of cholesterol-free Hh (Bellaiche et al., 1998; Gallet et al., 2003). EXT proteins are glycosyl transferases that catalyze the formation of heparan sulfate glycosylaminoglycan chains, which are attached to a core protein. Recently, the glypican (a type of HSPG attached to the cell membrane by a GPI-anchor) proteins Dally and Dally-like, were found to be required for Hh diffusion (Han et al., 2004), and Dally-like was also shown to be needed for the reception of Hh in cultured cells and embryos of Drosophila (Desbordes and Sanson, 2003; Lum et al., 2003). These data indicate that HSPGs are important for the formation of morphogen gradients and Hh signal reception.

In this work, we analyze the role of Hh lipid modifications (cholesterol and palmitic acid) in spreading, internalization and signaling during Hh gradient formation in the wing imaginal disc. We also examine the function of extracellular matrix HSPGs in the spreading and signaling of lipid-modified and unmodified forms of Hh. Our results indicate that Hh lipid modifications are essential for Hh/HSPG interaction. This interaction retains and stabilizes Hh within the epithelium to control spreading and proper signaling of Hh. We propose a conserved role of lipids in Hh signaling in Drosophila and vertebrates.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Mutants, insertions and transgenes
A description of the mutations, insertions and transgenes in FlyBase is available at http://gin.ebi.ac.uk:7081.

The mutants used were: dor⁸, a null allele (Shestopal et al., 1997); shi^ts1 (Grigliatti et al., 1973) and hh^ts2 (Ma et al., 1993), two temperature-sensitive alleles with restrictive temperatures at 32°C and 29°C, respectively; and ttv^l(2)00681 (Bellaiche et al., 1998).

The reporter genes used were dpp-LacZ^{BS 3.0} (Blackman et al., 1991), dpp¹⁰⁶³⁸ (Zecca et al., 1995) and ptc-lacZ (a gift from C. Goodman).

The following Gal4 drivers were used in the ectopic expression experiments using the Gal4/UAS system (Brand and Perrimon, 1993): hh-Gal4 (Tanimoto et al., 2000), AB1-Gal4 (Munro and Freeman, 2000), ap-Gal4 (Calleja et al., 1996) and Ubx-Gal4 (Pallavi and Shashidhara, 2003).

The hh transgenes were: UAS-hh-GFP (Torroja et al., 2004), UAS-hhN-GFP and UAS-hhc85s-GFP (Gorfinkiel et al., 2005). After testing the protein expression levels of several lines of GFP-tagged Hh forms by western blot, we selected the lines that showed the same expression levels for each Hh variant (see Fig. S1 in the supplementary material). UAS-hhN was prepared for the present study. UAS-hhN (Burke et al., 1999), UAS-hhN (Tabata and Kornberg, 1994) and UAS- hhc85s (Lee et al., 2001) were also used as controls.

Larva genotypes used for generating mosaic clones
Mutant clones
Clones were generated by FLP-mediated mitotic recombination. Larvae of the corresponding genotypes were incubated at 37°C for 1 hour 24-48 hours after egg laying (AEL), or for 45 minutes 48-72 hours AEL. The genotypes of the flies for clone induction were: shi^ts1 FRT18A / arm-lacZ FRT18A; FLP/+; hh-Gal4 / Hh-GFP(or HhN-GFP or Hhc85s-GFP); dor⁸ FRT18A / arm-lacZ FRT18A; FLP/+; hh-Gal4 / Hh-GFP(or HhN-GFP or Hhc85s-GFP); dor⁸ FRT18A / arm-lacZ FRT18A; ap-Gal4 / Hh-GPF(or HhN-GFP or Hhc85s-GFP); FLP/+; FLP; FRT 42D ttv^681b / FRT 42D arm-lacZ; hhGal4 / Hh-GFP(or HhN-GFP or Hhc85s-GFP).

Flip-out clones
To generate random clones of Hh-GFP, Hhc85s-GFP and HhN-GFP, the transgenes actin>CD2>Gal4 (Pignoni and Zipursky, 1997) and ubx>f⁺>Gal4, UAS-ßgal (de Celis, 1998) were used. Larvae of the corresponding genotypes were incubated at 37°C for 10 minutes to induce HS-FLP-mediated recombinant clones.

To generate random clones of Hh-GFP, Hhc85s-GFP and HhN-GFP in an hh^ts2 background, larvae of the genotypes Act>CD2>GAL4 / HS-FLP122; UAS-Hh-GFP(or HhN-GFP or Hhc85s-GFP), hh^ts2 / hh^ts2 and y, w, HS-FLP122; ubx>f⁺>Gal4, UAS-ßgal; UAS-Hh-GFP(or HhN-GFP or Hhc85s-GFP), hh^ts2 / hh^ts2 were incubated at 37°C for 10 minutes to induce recombinant clones and incubated at the restrictive temperature (29°C) for 18 hours before dissection.

To generate random clone mutants for ttv that ectopically expressed Hh and Hh-N under Gal4 control, we used the MARCM technique (Lee and Luo, 1999). Larvae of the following genotypes: UAS-Hh / y, w, FLP, Tub Gal4 UAS-GFP; FRT 42D ttv^681b / FRT 42D tub Gal80 and y,w, tubGal4 UAS-GFP; FRT 42D Tub Gal80 / FRT 42D ttv^681b; UAS-Hh were incubated at 37°C for 1 hour 24-48 hours AEL, or for 45 minutes 48-72 hours AEL.

Fractionation of Hh-GFP, HhN-GFP, Hhc85s-GFP and Hhc85sN-GFP in glycerol gradients
Salivary glands were collected in lysis buffer [Tris-HCl 50 mM (pH 8.0), DOC 0.4%, NaCl 140 mM, Triton X-100 1%, EDTA 1 mM (pH 8.0) containing a cocktail of pepstatin, aprotinin and leupeptin proteases inhibitors] from flies that expressed different forms of Hedgehog-GFP proteins induced with the AB1 Gal4 driver. The lysates (0.1 ml) were loaded on a 12 ml linear glycerol gradient (15-50%). The tubes were then centrifuged for 18 hours at 100,000 g in a SW40 rotor (Beckman) at 4°C. The gradient was fractionated in 21-23 fractions from the bottom (50 % glycerol) to the top (15% glycerol). An identical gradient was prepared using the standard protein horse ferritin, which has an estimated molecular weight of 465 kDa for the multimer. Aliquots were precipitated with TCA, using 10 µg insulin as carrier, and analyzed by western blotting using rat anti-Hh 1/200 (Guillen et al., 1995) and rabbit anti-Hh 1/500 (Tabata and Kornberg, 1994) in the ECL method of immunodetection. The standard protein was developed with its specific antibody.

Immunostaining of imaginal discs and western blot analysis
Immunostaining was performed according to standard protocols. Antibodies were used at the following dilutions: rabbit polyclonal anti-Hh (Takei et al., 2004), 1:500; mouse monoclonal anti-Ptc (Apa 1.3) (Capdevila et al., 1994), 1/50; rabbit polyclonal anti-ß-gal (from Jackson laboratories), 1/1000; rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP (Molecular Probes, A-6455), 1/100; rabbit polyclonal anti-Col antibody (Vervoort et al., 1999), 1/200; mouse monoclonal anti-En (Patel et al., 1989), 1/100; rat monoclonal anti-Ci (Motzny and Holmgren, 1995), 1/5; rat polyclonal anti-Caupolican (Diez del Corral et al., 1999), 1/100; and mouse monoclonal anti-DE-Cad (Iowa University Hybridoma Bank), 1:50.

For the western blots, protein extracts from salivary glands of AB1-Gal4/UAS-Hh, UAS-Hh-GFP flies were prepared in Laemmli buffer, resolved by SDS-PAGE, immunoblotted and then analyzed using anti-Hh (1/500) (Tabata and Kornberg, 1994), rat polyclonal anti-Hh (1/200) (Guillen et al., 1995) and anti-GFP (1/1000) (Molecular Probes, A-6455) antibodies. The signal was developed using the ECL Western Blotting Analysis System (Amersham Pharmacia). The presence of horse ferritin was established using a specific antibody (1:1000, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). The amount of protein extract loaded for each sample was control by Coomasie staining of the SDS-PAGE gel.

The protocols used for labeling the endocytic compartment and extracellular labeling of Hh-GFP are described elsewhere (Strigini and Cohen, 2000; Entchev et al., 2000; Torroja et al., 2004).

Microscopy and image processing
Bright-field microscopy imaging was performed using an Axioskop 2 plus (Zeiss) microscope, coupled to a CCD camera. A laser-scanning confocal microscope (LSM 510 META; MicroRadiance and Radiance 2000) was used for confocal fluorescence imaging. Metamorph and Image J software were used for image processing and determining fluorescence levels.

	RESULTS

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Lipid-modifications are required for correct Hh gradient formation
In larvae, the wing imaginal disc is formed by epithelial cells is a sac-like structure. One surface of this structure comprises a monolayer of columnar epithelial cells with their apical membranes orientated towards the disc lumen. This specialized group of cells will give rise to the wing (and notum). The other overlying surface is a squamous epithelium, called the peripodial membrane, which does not develop into any cuticular structure in the adult fly (see Fig. 5). Two populations of cells with different adhesion affinities divide the epithelium of columnar cells into posterior (P) and anterior (A) cells (García-Bellido et al., 1973). Hh is synthesized in P cells and the processed HhNp 20 kDa lipid-modified molecule is able to diffuse several cell diameters away, despite its potential to tether to membranes. However, the spreading of Hh is limited by interaction with the Patched (Ptc) receptor that is expressed in the A cells. When Hh reaches Ptc, a concentration gradient of Hh is formed at the boundary that separates the anterior and posterior (AP) compartments (reviewed by Ingham and McMahon, 2001; Torroja et al., 2005). Here, we explored the role of lipid moieties in the spreading and signaling mechanisms of the Hh molecule in the wing imaginal disc. To this end, we engineered GFP-tagged versions of the different Hh variants: HhN (lacking cholesterol), Hhc85s (lacking palmitic acid) and Hhc85sN (lacking cholesterol and palmitic acid), and then compared their functions with that of fully lipid-modified Hh-GFP. The correct processing of Hh-GFP and of variants lacking lipid-modifications was checked in western blots, which showed bands of expected molecular weight for each protein (see Fig. S1A in the supplementary material).

Biochemical studies in tissue cultured cells have shown that Shh, the vertebrate ortholog of Drosophila Hh, can form multimeric complexes in which hydrophobic moieties are thought to be sequestered inside the multimer to make the complex soluble and diffusible (Zeng et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2004). This multimeric complex shows stronger signaling activity than Shh monomers and both lipid modifications are essential for its formation (Chen et al., 2004). Hh multimers have been isolated from S2 cells, a Drosophila cell line, but surprisingly, palmitic acid modification was not essential for Hh to form a multimeric complex in S2 cells (Chen et al., 2004). Thus, we decided to establish whether the lipid-modified and unmodified forms of Hh-GFP expressed in fly tissues could form a multimeric complex. To avoid a possible interaction with endogenous Hh, we ectopically expressed the different Hh-GFP forms in salivary gland cells, where there is no endogenous Hh expression (Zhu et al., 2003). Fig. 1A shows that only the lipid-modified Hh-GFP was able to form multimers. As a control, we repeated the experiment using GFP-untagged versions of Hh and obtained similar results (data not shown). These data are in agreement with vertebrate Shh multimerization but not with previous results, which sugggested that the palmitic modification is not required for the formation of a multimeric complex in Drosophila tissue culture cells (Chen et al., 2004). This discrepancy might be due to the experimental approach employed (see Materials and methods).

In Hh-GFP/hhGal4 wing discs, dots of Hh-GFP, which we previously identified as endocytic vesicles of Hh internalized by Ptc (Torroja et al., 2004), were observed at a distance of five, six or even more cell diameters in the A compartment close to the AP border. Discs expressing HhN-GFP, Hhc85s-GFP (Fig. 1C,D) and even Hhc85sN-GFP (data not shown) also showed these dots distributed throughout the whole A compartment. These GFP accumulations observed for HhN-GFP and Hhc85s-GFP were also detected using several anti-Hh antibodies (see Fig. S1B, part b; C, part c in the supplementary material).

We then tried to establish if these punctate structures were vesicles of the endocytic compartment or extracellular aggregates - it has been suggested that Hh multimers could form extracellular aggregates, called large punctuated structures (LPS), in the embryo (Gallet, 2003; Gallet, 2005). Discs expressing different Hh-GFP variants induced with Hh-Gal4 were incubated `in vivo' with dextran-red to label the endocytic compartment. We found extensive co-localization of Hh-GFP, Hhc85s-GFP and HhN-GFP (as well as Hhc85sN-GFP) with the internalized dextran-red (Fig. 1B-D, parts b-d, arrowheads; data not shown). To check whether the dots of Hh-GFP that did not co-localize with dextrans (Fig. 1B-D, arrows) were intracellular or extracellular, we simultaneously labeled the extracellular Hh-GFP with -GFP antibody and the endocytic vesicles with dextrans. Fig. S1D shows that the punctate structures of Hh-GFP that did not co-localize with dextrans (arrows) are indeed intracellular vesicles. This indicates that all Hh variants dots correspond to accumulations in the endocytic compartment.

Lipid-modifications localize Hh at the lateral plasma membrane of receiving cells
We and others previously reported that Ptc internalizes Hh through a dynamin-dependent mechanism, because there was build-up and co-localization of Hh and Ptc when endocytosis was blocked in the temperature-sensitive dynamin mutants, shibire^ts1 (shi^ts1), both in the fly embryo and in imaginal disc cells (Capdevila et al., 1994; Han et al., 2004; Torroja et al., 2004; Gallet and Therond, 2005). We observed that the endocytosed Hh was targeted by the lysosomal protein degradation pathway because Hh and Ptc also accumulated in clones of dor^- mutant cells induced in imaginal discs (Torroja et al., 2004), a mutation that blocks the ubiquitin pathway (Sevrioukov et al., 1999). As the lipid-unmodified forms of Hh do not form a gradient in the wing disc (Fig. 1C,D), we then tried to determine whether the mechanisms of internalization and degradation of HhN-GFP and Hhc85s-GFP were affected.

We induced shi^ts1 mutant clones in discs expressing the variant forms of Hh in the P compartment and observed that Hhc85s-GFP and HhN-GFP accumulated at the apical membrane of shi^ts1 mutant clones at the restrictive temperature (Fig. 2B,C,E), while Hh-GFP built up at the basolateral membrane (Fig. 2A,D). This distinct apicobasal accumulation in Hh and HhN or Hhc85s in shi^ts1 clones suggests that the mutant forms diffuse through the apical surface of the epithelium, while wild-type Hh diffuses through the basolateral surface. To visualize the diffusion of Hh, we compared the extracellular staining of Hh-GFP with that of the mutant forms in wing imaginal discs expressing the GFP fusion proteins in the P compartment. Fig. 3 shows the presence of the three proteins on the apical surface in the producing cells (Fig. 3A-C asterisks). Surprisingly, only the mutant forms were able to diffuse through the apical surface towards the A compartment, whereas no apical labeling was found for Hh-GFP in the A compartment (Fig. 3A-C apical arrows). However, Hh-GFP diffused and formed an extracellular gradient in the basolateral space (Fig. 3A, basolateral arrowhead), while the mutant forms of Hh were much less represented and no extracellular gradient or build up were observed (Fig. 3B,C, basolateral arrowheads).

View larger version (103K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. The large punctate structures of Hh, HhN and Hhc85s are endocytic vesicles and only the lipid-modified Hh forms oligomers in Drosophila. (A) Glycerol gradients (50-15%) used to fractionate Hh-GFP, HhN-GFP, Hhc85s-GFP and Hhc85sN-GFP obtained from salivary glands expressing the four Hh forms. We observed that wild-type Hh fractionated as two different density gradients: one associated with the high molecular weight fraction (9-14), which corresponded to oligomers; the other associated with the low molecular weight fraction (17-23), corresponding to monomers. HhN-GFP, Hhc85s-GFP and Hhc85sN-GFP elute with the low-density fractions (monomers). (B-D,b-d) Wing imaginal discs expressing the different Hh-GFP forms with the hh-Gal4 driver. Hh-GFP forms a short gradient of around six or seven cell diameters (blue line in B), while HhN-GFP and Hhc85s-GFP proteins are unable to generate a proper gradient (blue line in C and D). HhN-GFP and Hhc85s-GFP vesicles are present far from the Hh-expressing cells. Internalized dextran red-positive vesicles (24 minutes of incubation) co-localized with Hh-GFP (b), HhN-GFP (c) and Hhc85s-GFP (d) in both A and P compartments of the wing imaginal cells that expressed the three forms of Hh in their own expression domain using the Hh-Gal4 driver (arrowheads). Some GFP labeled particles do not co-localize with the internalized dextran (arrows). These particles are nevertheless intracellular (see Fig. S1D in the supplementary material). These results indicate that, in all cases, the punctate structures are endocytic vesicles. The A compartment is orientated towards the left; the P compartment is orientated towards the right.

View larger version (139K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Differential accumulation of Hh-GFP versus HhN-GFP and Hhc85s-GFP in the plasma membrane of shits1 mutant clones. (A-E) shits1mutant clones induced in UAS-Hh-GFP/hhGal4 (A,D), UAS-HhN-GFP/hhGal4 (B,E) and Hhc85s-GFP/hhGal4 (C) wing imaginal discs. Hh-GFP accretions were only observed in the basolateral plasma membrane of the A compartment cells (arrowheads in A), while HhN-GFP (B) and Hhc85s-GFP (C) were detected only in the apical part of the A compartment cells. (D,E) Transverse sections of the shits1mutant clones in A,B, respectively. Arrows indicate the apical parts and arrowheads indicate the basolateral parts of the cells. There is basolateral accumulation of Hh (D) and apical accumulation of HhN (E). The AP boundary is indicated with a broken line.

Several conclusions can be derived from the above results. First, the non-palmitoylated and the non-cholesterolated forms of Hh synthesized in the P compartment (or in the dorsal compartment) are freely distributed and internalized throughout the disc. Second, internalization of wild-type Hh occurs through the basolateral membrane while internalization of the lipid-unmodified forms takes place through the apical plasma membrane; in all cases via a dynamin-dependent mechanism. Third, Ptc independent internalization of the lipid-unmodified forms of Hh also induces the Ptc independent degradation of Hh. This Ptc-independent mechanism of Hh internalization was previously suggested both in imaginal disc cells (Torroja et al., 2004) and in the embryo (Gallet and Therond, 2005).

As the internalization of HhN-GFP and Hhc85s-GFP occurred throughout the disc epithelium via the apical plasma membrane, even for areas of the disc far away from the Hh-producing cells, our interpretation was that these secreted forms of Hh could not be properly retained by the extracellular matrix. Hence, it was very likely that Hh forms not modified by lipids would concentrate in the disc lumen after their secretion, escaping the spatial restriction imposed by the extracellular matrix. To test this hypothesis, we expressed Hh-GFP, HhN-GFP and Hhc85s-GFP only in peripodial membrane cells using the ubx-Gal4 line (Pallavi and Shashidhara, 2003) and determined whether these forms of Hh can travel through the lumen and be internalized by the disc proper cells. When we expressed HhN-GFP and Hhc85s-GFP with the ubx-Gal4 driver, we observed Hh vesicles in the disc proper cells (Fig. 5B-c'), whereas no vesicles were observed in the case of wild-type Hh (Fig. 5A,a,A',a'). HhN endocytosis was more evident in the A than in the P compartment (Fig. 5B',b'), indicating that although there is Ptc-independent internalization of HhN, Ptc is still able to interact with HhN, as is also reflected by its signaling properties. Thus, HhN-GFP expressed from the peripodial membrane was able to induce the activation of gene targets, such us dpp-LacZ in the disc proper cells (Fig. 5B'). However, Hh-GFP was unable to induce this distant activation of response genes (Fig. 5A'). This non-autonomous effect of HhN-GFP from peripodial to disc proper cells through the disc lumen was also patently manifested by the enlargement of the A compartment (Fig. 5B') and by the adult phenotypes (Fig. 5E,G). Flies expressing HhN-GFP in the peripodial membrane (but not those expressing Hh-GFP) showed extra veins, enlargement of the costa region of the wing (Fig. 5E) and extra bristles in the notum (Fig. 5G). These mutant phenotypes are similar to those observed as a consequence of ectopic activation of the Hh pathway (Basler and Struhl, 1994; Tabata and Kornberg, 1994) and in hypomorph Ptc alleles (Phillips et al., 1990; Capdevila et al., 1994).

View larger version (137K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Differential localization of Hh-GFP, HhN-GFP and Hhc85s-GFP in the plasma membrane. (A-C) Extracellular labeling of Hh-GFP (A), HhN-GFP (B) and Hhc85s-GFP (C) showing their distribution at the apical versus basolateral plane. (a-c) AP z sections of the same wing discs in A-C. (a') AP z sections of a wing disc double-stained with anti-Hh antibody (green) and anti-DE-cadherin (purple) as an apical region marker. The three Hh forms occur in the extracellular space on the apical side of the producing cells (asterisk), while only lipid-unmodified forms of Hh appear in the apical extracellular space in the A compartment (arrows in apical planes and Z sections). Wild-type Hh forms an extracellular gradient in the basolateral A cells next to the AP compartment, while the lipid-unmodified forms are poorly represented and do not form a gradient (arrowheads in basolateral panels and z sections).

These results indicate that lipid-unmodified Hh is poorly retained by the extracellular matrix both in the peripodial cells and in the disc proper cells and is released to the lumen where it can freely diffuse.

Lipid modifications to Hh are required to activate high threshold responses
We have previously reported that Hh-GFP is able to signal as wild-type Hh (Torroja et al., 2004). We next analyzed the behavior of lipid-free Hh-GFP molecules in clones of cells ectopically expressing each form of Hh in the wing imaginal disc. For all the experiments, we chose fly lines that expressed similar levels of the various forms of Hh-GFP. As a control, we also induced ectopic expression clones of GFP-untagged versions and observed the same responses as with the GFP-tagged forms (data not shown). Ectopic Hh-GFP-expressing clones in the A compartment of the wing imaginal disc induced all Hh responses, both autonomously (arrows) and non-autonomously (arrowheads), indicating that Hh-GFP is able to signal at the same distance from its source as the wild-type Hh protein (Fig. 6C-F) (Torroja et al., 2004). Although Hh is not expressed in A compartment cells, we have previously reported that ectopic Hh in the A compartment is able to activate endogenous Hh expression (Guillen et al., 1995). Hence, to avoid possible interaction of ectopic Hh with endogenous Hh, we also induced clones of all Hh forms in a hh^ts2 background at the restrictive temperature and obtained the same results. Ectopic Hhc85s-GFP clones in the A compartment did not activate en (Fig. 6K) but activated other Hh targets such as ptc (at very low levels and only cell autonomously) and dpp (also at low levels), only autonomously (Fig. 6L-N). HhN-GFP, however, was able to activate all the Hh targets, although in the case of en and ptc the non-autonomous activation was over a very short range (only one cell diameter outside the clone) (see arrowheads in Fig. 6G,H). Surprisingly, low threshold responses, such as dpp, Iro and the cytoplasmic stabilization of Ci, were activated throughout the disc, even though HhN-GFP induction occurred in a restricted clone (Fig. 6I,J; data not shown). This differential non-autonomous response between low- and high-threshold response target genes with cholesterol-unmodified Hh was unexpected (see Fig. 6O,P,Q).

View larger version (84K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Internalization and degradation of HhN and Hhc85s independent of Ptc. (A-C) dor8 clones induced in UAS-Hh /HhGal4 (A), HhN-GFP/HhGal4 (B) and Hhc85s-GFP/HhGal4 (C) wing discs. The graphs represent a normalized pixel intensity of Ptc, Hh and ß-Gal staining, measured in the area represented by white frames in A-C. The three forms of Hh accumulate in dor8 clones, indicating an active process of degradation. There is precise direct correlation between the amounts of accumulated wild type Hh and Ptc in A (see graph), but not in the case of the lipid-unmodified Hh forms, where Ptc is not acculumated (see graphs in B,C). (D-F) dor8- clones in ap-Gal4/UAS-Hh-GFP (D), ap-Gal4/UAS-HhN-GFP (E) and ap-Gal4/UAS-Hhc85s-GFP (F) wing imaginal discs. There is increased accumulation of HhN-GFP and Hhc85s-GFP in dor- clones, induced both in the A and P compartments, even when they are located far from their expressing domains (arrows in E,F). However, wild-type Hh-GFP accumulates over a very short range in A compartment dor- clones (arrows in D) and is never accumulated in P compartment dor- clones (arrowheads in D). The accumulation of HhN-GFP and Hhc85s-GFP (green) in the P compartment dor- cells, where Ptc (red) is not present, indicates a process of internalization and degradation independent of Ptc (arrowheads in E,F). This is reinforced by the absence of Ptc accumulation in A compartment dor- clones in the case of Hhc85s-GFP (arrows in F). In the case of HhN-GFP, the small amount of Ptc accumulation in dor- clones induced in the A compartment reveals some interaction between HhN and the Ptc receptor (arrows in E). The diagrams on the right-hand side of the figure represent the areas of the disc shown in the confocal panels and the interpretation of the results shown.

View larger version (92K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Inductive effect of HhN but not of Hh from peripodial cells upon disc proper cells. (A-C') Expression of Hh-GFP (A,a,A',a'), HhN-GFP (B,b,B',b') and Hhc85s-GFP (C,c,C',c') in peripodial cells using the Ubx-Gal4 driver. The Ubx is expressed at high levels in the part of the peripodial membrane corresponding to the P compartment (arrowheads in A,B,C). HhN-GFP and Hhc85s-GFP, but not wild-type Hh-GFP, are observed in internalized vesicles in the cells of the disc proper (arrows in posterior and arrowheads in anterior compartment in A',B',C'). The internalized vesicles of HhN-GFP are more clearly visualized in the A than in the P compartment, unlike Hhc85s-GFP vesicles, which are visible in both A and P compartments. Dpp (red) is ectopically induced in the disc proper cells in HhN-GFP/Ubx-Gal4 disc (B,B'). (D-G) Wing and notum phenotypes of the Hh-GFP/Ubx-Gal4 and Hhc85s-GFP/Ubx-Gal4 (D,F), HhN-GFP/Ubx-Gal4 flies (E,G). The notum is enlarged and contains extra-macrochaetae (G) and there is modification of the wing pattern (E) in HhN-GFP/Ubx-Gal4 flies. (H) Diagrams showing the organization of the disc proper cells and peripodial cells in a front- and transverse view of a wing imaginal disc.

	DISCUSSION

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
This work indicates that interaction between lipid-modified Hh and HSPGs is required to restrict the movement of Hh to the extracellular matrix and promote optimal activation of the Hh pathway. This finding is based, first, on the analysis of the spreading and signaling properties of the lipid-unmodified forms of Hh and, second, on the responses shown by cells mutant for the genes that synthesize HSPGs to lipid-modified and unmodified forms of Hh.

One of the first observations made when expressing the lipid-unmodified forms of Hh is an extended gradient compared with that elicited by wild-type Hh (Fig. 1B-D). It is known that Hh gradient formation depends on the presence of its receptor Ptc, which is responsible for the internalization and degradation of Hh (reviewed by Torroja et al., 2005). Thus, we analyzed the internalization and degradation of lipid-unmodified forms of Hh, in the search for an explanation for the vast expansion of the gradient. We found that these mutant forms of Hh were efficiently internalized and degraded throughout the disc. So, why is there an extended gradient? One clue emerged from our analysis of Hh internalization in shi mutant cells. We found that the lipid-unmodified forms of Hh were internalized through the apical side of the epithelium, while wild-type Hh is internalized mainly through the basolateral surface. This differential internalization matches the preferential localization of lipid-unmodified Hh at the apical surface plasma membrane of A compartment cells. We also found that the lipid-unmodified forms of Hh can be internalized and degraded through a Ptc-independent mechanism. Thus, it is possible that this Ptc-independent mechanism would have no positive feedback from Hh, and would therefore not work as efficiently as when internalization was mediated by Ptc (see Lander et al., 2002) or by just a lower rate of internalization and degradation of Ptc. Alternatively or in addition, a reduced restriction of spreading through the extracellular matrix could explain why the gradient is extended. In agreement with this, we observed that the localization of lipid-unmodified Hh is not affected in mutants for HSPGs (data not shown). Furthermore, Hh is less represented at the basolateral membrane in the absence of HSPGs (Gorfinkiel et al., 2005), indicating an active role of HSPGs in anchoring lipid-modified Hh in the lateral cell region. This conclusion is further supported by the localization of the glypican Dally-like at the basolateral membrane of wing imaginal disc cells (Baeg et al., 2004; Han et al., 2005).

View larger version (98K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Signaling activity of Hh, HhN and Hhc85s. (A) A wing imaginal disc with the posterior P compartment cells expressing Hh (green) and the anterior A compartment cell expressing Ptc (red) in response to Hh. The red frame indicates the territory represented in the adjacent panel, showing the real staining of the wing disc with Hh (green) and Ptc (red) antibodies. The right panel shows the expression of different Hh target genes in A compartment cells. (B) The different thresholds of Hh signaling required for the activation of the different targets. Ectopic Hh-GFP (C-F), HhN-GFP (G-J) and Hhc85s-GFP (K-N) clones induce activation of En (C,G,K), Ptc (D,H,L), Dpp (E,I,M) and Iro (F,J,N) in the anterior compartment (labeled in red). Hh-expressing cells are marked by b-Gal (blue) in most of the panels, with the exception of panels E, I and M, where they are labeled by the absence of CD2 (blue). Arrows indicate the autonomous response and arrowheads indicate the non-autonomous response to various forms of Hh. (O-Q) The activation of Hh targets by ectopic Hh-GFP (O), HhN-GFP (P) and Hhc85s-GFP (Q) clones in the A compartment. Light green represents the levels and graded distribution of Hh protein and the dark green represents the signaling activity of wild-type Hh, HhN-GFP and Hhc85s-GFP. In O, but not in P and Q, Hh protein distribution is the same as its signaling activity gradient.

View larger version (94K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Diffusion properties and signaling activity of Hh-GFP, HhN-GFP and Hhc85s-GFP in ttv- mutant cells. (A-K) ttv- clones labeled by the absence of b-gal staining (blue) in wing discs expressing Hh-GFP (A-C), HhN-GFP (E-G) and Hhc85s-GFP (I-K) with the hh-Gal4 driver (green) and stained for Ptc (A,E,I), Col (B,F,J) and Iro (C,G,K) in red. HhN-GFP and Hhc85s-GFP, but not wild-type Hh-GFP, appear inside the ttv- cells and in the cells located anterior to the clone (arrows in E,I). Ptc and Col are expressed only in the first row of ttv- cells next to the AP border (arrowheads in A,B,E,F,I,J) and Hh-GFP vesicles co-localize with Ptc in all cases (arrowheads in A). Iro is expressed only in the first row of cells in the wild-type Hh-GFP- and Hhc85s-GFP-expressing discs (arrows in C,K). In HhN-GFP-expressing discs, Iro is activated throughout the ttv- clone (arrowheads in G, clone 1 in H). However, Iro expression decreases in a clone far from the HhN-GFP-producing cells because HhN-GFP levels are lower than at the AP compartment border (arrow in G, clone 2 in H). (D,H,L) Graphs showing the activation of Ptc, Col and Iro in ttv- clones abutting the AP compartment border (clone 1) or located distant to the AP border (clone 2) by wild-type Hh-GFP (D), HhN-GFP (H) and Hhc85s-GFP (L). The light green represents Hh levels and the graded distribution of the protein produced in the P compartment and secreted to the A compartment; the dark green represents the signaling activity induced by the different Hh forms. The broken lines represent the Hh gradients and signaling activity in a disc that does not contain ttv- clones.

In the formation of the Hh morphogenetic gradient throughout the extracellular matrix, we have to consider not only the function of HSPGs, rendering a restricted space suitable for the spreading of Hh (reviewed by Lin, 2004; Tabata and Takei, 2004) but also a possible role of HSPGs in signal reception. Thus, if a specific HSPG acts as a co-receptor for Hh together with Ptc, binding the ligand to the HSPG and to the receptor, it could limit the range of ligand movement and, at the same time, boost the signaling process. In effect, compelling evidence in the fly embryo and in fly tissue culture cells indicates that the presentation of Hh to Ptc might require a specific HSPG such as Dally-like (Desbordes and Sanson, 2003; Lum et al., 2003). In this sense, we show here that HSPG function is also required for Hh reception in the imaginal disc, but only to trigger Hh high-threshold response genes (Figs 7, 8). Thus, it is plausible that Hh coupled to a specific HSPG could form a high-affinity complex together with Ptc to allow these high-threshold responses. However, we observed that in the wing imaginal disc, Hh lacking cholesterol was able to induce the same low responses as fully lipid-modified Hh, in both cases in an HSPG-independent manner. This suggests that the low-level response of the pathway might involve a different reception complex in which HSPGs are not necessary.

View larger version (56K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 8. Signaling activity of Hh-GFP, HhN-GFP and Hhc85s-GFP in cells lacking tout-velu function and simultaneously expressing Hh. (A-D) Wing imaginal discs with clones mutant for ttv that also express wild-type Hh ectopically. All clones in the anterior compartment shown in the figure are located outside the expression domain of the different target genes tested. Clones are marked with GFP (A-D) and outlined with a red line (A'-D'). The discs are stained for different Hh targets (red): En (A,A'), Ptc (B,B'), Iro (C,C') and Ci (D,D'). (E) The results of the clone analysis. Hh triggers the response of low-threshold responses (Ci and Iro) in ttv- cells, while failing to activate high-threshold response genes (Ptc, En and Col) apart from the first row of cells within the clone.

Also in the embryonic epidermis, it has been proposed that apically distributed Hh LPSs are needed to activate Wg in anterior cells (Gallet et al., 2003). However, in the wing disc, we observed that all forms of Hh produced punctate structures, both apical and basolateral, which are also observed using different Hh antibodies (see Fig. S1 in the supplementary material). These structures are endocytic vesicles and are the result of the accumulation of Hh in the endocytic compartment rather than the visualization of multimeric lipid-modified Hh complexes moving from one cell to another. The high accretion of Hh observed in the dor^- clones indicates that these large endocytic vesicles are targeted to the degradation pathway.

Hh lipidation seems to confer a specific conformation to the Hh molecule so that it is targeted to specific locations in the receiving cells for signaling. Hence, the Ptc receptor might be located in sterol-rich membrane microdomains or lipid rafts in Drosophila, which function as platforms for intracellular sorting and signal transduction (Rietveld et al., 1999) (reviewed by Incardona and Eaton, 2000). Hh without lipids might not recognize these platforms, resulting in less efficient signaling. Interestingly, we observed that the internalization of the lipid-unmodified Hh that was not mediated by Ptc, which is more striking in the case of Hhc85s. HhN has less potency to activate the Hh pathway than wild-type Hh. As previously reported (Lee et al., 2001; Gallet et al., 2003), HhN has less potency to activate the Hh pathway than wild-type Hh. Hhc85s is much less potent than HhN (Fig. 6) and Hhc85sN is even less potent (data not shown). As we have shown, this low response in terms of target activation of unlipidated forms of Hh could be explained by their diminished access to Ptc.

The literature contains several contradictory conclusions regarding the signaling functions of Hh lipids in the mouse and Drosophila. Thus, the elimination of cholesterol has been reported to have a major effect on Hh signaling in vertebrates but only minor effects in Drosophila (Porter et al., 1996a; Burke et al., 1999). However, the diffusion of Drosophila HhN and Hhc85s differs from that of their vertebrate counterparts. In vertebrates, forms of Shh lacking cholesterol or palmitic acid showed restricted signaling and diffusion (Lewis et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2004), while in Drosophila, Hh without lipids is able to diffuse longer distances (Porter et al., 1996a; Burke et al., 1999). It is likely that the different structural characteristics of the target tissues where Hh acts could account for differences in the lipid requirements of signaling and diffusion between Drosophila and vertebrates. The wing imaginal disc consists of a single-layered sac of polarized epithelial cells with their apical surfaces orientated towards the disc lumen. If the extracellular matrix were not able to retain lipid-unmodified Hh, this molecule would be delivered to the disc lumen. The peculiar structure of the wing disc concentrates the lipid-unmodified forms of Hh in the lumen and this is likely to promote the activation of low-threshold target genes in cells far away from the Hh-producing cells. A role for the luminal transmission of ligands has already been described for Dpp signaling in Drosophila wing disc (Gibson et al., 2002). By contrast, we show here that only lipid-unmodified Hh can travel from the peripodial membrane to the disc proper cells (Fig. 5). Our results indicate that wild-type Hh is not traveling from the peripodial membrane towards the wing disc. In other systems, Hh without lipids might be lost because it is not retained and stabilised by the extracellular matrix; therefore, it would be expected that very restricted diffusion and signaling of non lipid-modified forms of Hh occurs, as demonstrated by previously (Chamoun et al., 2001; Kohtz et al., 2001; Lee et al., 2001; Lewis and Eisen, 2001; Chen et al., 2004). Our results indicate that the role of lipids in Hh signaling is similar in Drosophila and vertebrates, and corroborate the previous notion that lipid-modified forms of Hh are predominantly membrane associated and that Hh mutated forms lacking lipid adducts dissociate from cells after secretion (Lee et al., 1994; Porter et al., 1995; Pepinsky et al., 1998; Peters et al., 2004). In summary, we conclude that dual lipid modification, by cholesterol and palmitic acid, appears to be crucial for interaction between Hh and HSPGs, as well as the Ptc receptor, and that these interactions are important both for a precise Hh spreading through the epithelium surface and for proper Hh reception.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
We are very grateful to Nicole Gorfinkiel, Kiki Lalioti and Ignacio Sandoval for their help and discussions, to Carmen Ibañez for her excellent technical assistance and to Ernesto Sánchez-Herrero and Aphrodite Bilioni for comments on the manuscript. We also thank T. Tabata for the anti-Hh antibody, A. Vincent for the anti-Col antibody, R. Holmgren for the anti-Ci antibody and J. Modolell for the anti-caupolican antibody. Fly strains were provided by X. Lin, L. S. Shashidhara, J. Treisman, S. Zipursky, G. Morata, K. Basler, T. Kornberg, H. Kramers, S. Bray, T. Tabata and the Bloomington stock center. This study was financed by the Spanish D.G.I.C.Y.T., grants BFU2005-04183/BMC and MCYT GEN2001-4846-C05-01, the Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid, grant GR/SAL/0185/2004, and by an institutional grant from the Fundación Areces. L.Q. is supported by an I3P contract of the CSIC.

	Footnotes

 
Supplementary material

Supplementary material for this article is available at http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/133/3/471/DC1

^* These authors contributed equally to this work

Present address: The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, The Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK

	REFERENCES

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

Ahn, S. and Joyner, A. L. (2004). Dynamic changes in the response of cells to positive hedgehog signaling during mouse limb patterning. Cell 118,505 -516.[CrossRef][Medline]

Amanai, K. and Jiang, J. (2001). Distinct roles of Central missing and Dispatched in sending the Hedgehog signal. Development 128,5119 -5127.[Medline]

Baeg, G. H., Selva, E. M., Goodman, R. M., Dasgupta, R. and Perriman, N. (2004). The wingless morphogen gradient is established by the cooperative action of Frizzled and Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan receptors. Dev. Biol. 276,89 -100.[CrossRef][Medline]

Basler, K. and Struhl, G. (1994). Compartment boundaries and the control of Drosophila limb pattern by hedgehog protein. Nature 368,208 -214.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bellaiche, Y., The, I. and Perrimon, N. (1998). Tout-velu is a Drosophila homologue of the putative tumour suppressor EXT-1 and is needed for Hh diffusion. Nature 394, 85-88.[CrossRef][Medline]

Blackman, R. K., Sanicola, M., Raftery, L. A., Gillevet, T. and Gelbart, W. M. (1991). An extensive 3' cis-regulatory region directs the imaginal disk expression of decapentaplegic, a member of the TGF-beta family in Drosophila. Development 111,657 -666.[Abstract]

Bornemann, D. J., Duncan, J. E., Staatz, W., Selleck, S. and Warrior, R. (2004). Abrogation of heparan sulfate synthesis in Drosophila disrupts the Wingless, Hedgehog and Decapentaplegic signaling pathways. Development 131,1927 -1938.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brand, A. H. and Perrimon, N. (1993). Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118,401 -415.[Abstract]

Briscoe, J., Chen, Y., Jessell, T. M. and Struhl, G. (2001). A hedgehog-insensitive form of patched provides evidence for direct long-range morphogen activity of sonic hedgehog in the neural tube. Mol. Cell 7,1279 -1291.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bumcrot, D. A., Takada, R. and McMahon, A. P. (1995). Proteolytic processing yields two secreted forms of Sonic hedgehog. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15,2294 -2303.[Abstract]

Burke, R., Nellen, D., Bellotto, M., Hafen, E., Senti, K. A., Dickson, B. J. and Basler, K. (1999). Dispatched, a novel sterol-sensing domain protein dedicated to the release of cholesterol-modified hedgehog from signaling cells. Cell 99,803 -815.[CrossRef][Medline]

Calleja, M., Moreno, E., Pelaz, S. and Morata, G. (1996). Visualization of gene expression in living adult Drosophila. Science 274,252 -255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Capdevila, J., Pariente, F., Sampedro, J., Alonso, J. L. and Guerrero, I. (1994). Subcellular localization of the segment polarity protein patched suggests an interaction with the wingless reception complex in Drosophila embryos. Development 120,987 -998.[Abstract]

Chamoun, Z., Mann, R. K., Nellen, D., von Kessler, D. P., Bellotto, M., Beachy, P. A. and Basler, K. (2001). Skinny hedgehog, an acyltransferase required for palmitoylation and activity of the hedgehog signal. Science 293,2080 -2084.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Charron, F. and Tessier-Lavigne, M. (2005). Novel brain wiring functions for classical morphogens: a role as graded positional cues in axon guidance. Development 132,2251 -2262.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Charron, F., Stein, E., Jeong, J., McMahon, A. P. and Tessier-Lavigne, M. (2003). The morphogen sonic hedgehog is an axonal chemoattractant that collaborates with netrin-1 in midline axon guidance. Cell 113,11 -23.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chen, M. H., Li, Y. J., Kawakami, T., Xu, S. M. and Chuang, P. T. (2004). Palmitoylation is required for the production of a soluble multimeric Hedgehog protein complex and long-range signaling in vertebrates. Genes Dev. 18,641 -659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

de Celis, J. F. (1998). Positioning and differentiation of veins in the Drosophila wing. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 42,335 -343.[Medline]

Desbordes, S. C. and Sanson, B. (2003). The glypican Dally-like is required for Hedgehog signalling in the embryonic epidermis of Drosophila. Development 130,6245 -6255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Diez del Corral, R., Aroca, P., Gómez-Skarmeta, J., Cavodeassi, F. and Modolell, J. (1999). The Iroquois homeodomain proteins are required to specify body wall identity in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 13,1754 -1761.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Echelard, Y., Epstein, D. J., St-Jacques, B., Shen, L., Mohler, J., McMahon, J. A. and McMahon, A. P. (1993). Sonic hedgehog, a member of a family of putative signaling molecules, is implicated in the regulation of CNS polarity. Cell 75,1417 -1430.[CrossRef][Medline]

Entchev, E. V., Schwabedissen, A. and González-Gaitán, M. (2000). Gradient formation of the TGF-beta homolog Dpp. Cell 103,981 -991.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gallet, A. and Therond, P. P. (2005). Temporal modulation of the Hedgehog morphogen gradient by a patched-dependent targeting to lysosomal compartment. Dev. Biol. 277, 51-62.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gallet, A., Rodriguez, R., Ruel, L. and Therond, P. P. (2003). Cholesterol modification of hedgehog is required for trafficking and movement, revealing an asymmetric cellular response to hedgehog. Dev. Cell 4,191 -204.[CrossRef][Medline]

García-Bellido, A., Ripoll, P. and Morata, G. (1973). Developmental compartmentalisation of the wing disk of Drosophila. Nat. New Biol. 245,251 -253.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gibson, M. C., Lehman, D. A. and Schubiger, G. (2002). Lumenal transmission of decapentaplegic in Drosophila imaginal discs. Dev. Cell 3, 451-460.[CrossRef][Medline]

Glise, B., Miller, C. A., Crozatier, M., Halbisen, M. A., Wise, S., Olson, D. J., Vincent, A. and Blair, S. S. (2005). Shifted, the Drosophila ortholog of Wnt inhibitory factor-1, controls the distribution and movement of Hedgehog. Dev. Cell 8, 255-266.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gorfinkiel, N., Sierra, J., Callejo, A., Ibanez, C. and Guerrero, I. (2005). The Drosophila ortholog of the human Wnt inhibitor factor Shifted controls the diffusion of lipid-modified Hedgehog. Dev. Cell 8,241 -253.[CrossRef][Medline]

Grigliatti, T. A., Hall, L., Rosenbluth, R. and Suzuki, D. T. (1973). Temperature-sensitive mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. XIV. A selection of immobile adults. Mol. Gen. Genet. 120,107 -114.[CrossRef][Medline]

Guillen, I., Mullor, J. L., Capdevila, J., Sanchez-Herrero, E., Morata, G. and Guerrero, I. (1995). The function of engrailed and the specification of Drosophila wing pattern. Development 121,3447 -3456.[Abstract]

Han, C., Belenkaya, T. Y., Wang, B. and Lin, X. (2004). Drosophila glypicans control the cell-to-cell movement of Hedgehog by a dynamin-independent process. Development 131,601 -611.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Han, C., Yan, D., Belenkaya, T. Y. and Lin, X. (2005). Drosophila glypicans Dally and Dally-like shape the extracellular Wingless morphogen gradient in the wing disc. Development 132,667 -679.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Harfe, B. D., Scherz, P. J., Nissim, S., Tian, H., McMahon, A. P. and Tabin, C. J. (2004). Evidence for an expansion-based temporal Shh gradient in specifying vertebrate digit identities. Cell 118,517 -528.[CrossRef][Medline]

Heemskerk, J. and DiNardo, S. (1994). Drosophila hedgehog acts as a morphogen in cellular patterning. Cell 76,449 -460.[CrossRef][Medline]

Incardona, J. P. and Eaton, S. (2000). Cholesterol in signal transduction. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12,193 -203.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ingham, P. W. and McMahon, A. P. (2001). Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles. Genes Dev. 15,3059 -3087.[Free Full Text]

Kohtz, J. D., Lee, H. Y., Gaiano, N., Segal, J., Ng, E., Larson, T., Baker, D. P., Garber, E. A., Williams, K. P. and Fishell, G. (2001). N-terminal fatty-acylation of sonic hedgehog enhances the induction of rodent ventral forebrain neurons. Development 128,2351 -2363.[Medline]

Koziel, L., Kunath, M., Kelly, O. G. and Vortkamp, A. (2004). Ext1-dependent heparan sulfate regulates the range of Ihh signaling during endochondral ossification. Dev. Cell 6, 801-813.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lander, A. D., Nie, Q. and Wan, F. Y. (2002). Do morphogen gradients arise by diffusion? Dev. Cell 2, 785-796.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lee, J. D. and Treisman, J. E. (2001). Sightless has homology to transmembrane acyltransferases and is required to generate active Hedgehog protein. Curr. Biol. 11,1147 -1152.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lee, J. D., Kraus, P., Gaiano, N., Nery, S., Kohtz, J., Fishell, G., Loomis, C. A. and Treisman, J. E. (2001). An acylatable residue of Hedgehog is differentially required in Drosophila and mouse limb development. Dev. Biol. 233,122 -136.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lee, J. J., Ekker, S. C., von Kessler, D. P., Porter, J. A., Sun, B. I. and Beachy, P. A. (1994). Autoproteolysis in hedgehog protein biogenesis. Science 266,1528 -1537.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lee, T. and Luo, L. (1999). Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis. Neuron 22,451 -461.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lewis, K. E. and Eisen, J. S. (2001). Hedgehog signaling is required for primary motoneuron induction in zebrafish. Development 128,3485 -3495.[Medline]

Lewis, P. M., Dunn, M. P., McMahon, J. A., Logan, M., Martin, J. F., St-Jacques, B. and McMahon, A. P. (2001). Cholesterol modification of sonic hedgehog is required for long-range signaling activity and effective modulation of signaling by Ptc1. Cell 105,599 -612.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lin, X. (2004). Functions of heparan sulfate proteoglycans in cell signaling during development. Development 131,6009 -6021.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lum, L., Yao, S., Mozer, B., Rovescalli, A., Von Kessler, D., Nirenberg, M. and Beachy, P. A. (2003). Identification of Hedgehog pathway components by RNAi in Drosophila cultured cells. Science 299,2039 -2045.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ma, C., Zhou, Y., Beachy, P. A. and Moses, K. (1993). The segment polarity gene hedgehog is required for progression of the morphogenetic furrow in the developing Drosophila eye. Cell 75,927 -938.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mann, R. K. and Beachy, P. A. (2004). Novel lipid modifications of secreted protein signals. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73,891 -923.[CrossRef][Medline]

Marti, E., Bumcrot, D. A., Takada, R. and McMahon, A. P. (1995). Requirement of 19K form of Sonic hedgehog for induction of distinct ventral cell types in CNS explants. Nature 375,322 -325.[CrossRef][Medline]

McMahon, A. P., Ingham, P. W. and Tabin, C. J. (2003). Developmental roles and clinical significance of hedgehog signaling. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 53, 1-114.[Medline]

Micchelli, C. A., The, I., Selva, E., Mogila, V. and Perrimon, N. (2002). Rasp, a putative transmembrane acyltransferase, is required for Hedgehog signaling. Development 129,843 -851.[Medline]

Motzny, C. K. and Holmgren, R. (1995). The Drosophila cubitus interruptus protein and its role in the wingless and hedgehog signal transduction pathways. Mech. Dev. 52,137 -150.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mullor, J. L. and Guerrero, I. (2000). A gain-of-function mutant of patched dissects different responses to the Hedgehog gradient. Dev. Biol. 228,211 -224.[CrossRef][Medline]

Munro, S. and Freeman, M. (2000). The notch signalling regulator fringe acts in the Golgi apparatus and requires the glycosyltransferase signature motif DXD. Curr. Biol. 10,813 -820.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ohlmeyer, J. T. and Kalderon, D. (1998). Hedgehog stimulates maturation of Cubitus interruptus into a labile transcriptional activator. Nature 396,749 -753.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pallavi, S. K. and Shashidhara, L. S. (2003). Egfr/Ras pathway mediates interactions between peripodial and disc proper cells in Drosophila wing discs. Development 130,4931 -4941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Patel, N. H., Kornberg, T. B. and Goodman, C. S. (1989). Expression of engrailed during segmentation in grasshopper and crayfish. Development 107,201 -212.[Abstract]

Pepinsky, R. B., Zeng, C., Wen, D., Rayhorn, P., Baker, D. P., Williams, K. P., Bixler, S. A., Ambrose, C. M., Garber, E. A., Miatkowski, K. et al. (1998). Identification of a palmitic acid-modified form of human Sonic hedgehog. J. Biol. Chem. 273,14037 -14045.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Peters, C., Wolf, A., Wagner, M., Kuhlmann, J. and Waldmann, H. (2004). The cholesterol membrane anchor of the Hedgehog protein confers stable membrane association to lipid-modified proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101,8531 -8536.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Phillips, R. G., Roberts, I. J., Ingham, P. W. and Whittle, J. R. (1990). The Drosophila segment polarity gene patched is involved in a position-signalling mechanism in imaginal discs. Development 110,105 -114.[Abstract]

Pignoni, F. and Zipursky, S. L. (1997). Induction of Drosophila eye development by decapentaplegic. Development 124,271 -278.[Abstract]

Porter, J. A., von, Kessler, D. P., Ekker, S. C., Young, K. E., Lee, J. J., Moses, K. and Beachy, P. A. (1995). The product of hedgehog autoproteolytic cleavage active in local and long-range signalling. Nature 374,363 -366.[CrossRef][Medline]

Porter, J. A., Ekker, S. C., Park, W. J., von Kessler, D. P., Young, K. E., Chen, C. H., Ma, Y., Woods, A. S., Cotter, R. J., Koonin, E. V. et al. (1996a). Hedgehog patterning activity: role of a lipophilic modification mediated by the carboxy-terminal autoprocessing domain. Cell 86,21 -34.[CrossRef][Medline]

Porter, J. A., Young, K. E. and Beachy, P. A. (1996b). Cholesterol modification of hedgehog signaling proteins in animal development. Science 274,255 -259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rietveld, A., Neutz, S., Simons, K. and Eaton, S. (1999). Association of sterol- and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked proteins with Drosophila raft lipid microdomains. J. Biol. Chem. 274,12049 -12054.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sanchez-Herrero, E., Couso, J. P., Capdevila, J. and Guerrero, I. (1996). The fu gene discriminates between pathways to control dpp expression in Drosophila imaginal discs. Mech. Dev. 55,159 -170.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sevrioukov, E. A., He, J. P., Moghrabi, N., Sunio, A. and Kramer, H. (1999). A role for the deep orange and carnation eye color genes in lysosomal delivery in Drosophila. Mol. Cell 4,479 -486.[CrossRef][Medline]

Shestopal, S. A., Makunin, I. V., Belyaeva, E. S., Ashburner, M. and Zhimulev, I. F. (1997). Molecular characterization of the deep orange (dor) gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Gen. Genet. 253,642 -648.[CrossRef][Medline]

Strigini, M. and Cohen, S. M. (2000). Wingless gradient formation in the Drosophila wing. Curr. Biol. 10,293 -300.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tabata, T. and Kornberg, T. B. (1994). Hedgehog is a signaling protein with a key role in patterning Drosophila imaginal discs. Cell 76,89 -102.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tabata, T. and Takei, Y. (2004). Morphogens, their identification and regulation. Development 131,703 -712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Takei, Y., Ozawa, Y., Sato, M., Watanabe, A. and Tabata, T. (2004). Three Drosophila EXT genes shape morphogen gradients through synthesis of heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Development 131,73 -82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tanimoto, H., Itoh, S., ten Dijke, P. and Tabata, T. (2000). Hedgehog creates a gradient of DPP activity in Drosophila wing imaginal discs. Mol. Cell 5, 59-71.[CrossRef][Medline]

The, I., Bellaiche, Y. and Perrimon, N. (1999). Hedgehog movement is regulated through tout velu-dependent synthesis of a heparan sulfate proteoglycan. Mol. Cell 4, 633-639.[CrossRef][Medline]

Therond, P. P., Limbourg Bouchon, B., Gallet, A., Dussilol, F., Pietri, T., van den Heuvel, M. and Tricoire, H. (1999). Differential requirements of the fused kinase for hedgehog signalling in the Drosophila embryo. Development 126,4039 -4051.[Abstract]

Tian, H., Jeong, J., Harfe, B. D., Tabin, C. J. and McMahon, A. P. (2005). Mouse Disp1 is required in sonic hedgehog-expressing cells for paracrine activity of the cholesterol-modified ligand. Development 132,133 -142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Torroja, C., Gorfinkiel, N. and Guerrero, I. (2004). Patched controls the Hedgehog gradient by endocytosis in a dynamin-dependent manner, but this internalization does not play a major role in signal transduction. Development 131,2395 -2408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Torroja, C., Gorfinkiel, N. and Guerrero, I. (2005). Mechanisms of Hedgehog gradient formation and interpretation. J. Neurobiol. 64,334 -356.[CrossRef][Medline]

Vervoort, M., Crozatier, M., Valle, D. and Vincent, A. (1999). The COE transcription factor collier is a mediator of short-range hedgehog-induced patterning of the drosophila wing. Curr. Biol. 9,632 -639.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zecca, M., Basler, K. and Struhl, G. (1995). Sequential organizing activities of engrailed, hedgehog and decapentaplegic in the Drosophila wing. Development 121,2265 -2278.[Abstract]

Zeng, X., Goetz, J. A., Suber, L. M., Scott, W. J., Jr, Schreiner, C. M. and Robbins, D. J. (2001). A freely diffusible form of Sonic hedgehog mediates long-range signalling. Nature 411,716 -720.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhu, A. J., Zheng, L., Suyama, K. and Scott, M. P. (2003). Altered localization of Drosophila Smoothened protein activates Hedgehog signal transduction. Genes Dev. 17,1240 -1252.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

Twitter

Related articles in Development:

Hedgehog: a low cholesterol spread?

Development 2006 133: e301. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Varjosalo and J. Taipale Hedgehog: functions and mechanisms Genes & Dev., September 15, 2008; 22(18): 2454 - 2472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Buglino and M. D. Resh Hhat Is a Palmitoylacyltransferase with Specificity for N-Palmitoylation of Sonic Hedgehog J. Biol. Chem., August 8, 2008; 283(32): 22076 - 22088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Casso, S. Liu, D. D. Iwaki, S. K. Ogden, and T. B. Kornberg A Screen for Modifiers of Hedgehog Signaling in Drosophila melanogaster Identifies swm and mts Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1399 - 1413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Callejo, J. Culi, and I. Guerrero Patched, the receptor of Hedgehog, is a lipoprotein receptor PNAS, January 22, 2008; 105(3): 912 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Huang, Y. Litingtung, and C. Chiang Region-specific requirement for cholesterol modification of sonic hedgehog in patterning the telencephalon and spinal cord Development, June 1, 2007; 134(11): 2095 - 2105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Varjosalo and J. Taipale Hedgehog signaling J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2007; 120(1): 3 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. McLellan, S. Yao, X. Zheng, B. V. Geisbrecht, R. Ghirlando, P. A. Beachy, and D. J. Leahy From the Cover: Structure of a heparin-dependent complex of Hedgehog and Ihog PNAS, November 14, 2006; 103(46): 17208 - 17213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Wendler, X. Franch-Marro, and J.-P. Vincent How does cholesterol affect the way Hedgehog works? Development, August 15, 2006; 133(16): 3055 - 3061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Summary Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material All Versions of this Article: dev.02217v1 133/3/471    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in Development Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Callejo, A. Articles by Guerrero, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Callejo, A. Articles by Guerrero, I. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?