spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 2


Fig. 2. Modulation of Nemo affects the spacing of veins and wing cell density. (A-C) Comparison of intervein distances between wild-type (A) and nmoadk2/nmoadk2 (B) Drosophila wings. (C) Superimposition of the two wings, showing that nmo L2 and L5 veins (arrows) are spaced further apart than in the wild type. (D-F) Comparison of intervein distances between an omb-Gal4/+ control (D) and omb-Gal4/+; UAS-nmo/+ (E). (F) Superimposition of the two wings, showing that omb>nmo L2 and L5 veins (arrows) are closer together than in the omb-Gal4 control. (G) A wild-type wing with the numbering scheme depicted for the measured intervals, 1-4. (H) Measurement of intervein regions in the wild type, omb-Gal4/+, omb>nmo and nmoadk2. (I-L) Cell density within a given region in the wing blade of the wild type (I,J) and nmoadk2/nmoadk2 (K,L) was calculated by counting trichome density in the indicated squares (I,K; the location of the counted regions is indicated with an asterisk in J,L). The results are shown in Table 1.





Right arrow Return to article