spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 2


Fig. 2. Mapping the spatiotemporal pattern of ß-gal activity in TOPgal Wnt reporter embryos. (A,B) At E8.5, reporter activity is restricted to the lateral (L) neural folds and is absent from the medial (M) midline region near the anterior neural ridge (anr). (C) X-Gal staining of a transverse section reveals reporter activity is confined to lateral neuroectoderm of the neural fold (nf). (D) Frontal and (E) lateral views at E9.5 illustrate reporter activity in cranial neural crest cells migrating into the first pharyngeal arch (p1) and the prosencephalon (pros). Cranial neural crest cells covering the midbrain (mb) are also ß-gal-positive. (F) A transverse section through p1 show that at this stage, X-Gal staining is found in neural crest (nc) cells but not surface ectoderm (se) or neuroectoderm (ne). (G) Frontal and (H) lateral views at E10.5 indicate a distinct boundary between reporter-positive and reporter-negative cells. The frontonasal prominence (f) is devoid of staining, whereas some staining is evident in the median nasal prominence (m). The lateral nasal (l) and maxillary (mx) prominences show strong X-Gal staining. (I) Transverse sections reveal that surface ectoderm and mesenchyme of the median (m) and lateral nasal (l) prominences are sites of X-Gal staining, but neither surface ectoderm or mesenchyme in the frontonasal (f) prominence is positive for the reporter. (J) Frontal and (K) lateral views at E11.5 show an increase in X-Gal staining in the median nasal (m) prominence, whereas the frontonasal (f) prominence remains devoid of staining. At this stage, the median nasal prominence and maxillary prominence have fused (red asterisk). (L) Transverse sections show X-Gal staining disappears from surface ectoderm, but persists in maxillary mesenchyme as the prominences fuse (red asterisk). (M) Although reduced in size, the median nasal prominence remains free of X-Gal staining. (N) Transverse sections show a boundary between ß-gal-positive and ß-gal-negative regions in the frontonasal mesenchyme (red arrows). At this stage, X-Gal staining is restricted to mesenchyme (inset, red arrow). (O) At E12.5, the frontonasal (f) prominence is compressed by the growth of the maxillary (mx) prominences and (P) transverse sections show that the frontonasal region lacks reporter activity. The median nasal (m) prominence exhibits reporter activity. (Q) At E13.5, the mouse muzzle is fully formed and ß-gal activity is evident in the whisker primordia. The continued growth of the maxillae (mx) relative to the compressed frontonasal (f) prominence produces the infranasal depression (ind, red arrow). (R,S) Transverse sections show the general lack of X-Gal staining in the frontonasal prominence relative to strong X-Gal staining in the maxillary prominences (mx, red dotted line). (T,U) Low- and high-power magnifications at E14.5 reveal frontonasal (f) prominence-derived tissues are reduced to a thin stripe of midline tissue (dotted red line) that generally maintains its ß-gal-negative status. The maxillary prominences (mx) remain ß-gal-positive. (V) A ventral view reveals the general lack of X-Gal staining in frontonasal prominence-derived primary (1o) palate. The boundary of X-Gal staining follows the demarcation between structures derived from the maxillary and frontonasal prominences (dotted red lines). White dotted circle, incisive foramen. Scale bars: white, 250 µm; black, 100 µm.





Right arrow Return to article