spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 3


Fig. 3. Developmental series analysis reveals a delay and premature termination of foliation. At P0, the wild-type (A) and Gli2-En1 cko mutant (B) cerebella appear similar in size in whole mount. By P2, a slight difference in size is observed between wild type (E) and mutant (F). The mutant cerebellum at P5 (J) is clearly smaller than that of the wild-type (I). Histological analysis of sagittal sections at P0, P2, and P5 of wild-type (C,G,K) and Gli2-En1 cko (D,H,L) cerebella show shallower fissures, and a thinner EGL in mutants. (M-T) The mutant cerebellum does not increase in size after P8 (N,P,R,T) compared with the continued growth observed after P8 in wild-type (M,O,Q,S). The overall anteroposterior pattern of foliation appears intact, although the number of fissures present in P16 mutants (T) is comparable to the number present in wild type at P2 (S). (U-Z) At P0, the mutant EGL (X) is thinner than in wild type (U). By P5, the wild-type EGL has thickened to more than 10 cell layers (V), whereas the mutant EGL contains 2-4 cell layers (Y). By P8, the wild-type EGL remains thick (W), in contrast to the mutant EGL, which has been depleted (Z). Arrows indicate principle fissures forming cardinal lobes, asterisks indicate fissures forming lobules and open circles represent fissures forming sublobules. Broken yellow line indicates pial surface between two lobules; broken blue line outlines the cerebellum. Scale bar: 250 µm in C,D,G,H; 350 µm in K,L; 500 µm in O,P,S,T.





Right arrow Return to article