QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 23 May 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.000448

This Article Summary Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material All Versions of this Article: dev.000448v1 134/13/2449    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hans, S. Articles by Westerfield, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hans, S. Articles by Westerfield, M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Changes in retinoic acid signaling alter otic patterning

¹ Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
² Biotechnology Center and Center of Regenerative Therapies, University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: monte{at}uoneuro.uoregon.edu)

Accepted 30 April 2007

	SUMMARY

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Retinoic acid (RA) has pleiotropic functions during embryogenesis. In zebrafish, increasing or blocking RA signaling results in enlarged or reduced otic vesicles, respectively. Here we elucidate the mechanisms that underlie these changes and show that they have origins in different tissues. Excess RA leads to ectopic foxi1 expression throughout the entire preplacodal domain. Foxi1 provides competence to adopt an otic fate. Subsequently, pax8, the expression of which depends upon Foxi1 and Fgf, is also expressed throughout the preplacodal domain. By contrast, loss of RA signaling does not affect foxi1 expression or otic competence, but instead results in delayed onset of fgf3 expression and impaired otic induction. fgf8 mutants depleted of RA signaling produce few otic cells, and these cells fail to form a vesicle, indicating that Fgf8 is the primary factor responsible for otic induction in RA-depleted embryos. Otic induction is rescued by fgf8 overexpression in RA-depleted embryos, although otic vesicles never achieve a normal size, suggesting that an additional factor is required to maintain otic fate. fgf3;tcf2 double mutants form otic vesicles similar to RA-signaling-depleted embryos, suggesting a signal from rhombomere 5-6 may also be required for otic fate maintenance. We show that rhombomere 5 wnt8b expression is absent in both RA-signaling-depleted embryos and in fgf3;tcf2 double mutants, and inactivation of wnt8b in fgf3 mutants by morpholino injection results in small otic vesicles, similar to RA depletion in wild type. Thus, excess RA expands otic competence, whereas the loss of RA impairs the expression of fgf3 and wnt8b in the hindbrain, compromising the induction and maintenance of otic fate.

Key words: Competence, dlx3b, Danio rerio, fgf3, fgf8, foxi1, Inner ear, Morpholino, Otic induction, Otic placode, Retinoic acid, Zebrafish

	INTRODUCTION

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The vertebrate inner ear is the sensory organ that provides auditory and vestibular functions. It develops from a transient ectodermal thickening, the otic placode, visible on either side of the developing hindbrain. Depending on the species, the placode invaginates or cavitates to form the otic vesicle, also known as the otocyst, an epithelial structure with sharply defined borders. Subsequently, the otocyst gives rise to all structures of the inner ear including the membranous labyrinth and neurons of the statoacoustic ganglion (Noden and van de Water, 1986; Couly et al., 1993; Fritzsch et al., 1997; Whitfield et al., 2002; Barald and Kelley, 2004).

Previous studies support the primacy of fibroblast growth factors (Fgfs) in the induction of the otic placode. Various Fgf family members from various sources regulate otic induction in different species, with only hindbrain-derived Fgf3 playing a conserved role (reviewed in Fritzsch et al., 1997; Torres and Giráldez, 1998; Whitfield et al., 2002; Brown et al., 2003). In zebrafish, Fgf3 and Fgf8 have been implicated to have overlapping functions; loss of both fgf3 and fgf8 together results in near or total ablation of otic tissue (Phillips et al., 2001; Maroon et al., 2002; Léger and Brand, 2002). In mouse, Fgf3 and Fgf10 act as redundant signals during otic induction (Wright and Mansour, 2003; Alvarez et al., 2003): Fgf3 is expressed in the hindbrain abutting the preotic domain, whereas Fgf10 is expressed in the mesoderm beneath it, and loss of both Fgf3 and Fgf10 results in the complete ablation of otic development (Wright and Mansour, 2003; Alvarez et al., 2003). Furthermore, Fgf8 has been shown to play a crucial role upstream of the Fgf signaling cascade required for otic induction in this species (Ladher et al., 2005). In chick, Fgf3, Fgf8 and Fgf19 and, in amphibians, Fgf2 and Fgf3, have been implicated in otic induction (Mahmood et al., 1995; Ladher et al., 2000; Ladher et al., 2005; Song and Slack, 1994; Lombardo et al., 1998).

Recently, studies have shown that Pax2a and Pax8 are the main effectors downstream of Fgf-signaling and that cells need to express Foxi1 and Dlx3b transcription factors to be competent to respond to Fgf signaling in zebrafish (Hans et al., 2004; Solomon et al., 2004). The expression of foxi1 is restricted to bilateral domains, including the preotic domain at late gastrula stages, and disruption of foxi1 expression leads to severe defects in otic placode formation and highly variable ear phenotypes (Thisse et al., 2005; Solomon et al., 2003; Nissen et al., 2003). The homeobox gene, dlx3b, is co-expressed with dlx4b in late gastrula stage embryos in a stripe corresponding to cells of the future neural plate border, and knockdown of dlx3b and dlx4b together causes a severe loss of otic and olfactory tissues (Akimenko et al., 1994; Ekker et al., 1992; Ellies et al., 1997; Kudoh et al., 2001; Solomon and Fritz, 2002; Liu et al., 2003). Loss of both Dlx3b and Foxi1 ablates all indications of otic induction even in the presence of a fully functional or over-activated Fgf signaling pathway (Hans et al., 2004; Solomon et al., 2004; Hans et al., 2007).

Retinoic acid (RA), a derivative of vitamin A, is required for proper embryonic development. Embryos deficient in RA signaling show defects in the circulatory system, limbs, trunk and hematopoietic system (reviewed by Maden, 2002). RA plays a crucial role in hindbrain patterning and rhombomere (r) identity, and the hindbrain is known to regulate otic development (reviewed by Gavalas and Krumlauf, 2000; Romand, 2003). In amniote embryos, RA is required in a concentration- and time-dependent manner for the development of the posterior hindbrain, particularly r5-r7, and compromised RA signaling leads to an expansion of anterior hindbrain at the expense of posterior hindbrain (Dupé et al., 1999; Dupé and Lumsden, 2001). Complete absence of RA signaling leads to a complete loss of r5-r7 accompanied by an expansion of r3-r4, as observed in mouse embryos mutant for Aldh1a2 (also known as Raldh2 - Mouse Genome Informatics). Aldh1a2 is an aldehyde dehydrogenase that is responsible for the majority of RA production in the early embryo (Niederreither et al., 1999; Niederreither et al., 2000). Mutations in aldh1a2 in zebrafish are less profound and show only a loss of r7 accompanied by a slight expansion of r5 and r6 similar to weak vitamin A deficiency syndrome (VAD) in amniote embryos (Begemann et al., 2001; Grandel et al., 2002; Maves and Kimmel, 2005). However, a loss of r5-r7 accompanied by an expansion of r3 and r4 is observed after knockdown of RA signaling by pharmacological treatment, suggesting that RA is produced by something in addition to Aldh1a2 (Grandel et al., 2002; Maves and Kimmel, 2005). Treatment of vertebrate embryos with excess RA posteriorizes the anterior neural plate with the transformation of r2-r3 to r4-r5 identity and expansion of posterior hindbrain at the expense of presumptive fore- and mid-brain structures (Marshall et al., 1992; Kudoh et al., 2002).

Otic defects generated by changes in RA signaling are considered mostly secondary consequences due to changes in Fgf signaling, because hindbrain patterning is disturbed in RA gain- and loss-of-function studies. In embryos with no RA signaling, such as mouse Aldh1a2 mutants, expression of Fgf3, which is specifically expressed in the presumptive r5-r6 in wild-type embryos, is weak and not properly restricted, and otocysts are hypoplastic and abnormally distant from the hindbrain (Niederreither et al., 1999). The same otic phenotype can be observed in zebrafish after knockdown of RA by pharmacological treatment and it has been suggested, but not yet shown, that RA is required for normal fgf3 expression in the presumptive r4 and for the induction of the otic placode (Perz-Edwards et al., 2001; Whitfield et al., 2002). A moderate loss of RA signaling, such as in weak quail or rat VAD embryos, however, leads to the formation of supernumerary otic vesicles caudal to the main otocyst, which correlates with the expansion of posterior hindbrain and, in particular, with the caudal expansion of Fgf3 expression (White et al., 2000; Kil et al., 2005). In zebrafish, the opposite result has been reported; excess, rather than reduced, RA results in the formation of supernumerary and ectopic otic vesicles in an Fgf-dependent manner (Phillips et al., 2001). In zebrafish embryos treated with teratogenic doses (1 µM) of RA, hindbrain expression domains of fgf3 and fgf8 are greatly expanded into the anterior neural plate, inducing preotic pax8 expression surrounding the anterior neural plate. Inactivation of Fgf3 and/or Fgf8 by morpholino injection blocks the effects of exogenous RA (Phillips et al., 2001).

Here, we show that the opposite otic phenotypes generated by more or less RA signaling are produced by different mechanisms. We used a 50-fold lower dose of RA than that of previous studies, and show that RA affects otic induction without expanding fgf3 and fgf8 expression in the hindbrain. Instead, this low dose of excess RA leads to an increase in otic competence due to expanded expression of foxi1 throughout the preplacodal domain. By contrast, reduced RA signaling results in lower induction and impaired maintenance of otic fates, due to compromised fgf3 and wnt8b expression in the hindbrain. We further show that fgf8 is the primary inducing factor in RA-deprived embryos and that the induction but not the maintenance phenotype can be rescued by an increase in Fgf-signaling.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Animals
Embryos were obtained from the University of Oregon zebrafish facility, produced using standard procedures (Westerfield, 2000) and staged according to standard criteria (Kimmel et al., 1995) or by hours post fertilization at 28°C (hpf). The wild-type line used was AB. The lines acerebellar^ti282a (a strong hypomorphic allele of fgf8); lia^t24149 (a hypomorphic allele of fgf3); tcf2^hi2169 (a null or strong hypomorphic allele of tcf2) and the transgenic line Tg(hsp:fgf8) (to misexpress fgf8) have been described previously (Brand et al., 1996; Herzog et al., 2004; Sun and Hopkins, 2001; Hans et al., 2007), and we refer to the homozygous mutants as fgf8, fgf3 and tcf2 mutants, respectively. Homozygous mutants and double mutants were scored either by their morphological phenotype and/or by PCR or loss of pou1f1 expression (Herzog et al., 2004; Sun and Hopkins, 2001). Heat-shock-treatment embryos were transferred, still in their chorions, into fresh 37-39°C embryo medium in a 1.5 ml tube (20 embryos per tube) and maintained for 30 minutes in a heating block.

Genes and markers
Approved gene and protein names that follow the zebrafish nomenclature conventions (http://zfin.org/zf_info/nomen.html) are used.

In situ hybridization
cDNA probes that detect the following genes were used: cldna (Kollmar et al., 2001); dlx3b (Ekker et al., 1992); fgf3 (Phillips et al., 2001); fgf8 (Reifers et al., 1998); foxi1 (Solomon et al., 2003); otx2 (Li et al., 1994); pax8 (Pfeffer et al., 1998); pou1f1 (Nica et al., 2004); stm (Söllner et al., 2003); and wnt8b (Kelly et al., 1995). Probe synthesis and single- or double-color in situ hybridization was performed essentially as previously described (Thisse et al., 1993; Jowett and Yan, 1996; Whitlock and Westerfield, 2000).

Morpholinos (MOs) and pharmacological treatments
The dlx3b-MO, foxi1-MO and wnt8b-MO have been previously described (Liu et al., 2003; Solomon and Fritz, 2002; Kim et al., 2002). For pharmacological treatments, the following stock solutions were made and stored at -80°C: 100 mM 4-(Diethylamino)-benzaldehyde (DEAB; Sigma) in DMSO and 1 mM all-trans retinoic acid (RA; Sigma) in DMSO. For embryo treatments, dilutions of these chemicals were made in embryo medium as follows: DEAB, 10 µM; and RA, 10, 20 and 1000 nM. Prior to gastrulation (30% epiboly or 4.7 hpf) embryos were removed from their chorions and transferred into Petri dishes containing the treatment solution. Treatments with a teratogenic dose of RA were carried out as described previously (Kudoh et al., 2002); dechorionated embryos at 40% epiboly stage were treated with 1 µM RA for 80 minutes followed by thorough rinses with embryo medium. For control treatments, sibling embryos were incubated in corresponding dilutions of DMSO. All incubations were conducted in the dark.

	RESULTS

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Excess or loss of RA signaling interferes with otic induction
It has been shown previously that excess or deficient RA signaling leads to opposite otic phenotypes, but the underlying mechanisms have remained obscure (Perz-Edwards et al., 2001; Phillips et al., 2001). To study the role of RA signaling in otic development, we analyzed the expression of several otic markers at the vesicle, placodal and preplacodal stages. To interfere with RA signaling, we used the pharmacological inhibitor 4-(Diethylamino)-benzaldehyde (DEAB), a potent retinaldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitor (Russo et al., 1988). Compared with the morphology of controls at 50 hpf, loss of RA signaling led to strongly reduced otic vesicles with only one small otolith and impaired semicircular canal protrusions, whereas excess RA at a concentration of 10 nM led to the formation of enlarged otic vesicles containing three otoliths and multiple semicircular canal protrusions (Fig. 1A-C). Assessed at 22 hpf by expression of the otic marker starmaker (stm), which was expressed throughout the entire epithelium of control otic vesicles, otic vesicle size was reduced by up to 50% in RA-signaling-depleted embryos, but increased up to 40% in the presence of 10 nM RA (Fig. 1D-F). At the 12-somite stage, when the placode was outlined by cldna expression in control embryos, the otic placode was reduced in size in RA-signaling-depleted embryos, whereas excess RA led to a size increase (Fig. 1G-I). Use of pax8 expression, which is initiated in the otic anlagen prior to the formation of the placode, showed that the opposite phenotypes generated by excess or deficient RA signaling are already evident at preotic stages. In RA-signaling-depleted embryos, the preotic expression of pax8 is reduced, whereas, in RA-treated embryos, the preotic pax8 expression domain is enlarged and weak expression of pax8 surrounding the entire anterior neural plate can be detected (Fig. 1J-L). An increase of RA to 20 nM amplifies the pax8 expression surrounding the anterior neural plate (Fig. 2A), consistent with results published previously (Phillips et al., 2001). However, in contrast to Phillips et al., who reported that 20-30% of embryos treated with teratogenic doses (1 µM) of RA produce ectopic otic vesicles at the anterior limit of the head, we observed only randomly distributed small patches of ectopic otic cells in embryos treated with 20 nM RA (Fig. 2B-D). To demonstrate that our RA treatment did not posteriorize the anterior neural plate in the same manner as typical teratogenic doses of RA (Phillips et al., 2001; Kudoh et al., 2002), we treated embryos with either 20 nM RA or a teratogenic dose of RA and compared them to controls (see Fig. S1 in the supplementary material). Subsequent marker analysis of the anteroposterior axis showed that teratogenic doses, but not 20 nM, of RA significantly altered the expression of early anteroposterior-axis-specific genes. In comparison to controls, expressions of six3a and otx2 was unaffected by 20 nM RA but are completely abolished in the presence of a teratogenic dose (see Fig. S1A-F in the supplementary material). Expression of the RA-controlled gene hoxb1b (Alexandre et al., 1996) in the caudal hindbrain of control embryos was mildly expanded in embryos treated with 20 nM RA, but it was strongly misexpressed throughout the entire neural plate of embryos treated with a teratogenic dose of RA (see Fig. S1G-I in the supplementary material). In embryos treated with 20 nM RA, expression of gbx1 in the rostral hindbrain was indistinguishable from control embryos, whereas it was misexpressed in the anterior neural plate of embryos treated with a teratogenic dose of RA (see Fig. S1J-L in the supplementary material). Together, our results show that the opposite phenotypes generated by gain or loss of RA signaling can be traced back to otic induction and that ectopic otic induction occurs with low doses of RA that do not apparently affect other aspects of embryonic development.

View larger version (103K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Loss and excess of RA signaling generate opposite phenotypes. (A-F) Compared to control embryos, otic vesicles are reduced or increased in size, respectively, after depletion of RA signaling (DEAB) or after the application of 10 nM RA, as assessed both by morphology at 50 hpf (A-C) or stm expression at 22 hpf (D-F). (G-L) Reduction or increase in the number of preotic cells is already evident at placodal (G-I, 12-somite stage) and preplacodal (J-L, 5-somite stage) stages after labeling with cldna (G-I) or pax8 (J-L). (A-C) Lateral views of live otic vesicles with anterior to the left and dorsal towards the top. (D-L) Dorsal views with anterior towards the top. Scale bar: 35 µm.

View larger version (71K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Application of 20 nM RA leads to widespread ectopic otic induction and to the formation of ectopic otic cells outside of the endogenous ear. (A) Application of 20 nM RA leads to ectopic pax8 expression encompassing the entire preplacodal domain (compare with Fig. 1J,L). (B-D) Embryos treated with 20 nM RA display ectopic patches of cells that express the otic marker stm and form enlarged vesicles. (C,D) Higher magnifications of B show the epithelial structure of these patches. Dorsal views with anterior towards the top. Scale bar: 35 µm for A; 50 µm for B; 10 µm for C,D.

View larger version (79K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Loss and excess of RA signaling affect different tissues. (A-F) In comparison to controls (A,D) or to embryos treated with 20 nM RA (C,F), r4-specific fgf3 expression is delayed by the end of gastrulation in embryos depleted of RA signaling (DEAB, B) and remains reduced in an enlarged r4 primordium at the three-somite stage (E). (G-I) An enlarged r4-specific fgf8 expression domain is also present in embryos depleted of RA signaling (H) compared with control (G) or 20 nM RA-treated (I) embryos. (J-L) foxi1 expression is indistinguishable from control embryos (J) after RA-signaling depletion (K), whereas the application of 20 nM RA leads to ectopic expression within the entire preplacodal domain (L). (M-O) Expression of dlx3b in the preplacodal domain is unaffected by loss (N) or excess (O) of RA signaling. Dorsal views with anterior towards the top. Scale bar: 90 µm.

View larger version (104K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Increased RA signaling compromises lens specification. (A-F) Assessed both by morphology at 50 hpf (DIC microscopy, A-C) and cx44.1 expression at 24 hpf (D-F), the lens is reduced in size or completely lost after the application of 10 or 20 nM RA, compared with wild-type embryos. (G-I) Compromised lens specification is already evident at preplacodal stages (five-somite stage, 5S), as indicated by pax6b labeling. (A-C) Lateral views of live eyes with anterior to the left and dorsal towards the top. (D-I) Dorsal views with anterior towards the top. Scale bar: 30 µm for A-C; 50 µm for D-F; 35 µm for G-I.

View larger version (84K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Fgf8 mediates otic induction in the absence of RA signaling. (A-D) Assessed by morphology at 50 hpf (DIC microscopy), otic vesicles are reduced after the depletion of RA (B) and in fgf8 mutants (C), and are completely lost in fgf8 mutants depleted of RA signaling (D), in comparison to controls (A). (E-H) Labeling with stm at 22 hpf reveals the presence of only residual otic cells in fgf8 mutants depleted of RA signaling (H) compared to fgf8 mutant (G), RA-depleted (F) or control (E) embryos, in which more otic cells are present. (I-L) Otic vesicle size reduction in fgf8 mutants depleted of RA signaling is evident as early as the preplacodal stages (five-somite stage, 5S), as detected by labeling with pax8. (A-D) Lateral views of live otic vesicles with anterior to the left and dorsal towards the top. (D-L) Dorsal views with anterior towards the top. Scale bar: 35 µm.

View larger version (57K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Misexpression of fgf8 at the end of gastrulation rescues otic induction in RA-depleted embryos, but the rescue is not maintained. (A,B) Preotic pax8 expression is expanded in transgenic hsp:fgf8 embryos (B) after misexpression of fgf8 at the end of gastrulation in comparison to non-transgenic embryos (A). (C,D) Reduced preotic pax8 expression in RA-depleted embryos (C) can be rescued by the misexpression of fgf8 at the end of gastrulation (D), as can heat-shocked transgenic hsp:fgf8 embryos with normal RA signaling (B). (E,F). Misexpression of fgf8 at late gastrulation stages (F) leads to the formation of much larger otic vesicles in comparison to their non-transgenic siblings (E). (G,H) Transgenic hsp:fgf8 embryos depleted of RA signaling (H) do not show an increase in otic cells but rather resemble non-transgenic RA-depleted siblings (G). Dorsal views with anterior towards the top. Scale bar: 35 µm.

View larger version (70K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Rhombomere 5-specific Wnt8b function is required for the maintenance of otic fate. (A-D) Assessed by morphology, otic vesicles are reduced in fgf3 (C) and tcf2 (D) single mutants compared to wild-type embryos (A), but not as much as in RA-depleted embryos (B). (E) Loss of both fgf3 and tcf2 together results in otic vesicles that form only one otolith, as is observed in RA-depleted embryos (B). (F,G) Expression of dlx3b in the dorsal half of the otocyst at 22 hpf is lost in embryos depleted of RA signaling. (H-J) In control embryos at 22 hpf, wnt8b expression can be detected in the midbrain-hindbrain boundary, in r3 and in r5 (H), whereas tcf2 mutants (I) and RA-depleted embryos (J) show wnt8b in the midbrain-hindbrain boundary and in r3, but not in r5. (K-N) Inactivation of Wnt8b in wild-type embryos by morpholino injection (MO, N) leads to a reduced ear size (labeled with stm at 22 hpf), similar to the size observed in fgf3 mutants (M), compared to untreated wild type (K); however, the size reduction is not as severe as in embryos depleted of RA signaling (L). Loss of Wnt8b function in fgf3 mutants (O) produces reduced otic vesicles comparable to RA-depleted embryos (L). (A-G) Lateral views with anterior to the left and dorsal towards the top. (H-O) Dorsal views with anterior towards the top. Scale bar: 35 µm for A-E and H-O; 20 µm for F,G.

	DISCUSSION

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Ectopic RA signaling increases the competence of cells to respond to otic-inducing signals, but endogenous RA is not required for otic competence
Treatment of vertebrate embryos with RA causes a posteriorization of the anterior neural plate in a concentration-dependent manner, which leads to transformation of r2-r3 into r4-r5 and to the expansion of the posterior hindbrain at the expense of the presumptive fore- and mid-brain structures (Marshall et al., 1992; Kudoh et al., 2002). Furthermore, teratogenic doses of RA completely transform forebrain and midbrain into hindbrain and enlarge the preotic expression domain of pax8 (Phillips et al., 2001). Our results demonstrate that much lower concentrations of RA that do not interfere with the patterning of the anterior neural plate are sufficient to produce ectopic expression of foxi1, which expands the domain of preotic pax8 expression. Consistent with recent reports showing that preotic pax8 expression depends on Foxi1 (Solomon et al., 2003; Nissen et al., 2003), we found that the enlarged pax8 expression observed in 20 nM RA-treated wild-type embryos was severely reduced to a small, residual domain of expression at the anterior end in RA-treated foxi1 mutants (Hans et al., 2007). Fate changes after the application of 20 nM RA were observed only in the preplacodal domain, but not within the anterior neural plate, whereas a teratogenic dose of RA affected both tissues. This difference is presumably due to the presence of RA-degrading enzymes of the Cyp26 class that are expressed within the anterior neural plate but not in the preplacodal domain (Dobbs-McAuliffe et al., 2004; Kudoh et al., 2002; Hernandez et al., 2006). Consistent with this interpretation, a recent study has shown that 5 nM RA is sufficient to posteriorize cyp26a1 mutants, whereas 200 nM RA is required to obtain the same effect on wild-type embryos (Hernandez et al., 2006).

Our observation that excess RA leads to ectopic expression of foxi1 throughout the entire preplacodal domain provides a consistent explanation for the findings of Woo and Fraser (Woo and Fraser, 1997). Transplantation of ventral and lateral germring tissue into the prospective forebrain region can induce ectopic otic vesicles, whereas the transplantation of dorsal germring tissue (the embryonic shield) does not. Although germring grafts also lead to the induction of ectopic hindbrain tissue, the direct transplantation of hindbrain into the prospective forebrain region never induces ectopic otic vesicles (Woo and Fraser, 1997). RA is generated by the enzymatic activity of aldehyde dehydrogenases, which are encoded by Aldh genes, and, during zebrafish gastrulation, aldh1a2 is expressed in the ventral and lateral germring but not dorsally in the embryonic shield (Begemann et al., 2001; Grandel et al., 2002). Thus, we propose that RA produced by the grafted ventral and lateral germring increases the competence of anterior preplacodal cells to respond to otic-inducing signals because of ectopic activation of foxi1. The observed ectopic otic induction might also benefit from ectopic Fgf signaling provided by the graft, because fgf3, fgf8, fgf17b and fgf24 are all expressed in a dorsoventral gradient in the zebrafish germ ring, with highest levels on the dorsal side (Fürthauer et al., 1997; Fürthauer et al., 2004; Reifers et al., 1998; Cao et al., 2004).

Although RA is sufficient to induce foxi1 expression, our data also show that loss of RA signaling during zebrafish gastrulation has no effect on the expression of foxi1. Thus, impaired otic induction in RA-depleted embryos is not due to an effect on Foxi1 level and, hence, we conclude that RA signaling is not required for the early events of otic induction. The observed effect of excess RA on foxi1 expression might rather reveal a regulatory mechanism employed during other aspects of development. In zebrafish at 48 hpf, foxi1 is expressed in the retina, in the pharyngeal pouches and in the dorsal septum of the otic vesicle (Thisse et al., 2005), and RA signaling has been implicated in the development of all of these tissues (Drager et al., 2001; Mark et al., 2004; Romand, 2003). It is currently unknown, however, whether foxi1 expression depends on RA signaling in these tissues.

Our results further indicate that early fgf3 expression is crucial during the relatively short time-window for otic induction in zebrafish. Impaired fgf3 expression in the developing hindbrain of RA-signaling-depleted embryos delayed otic induction and could not be compensated for by an expanded hindbrain domain of fgf3 and fgf8 expression at later stages. Consistently, depletion of fgf3 by morpholino injection severely reduces pax8 expression at the tailbud stage (Phillips et al., 2001; Léger and Brand, 2002). Based on experiments with a stable transgenic line that expresses fgf8 uniformly under the control of the zebrafish temperature-inducible hsp70 promoter, we recently proposed that otic induction in zebrafish occurs between the end of gastrulation and the early segmentation stages (Hans et al., 2007). Using the same approach here, we show that even in the absence of RA signaling, cells in the preotic region can undergo ectopic otic induction after ectopic activation of Fgf signaling at late gastrulation stages, similar to control embryos. Thus, cells are still competent to adopt otic fate after exposure to a high uniform dose of Fgf8 but are unable to respond to the endogenous Fgf3 and Fgf8 emanating from the developing hindbrain after the loss of RA signaling. Incorrect spatial positioning of inducing and induced tissue might also contribute to impaired otic induction, because, in RA-signaling-depleted embryos, the r3 primordium is greatly expanded, displacing the inducing r4 from the preotic region.

Wnt signaling during otic induction
Our analysis further demonstrates that defects in otic specification caused by loss of RA signaling are a secondary consequence of changes in hindbrain patterning. We found that embryos depleted of RA signaling formed small otic vesicles because of compromised otic induction due to decreased fgf3 expression and because of compromised maintenance of otic fate due to loss of wnt8b expression. Reduced otic induction due to weaker expression of Fgf3 has been proposed from work in both mammals and zebrafish (Niederreither et al., 1999; Whitfield et al., 2002; Phillips et al., 2001; Léger and Brand, 2002), and a recent study in mouse shows that Wnt signaling is required after Fgf-dependent induction to maintain otic fate (Ohyama et al., 2006). In the latter study, Wnt signaling was detected using a Tcf/Lef reporter construct within the preotic region in a subset of Pax2-positive cells after Fgf-dependent induction but prior to the formation of the placode. Furthermore, disruption of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway in preotic Pax2-positive cells leads to an expansion of epidermal fate at the expense of otic fate, and otic vesicles are significantly reduced in size (Ohyama et al., 2006). Conversely, constitutive activation of canonical Wnt signaling in preotic Pax2-positive cells leads to the expansion of otic fate at the expense of epidermal fate, suggesting that Wnt signaling mediates a placode-epidermis fate decision by directing preotic cells to an otic fate (Ohyama et al., 2006). So far, it is unknown whether Wnt signaling plays the same role in zebrafish. It has been reported that, in zebrafish, the Wnt reporter gene TOPdGFP, a transgene consisting of a GFP-coding sequence downstream of a minimal promoter and four Lef-binding sites, is not expressed during early stages of otic induction (Phillips et al., 2004), but nothing is known about its expression later in development, prior to the formation of the otic placode. Consistent with a similar role for Wnt signaling, we found that, in RA-depleted embryos, otic induction can be rescued but not maintained. Furthermore, we have previously found that expression of the endogenous Wnt reporter gene axin2 is absent during the initial stages of otic induction but that axin2 is expressed within the preotic region prior to the formation of the otic region (our unpublished results). Cell-autonomous disruption or constitutive activation of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway in mouse by conditional knockout of ß-catenin or by the expression of a conditionally activated form of ß-catenin within preotic Pax2-positive cells led Ohyama et al. to propose that Wnt8a from r4 is the source of Wnt signaling (Ohyama et al., 2006). Our data, on the other hand, indicate that wnt8b expression in r5 is the source, consistent with findings that Wnt8b signaling is strongly deficient in the posterior hindbrain of mafb mutants and that inactivation of Wnt8b by morpholino injection results in smaller otic vesicles that mimic the size and patterning defects of mafb mutants (M. Brand, personal communication). In zebrafish, wnt8a encodes a bicistronic message encoding two complete open-reading frames, ORF1 and ORF2, and, at 75% epiboly (8 hpf), ORF2 can be detected in r5-r6 adjacent to the otic anlagen (Kelly et al., 1995; Lekven et al., 2001). Loss of Wnt8a function by morpholino injection results in greatly reduced otocysts (Phillips et al., 2004), supporting the model proposed by Ohyama et al. (Ohyama et al., 2006). However, proper expression of fgf3 and fgf8 is disturbed in the hindbrain of these embryos, thus compromising otic induction (Phillips et al., 2004) and making it difficult to address later Wnt8a function during otic development. It is very likely that several Wnt molecules are involved in otic fate maintenance after Fgf-dependent induction. Expression of wnt1, wnt3a and wnt10b has been reported in the zebrafish hindbrain in addition to wnt8a and wnt8b, and, interestingly, expression of wnt1 and wnt3a is severely reduced in the caudal hindbrain of tcf2 mutants (Lekven et al., 2003; Buckles et al., 2004; Lecaudey et al., 2006), as we have shown for wnt8b. Conditional and combinatorial knockout will be necessary to address the role of particular Wnt molecules in otic fate maintenance.

Absent or inappropriate amounts of Wnt signaling might also be responsible for the reduced number of otic cells in RA-treated embryos at later stages. Our treatment of embryos with 20 nM RA led to the massive ectopic expression of pax8 around the anterior neural plate border, similar to the results published by Phillips et al. (Phillips et al., 2001). However, in contrast to Phillips et al., who reported that 20-30% of RA-treated embryos produce ectopic morphologically visible otic vesicles at the anterior limit of the head, we observed only randomly distributed small patches of ectopic otic cells. Phillips et al. showed that the anterior neural plate is strongly posteriorized after treatment with a teratogenic dose of RA, which leads to the anterior expansion of hindbrain fgf3 and fgf8 expression domains. Wnt signaling is presumably also shifted anteriorly in these RA-treated embryos, maintaining the fate of the ectopic otic cells. In wild-type embryos, however, Wnt signaling is absent in the early neural plate anterior to the future midbrain-hindbrain boundary (Wilson and Houart, 2004). Because our conditions to generate excess RA signaling (20 nM) did not apparently change anterior neural plate fate, pax8-positive cells anterior to the future midbrain-hindbrain boundary presumably do not receive Wnt signaling, which is essential for the maintenance of otic fates after induction. Furthermore, pathways to generate other placode-derived sensory organs were presumably intact under our experiments, which might also contribute to fewer ectopic otic cells in RA-treated embryos at later stages.

Ectopic RA signaling and lens placode induction
We found that the application of 20 nM RA led to the expression of foxi1 within the entire preplacodal domain. However, we did not observe any expansion of the otic tissue at the expense of other sensory organs, except for the lens. Interestingly, it was recently shown that the entire preplacodal domain is initially specified as lens tissue, implying that lens fate is a default state of the preplacodal territory and that subsequent development requires repression of lens fate in prospective non-lens domains (Bailey et al., 2006). By promoting otic fate in response to Fgf signaling, Foxi1 in the preotic region of wild-type embryos and expanded Foxi1 expression in RA-treated embryos might be involved in lens fate repression. Consistent with this interpretation, microarray analysis covering approximately 20,000 zebrafish genes showed that only seven genes, including pax6b, are significantly repressed after overexpression of Foxi1 (Yan et al., 2006). However, it is also likely that the reduction or loss of lens tissue is not due to misexpression of foxi1 or to a posteriorization of the preplacodal domain, but rather due to the ectopic expression of pax8. Reciprocal inhibition between the paired-domain proteins Pax2 and Pax6 has been implicated in the specification of mammalian eye territories and in formation of the di-mesencephalic boundary (Schwarz et al., 2000; Nakamura and Watanabe, 2005). Other studies have shown that both Pax2 and Pax6 can be converted from transcriptional activators to repressors via interaction with co-repressors of the Groucho protein family (Eberhard et al., 2000). Pax2 is highly related to Pax5 and Pax8, and gene replacement in the mouse has shown that Pax5 can functionally substitute for Pax2, indicating that Pax2, Pax5 and Pax8 proteins are biochemically interchangeable (Pfeffer et al., 1998; Bouchard et al., 2000). Combined and redundant gene function has also been shown for Pax2 and Pax8 during development of the mouse urogenital system and the zebrafish inner ear (Bouchard et al., 2002; Hans et al., 2004; Mackereth et al., 2005). Further investigation of the roles of Foxi1 and Pax2 or Pax8 in otic induction and in the repression of other fates will help clarify the functional similarities and differences among these factors.

Supplementary material
Supplementary material for this article is available at http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/134/13/2449/DC1

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
We wish to thank Sandra Brown and Lauren Clancey for technical assistance; Michael Brand for sharing unpublished results; Lisa Maves for critical reading of the manuscript; and Gunnar Valdimarsson for materials. This work was supported by NIH grants DC04186 and HD22486. S.H. is a recipient of a Feodor Lynen fellowship of the Alexander von Humboldt foundation.

	REFERENCES

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

Akimenko, M.-A., Ekker, M., Wegner, J., Lin, W. and Westerfield, M. (1994). Combinatorial expression of three zebrafish genes related to Distal-less: part of a homeobox code for the head. J. Neurosci. 14,3475 -3486.[Abstract]
Alexandre, D., Clarke, J. D., Oxtoby, E., Yan, Y. L., Jowett, T. and Holder, N. (1996). Ectopic expression of Hoxa-1 in the zebrafish alters the fate of the mandibular arch neural crest and phenocopies a retinoic acid-induced phenotype. Development 122,735 -746.[Abstract]
Alvarez, Y., Alonso, M. T., Vendrell, V., Zelarayan, L. C., Chamero, P., Theil, T., Bösel, M. R., Shigeaki, K., Maconochie, M., Riethmacher, D. et al. (2003). Requirements for FGF3 and FGF10 during inner ear formation. Development 130,6329 -6338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Bailey, A. P., Bhattacharyya, S., Bronner-Fraser, M. and Streit, A. (2006). Lens specification is the ground state of all sensory placodes, from which FGF promotes olfactory identity. Dev. Cell 11,505 -517.[CrossRef][Medline]
Barald, K. F. and Kelley, M. W. (2004). From placode to polarization: new wrinkles in the development of the inner ear. Development 131,4119 -4130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Begemann, G., Schilling, T. F., Rauch, G. J., Geisler, R. and Ingham, P. W. (2001). The zebrafish neckless mutation reveals a requirement for raldh2 in mesodermal signals that pattern the hindbrain. Development 128,3081 -3094.[Medline]
Bouchard, M., Pfeffer, P. and Büsslinger, M. (2000). Functional equivalence of the transcription factors Pax2 and Pax5 in mouse development. Development 127,3707 -3713.
Bouchard, M., Souabni, A., Mandler, M., Neubüser, A. and Busslinger, M. (2002). Nephric lineage specification by Pax2 and Pax8. Genes Dev. 16,2958 -2970.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Brand, M., Heisenberg, C. P., Jiang, Y. J., Beuchle, D., Lun, K., Furutani-Seiki, M., Granato, M., Haffter, P., Hammerschmidt, M., Kane, D. et al. (1996). Mutations in zebrafish affecting the formation of the boundary between midbrain and hindbrain. Development 123,179 -190.[Abstract]
Brown, S. T., Martin, K. and Groves, A. K. (2003). Molecular basis of inner ear induction. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 57,115 -149.[Medline]
Buckles, G. R., Thorpe, C. J., Ramel, M. C. and Lekven, A. C. (2004). Combinatorial Wnt control of zebrafish midbrain-hindbrain boundary formation. Mech. Dev. 121,437 -447.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cao, Y., Zhao, J., Sun, Z., Zhao, Z., Postlethwait, J. and Meng, A. (2004). fgf17b, a novel member of Fgf family, helps patterning zebrafish embryos. Dev. Biol. 271,130 -143.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cason, N., White, T. W., Cheng, S., Goodenough, D. A. and Valdimarsson, G. (2001). Molecular cloning, expression analysis, and functional characterization of connexin44.1: a zebrafish lens gap junction protein. Dev. Dyn. 221,238 -247.[CrossRef][Medline]
Couly, G. F., Coltey, P. M. and Le Douarin, N. M. (1993). The triple origin of skull in higher vertebrates: a study in quail-chick chimeras. Development 117,409 -429.[Abstract]
Dobbs-McAuliffe, B., Zhao, Q. and Linney, E. (2004). Feedback mechanisms regulate retinoic acid production and degradation in the zebrafish embryo. Mech. Dev. 121,339 -350.[CrossRef][Medline]
Drager, U. C., Li, H., Wagner, E. and McCaffery, P. (2001). Retinoic acid synthesis and breakdown in the developing mouse retina. Prog. Brain Res. 131,579 -587.[Medline]
Dupé, V. and Lumsden, A. (2001). Hindbrain patterning involves graded responses to retinoic acid signalling. Development 128,2199 -2208.[Medline]
Dupé, V., Ghyselinck, N. B., Wendling, O., Chambon, P. and Mark, M. (1999). Key roles of retinoic acid receptors alpha and beta in the patterning of the caudal hindbrain, pharyngeal arches and otocyst in the mouse. Development 126,5051 -5059.[Abstract]
Dutta, S., Dietrich, J. E., Aspöck, G., Burdine, R. D., Schier, S., Westerfield, M. and Varga, Z. M. (2005). pitx3 defines an equivalence domain for lens and anterior pituitary placode. Development 132,1579 -1590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Eberhard, D., Jiménez, G., Heavey, B. and Busslinger, M. (2000). Transcriptional repression by Pax5 (BSAP) through interaction with corepressors of the Groucho family. EMBO J. 19,2292 -2303.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ekker, M. E., Akimenko, M.-A., BreMiller, R. and Westerfield, M. (1992). Regional expression of three homeobox transcripts in the inner ear of zebrafish embryos. Neuron 9, 27-35.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ellies, D., Stock, D., Hatch, G., Giroux, G., Weiss, K. and Ekker, M. E. (1997). Relationship between the genomic organization and the overlapping embryonic expression patterns of zebrafish dlx genes. Genomics 45,580 -590.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fritzsch, B. F., Barald, K. F. and Lomax, M. I. (1997). Early embryology of the vertebrate ear. In Development of the Auditory System (ed. E. W. Rubel, A. N. Popper and R. R. Fay), pp. 80-145. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Fürthauer, M., Thisse, C. and Thisse, B. (1997). A role for FGF-8 in the dorsoventral patterning of the zebrafish gastrula. Development 124,4253 -4264.[Abstract]
Fürthauer, M., Van Celst, J., Thisse, C. and Thisse, B. (2004). Fgf signalling controls the dorsoventral patterning of the zebrafish embryo. Development 131,2853 -2864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Gavalas, A. and Krumlauf, R. (2000). Retinoid signalling and hindbrain patterning. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10,380 -386.[CrossRef][Medline]
Grandel, H., Lun, K., Rauch, G. J., Rhinn, M., Piotrowski, T., Houart, C., Sordino, P., Kuchler, A. M., Schulte-Merker, S., Geisler, R. et al. (2002). Retinoic acid signalling in the zebrafish embryo is necessary during pre-segmentation stages to pattern the anterior-posterior axis of the CNS and to induce a pectoral fin bud. Development 129,2851 -2865.[Medline]
Hans, S., Liu, D. and Westerfield, M. (2004). Pax8 and Pax2a function synergistically in otic specification, downstream of the Foxi1 and Dlx3b transcription factors. Development 131,5091 -5102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Hans, S., Christison, J., Liu, D. and Westerfield, M. (2007). Fgf-dependent otic induction requires competence provided by Foxi1 and Dlx3b. BMC Dev. Biol. 7, 5.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hernandez, R. E., Rikhof, H. A., Bachmann, R. and Moens, C. B. (2004). vhnf1 integrates global RA patterning and local FGF signals to direct posterior hindbrain development in zebrafish. Development 131, 4511-4520.
Hernandez, R. E., Putzke, A. P., Myers, J. P., Margaretha, L. and Moens, C. B. (2006). Cyp26 enzymes generate the retinoic acid response pattern necessary for hindbrain development. Development 134,177 -187.[CrossRef]
Herzog, W., Sonntag, C., von der Hardt, S., Roehl, H. H., Varga, Z. M. and Hammerschmidt, M. (2004). Fgf3 signaling from the ventral diencephalon is required for early specification and subsequent survival of the zebrafish adenohypophysis. Development 131,3681 -3692.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Jowett, T. and Yan, Y. L. (1996). Double fluorescent in situ hybridization to zebrafish embryos. Trends Genet. 12,387 -389.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kelly, G. M., Erezyilmaz, D. F. and Moon, R. T. (1995). Zebrafish wnt8 and wnt8b share a common activity but are involved in distinct developmental pathways. Development 121,1787 -1799.[Abstract]
Kil, S. H., Streit, A., Brown, S. T., Agrawal, N., Collazo, A., Zile, M. H. and Groves, A. K. (2005). Distinct roles for hindbrain and paraxial mesoderm in the induction and patterning of the inner ear revealed by a study of vitamin-A-deficient quail. Dev. Biol. 285,252 -271.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kim, S. H., Shin, J., Park, H. C., Yeo, S. Y., Hong, S. K., Han, S., Rhee, M., Kim, C. H., Chitnis, A. B. and Huh, T. L. (2002). Specification of an anterior neuroectoderm patterning by Frizzled8a-mediated Wnt8b signalling during late gastrulation in zebrafish. Development 129,4443 -4455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kimmel, C. B., Ballard, W. W., Kimmel, S. R., Ullmann, B. and Schilling, T. F. (1995). Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 203,253 -310.[Medline]
Kollmar, R., Nakamura, S. K., Kappler, J. A. and Hudspeth, A. J. (2001). Expression and phylogeny of claudins in vertebrate primordia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98,10196 -10201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kudoh, T., Tsang, M., Hukriede, N. A., Chen, X., Dedekian, M., Clarke, C. J., Kiang, A., Schultz, S., Epstein, J. A., Toyama, R. et al. (2001). A gene expression screen in zebrafish embryogenesis. Genome Res. 11,1979 -1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kudoh, T., Wilson, S. W. and Dawid, I. B. (2002). Distinct roles for Fgf, Wnt and retinoic acid in posteriorizing the neural ectoderm. Development 129,4335 -4346.[Medline]
Ladher, R. K., Anakwe, K. U., Gurney, A. L., Schoenwolf, G. C. and Francis-West, P. H. (2000). Identification of synergistic signals initiating inner ear development. Science 290,1965 -1967.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Ladher, R. K., Wright, T. J., Moon, A. M., Mansour, S. L. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (2005). FGF8 initiates inner ear induction in chick and mouse. Genes Dev. 19,603 -613.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Lecaudey, V., Ulloa, E., Anselme, I., Stedman, A., Schneider-Maunoury, S. and Pujades, C. (2006). Role of the hindbrain in patterning the otic vesicle: A study of the zebrafish vhnf1 mutant. Dev. Biol. 303,134 -143.[CrossRef][Medline]
Léger, S. and Brand, M. (2002). Fgf8 and Fgf3 are required for zebrafish ear placode induction, maintenance and inner ear patterning. Mech. Dev. 119,91 -108.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lekven, A. C., Thorpe, C. J., Waxman, J. S. and Moon, R. T. (2001). Zebrafish wnt8 encodes two wnt8 proteins on a bicistronic transcript and is required for mesoderm and neurectoderm patterning. Dev. Cell 1,103 -114.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lekven, A. C., Buckles, G. R., Kostakis, N. and Moon, R. T. (2003). Wnt1 and wnt10b function redundantly at the zebrafish midbrain-hindbrain boundary. Dev. Biol. 15,172 -187.
Li, Y., Allende, M. L., Finkelstein, R. and Weinberg, E. S. (1994). Expression of two zebrafish orthodenticle-related genes in the embryonic brain. Mech. Dev. 48,229 -244.[CrossRef][Medline]
Liu, D., Chu, H., Maves, L., Yan, Y.-L., Morcos, P. A., Postlethwait. P. and Westerfield, M. (2003). Fgf3 and Fgf8 dependent and independent transcription factors are required for otic placode specification. Development 130,2213 -2224.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Lombardo, A., Isaacs, H. V. and Slack, J. M. (1998). Expression and functions of FGF-3 in Xenopus development. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 42,1101 -1107.[Medline]
Mackereth, M. D., Kwak, S. J., Fritz, A. and Riley, B. B. (2005). Zebrafish pax8 is required for otic placode induction and plays a redundant role with Pax2 genes in the maintenance of the otic placode. Development 132,371 -382.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Maden, M. (2002). Retinoid signaling in the development of the central nervous system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17,843 -853.
Mahmood, R., Kiefer, P., Guthrie, S., Dickson, C. and Mason, I. (1995). Multiple roles for FGF-3 during cranial neural development in the chicken. Development 121,1399 -1410.[Abstract]
Mark, M., Ghyselinck, N. B. and Chambon, P. (2004). Retinoic acid signalling in the development of branchial arches. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14,591 -598.[CrossRef][Medline]
Maroon, H., Walshe, J., Mahmood, R., Kiefer, P., Dickson, C. and Mason, I. (2002). Fgf3 and Fgf8 are required together for formation of the otic placode and vesicle. Development 129,2099 -2108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Marshall, H., Nonchev, S., Sham, M. H., Muchamore, I., Lumsden, A. and Krumlauf, R. (1992). Retinoic acid alters hindbrain Hox code and induces transformation of rhombomeres 2/3 into a 4/5 identity. Nature 360,737 -741.[CrossRef][Medline]
Maves, L. and Kimmel, C. B. (2005). Dynamic and sequential patterning of the zebrafish posterior hindbrain by retinoic acid. Dev. Biol. 285,593 -605.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nakamura, H. and Watanabe, Y. (2005). Isthmus organizer and regionalization of the mesencephalon and metencephalon. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 49,231 -235.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nica, G., Herzog, W., Sonntag, C. and Hammerschmidt, M. (2004). Zebrafish pit1 mutants lack three pituitary cell types and develop severe dwarfism. Mol. Endocrinol. 18,1196 -1209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Niederreither, K., Subbarayan, V., Dollé, P. and Chambon, P. (1999). Embryonic retinoic acid synthesis is essential for early mouse postimplantation development. Nat. Genet. 21,444 -448.[CrossRef][Medline]
Niederreither, K., Vermot, J., Schuhbaur, B., Chambon, P. and Dollé, P. (2000). Retinoic acid synthesis and hindbrain patterning in the mouse embryo. Development 127, 75-85.[Abstract]
Nissen, R. M., Yan, J., Amsterdam, A., Hopkins, N. and Burgess, S. M. (2003). Zebrafish foxi one modulates cellular responses to Fgf signaling required for the integrity of ear and jaw. Development 130,2543 -2554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Noden, D. M. and van de Water, T. R. (1986). The developing ear: tissue orgins and interactions. In The Biology of Change in Otolaryngology (ed. R. J. Ruben, T. R. van de Water and E. W. Rubel), pp. 15-46. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ohyama, T., Mohamed, O. A., Taketo, M. M., Dufort, D. and Groves, A. K. (2006). Wnt signals mediate a fate decision between otic placode and epidermis. Development 133,865 -875.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Perz-Edwards, A., Hardison, N. L. and Linney, E. (2001). Retinoic acid mediated gene expression in transgenic reporter zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 229,89 -101.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pfeffer, P. L., Gerster, T., Lun, K., Brand, M. and Busslinger, M. (1998). Characterization of three novel members of the zebrafish Pax2/5/8 family: dependency of Pax5 and Pax8 on the Pax2. 1 (noi) function. Development 125,3063 -3074.[Abstract]
Phillips, B. T., Bolding, K. and Riley, B. B. (2001). Zebrafish fgf3 and fgf8 encode redundant functions required for otic placode induction. Dev. Biol. 235,351 -365.[CrossRef][Medline]
Phillips, B. T., Storch, M. K., Lekven, A. C. and Riley, B. B. (2004). A direct role for Fgf but not Wnt in otic placode induction. Development 131,923 -931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Reifers, F., Bohli, H., Walsh, E. C., Crossley, P. H. and Stainier, D. Y. R. (1998). Fgf8 is mutated in zebrafish acerebellar (ace) mutants and is required for maintenance of midbrain-hindbrain boundary and somitogenesis. Development 125,2381 -2395.[Abstract]
Riccomagno, M. M., Takada, S. and Epstein, D. J. (2005). Wnt-dependent regulation of inner ear morphogenesis is balanced by the opposing and supporting roles of Shh. Genes Dev. 19,1612 -1623.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Romand, R. (2003). The roles of retinoic acid during inner ear development. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 57,261 -291.[Medline]
Russo, J. E., Hauguitz, D. and Hilton, J. (1988). Inhibition of mouse cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenase by 4-(diethylamino)-benzaldehyde. Biochem. Pharmacol. 37,1639 -1642.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schwarz, M., Cecconi, F., Bernier, G., Andrejewski, N., Kammandel, B., Wagner, M. and Gruss, P. (2000). Spatial specification of mammalian eye territories by reciprocal transcriptional repression of Pax2 and Pax6. Development 127,4325 -4334.[Abstract]
Söllner, C., Burghammer, M., Busch-Nentwich, E., Berger, J., Schwarz, H., Riekel, C. and Nicolson, T. (2003). Control of crystal size and lattice formation by starmaker in otolith biomineralization. Science 302,282 -286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Solomon, K. S. and Fritz, A. (2002). Concerted action of two dlx paralogs in sensory placode formation. Development 129,3127 -3136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Solomon, K. S., Kudoh, T., Dawid, I. G. and Fritz, A. (2003). Zebrafish foxil mediates otic placode formation and jaw development. Development 130,929 -940.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Solomon, K. S., Kwak, S.-J. and Fritz, A. (2004). Genetic interactions underlying otic placode induction and formation. Dev. Dyn. 230,419 -433.[CrossRef][Medline]
Song, J. and Slack, J. M. (1994). Spatial and temporal expression of basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) mRNA and protein in early Xenopus development. Mech. Dev. 48,141 -151.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sun, Z. and Hopkins, N. (2001). vhnf1, the MODY5 and familial GCKD-associated gene, regulates regional specification of the zebrafish gut, pronephros, and hindbrain. Genes Dev. 15,3217 -3229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Thisse, B., Pflumio, S., Fürthauer, M., Loppin, B., Heyer, V., Degrave, A., Woehl, R., Lux, A., Steffan, T., Charbonnier, X. Q. et al. (2001). Expression of the zebrafish genome during embryogenesis. ZFIN Direct Data Submission, ZDB-PUB-010810-1, http://zfin.org/.
Thisse, B., Fauny, J.-D., Hamadbachir, A. and Thisse, C. (2005). High throughput expression analysis of ZF-models consortium clones. ZFIN Direct Data Submission, ZDB-PUB-051025-1, http://zfin.org/.
Thisse, C., Thisse, B., Schilling, T. and Postlethwait, J. H. (1993). Structure of the zebrafish snail gene and its expression in wild-type, spadetail and no tail mutant embryos. Development 119,1203 -1215.[Abstract]
Torres, M. and Giráldez, F. (1998). The development of the vertebrate inner ear. Mech. Dev. 71, 5-21.[CrossRef][Medline]
Westerfield, M. (2000). The Zebrafish Book. A Guide for the Laboratory use of Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Eugene: University of Oregon Press.
White, J. C., Highland, M., Kaiser, M. and Clagett-Dame, M. (2000). Vitamin A deficiency results in the dose-dependent acquisition of anterior character and shortening of the caudal hindbrain of the rat embryo. Dev. Biol. 220,263 -284.[CrossRef][Medline]
Whitfield, T. T., Riley, B. B., Chiang, M.-Y. and Phillips, B. (2002). Development of the zebrafish inner ear. Dev. Dyn. 223,427 -458.[CrossRef][Medline]
Whitlock, K. E. and Westerfield, M. (2000). The olfactory placodes of the zebrafish form by convergence of cellular fields at the edge of the neural plate. Development 127,3645 -3653.[Abstract]
Wilson, S. W. and Houart, C. (2004). Early steps in the development of the forebrain. Dev. Cell 6, 167-181.[CrossRef][Medline]
Woo, K. and Fraser, S. E. (1997). Specification of the zebrafish nervous system by nonaxial signals. Science 277,254 -257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Wright, T. J. and Mansour, S. L. (2003). Fgf3 and Fgf10 are required for mouse otic placode induction. Development 130,3379 -3390.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Yan, J., Xu, L., Crawford, G., Wang, Z. and Burgess, S. M. (2006). The forkhead transcription factor FoxI1 remains bound to condensed mitotic chromosomes and stably remodels chromatin structure. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26,155 -168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

Twitter

This Article Summary Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material All Versions of this Article: dev.000448v1 134/13/2449    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hans, S. Articles by Westerfield, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hans, S. Articles by Westerfield, M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?