|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online May 16, 2007
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.001388
1 in postmigratory enteric neurons triggers unconventional neuronal death in the colon and causes a Hirschsprung's disease phenotype
1 Laboratory for Neuronal Differentiation and Regeneration, RIKEN Center for
Developmental Biology, Kobe 650-0047, Japan.
2 Departments of Medicine, Renal Division, Washington University School of
Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
3 Laboratory for Cellular Morphogenesis, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology,
Kobe 650-0047, Japan.
4 Department of Cell Biology and Neurosciences, Osaka University Graduate School
of Medicine, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
5 Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis,
MO 63110, USA.
* Authors for correspondence (e-mail: jeff{at}pathbox.wustl.edu; enomoto{at}cdb.riken.jp)
Accepted 19 March 2007
| SUMMARY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1,
the high affinity receptor for GDNF, in mice during late gestation induces
rapid and widespread neuronal death in the colon, leading to colon
aganglionosis reminiscent of Hirschsprung's disease. Enteric neuron death
induced by GFR
1 inactivation is not associated with
the activation of common cell death executors, caspase-3 or -7, and lacks the
morphological hallmarks of apoptosis, such as chromatin compaction and
mitochondrial pathology. Consistent with these in vivo observations, neither
caspase inhibition nor Bax deficiency blocks death of colon-derived enteric
neurons induced by GDNF deprivation. This study reveals an essential role for
GFR
1 in the survival of enteric neurons and suggests that
caspase-independent death can be triggered by abolition of neurotrophic
signals.
Key words: GFR
1, GDNF, Enteric neuron, Mouse
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The enteric nervous system (ENS) constitutes one division of the peripheral
nervous system and controls motility, secretion and blood flow in the
gastrointestinal tract. The ENS is extraordinarily autonomic, being able to
function by its own intrinsic neural circuits even when devoid of central
afferent innervations. Structurally, the ENS is organized into myenteric
(Auerbach) and submucosal (Meissner) plexi, each of which is comprised of
interconnected ganglia containing diverse sets of neurons and glia. The
majority of enteric neurons and glia originates from the vagal neural crest,
which is formed at the level of somites 1-7
(Le Douarin, 1986
). In mice,
the vagal neural crest-derived ENS progenitors first enter the foregut between
embryonic day 9.0-9.5 (E9.0-9.5) and successively undergo extensive
rostrocaudal migration in the gut mesenchyme until they, along with their
progeny, furnish the entire gastrointestinal tract at around E14.5
(Young et al., 1998
). As they
migrate, ENS progenitors proliferate to maintain cellular sources, and some of
their progeny begin to differentiate, as indicated by the onset of
pan-neuronal or neuronal population-specific marker (e.g. neurotransmitters)
expression at developmentally determined times and locations
(Young et al., 2003
).
Subsequently, neuronal and glial differentiation continues even after the gut
is colonized by ENS progenitors (Young et
al., 2003
). Thus, the development of the ENS is a complex,
asynchronous process that relies on the exquisite control of cell migration,
proliferation and differentiation of neural crest-derived progenitor cells and
their progeny in a spatiotemporally specific fashion.
Previous developmental studies have delineated a number of unique features
of the ENS with respect to neuronal survival and death. First, unlike other
areas of the nervous system, the developing ENS fails to exhibit evidence of
neuronal apoptosis (Gianino et al.,
2003
; Kruger et al.,
2003
). Consistent with this observation, genetic ablation of the
pro-apoptotic protein Bax, which increases final neuron counts in various
systems by protecting neurons from apoptotic death
(Deckwerth et al., 1996
), fails
to affect the number of neurons in the ENS
(Gianino et al., 2003
). These
results suggest that physiological neuronal death may not take place during
ENS development. Alternatively, enteric neurons may die in an unconventional
(non-apoptotic) fashion during normal development. It remains undetermined
whether the survival of enteric neurons depends on extracellular survival
signals in vivo and, if so, whether the absence of such factors results in the
activation of conserved molecular and morphological death pathways.
GDNF is a founding member of the GFL family and signals through a
multicomponent receptor complex consisting of a glycosyl-phosphatidyl-inositol
(GPI)-anchored cell surface protein, GFR
1, and the RET tyrosine kinase
(Airaksinen and Saarma, 2002
;
Baloh et al., 2000
). During ENS
development, GDNF is expressed in the gut mesenchyme, whereas both RET and
GFR
1 are expressed in ENS progenitors and neurons. As suggested by
these expression patterns, GDNF signaling via RET/GFR
1 is essential for
development of the ENS in vertebrates. For instance, in humans, mutations in
the Ret gene lead to increased susceptibility to Hirschsprung's
disease, a congenital disorder characterized by the absence of enteric ganglia
[intestinal aganglionosis (Newgreen and
Young, 2002a
; Newgreen and
Young, 2002b
)]. Mice deficient for GDNF,
GFR
1 or Ret display complete absence of enteric
ganglia in the gut distal to the stomach
(Airaksinen and Saarma, 2002
;
Baloh et al., 2000
).
Detailed analysis of Ret-deficient embryos revealed that ENS
progenitors are reduced in number and fail to enter the midgut, deficits that
are discernible as early as E10.5 (Durbec
et al., 1996
). Although these studies demonstrate the requirement
for GDNF signaling in the initial colonization of the gastrointestinal tract
by ENS progenitors, this early developmental deficit leads to the complete
depletion of the cellular source for the ENS in the small and large intestine,
precluding analysis of the physiological role of GDNF signaling in later ENS
development, especially in the distal portion of the gastrointestinal tract.
It seems likely that GDNF plays a role in later ENS development, as its
expression in the gastrointestinal tract persists after the deficits in
migration are observed (Golden et al.,
1999
;Young et al.,
2001
). For instance, a mitogenic role for GDNF during ENS
development was suggested by a study of embryos lacking one copy of the
GDNF gene (Shen et al.,
2002
), in which the proliferating ENS precursor population in the
midgut is significantly smaller at E12.5 than in wild-type littermates
(Gianino et al., 2003
).
Nevertheless, many aspects of GDNF function remain unknown due to the
remaining functional GDNF allele in heterozygous mice, and therefore
the physiological functions of GDNF, GFR
1 and RET during the
development of the ENS have yet to be fully explored.
We describe here the successful generation of a
GFR
1 conditional GFP reporter mouse line to elucidate
the biological role of GFR
1. By crossing GFR
1
conditional knockout mice with mice ubiquitously expressing inducible Cre
protein, we inactivated GFR
1 function in late ENS
development, particularly after vagal crest-derived ENS progenitors have
finished investing the entire gut. Disruption of GFR
1
at these later stages of ENS development induced unexpected widespread death
of enteric neurons specifically in the distal gastrointestinal tract, which
led to colon aganglionosis reminiscent of Hirschsprung's disease at birth.
This massive cell elimination in the GFR
1 conditional
knockout gut does not proceed by canonical apoptotic pathways. The present
study uncovers unique features in the control of neuronal survival and death
by GFR
1 that may underlie development and pathology
in the enteric nervous system.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 mice
1 gene
but allows the expression of the inserted gene
(Enomoto et al., 2004
1 allele was generated using embryonic stem
cell-based homologous recombination, and successive removal of the neo
cassette by crossing chimeric mice to ACTB-Flpe transgenic mice
(Rodriguez et al., 2000
1
mice (GFR
1flox/+) (see Fig. S2 in the
supplementary material). For time-specific inactivation of GFRa1,
GFRa1flox/flox mice were crossed to GFRa1
heterozygous mice (GFRa1+/-)
(Enomoto et al., 1998
The genotypes of mice carrying floxed GFRa1 or GFRa1
GFP-knock-in alleles were determined by PCR using oligonucleotides (see
Fig. S2C in the supplementary material): P1
(5'-CTTCCAGGTTGGGTCGGAACTGAACCC-3'); P2
(5'-AGAGAGCTCAGCGTGCAGAGATC-3'); P3
(5'-TTTACGTCGCCGTCCAGCTCGA-3'). Primers to genotype
GFRa1+/- are described elsewhere
(Enomoto et al., 1998
).
Histological analysis
GDNFlacZ/+ mice
(Moore et al., 1996
) (a kind
gift from V. Pachnis, MRI-NIMR, UK) were used for the
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal) staining. The
gastrointestinal tract was fixed in 0.2% glutaraldehyde, 5 mM EGTA, 2 mM
MgCl2, 0.1% NP-40, 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.2) for 30 minutes at 4°C and
incubated in X-gal solution for 4 hours at room temperature.
Immunohistochemistry and acetylcholinesterase histochemistry were performed
as described previously (Enomoto et al.,
1998
). The following antibodies were used for
immunohistochemistry: chicken anti-GFP (1:1000, Aves Labs), goat
anti-GFR
1 (1:500, Neuromics), rabbit anti-PGP9.5 (1:500, Ultra Clone),
rabbit anti-cleaved caspase-3 and -7 (1:300, Cell Signaling), rabbit
anti-phospho-ERK (1:500, Cell Signaling), rabbit anti-Phox2b [1:1000, a kind
gift from J-F. Brunet, CNRS UMR, France
(Pattyn et al., 1997
)], rabbit
anti-S100ß (1:500, NeoMarkers), mouse anti-TuJ1 (1:500, Covance).
Secondary Alexa 488-, 594- and 633-conjugated antibodies (used at 1:500) were
from Invitrogen. Confocal images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM5 PASCAL
system. Time-lapse imaging was performed using an Olympus ZDC-IMAGE system.
Fluorescent and brightfield imaging was performed with a Zeiss Axioskop 2 FS
plus system.
Cell culture
Small or large intestine was digested with collagenase/dispase (1 mg/ml,
Roche) for 15 minutes at 37°C. After obtaining single cell suspensions,
enteric neurons were immunopurified using the MACSelect LNGFR MicroBeads
system (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Following immunoselection, 1x104 cells were plated onto a
single well of an eight-well slide coated with poly-D-lysine (0.1 mg/ml) and
laminin (20 µg/ml). The culture medium contained DMEM-low (Invitrogen) with
1% N2 supplement, 2% B27 supplement (Invitrogen) and penicillin/streptomycin
(Meiji Seika). Cells were cultured for 2 days in the presence of GDNF (100
ng/ml), then switched to medium containing either GDNF-neutralizing antibodies
(no further addition of GDNF; GDNF-deprivation) or GDNF (100 ng/ml; control).
Culture of sympathetic neurons [from superior cervical ganglia (SCG)] was
performed as described previously (Martin
et al., 1988
). Other reagents and conditions are as follows:
neutralizing antibodies for NGF (1:1000; SIGMA) or GDNF (0.5 µg/ml; R&D
Systems), zVAD-fmk (100 µM; R&D Systems), Hoechst 33342 (1 µg/µl,
Sigma), TMR red In Situ Cell Death Detection kit (Roche) for terminal
deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL).
Bax-/- mice (Knudson
et al., 1995
) were obtained from Jackson Laboratories. For
virus-mediated gene transfer, human Bcl-XL was cloned into
FUW (Lois et al., 2002
).
High-titer viral particles were obtained as previously described
(Miyoshi et al., 1998
).
Transmission electron microscopy
Distal colon of E15.5 embryo, neurons cultured on the coverslip, and SCG of
P0 mouse were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M
sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) followed by postfixation with 1%
OsO4 in the same buffer. After being stained en bloc with 0.5%
aqueous uranyl acetate, samples were dehydrated with ethanol and embedded in
Polybed 812. Semithin (0.5 µm) sections were stained with Toluidine Blue.
Ultra-thin (80 nm) sections were stained doubly with uranyl acetate and lead
citrate and examined under a JEOL JEM 1010 transmission electron microscope at
100 kV. Myenteric ganglia were clearly distinguishable from muscle cells,
which had characteristic shapes and dense cytoplasm
(Vannucchi and Faussone-Pellegrini,
2000
). To examine death figures of ENS cells in conditional
GFR
1 mutant colon where massive ENS degeneration is
undergoing, only regions where the presence of the ganglia (or degenerating
ganglia) was confirmed were selected for the morphological analysis.
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 mouse mutants
1 displays spatiotemporally dynamic
changes during the development of the ENS. During early ENS development
(E9.5-11.5), GFR
1 was expressed in virtually all ENS
progenitors (data not shown). At E13.5, GFR
1
expression was detectable in both ENS progenitors and the majority of
differentiating neurons, although the levels of GFR
1
expression in the former were higher than those in the latter (see Fig. S1A in
the supplementary material). After E13.5, GFR
1
expression levels in enteric neurons were reduced, especially in the small
intestine, and neurons expressing high levels of GFR
1
became confined to the colon at E15.5 (Fig.
1B). In contrast to the dynamic changes in
GFR
1 expression in neurons, enteric glial cells
maintained high GFR
1 expression from their emergence
(
E13.5) to postnatal periods. After postnatal day 5 (P5), cells
expressing high levels of GFR
1 expression were
confined to glia, although approximately 35% of enteric neurons expressed
GFR
1 at marginal levels (see Fig. S1B in the
supplementary material).
We were especially intrigued by the high level of GDNF expression
in the cecum and colon during late gestation (E15.5-19.5;
Fig. 1A), when colonization of
the gut by ENS progenitors has already completed and most ENS progenitors in
the myenteric layer have exited the cell cycle and initiated neuronal or glial
differentiation (Young et al.,
2005
). Although Ret was expressed in all enteric neurons
(data not shown), GFR
1 was differentially expressed
in neurons of different gut regions. Nearly 100% of the enteric neurons in the
colon expressed GFR
1, whereas it was expressed in
only a small subpopulation of neurons in the small intestine
(Fig. 1B,C). Because
GFR
1 is initially expressed in almost all ENS
progenitors in early development (E11.5, data not shown), the shift in
GFR
1 expression in developing enteric neurons
suggested that GDNF plays a spatiotemporally specific role dependent on the
developmental context.
To investigate the physiological role of GDNF in late ENS development in
vivo, we engineered mice in which the function of
GFR
1 can be conditionally inactivated using the
Cre-loxP system. A gene cassette composed of floxed
GFR
1 cDNA followed by GFP cDNA was knocked
into the first coding exon of the GFR
1 gene by
homologous recombination (Fig.
2A; see Fig. S2 in the supplementary material). Because
Cre-mediated excision of floxed GFR
1 cDNA converts
the floxed GFR
1 allele (functional) into a
GFP reporter allele (null, see Materials and methods), this strategy
allows facile detection of cells that have undergone Cre recombination through
monitoring of GFP fluorescence (see Fig. S2D in the supplementary material).
GFR
1flox/flox mice were viable, grew to
adulthood and were fertile, validating the normal function of the floxed
GFR
1 allele. To temporarily control the inactivation
of GFR
1 function, we used CAGGCre-ERTM
mice (Hayashi and McMahon,
2002
), which ubiquitously express chimeric Cre protein fused to
the mutated ligand-binding domain of the estrogen receptor. We crossed
GFR
1flox/flox mice to
GFR
1+/- mice
(Enomoto et al., 1998
)
harboring the CAGGCre-ERTM transgene to obtain
GFR
1flox/+:CAGGCre-ERTM or
GFR
1flox/-:CAGGCre-ERTM
embryos in the same litters (Fig.
2B). Treatment of pregnant mothers with 4-OHT induced Cre activity
in utero, generating
GFR
1GFP/+:CAGGCre-ERTM
(control) and GFR
1GFP/-:
CAGGCre-ERTM (conditional KO:cKO) embryos. In this setting,
control and cKO cells differ only in whether they maintain
GFR
1 expression or not; other conditions, including
4-OHT exposure and transient Cre activation, were identical. Thus this
strategy allowed us to reliably assess the physiological function of
GFR
1 by comparing phenotypes between control and cKO cells.
By GFP and PGP9.5 double staining, the estimated recombination efficiency
in enteric neurons was approximately 70%
(Fig. 2C). No GFR
1
protein was detected in GFP-positive (GFP+) cells in cKO embryos
(Fig. 2D; gut from an E15.5
embryo treated with 4-OHT at E13.5 shown as an example). Furthermore,
phosphorylation of ERK, a signaling event downstream of RET activation, was
not detectable in GFP+ cells, which was already evident 1 day after
4-OHT treatment (Fig. 2E, gut
from an E13.5 embryo treated with 4-OHT at E12.5 shown as an example). These
results validated the idea that the conditional ablation strategy was
operational and suggested that GDNF signaling is impaired in enteric neurons
rapidly after GFR
1 inactivation.
|
1 inactivation during late gestation leads to drastic cell loss in the ENS
1. Formation of the ENS proceeded normally in both
GFR
1flox/+:CAGGCre-ERTM and
GFR
1flox/-:CAGGCre-ERTM
embryos without Cre activation (Fig.
3A). Pregnant mothers were administered 0.5 mg 4-OHT at E15.5, and
the gut from their embryos was examined at E18.5 (3 days after
GFR
1 inactivation) by acetylcholinesterase (AChE)
histochemistry, which labels the cell bodies and neurites of enteric neurons.
A dense reticulate pattern of the enteric ganglia and their innervation was
observed in the small intestine; the staining pattern was comparable in
control and cKO embryos (Fig.
3B insets, SI). However, in the colon of the cKO embryos, ganglion
structure was completely disrupted, and abnormally thick nerve bundles were
observed (Fig. 3B, bottom).
These nerve fibers were likely un-defasciculated extrinsic nerve fibers
(Payette et al., 1987
1, revealing the essential role of GDNF signaling
for the survival of cells in the ENS during late gestation.
Spatiotemporally specific regulation of enteric neuron survival by GFR
1
To understand the spatiotemporal specificity in GFR
1 regulation of
ENS cell survival, we inactivated GFR
1 function at
different time periods. When embryos were treated with 4-OHT at E11.5 (in the
midst of ENS progenitor migration) and their gut was examined at E13.5, we
observed that the population of cells expressing GFP in cKO gut was
significantly smaller than that in control
(Fig. 4A). This was at least
partly explained by impaired proliferation, as significantly fewer
GFP+ cells incorporated BrdU in the cKO midgut than in control (cKO
12.2±1.4% versus control 24.4±3.4%; values obtained by
BrdU+ cells/GFP+ cells, n=3 for each genotype,
P<0.05). We detected no sign of increased cell death of
GFP-expressing cells by TUNEL in cKO gut (E12.5-13.5, data not shown). Because
TUNEL was not an ideal marker to efficiently detect cell death in the ENS (see
below), we also performed time-lapse microscopic analysis of cKO cells in gut
explant culture. No abnormal cell death was detected even by prolonged
time-lapse observation (up to 32 hours after 4-OHT treatment, data not shown).
Those results demonstrate that, during E11.5-13.5, GDNF signaling plays a
crucial role in cell proliferation
(Gianino et al., 2003
), but
not cell survival.
|
1 inactivation at E15.5, no
structural abnormalities were detected in the enteric ganglia of the small
intestine (Fig. 4B,
n=5). This revealed that, unlike in the colon, widespread cell death
does not take place in the small intestine, although the possibility that a
minimal number of neurons may die in the small intestine after
GFR
1 inactivation cannot be excluded. The unequivocal
phenotypic difference between the small intestine and the colon in conditional
GFR
1-deficient embryos suggested that the requirement
of GFR
1 for ENS cell survival is more related to the regional
specificity of the colon rather than to the timing of colonization of the gut
by ENS progenitors.
We also inactivated GFR
1 in the postnatal ENS, and
found no adverse effects on the structural integrity of the ENS when it was
examined at P14 (Fig. 4C). The
data collectively reveal that the requirement of GFR
1 for ENS cell
survival is restricted to the colon during the late-gestational to
early-postnatal period.
Lack of caspase activation during ENS degeneration of GFR
1 cKO colon
Virtually all cells in the ENS were eliminated in cKO colon within 3 days
after 4-OHT administration when GFR
1 inactivation was induced during
late gestation. To determine the kinetics of cell death, we performed
timecourse analyses. In both control and cKO colon, GFP expression became
detectable 10-12 hours after 4-OHT administration (data not shown). By 16-21
hours after 4-OHT treatment, almost the entire myenteric layer was visualized
by GFP in the colon of both control and cKO embryos
(Fig. 5A, top). Because
GFR
1 is known to be expressed in both enteric neural crest derivatives
and smooth muscle cells at mid-gestation, we examined which cell types were
marked by GFP in the colon. Most GFP-expressing cells were positive either for
Phox2b, PGP9.5 and/or B-FABP (Fig.
5B, data not shown), indicating that the majority of cells marked
by strong GFP fluorescence were immature neurons or glia at this developmental
time period (Young et al.,
2003
). After 21 hours of 4-OHT administration, a progressive
disappearance of GFP fluorescence was observed, and the signals were
completely extinguished by 36 hours after 4-OHT treatment in most cKO colons,
while GFP signals in the corresponding regions of control colon remained
intact during the timecourse (Fig.
5A, cKO bottom and control). Complete absence of enteric ganglia
in cKO colon (36 hours after 4-OHT) was confirmed by thionin staining of the
colon sections (data not shown). These results indicated that enteric ganglion
cells in cKO colon die within 36 hours after 4-OHT. Although the results also
indicated that both enteric neurons and glia died in the absence of
GFR
1, cells primarily affected by conditional
GFR
1 ablation were considered to be neurons because
GFR
1 is more highly expressed in colonic neurons at
E15.5 (Fig. 1B) and because
loss of GFR
1 in non-neuronal cells does not affect
ENS development (Enomoto et al.,
2004
) (see also Discussion).
As the peak of cell death was estimated to occur 24-30 hours after 4-OHT
treatment, we attempted to visualize dying cells using TUNEL or antibodies
that detect activated caspsase-3 or caspase-7. Surprisingly, despite the
drastic cell loss, very few cells were detected by these methods. The total
numbers of TUNEL-positive cells, generated by summing all consecutive sections
of the entire colon, were 0.7±0.8, 7.0±1.4, 11.0±3.9 and
0 at 21, 24, 27 and 36 hours after 4-OHT treatment, respectively (n=3
for each time point). Activated-caspase staining detected even fewer cells
(0.6±0.5 cells and 0.4±0.4 cells per entire colon for caspase-3
and caspase-7, respectively; only found at 27 hours after 4-OHT, n=3
for each time point). We failed to detect any TUNEL-positive cells that were
also caspase-positive (Fig. 5C
right). The staining pattern in the degenerating ENS was quite unusual
because, in other parts of the developing nervous system where neuronal
apoptosis is taking place, activated-caspase-positive cells often outnumber
and also include TUNEL-positive cells (Fig.
5C left, DRG shown as an example). Thus, neither TUNEL nor
activated caspase efficiently detected cell death in the ENS after
GFR
1 inactivation, implying a unique regulation of
cell death in GFR
1-deficient cells in the colon.
|
1
cKO gut prompted us to examine the involvement of conserved death pathways in
enteric neurons. We immunopurified enteric neurons from E15.5 embryonic gut,
cultured them with GDNF for 2 days and then examined the effect of GDNF
withdrawal. While most neurons from the small intestine survived for several
days after GDNF withdrawal (Fig.
6A, SI), more than 70% of the neurons from the colon died within
24 hours after GDNF deprivation (Fig.
6A,B). Thus, the survival of the majority of neurons from the
colon is solely dependent on GDNF under these culture conditions.
Interestingly, neurons from the colon became more resistant to GDNF withdrawal
when they were cultured initially for at least 3 days in the presence of GDNF
(data not shown). Thus GDNF dependency by colonic neurons is limited to a
relatively small time window, which appears to recapitulate the observation
that GFR
1 is required for colonic neuron survival only during late
gestation.
We analyzed the biological properties of the death process triggered by
GDNF deprivation using enteric neurons isolated from the colon. NGF-deprived
sympathetic neurons were separately prepared, as these neurons die by
apoptosis in a caspase-dependent fashion
(Deshmukh et al., 1996
),
thereby serving as control. In NGF-deprived sympathetic neurons (48 hours
after NGF deprivation), chromatin compaction and nuclear fragmentation was
easily discernible by Hoechst staining, and the staining overlapped with
strong punctate signals by TUNEL (Fig.
6C, right panels). By contrast, dying enteric neurons displayed
little chromatin compaction and were only weakly stained by TUNEL in a hazy
pattern (Fig. 6C, left panels).
The staining pattern by TUNEL in GDNF-deprived enteric neurons was reminiscent
of that observed in neuronal death in caspase-3-deficient mice
(Oppenheim et al., 2001
). Thus
we examined caspase activation and its involvement in enteric neuron death.
Caspase activation was examined by counting the numbers of cells positive for
active caspase-3 against numbers of remaining enteric neurons detected by TuJ1
immunoreactivity. Only a minor fraction of enteric neurons was stained by
activated caspase-3 at 12 hours after GDNF deprivation (1.1±0.3% in
GDNF-deprived versus 0.6±0.2% in control neurons). Similar results were
obtained at 24 hours after GDNF deprivation. In addition, caspase-7 activation
was also infrequently observed during the timecourse of cell death (data not
shown). These observations contrasted sharply with the widespread caspase-3
activation that occurred in NGF-deprived sympathetic neurons (5.1±3.2%
of control versus 26.3±2.9% in NGF-deprived neurons; 24 hours after NGF
withdrawal). Furthermore, treatment of neurons with zVAD-fmk, a pan-caspase
inhibitor, which completely protected sympathetic neurons from apoptosis,
failed to rescue the survival of enteric neurons
(Fig. 6D). Therefore, caspases
are only minimally activated and are dispensable for enteric neuron death.
To investigate the potential involvement of the proapoptotic protein, Bax, we cultured enteric neurons from Bax-/- embryos and examined their response to GDNF deprivation. Although Bax-/- neurons tended to show a slight increase in viability, the difference in their survival was not statistically significant (three independent experiments, representative results shown in Fig. 6E). By contrast, Bcl-XL overexpression in enteric neurons significantly rescued the survival of GDNF-deprived enteric neurons (Fig. 6F). Collectively, the results show that enteric neuron death requires neither Bax nor caspases, key components for apoptosis, suggesting the presence of non-canonical cell death machinery in GDNF-deprived enteric neurons that can be blocked by Bcl-XL.
Ultrastructural analysis reveals atypical death of enteric neurons in vivo
Analysis of cultured enteric neurons revealed that enteric neurons die in a
non-apoptotic and caspase-independent fashion in vitro. To elucidate the
morphological attributes of ENS cell death, we examined the ultrastructure of
enteric ganglia by transmission electron microscopy in control and cKO colon
20-48 hours after 4-OHT treatment of pregnant mothers at E15.5.
|
1-deficient degenerating ENS cells. Finally,
necrotic cells were never found in the myenteric layer of cKO colon.
Collectively, these studies revealed that, unlike cell death that occurs in
many other parts of the nervous system, dying enteric ganglion cells exhibit
molecular and morphological features distinct from those of apoptosis.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1/RET is central to
the control of ENS development, because homozygous null mutations in either of
these genes affect ENS progenitor cells early during ENS development and cause
the nearly complete absence of the enteric ganglia throughout the entire
gastrointestinal tract. In contrast to the importance of GDNF signaling in
early ENS development, however, the physiological role of GDNF signaling in
later ENS development has not been explored extensively. By engineering mice
in which GFR
1, the high affinity GDNF receptor, can be conditionally
inactivated, we were able to assess directly, for the first time, the
physiological function of GFR
1 in ENS development during late
gestation. Our analysis has revealed a previously unforeseen function of
GFR
1 in cell survival control of the ENS, providing novel insights into
the regulation of ENS development by GFR
1.
GDNF is a physiological survival factor for enteric neurons
Previous mouse genetic studies have identified several genes that play
crucial roles in ENS development, some of which are shown to be potentially
involved in the regulation of cell survival. For instance, increased cell
death of ENS progenitors is observed in the esophagus of
Ret-/-, Phox2b-/- and
Sox10Dom/Sox10Dom (Dom, Dominant megacolon
mutation) embryos (Kapur,
1999
; Pattyn et al.,
1999
; Taraviras et al.,
1999
). Moreover, decreases in enteric neuron numbers are observed
in mice lacking NT-3 or TrkC (also known as Ntf3
and Ntrk3, respectively, - Mouse Genome Informatics)
(Chalazonitis et al., 2001
).
However, due to the complex nature of ENS development, in which cell
migration, proliferation, differentiation and survival proceed in a
significantly overlapping manner, it has been difficult to deduce the precise
function of those molecules by simply examining ENS phenotypes of mutant mice.
By generating conditional GFR
1 mouse mutants and
disrupting GFR
1 gene function during late gestation,
we were able to examine the biological role of GFR
1 specifically in
postmigratory differentiating cells in the ENS. GFR
1
inactivation rapidly triggered cell death and nearly completely disrupted the
ENS structure in the normally formed colon, providing compelling evidence that
GFR
1 inactivation affects cell survival during late
gestation. Because GFR
1/RET receptor complex mediates GDNF signaling,
and because NRTN- or ARTN-deficient mice do not display
aganglionosis of the colon (Heuckeroth et
al., 1999
; Honma et al.,
2002
), the ligand that associates with GFR
1 in vivo to
support colonic neuronal survival is likely to be GDNF.
|
1 cKO gut, not only neurons but also glial
cells die, as virtually all cells are eliminated in the myenteric layers of
GFR
1 cKO colon by birth. Because GFR
1 is
expressed in enteric neurons, glia and smooth muscle cells in the colon during
late gestation, one might speculate that GFR
1
inactivation affects all of these cell types and that neurons die secondarily
due to death of those non-neuronal cells. However, mice in which the
elimination of GFR
1 expression in the gut is
restricted to smooth muscle cells and glia (cis-only mice)
(Enomoto et al., 2004
1 in
non-neuronal cell populations in the gut has no adverse effects on the
survival of glia in the ENS. Thus, the cells that are primarily affected in
GFR
1 cKO colon are neurons, and neuronal cell death
occurs in a cell-autonomous fashion. We speculate that enteric glia die
secondarily to enteric neuron death in GFR
1 cKO colon
owing to the sudden abolition of trophic support from neurons, similar to the
massive glial death that is observed in response to neuronal insults in other
regions of the developing nervous system
(Grinspan et al., 1996Our electron microscopic analysis of the colon of GDNF heterozygous embryos failed to detect the presence of death figures in the developing ENS (T.U., unpublished). This is perhaps because the early reduction of proliferating ENS progenitors diminishes the number of enteric neurons at later stages and thereby decreases the vulnerability to reduced GDNF levels in heterozygous animals. Thus, the survival-promoting actions of GDNF signaling could have not been uncovered without conditional gene ablation. Collectively, our study, along with previous evidence, establishes GDNF as a pleiotropic factor controlling multiple facets of enteric neuron development, including cell migration, proliferation, differentiation and survival.
Unique features in the control of survival and death of enteric neurons by GDNF signaling
Our histological and biochemical characterization of enteric neuron death
delineates crucial features of the death of these neurons. A detailed temporal
analysis of GFR
1-deficient colon revealed that the
death process occurred fairly rapidly, resulting in the almost complete
elimination of neurons within 36 hours after induction of
GFR
1 inactivation, as judged by GFP fluorescence.
Considering the time required for Cre-mediated GFR
1
cDNA excision, GFR
1 degradation and GFP maturation in those neurons
(more than 8-10 hours in total), the estimated time for enteric neuron death
is less than 26-28 hours after actual loss of GFR
1
function.
Although we observed the emergence of TUNEL-positive cells in the ENS after
GFR
1 inactivation, the total numbers of
TUNEL-positive cells in the entire colon even at multiple time points were
less than 20, which is remarkably few, considering that as many as 20,000
neurons (Gianino et al., 2003
)
succumb to death in GFR
1-deficient colon within 36
hours, and in comparison to the significantly higher levels of TUNEL-positive
cells observed in other parts of the nervous system during the naturally
occurring cell death period (White et al.,
1998
). We did not observe activation of caspase-3 or caspase-7 in
GFR
1-deficient colon even at the peak of the cell
death period. Thus, neither TUNEL nor activated caspase immunoreactivity
efficiently detected ENS cell death after GFR
1
inactivation. Consistent with these findings, pan-caspase inhibition does not
block death of GDNF-deprived colonic neurons in vitro. Furthermore, hallmarks
of apoptosis (chromatin compaction and mitochondrial pathology) were rarely
detected in dying enteric neurons in ultrastructural analyses. The results
demonstrate that the death machinery employed by enteric neurons is distinct
from that utilized by other types of neurons undergoing apoptosis. Although
our morphological examinations delineated crucial features of dying enteric
neurons, they failed to definitively classify enteric neuron death into one of
the currently proposed death forms such as apoptosis, autophagic death or
necrosis (Clarke, 1990
;
Nelson and White, 2004
).
Enteric neuron death is also distinct from previously reported atypical death
of GDNF-deprived sympathetic neurons (Yu
et al., 2003
) in that enteric neuron death proceeds in a
caspase-independent fashion. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence that
caspase-independent cell death is triggered by disruption of neurotrophic
factor signaling. The unconventional nature of enteric neuron death may
explain why previous studies failed to detect apoptosis during the development
of the ENS. Physiological cell death in the ENS, if it in fact occurs at all,
may not take the form of apoptosis, as we observed in
GFR
1 cKO colon.
Although our data have revealed an unconventional form of enteric neuron
death, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Efficient blockade of enteric
neuron death in vitro by Bcl-XL overexpression suggests that
enteric neuron death triggered by GDNF does not reflect a global collapse of
cellular homeostasis, but rather a molecularly regulated process. The finding
also suggests the potential involvement of mitochondria in the death process,
although only minimal morphological abnormalities were detected in the
mitochondria of dying enteric neurons in vivo. Alternatively, autophagy may in
fact play a role in GDNF deprivation-induced enteric neuron death, because
Bcl-2, one of the closest relatives of Bcl-XL, inhibits autophagy
and autophagy-induced cell death by interacting with Beclin 1
(Pattingre et al., 2005
).
Consistent with this possibility, we observed a few degenerating cells with
multivesicular lysosomal structures in cKO colon, suggesting that at least a
fraction of enteric neuron death is associated with the abnormal activation of
autophagic processes. However, treatment of enteric neurons with
3-methyladenine, a pharmacological inhibitor of autophagy, did not block the
death or prolong the survival of GDNF-deprived neurons (our unpublished data),
arguing against the notion that conventional autophagy plays a pro-death role,
at least in our culture paradigm. As Bcl-XL interacts with a number
of molecules and mediates a variety of functions dependent on its subcellular
localization, determining the site of action of Bcl-XL (e.g.
mitochondria or ER membrane) in cell death inhibition may help to clarify the
mechanisms underlying enteric neuron death.
Finally, the unconventional features of the death of GFR
1-deficient
colonic neurons raise the possibility that, in some pathological conditions,
neuronal death in the enteric ganglia is indiscernible by conventional methods
such as TUNEL or immunodetection of activated caspases. Especially, it is
important to consider the potential involvement of cell death in the etiology
of Hirschsprung's disease, because mutations in the Ret gene are the
primary cause of the disease and because aganglionosis is restricted to the
distal colon in most patients. In this respect, it is noteworthy that RET can
function as a dependence receptor and induces cell death in certain in vitro
paradigms (Bordeaux et al.,
2000
). Thus, it would be of interest to investigate whether RET
dysfunction caused by Hirschsprung's disease-associated Ret mutations
induces cell death in the colon and to examine whether the death, if any, is
triggered by dependence-receptor function of RET in future studies.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material for this article is available at
http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/134/11/2171/DC1
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Airaksinen, M. S. and Saarma, M. (2002). The GDNF family: signalling, biological functions and therapeutic value. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3,383 -394.[CrossRef][Medline]
Baloh, R. H., Enomoto, H., Johnson, E. M., Jr and Milbrandt, J. (2000). The GDNF family ligands and receptors-implications for neural development. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10,103 -110.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bordeaux, M. C., Forcet, C., Granger, L., Corset, V., Bidaud, C., Billaud, M., Bredesen, D. E., Edery, P. and Mehlen, P. (2000). The RET proto-oncogene induces apoptosis: a novel mechanism for Hirschsprung disease. EMBO J. 19,4056 -4063.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chalazonitis, A., Pham, T. D., Rothman, T. P., DiStefano, P. S.,
Bothwell, M., Blair-Flynn, J., Tessarollo, L. and Gershon, M. D.
(2001). Neurotrophin-3 is required for the
survival-differentiation of subsets of developing enteric neurons.
J. Neurosci. 21,5620
-5636.
Clarke, P. G. (1990). Developmental cell death: morphological diversity and multiple mechanisms. Anat. Embryol. 181,195 -213.[Medline]
Deckwerth, T. L., Elliott, J. L., Knudson, C. M., Johnson, E. M., Jr, Snider, W. D. and Korsmeyer, S. J. (1996). BAX is required for neuronal death after trophic factor deprivation and during development. Neuron 17,401 -411.[CrossRef][Medline]
Deshmukh, M., Vasilakos, J., Deckwerth, T. L., Lampe, P. A.,
Shivers, B. D. and Johnson, E. M., Jr (1996). Genetic and
metabolic status of NGF-deprived sympathetic neurons saved by an inhibitor of
ICE family proteases. J. Cell Biol.
135,1341
-1354.
Durbec, P. L., Larsson-Blomberg, L. B., Schuchardt, A., Costantini, F. and Pachnis, V. (1996). Common origin and developmental dependence on c-ret of subsets of enteric and sympathetic neuroblasts. Development 122,349 -358.[Abstract]
Enomoto, H., Araki, T., Jackman, A., Heuckeroth, R. O., Snider,
W. D., Johnson, E. M., Jr and Milbrandt, J. (1998). GFR
1-deficient mice have deficits in the enteric nervous system and
kidneys. Neuron 21,317
-324.[CrossRef][Medline]
Enomoto, H., Hughes, I., Golden, J., Baloh, R. H., Yonemura, S., Heuckeroth, R. O., Johnson, E. M., Jr and Milbrandt, J. (2004). GFRalpha1 expression in cells lacking RET is dispensable for organogenesis and nerve regeneration. Neuron 44,623 -636.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gianino, S., Grider, J. R., Cresswell, J., Enomoto, H. and
Heuckeroth, R. O. (2003). GDNF availability determines
enteric neuron number by controlling precursor proliferation.
Development 130,2187
-2198.
Golden, J. P., DeMaro, J. A., Osborne, P. A., Milbrandt, J. and Johnson, E. M., Jr (1999). Expression of neurturin, GDNF, and GDNF family-receptor mRNA in the developing and mature mouse. Exp. Neurol. 158,504 -528.[CrossRef][Medline]
Grinspan, J. B., Marchionni, M. A., Reeves, M., Coulaloglou, M.
and Scherer, S. S. (1996). Axonal interactions regulate
Schwann cell apoptosis in developing peripheral nerve: neuregulin receptors
and the role of neuregulins. J. Neurosci.
16,6107
-6118.
Hayashi, S. and McMahon, A. P. (2002). Efficient recombination in diverse tissues by a tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre: a tool for temporally regulated gene activation/inactivation in the mouse. Dev. Biol. 244,305 -318.[CrossRef][Medline]
Heuckeroth, R. O., Enomoto, H., Grider, J. R., Golden, J. P., Hanke, J. A., Jackman, A., Molliver, D. C., Bardgett, M. E., Snider, W. D., Johnson, E. M., Jr et al. (1999). Gene targeting reveals a critical role for neurturin in the development and maintenance of enteric, sensory, and parasympathetic neurons [see comments]. Neuron 22,253 -263.[CrossRef][Medline]
Honma, Y., Araki, T., Gianino, S., Bruce, A., Heuckeroth, R., Johnson, E. and Milbrandt, J. (2002). Artemin is a vascular-derived neurotropic factor for developing sympathetic neurons. Neuron 35,267 -282.[CrossRef][Medline]
Indo, Y., Tsuruta, M., Hayashida, Y., Karim, M. A., Ohta, K., Kawano, T., Mitsubuchi, H., Tonoki, H., Awaya, Y. and Matsuda, I. (1996). Mutations in the TRKA/NGF receptor gene in patients with congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis. Nat. Genet. 13,485 -488.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kapur, R. P. (1999). Early death of neural crest cells is responsible for total enteric aganglionosis in Sox10(Dom)/Sox10(Dom) mouse embryos. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 2,559 -569.[CrossRef][Medline]
Knudson, C. M., Tung, K. S., Tourtellotte, W. G., Brown, G. A.
and Korsmeyer, S. J. (1995). Bax-deficient mice with lymphoid
hyperplasia and male germ cell death. Science
270, 96-99.
Kruger, G. M., Mosher, J. T., Tsai, Y. H., Yeager, K. J., Iwashita, T., Gariepy, C. E. and Morrison, S. J. (2003). Temporally distinct requirements for endothelin receptor B in the generation and migration of gut neural crest stem cells. Neuron 40,917 -929.[CrossRef][Medline]
Le Douarin, N. M. (1986). Cell line segregation
during peripheral nervous system ontogeny. Science
231,1515
-1522.
Lois, C., Hong, E. J., Pease, S., Brown, E. J. and Baltimore,
D. (2002). Germline transmission and tissue-specific
expression of transgenes delivered by lentiviral vectors.
Science 295,868
-872.
Martin, D. P., Schmidt, R. E., DiStefano, P. S., Lowry, O. H., Carter, J. G. and