(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.

Fig. 8. Model of Wnt-mediated signaling regulating species-specific facial
morphogenesis. (A) At the phylotypic stage of development, murine
and avian embryos have very similar facial features. (B,C) Our
data suggest that species-specific patterns of Wnt responsiveness pre-date and
predict regional growth within the facial prominences. For example, in embryos
with an elongated frontonasal prominence (B), Wnt responsiveness (green)
predominates in the midline, whereas in embryos with a compressed frontonasal
region and expanded maxillary prominences (C), Wnt signaling (blue) dominates
in the lateral regions and is absent from the midline. (D,E) Wnt
responsiveness is predictive of areas of greater outgrowth. In avians (D), Wnt
signaling is dominant in the frontonasal midline but in animals with muzzles
or snouts (E), Wnt signaling is largely confined to the expanding lateral
facial prominences. (F,G) When the facial prominences have
assumed their species-specific morphology, Wnt signaling is maintained in
regions of outgrowth. In avians (F), this area correlates to the apex of the
upper beak, whereas in mice (G) it correlates to the expanding maxillary
prominences.