|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online August 24, 2007
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.02881
1 Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue,
San Francisco, CA 94132, USA.
2 Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Chikusa,
Nagoya, 464-8601, Japan.
Author for correspondence (e-mail:
LBurrus{at}sfsu.edu)
Received for publication 29 June 2007.
 |
SUMMARY |
|---|
 TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Key words: Wnt1, Wnt3a, Porcupine, Palmitoylation, Chick, Neural tube, Gradient, Proliferation, BAT-gal
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
;
Moon et al., 2004). Wnts act
as morphogens in a number of model systems
(Johnston and Schubiger, 1996;
Kiecker and Niehrs, 2001;
Lawrence et al., 1996;
Neumann and Cohen, 1997;
Zecca et al., 1996); thus, the
mechanism by which Wnt gradients are formed is a key question in developmental
biology. One of the best-characterized Wnt activity gradients is in the
developing chick neural tube, where dorsally expressed Wnt1 and Wnt3a create a
dorsal-to-ventral proliferation gradient that drives the dorsal expansion of
the neural tube (Megason and McMahon,
2002).
Activity gradients, like those observed for Wnt1 and Wnt3a in the neural
tube, can reflect a protein activity gradient, which may be influenced by
competence and inhibitory factors and/or a protein distribution gradient. The
discovery that secreted signaling proteins like Wnts, hedgehogs and Spitz are
palmitoylated has raised the possibility that palmitoylation participates in
the formation of activity and distribution gradients
(Miura et al., 2006;
Pepinsky et al., 1998;
Willert et al., 2003). A
palmitoylation site for mouse Wnt3a has been mapped to cysteine 77
(Willert et al., 2003).
Mutation of this cysteine to an alanine results in a significant loss of
activity in both autocrine and paracrine assays
(Willert et al., 2003).
Likewise, mutation of the cognate residue in Wingless (Wg), the
Drosophila ortholog of Wnt1, causes a loss-of-function wg
phenotype (Couso and Martinez Arias,
1994; Willert et al.,
2003) and a dramatic redistribution of the Wg protein in
Drosophila embryos (Nusse,
2003). These studies suggest that palmitoylation regulates the
activity and distribution of Wnt proteins.
Porcupine is a ubiquitously expressed upstream regulator of Wnt/Wg
glycosylation and lipid-modification that is localized to the endoplasmic
reticulum (Fradkin et al.,
2004; Kadowaki et al.,
1996; Noordermeer et al.,
1995; Nusse, 2003;
Perrimon et al., 1989;
Perrimon and Mahowald, 1987;
Siegfried et al., 1994;
Tanaka et al., 2002;
Tanaka et al., 2000;
van den Heuvel et al., 1993).
Bioinformatic studies predict that Porcupine functions as a membrane bound
O-acyl transferase (Hofmann,
2000). Porcupine is required for the lipid-modification of Wnt/Wg
(Zhai et al., 2004), but it
unknown whether Porcupine is a direct or indirect regulator of Wnt lipidation.
Additionally, although Porcupine loss-of-function mutations phenocopy
mutations in the palmitoylated cysteine of Wg and show a similar disruption of
Wg secretion, it is unknown whether Porcupine directly regulates the
modification of Wg (Kadowaki et al.,
1996; Nusse, 2003;
Siegfried et al., 1994;
van den Heuvel et al., 1993;
Zhai et al., 2004).
Here we test the hypothesis that porcupine-mediated lipid-modification of Wnt1 and Wnt3a proteins influences the generation of the proliferation gradient observed in the chick neural tube by regulating both the activity and distribution of Wnt proteins. Through a combination of in vitro and in vivo experiments, which include the use of newly developed monoclonal antibodies against chick Wnt1 and Wnt3a, we show that both Wnt1 and Wnt3a possess at least one previously unidentified site for porcupine-mediated lipid-modification. We further show that porcupine promotes Wnt activity and restricts the diffusion of Wnt proteins away from the site of synthesis. Our results suggest porcupine is a key regulator of the Wnt gradient in the developing vertebrate neural tube.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
),
Super8XTopFlash and Super8XFopFlash
(Veeman et al., 2003); Andy
McMahon for pCIG (Megason and McMahon,
2002), chick (c) Wnt1 partial cDNA
(Hollyday et al., 1995), mouse
(m) Wnt1 (Fung et al.,
1985) and Wnt3a cDNAs
(Gavin et al., 1990); Elena
Frolova for a partial cWnt1 cDNA
(Fokina and Frolova, 2006);
Tsutomu Nohno for a partial cWnt3a cDNA
(Kawakami et al., 2000); and
Stefano Piccolo for BAT-gal (Maretto et
al., 2003). Other materials include: TX-114 (Fisher); fetal bovine serum (Hyclone); Hybridoma Cloning Factor (Origen); lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen); Dual Luciferase Reporter (Promega); Triton X-100; anti-phosphohistone H3 (ser10) polyclonal antibody (Upstate Technologies); anti-tubulin (Santa Cruz); anti-ß-galactosidase J1E7 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank); anti-NCAM (Chemicon); goat anti-mouse IgG(H+L)-AP, goat anti-mouse IgG(H+L)-Cy3 and goat-anti-rabbit IgG(H+L)-Cy5 (Jackson ImmunoResearch).
Plasmids
Full-length cDNAs for cWnt1 and cWnt3a have not been
isolated. Thus, we used a construct with the mWnt3a signal peptide fused to
cWnt3a coding sequence (Galli et
al., 2004). Because the mature protein contains only chick
sequence, we refer to this chimeric protein as cWnt3a. We generated a similar
fusion for the chick Wnt1 protein (cWnt1), piecing together amino acids 1-63
from mWnt1 (...EPSLQL) with amino acids 64-370 from cWnt1 (LSRKQ...).
We used pGEX-2T (Amersham) to generate GST:Wnt fusion proteins. For GST:cWnt1, the fusion protein corresponds to amino acids 73-112 of the full-length mouse-chick chimeric Wnt1 protein (RQNPG....QGPNI). For GST:cWnt3a, the fusion protein corresponds to amino acids 208-264 of the full-length mouse-chick chimeric Wnt3a protein (LSGSC....YNFFK). A construct encoding 6xhis-tagged Wnt1 was generated by subcloning the same fragments into pET21(b) (Novagen).
We used sequence overlap extension to generate point mutations in cWnt1, cWnt3a and mPorcD (accession AB036749). For cWnt1 and cWnt3a, we changed C93 and C77, respectively, to either a serine or alanine. For mPorcD, we changed the H341 residue to either an aspartic acid or glutamine.
For uniformity of expression in cell culture studies, the following cDNAs were subcloned into pcDNA3.1(-)A (Invitrogen): cWnt1, cWnt1(C93S), cWnt3a, cWnt3a(C77S), mPorcD and mPorcD(H341Q) and GFP. The myc/his tag encoded by sequences in pcDNA was intentionally excluded in the resulting protein.
For electroporations, the sequences encoding cWnt1, cWnt1(C93S), cWnt3a,
cWnt3a(C77S), mPorcD and mPorcD(H341Q) were subcloned into pCIG
(Megason and McMahon,
2002).
For RNAi studies, the Whitehead siRNA selection algorithm identified
sequences directed against human (h) PORC
(Caricasole et al., 2002;
Tanaka et al., 2000;
Yuan et al., 2004). The first
sequence (`a'), which corresponds to nucleotide 434 of hPORCD, is
5'-aaaaAAGGCAGTGTCTCTGGGCTTCGA-3', whereas the `b' sequence
corresponds to nucleotide 946 and is
5'-aaaaAAGCTGGAACCTGCCCATGTCTT-3' (lower case letters represent
nucleotides added for subcloning). BLAST analysis verified no significant
cross-reactivity with other genes. Double-stranded oligonucleotides encoding
these two regions were subcloned into pHippy. A control RNAi construct against
GFP was generated as described
(Kaykas and Moon, 2004).
To test the efficacy of our RNAi constructs, we fused sequences encoding
HA-tagged mPorcD (Tanaka et al.,
2000) to hPORC sequences that include target sequences
for the RNAi constructs (Caricasole et al.,
2002). This insert was subcloned into pcDNA3.1 for transfections.
For transfections, 0.1-1 µg of pcDNA.HA-Porc was transfected alone or with
1.5-18 µg of the GFP or hPORC RNAi constructs.
Generation of monoclonal antibodies against cWnt1 and cWnt3a
GST-Wnt fusion proteins were produced in E. coli and purified over
a glutathione-agarose affinity column
(Burrus and McMahon, 1995).
Concentrated pooled fractions (1-8 mg/ml) were sent to Covance for mouse
immunizations and fusions. We identified positive clones by ELISA and western
blot analysis. Clones 5F1-G11-D1 (Wnt1; IgG1) and 3E9-1B11-H3 (Wnt3a; IgG2b)
were used exclusively in this manuscript. These antibodies do not detect mWnt1
or mWnt3a (data not shown).
TX-114 phase-separation assay
Human embryonic kidney 293T cells were plated on 12-well plates the day
prior to transfection at a density that would yield 90% confluence on the day
of transfection. Transfections were performed with lipofectamine with minor
modifications from the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were transfected
with 1.6 µg of each vector per well and incubated overnight at 37°C in
5% CO2. Cells were washed once with PBS (pH 7.4). Then, 0.5 ml 100
mM Hepes (pH 7.4) containing 100 mM NaCl was added to each well. After
scraping, cells were triturated with 18G and 25G needles and transferred to
microcentrifuge tubes. The TX-114 extraction was performed essentially as
described previously (Willert et al.,
2003). Samples were precipitated, resuspended, and boiled in
1xSDS-PAGE sample buffer prior to electrophoresis and electroblotting.
Western blots were probed with anti-Wnt1, anti-Wnt3a and anti-tubulin.
Alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies were used for detection.
Each experiment was performed at least three times.
TCF reporter assay
293T cells were plated onto 24-well plates as described above. DNA
quantities used in transfections are as follows: pcDNA.GFP, pcDNA.Wnt1,
pcDNA.Wnt1(C93S or C93A), pcDNA.Wnt3a, pcDNA.Wnt3a(C77S or C77A),
pcDNA.mPorcD, pcDNA.mPorcD(H341D or H341Q) at 0.25 µg/well; pHippy.GFP,
pHippy.hPorc(a), pHippy.hPorc(b) at a total of 125 ng/well; Super8XTopFlash or
Super8XFopFlash at 0.1 µg/well; RL-CMV at 0.1 ng/well. Luciferase
measurements were carried out in a TD-20/20 luminometer. For each assay, five
independent replicates were performed. The assay was performed at least three
times.
Electroporations
Hamburger and Hamilton (HH) stage-11 to -14 chick embryos
(Hamburger and Hamilton, 1951)
were electroporated in the neural tube as previously described
(Galli et al., 2004). Embryos
were embedded and sectioned (16-30 µm) on a Leica cryostat
(Galli et al., 2004).
Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization of tissue sections
Tissue sections were immunostained with anti-Wnt1, anti-Wnt3a, anti-NCAM,
anti-phosphohistone H3, or anti-ß-galactosidase and imaged by confocal
microscopy as previously described (Galli
et al., 2006). In situ hybridizations were performed according to
standard protocols.
Quantitation and statistical analysis
Quantification of the data in Fig.
7 by two independent investigators yielded identical results.
Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed, unpaired Student's
t-test.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
). Because regulators of both protein activity and
distribution play important roles in the formation of activity gradients, we
analyzed the distribution of Wnt1 and Wnt3a proteins in the chick neural tube.
To do this, we generated monoclonal antibodies against chick (c) Wnt1 and
Wnt3a. Both antibodies are capable of specifically recognizing cWnt1 and
cWnt3a on western blots (Fig.
1A) and via immunohistochemistry when overexpressed in cells
(Fig. 1B) and tissues
(Fig. 2A-F). Only the cWnt1
antibody, however, was able to detect endogenous Wnt protein
(Fig. 2G-O). In the western
blot (Fig. 1A), the presence of
multiple bands migrating at approximately 40 kDa is consistent with previous
reports of differential glycosylation of Wnt proteins
(Brown et al., 1987;
Burrus and McMahon, 1995;
Papkoff et al., 1987;
Smolich et al., 1993).
Likewise, the distribution of cWnt1 and cWnt3a overexpressed in COS7 cells
(Fig. 1B) is indistinguishable
from that of mouse (m) Wnt1 and Wnt3a, which are localized to the endoplasmic
reticulum (Burrus and McMahon,
1995). We then determined the localization of Wnt proteins expressed in the chick neural tube. The vast majority of ectopic cWnt1 and cWnt3a was distributed at or very near the site(s) of synthesis (Fig. 2A-F). The perinuclear staining observed in the GFP-positive cells was reminiscent of that observed in COS cells (Fig. 1B, Fig. 2A-F). We also occasionally observed immunopositive punctae away from the site(s) of synthesis (Fig. 2D).
|
Porcupine promotes lipid-modification of Wnt1/Wnt3a
Although Porcupine is an upstream regulator of Wnt activity and
distribution in invertebrates, porcupine has not been directly linked to the
lipid-modification of vertebrate Wnt proteins. To test whether porcupine might
have a role in the lipid-modification of vertebrate Wnt proteins, we
transiently expressed wild-type cWnt1 or cWnt3a along with either mPorcD or
GFP (control) in 293T cells (Figs
3,
4). We then used a TX-114
phase-separation assay to compare the hydrophobicity of Wnt protein expressed
in the presence of either mPorcD or GFP. Four splice variants of porcupine
have been identified in the mouse (designated A-D); we chose to use the `D'
variant for these studies because it is the predominant variant expressed in
neural tissue (Tanaka et al.,
2000). Upon co-expression of cWnt1 or cWnt3a with GFP, we observed
that Wnt protein was present in both the aqueous and detergent phases (Figs
3,
4). The presence of some
protein in the detergent phase was not unexpected, as porcupine expression is
ubiquitous and we had determined via RT-PCR that 293T cells express endogenous
porcupine (data not shown). The protein in the aqueous phase exhibited more
heterogeneity in apparent molecular mass than that in the detergent phase.
These results are consistent with reports that Wnts are differentially
glycosylated (Brown et al.,
1987; Burrus and McMahon,
1995; Papkoff et al.,
1987; Smolich et al.,
1993) and that ectopic porcupine promotes processing into more
fully glycosylated forms, presumably by an indirect mechanism
(Tanaka et al., 2002). It is
possible that a different subset of isoforms would have been observed had we
assayed Wnt proteins in conditioned medium rather than in cell lysates, as was
done here. Upon co-expression of cWnt1 or cWnt3a with mPorcD, we observed a
dramatic shift of Wnt protein into the detergent phase. This shift was
accompanied by an increase in the total amount of Wnt protein in the aqueous
and detergent phases. Tubulin levels remained constant in the presence or
absence of porcupine. Thus, in addition to promoting an increase in the
hydrophobicity of Wnt, ectopic porcupine also stimulated an overall
accumulation of cell-associated Wnt protein. These data are consistent with a
role for porcupine as an upstream regulator of the lipid-modification of Wnt
proteins.
Bioinformatic analysis coupled with functional analysis of other
MBOAT-family members suggested that the H341 residue is required for the acyl
transferase activity of mPorcD (Guo et
al., 2005; Hofmann,
2000; Lin et al.,
2003). To test whether the predicted catalytic domain is required
to shift Wnt protein into the hydrophobic phase of a TX-114 extraction, we
carried out parallel experiments using a porcupine construct with an aspartic
acid (D) or a glutamine (Q) residue substitution of H341 [designated
mPorcD(H341D) and mPorcD(H341Q), respectively]. Upon co-transfection of cells
with Wnt3a and either mPorcD(H341D) or mPorcD(H341Q), the relative proportion
of Wnt3a protein in the aqueous/detergent fractions was not detectably changed
as compared with co-transfection of Wnt3a and GFP
(Fig. 3). Furthermore,
co-transfection of the mutant porcupine proteins did not increase the level of
cell-associated Wnt protein (Fig.
3). In fact, we consistently observed a reduction in Wnt protein
accumulation in cells co-transfected with mutant porcupine. Thus, the
histidine in the predicted acyl transferase active site of porcupine is
required for the hydrophobic shift observed for Wnt protein in the TX-114
phase-separation assay.
Wnt1 and Wnt3a possess at least one additional site for porcupine-mediated lipid-modification
Although a single palmitoylated cysteine residue has been identified in Wnt
proteins, the existence of additional modification sites was not ruled out
(Willert et al., 2003). To
determine whether additional modification sites exist, we tested the ability
of mPorcD to stimulate the hydrophobic modification of Wnt1 and Wnt3a, in
which the previously identified cysteine residue was changed to a serine
residue [designated Wnt1(C93S) and Wnt3a(C77S)]. As before, mPorcD
dramatically stimulated the shift of mutant cWnt1 and cWnt3a into the
detergent phase as compared with co-transfection with GFP
(Fig. 4). Because
oxyester-linked palmitate occasionally occurs on serines
(Bernstein et al., 2004), we
also tested the ability of porcupine to modify cWnt1(C93A) and cWnt3a(C77A)
proteins. Our results show that porcupine is still able to promote the
lipid-modification of these mutant proteins (see Fig. S1 in the supplementary
material), demonstrating that the previously identified cysteine residue is
not the only site modified by porcupine.
|
). All
cells were co-transfected with Renilla luciferase (pRL-CMV) to
control for differences in cell lysis. It is important to note that this assay
does not distinguish between autocrine and paracrine Wnt activity. We first tested whether overexpression of porcupine could augment the activity of cWnt3a in 293T cells. Co-transfection of porcupine and cWnt3a caused a 1.2-fold increase in reporter activity as compared with co-transfection of GFP and cWnt3a (Fig. 5, P<0.05). Thus, overexpression of porcupine promotes Wnt activity.
To determine the role of the H341 residue of porcupine, we tested the ability of mPorcD(H341D) and mPorcD(H341Q) to promote Wnt activity. Interestingly, co-transfection with either mutant resulted in diminished reporter activity as compared with controls (Fig. 5, P<0.05). These results suggest that the catalytically inactive porcupine is able to act as an inhibitor of endogenous porcupine, possibly via direct competition for substrate.
|
). As a
negative control, we used an RNAi construct designed to knockdown the
expression of GFP.
|
Co-transfection of either hPORC RNAi construct along with cWnt3a caused a dramatic reduction of cWnt3a activity as compared with co-transfection with GFP RNAi (Fig. 5). Cells transfected with both hPORC RNAi constructs exhibited a less dramatic loss of cWnt3a-induced TopFlash activity (Fig. 5). Co-transfection of ectopic mPorcD partially rescued the effects of the hPORC RNAi constructs (data not shown). Similar data were obtained for cWnt1 (data not shown). Together, these results show that porcupine is required for Wnt activity in 293T cells (P<0.01 for all RNAi constructs).
We then tested whether mutation of C93/C77 in Wnt1/Wnt3a would yield similar results as knocking down endogenous porcupine. cWnt1(C93S) and cWnt3a(C77S) exhibited reduced activity as compared with their wild-type counterparts (Fig. 5). Thus, this cysteine residue is important for the biological activity of Wnt1 and Wnt3a.
Because our TX-114 assays indicated that porcupine can promote the lipid-modification of at least one site in addition to C93/C77, we also tested whether additional sites were likely to play a role in the regulation of Wnt activity by porcupine. To do this, we co-transfected cWnt3a(C77S) with a mixture of the two hPORC RNAi constructs. Cells transfected with these constructs exhibited less TopFlash activity than cells transfected with cWnt3a(C77S) and GFP RNAi (Fig. 5, P<0.01). Cumulatively, these results provide strong evidence for the existence of at least one additional site for porcupine modification.
Porcupine and palmitoylation also regulate Wnt activity in the chick neural tube
To test whether the observed roles for porcupine and Wnt palmitoylation in
293T cells are conserved in the chick neural tube, we electroporated porcupine
and Wnt constructs into the neural tube and assessed their effect on
proliferation. All cDNAs were subcloned into pCIG, a vector that uses the
ß-actin promoter to drive the expression of a bi-cistronic mRNA, which is
then translated into two independent proteins: the experimental protein and a
nuclear-localized variant of GFP (Megason
and McMahon, 2002). Electroporations were conducted with the anode
on the left side of the embryo and the cathode on the right, resulting in
transfection of the right side of the neural tube. GFP-positive embryos were
harvested 24 hours post-electroporation and immunostained with
anti-phosphohistone H3, a marker for cells in late G2/M phase
(Hendzel et al., 1997;
Wei et al., 1999). In the
developing neural tube, mitotic cells are positioned adjacent to the lumen in
the ventricular zone. To quantify proliferation in electroporated embryos, we
counted the total number of H3-positive cells on the control (left) and
experimental (right) sides of the neural tube. To normalize the number of
mitotic cells back to the total number of cells, we divided the number of
mitotic cells by the area of the control and experimental sides of the neural
tube to generate a `proliferation index'. This means of normalization is valid
because we have previously determined that cell size remains constant
(Galli et al., 2006). Because
the proliferation index is dependent on the stage of the embryo and the axial
level analyzed, we further normalized the data by dividing the experimental
proliferation index by the control proliferation index. Thus, we expect that
ectopic expression of inert constructs would produce a ratio close to 1,
whereas those that induce proliferation would yield a ratio of greater than 1,
and those that reduce proliferation would generate a ratio of less than 1.
|
|
|
Ectopic porcupine also shortens the BAT-gal activity gradient in the chick neural tube
To further assess the effect of porcupine on the gradient of Wnt activity,
we co-electroporated embryos with BAT-gal, a Wnt reporter construct
(Maretto et al., 2003), and
either a GFP-expressing control vector (pCIG) or pCIG containing Wnt1, Wnt3a
or porcupine inserts. We then divided the length of the Wnt activity gradient
(along the dorsal-ventral axis), as indicated by immunostaining with
antibodies against ß-galactosidase, by the length of the transfected area
as indicated by GFP (Fig. 8).
It should be noted that these measurements do not provide a measure of the
level of Wnt activity, which would require measurement of the intensity of the
ß-galactosidase immunostaining.
When co-electroporated with pCIG (GFP) alone, the BAT-gal gradient extended
throughout most of the dorsal half of the neural tube
(Fig. 8). Consistent with
previous reports, ectopic expression of cWnt1 and cWnt3a extended the Wnt
activity range ventrally as compared with expression of pCIG
(P<0.001; Fig. 8).
If the function of porcupine is to simply increase the affinity/avidity of
Wnt, we expect porcupine overexpression to lengthen the Wnt gradient. This is
because low concentrations of Wnt protein at the distal end of the Wnt
gradient would have effectively greater activity, permitting activation of
BAT-gal in more-ventral domains. Similarly, if porcupine promotes the
stability or secretion of Wnt protein, we expect overexpression of porcupine
to lengthen the gradient. However, if porcupine restricts the range of Wnt
distribution, we expect a shortened gradient in the presence of porcupine.
Indeed, we observed that porcupine expression restricted the Wnt activity
range compared with control embryos (P<0.01;
Fig. 8). These data suggest
that the range of Wnt distribution is restricted by the presence of porcupine.
Predicted outcomes for the mPorcD(H341Q) mutant are less straightforward. On
the one hand, Porcupine is required for Wg/Wnt activity and Wg secretion
(Kadowaki et al., 1996;
Nusse, 2003;
Siegfried et al., 1994;
van den Heuvel et al., 1993;
Zhai et al., 2004). On the
other hand, ectopic porcupine appears to restrict the range of diffusion.
Sections with fewer than five ß-galactosidase-positive cells were
eliminated from the analysis as we felt there was not adequate data to suggest
a distal limit for the range of activity. Because effects on secretion are
expected to supersede effects on the range of diffusion, we predicted that
expression of the slightly inhibitory mutant porcupine [mPorcD(H341Q)]
construct would result in a decrease in the range of Wnt activity. Though not
statistically significant (P=0.14), this trend was observed
(Fig. 8).
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
; Chamoun et al.,
2001; Lee and Treisman,
2001; Micchelli et al.,
2002; Miura et al.,
2006), this modification has differential effects on the two
ligands. Whereas palmitoylation of sonic hedgehog (Shh) is required for
long-range signaling (Chen et al.,
2004), palmitoylation of Spitz restricts its range of activity
(Miura et al., 2006). We show
here that porcupine restricts the range of Wnt activity.
To reach this conclusion, we analyzed the role of porcupine in regulating
the lipid-modification, activity and distribution of Wnt proteins in
vertebrates. First, antibodies against Wnt1 were used to assess distribution
of ectopic and endogenous Wnt1 in the developing chick neural tube. When we
overexpressed either cWnt1 or cWnt3a protein in the neural tube, the vast
majority of the staining was very close to the site of synthesis. Although we
observed immunopositive punctae resembling Drosophila
vesicular/argosome/lipoprotein-type structures
(Gonzalez et al., 1991;
Greco et al., 2001;
Panakova et al., 2005;
Strigini and Cohen, 2000;
van den Heuvel et al., 1993),
we cannot rule out the possibility that these represent aggregates of
improperly folded Wnt protein. Immunostaining for endogenous Wnt1 showed that
the protein localized very close to the site of synthesis. We were unable to
reliably detect a Wnt protein gradient extending as far ventrally as the
expression of BAT-gal in control embryos. We suspect this difference is due to
the ability to detect cell-associated, but not secreted, Wnt protein. For
instance, tissue fixation precludes the detection of secreted Wg in
Drosophila (Strigini and Cohen,
2000). We observe similar results with fixed or fresh frozen
sections, even though our Wnt1 antibody recognizes native Wnt1 protein (data
not shown). The exceptional intractability of Wnt immunostaining is further
highlighted by the fact that our immunostaining protocol yields robust
staining of the Shh gradient emanating from the floor plate/notochord (data
not shown).
|
; Willert et al.,
2003), and S209 of Wnt3a
(Takada et al., 2006). This
observation is significant because membrane interactions generally require two
separate lipid modifications in order meet the energetic requirements of the
association between protein and membrane
(Arni et al., 1998;
Hancock et al., 1990;
Resh, 1994). Because these two
sites exhibit little sequence similarity, we wondered whether porcupine
regulates the modification of both of these sites. As porcupine is able to
promote lipid-modification of the C93/C77 mutants, it is likely that porcupine
regulates lipid-modification of the S224/S209 site of Wnt1 and Wnt3a. Our
observation that porcupine can also promote the modification of Wnt1 when S224
is mutated (data not shown), further suggests that porcupine regulates the
modification of C93. We do not know whether the modification of these sites
represents a direct or indirect activity of porcupine. Data showing that the
histidine in the acyl transferase active site of porcupine is required for Wnt
modification is consistent with the hypothesis that porcupine is the enzyme
that directly modifies Wnt proteins. However, the only way to unequivocally
test this is to determine whether purified porcupine can mediate
lipid-modification of purified Wnt proteins.
We then tested the role of porcupine/lipid-modification in mediating the
activity of Wnt1 and Wnt3a. Consistent with previous studies in
Drosophila (Kadowaki et al.,
1996; Nusse, 2003;
Siegfried et al., 1994;
Zhai et al., 2004), porcupine
loss-of-function studies in 293T cells and in chick neural tube show a
decrease in Wnt activity. Likewise, mutation of C93/C77 and S224/S209 show no
detectable activity in 293T cells (data not shown). In the neural tube,
Wnt1(C93S) shows decreased activity, whereas Wnt3a(C77S) shows increased
activity. Although we do not know the reason the singly mutated Wnt3a is
hypermorphic, we suspect that mutation of the second lipid-modification site
in Wnt3a will result in a loss of activity. As our studies do not
differentiate between the autocrine and paracrine activities of Wnt1 and
Wnt3a, we cannot definitively distinguish whether we are observing a decrease
in the affinity/avidity of Wnt1/Wnt3a or a decrease in secretion.
We also found that expression of ectopic mPorcD promotes the activity of
cWnt1 and cWnt3a in 293T cells and in the chick dorsal neural tube. As per
above, this might reflect an increase in affinity/avidity or an increase in
secretion. Our results from the TX-114 assays showing that porcupine increases
the amount of cell-associated Wnt protein, suggest that ectopic porcupine does
not simply promote secretion. Furthermore, whereas porcupine loss-of-function
experiments cause improper secretion and localization of Wnt proteins
(Nusse, 2003;
Takada et al., 2006;
van den Heuvel et al., 1993;
Zhai et al., 2004),
gain-of-function experiments show little effect on secretion
(Kadowaki et al., 1996). Thus,
it is unlikely that the ability of ectopic porcupine to promote Wnt activity
can be solely attributed to increased secretion. We predict that
lipid-modification of Wnts promotes their affinity/avidity for cell surface
receptors. This prediction is consistent with recently published data showing
that binding of Wnt5a to frizzled 5 requires palmitoylation of C104
(Kurayoshi et al., 2007).
Because porcupine is an upstream regulator of glycosylation and
lipid-modification of vertebrate Wnt proteins
(Kurayoshi et al., 2007;
Takada et al., 2006;
Tanaka et al., 2002),
differences in Wnt activity observed upon porcupine overexpression might stem
from changes in glycosylation and not lipidation. Although both glycosylation
and lipid-modification are required for the secretion of Wnts, the removal of
the two known lipid-modification sites causes a more dramatic loss of activity
than the mutation of all asparagine-linked glycosylation sites (data not
shown) (Komekado et al., 2007;
Kurayoshi et al., 2007;
Mason et al., 1992;
Takada et al., 2006;
Willert et al., 2003;
Zhai et al., 2004). As these
effects of removing the two lipid-modification sites more closely mimic the
effects of knocking down porcupine (shown here)
(Kurayoshi et al., 2007;
Takada et al., 2006;
Willert et al., 2003), it
seems likely that the primary role of porcupine with respect to Wnt proteins
is the regulation of lipid-modification.
The most important findings of our work are derived from our use of the
chick model system to assess the effect of porcupine on the Wnt1/Wnt3a
gradient in the developing neural tube. Loss-of-function studies identify a
requirement for porcupine in the secretion of vertebrate Wnt proteins
(Takada et al., 2006);
however, the early requirement for porcupine in secretion precluded
determination of the role of porcupine/lipid-modification in regulating the
distribution of Wnt protein after secretion. Our gain-of-function studies show
that porcupine steepens the Wnt-mediated proliferation gradient in the neural
tube and shortens the Wnt range of activity as measured by BAT-gal activity.
Although the ability of porcupine to steepen the proliferation gradient could
be attributed to the ability of porcupine to augment Wnt activity, these
results strongly suggest that porcupine limits the distribution of Wnt
protein. Thus, we conclude that porcupine plays a role in regulating both the
activity and distribution of Wnt proteins. Our interpretation is that
lipid-modification by porcupine results in Wnts being tethered closer to their
site of synthesis, thus raising their local concentration. Interestingly,
heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) are also able to promote such an
increase in local concentration (Baeg et
al., 2001; Giraldez et al.,
2002; Han et al.,
2005; Kirkpatrick et al.,
2004). Our data from the TX-114 extractions showing that porcupine
overexpression promotes increased cell-associated Wnt protein is consistent
with this idea.
Other proteins involved in Wnt secretion and/or the establishment of Wnt
gradients have been identified (Banziger et
al., 2006; Bartscherer et al.,
2006; Coudreuse and Korswagen,
2007; Coudreuse et al.,
2006; Hausmann et al.,
2007; Prasad and Clark,
2006). It will be interesting to determine how these proteins
coordinate with porcupine to regulate Wnt secretion and gradient
formation.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material for this article is available at
http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/134/18/3339/DC1
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Amanai, K. and Jiang, J. (2001). Distinct roles of Central missing and Dispatched in sending the Hedgehog signal. Development 128,5119 -5127.[Medline]
Arni, S., Keilbaugh, S. A., Ostermeyer, A. G. and Brown, D.
A. (1998). Association of GAP-43 with detergent-resistant
membranes requires two palmitoylated cysteine residues. J. Biol.
Chem. 273,28478
-28485.
Baeg, G. H., Lin, X., Khare, N., Baumgartner, S. and Perrimon, N. (2001). Heparan sulfate proteoglycans are critical for the organization of the extracellular distribution of Wingless. Development 128,87 -94.[Abstract]
Banziger, C., Soldini, D., Schutt, C., Zipperlen, P., Hausmann, G. and Basler, K. (2006). Wntless, a conserved membrane protein dedicated to the secretion of Wnt proteins from signaling cells. Cell 125,509 -522.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bartscherer, K., Pelte, N., Ingelfinger, D. and Boutros, M. (2006). Secretion of Wnt ligands requires Evi, a conserved transmembrane protein. Cell 125,523 -533.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bernstein, L. S., Linder, M. E. and Hepler, J. R. (2004). Analysis of RGS protein palmitoylation. Methods Mol. Biol. 237,195 -204.[Medline]
Brown, A. M., Papkoff, J., Fung, Y. K., Shackleford, G. M. and
Varmus, H. E. (1987). Identification of protein products
encoded by the proto-oncogene int-1. Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,3971
-3977.
Burrus, L. W. and McMahon, A. P. (1995). Biochemical analysis of murine Wnt proteins reveals both shared and distinct properties. Exp. Cell Res. 220,363 -373.[CrossRef][Medline]
Caricasole, A., Ferraro, T., Rimland, J. M. and Terstappen, G. C. (2002). Molecular cloning and initial characterization of the MG61/PORC gene, the human homologue of the Drosophila segment polarity gene Porcupine. Gene 288,147 -157.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chamoun, Z., Mann, R. K., Nellen, D., von Kessler, D. P.,
Bellotto, M., Beachy, P. A. and Basler, K. (2001). Skinny
hedgehog, an acyltransferase required for palmitoylation and activity of the
hedgehog signal. Science
293,2080
-2084.
Chen, M. H., Li, Y. J., Kawakami, T., Xu, S. M. and Chuang, P.
T. (2004). Palmitoylation is required for the production of a
soluble multimeric Hedgehog protein complex and long-range signaling in
vertebrates. Genes Dev.
18,641
-659.
Coudreuse, D. and Korswagen, H. C. (2007). The
making of Wnt: new insights into Wnt maturation, sorting and secretion.
Development 134,3
-12.
Coudreuse, D. Y., Roel, G., Betist, M. C., Destree, O. and
Korswagen, H. C. (2006). Wnt gradient formation requires
retromer function in Wnt-producing cells. Science
312,921
-924.
Couso, J. P. and Martinez Arias, A. (1994). Notch is required for wingless signaling in the epidermis of Drosophila. Cell 79,259 -272.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fokina, V. M. and Frolova, E. I. (2006). Expression patterns of Wnt genes during development of an anterior part of the chicken eye. Dev. Dyn. 235,496 -505.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fradkin, L. G., van Schie, M., Wouda, R. R., de Jong, A., Kamphorst, J. T., Radjkoemar-Bansraj, M. and Noordermeer, J. N. (2004). The Drosophila Wnt5 protein mediates selective axon fasciculation in the embryonic central nervous system. Dev. Biol. 272,362 -375.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fung, Y. K., Shackleford, G. M., Brown, A. M., Sanders, G. S.
and Varmus, H. E. (1985). Nucleotide sequence and expression
in vitro of cDNA derived from mRNA of int-1, a provirally activated mouse
mammary oncogene. Mol. Cell. Biol.
5,3337
-3344.
Galli, L. M., Willert, K., Nusse, R., Yablonka-Reuveni, Z., Nohno, T., Denetclaw, W. and Burrus, L. W. (2004). A proliferative role for Wnt-3a in chick somites. Dev. Biol. 269,489 -504.[CrossRef][Medline]
Galli, L. M., Barnes, T., Cheng, T., Acosta, L., Anglade, A., Willert, K., Nusse, R. and Burrus, L. W. (2006). Differential inhibition of Wnt-3a by Sfrp-1, Sfrp-2, and Sfrp-3. Dev. Dyn. 235,681 -690.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gavin, B. J., McMahon, J. A. and McMahon, A. P.
(1990). Expression of multiple novel Wnt-1/int-1-related genes
during fetal and adult mouse development. Genes Dev.
4,2319
-2332.
Giraldez, A. J., Copley, R. R. and Cohen, S. M. (2002). HSPG modification by the secreted enzyme Notum shapes the Wingless morphogen gradient. Dev. Cell 2, 667-676.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gonzalez, F., Swales, L., Bejsovec, A., Skaer, H. and Martinez Arias, A. (1991). Secretion and movement of wingless protein in the epidermis of the Drosophila embryo. Mech. Dev. 35, 43-54.[CrossRef][Medline]
Greco, V., Hannus, M. and Eaton, S. (2001). Argosomes: a potential vehicle for the spread of morphogens through epithelia. Cell 106,633 -645.[CrossRef][Medline]
Guo, Z.-Y., Lin, S., Heinen, J. A., Chang, C. C. Y. and Chang,
T.-Y. (2005). The active site His-460 of human acyl-coenzyme
A:cholesterol acyltransferase 1 resides in a hitherto undisclosed
transmembrane domain. J. Biol. Chem.
280,37814
-37826.
Hamburger, V. and Hamilton, H. L. (1951). A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Morphol. 88,49 -92.[CrossRef]
Han, C., Yan, D., Belenkaya, T. Y. and Lin, X.
(2005). Drosophila glypicans Dally and Dally-like shape the
extracellular Wingless morphogen gradient in the wing disc.
Development 132,667
-679.
Hancock, J. F., Paterson, H. and Marshall, C. J. (1990). A polybasic domain or palmitoylation is required in addition to the CAAX motif to localize p21ras to the plasma membrane. Cell 63,133 -139.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hausmann, G., Banziger, C. and Basler, K. (2007). Helping Wingless take flight: how WNT proteins are secreted. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 331-336.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hendzel, M. J., Wei, Y., Mancini, M. A., Van Hooser, A., Ranalli, T., Brinkley, B. R., Bazett-Jones, D. P. and Allis, C. D. (1997). Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of histone H3 initiates primarily within pericentromeric heterochromatin during G2 and spreads in an ordered fashion coincident with mitotic chromosome condensation. Chromosoma 106,348 -360.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hofmann, K. (2000). A superfamily of membrane-bound O-acyltransferases with implications for wnt signaling. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25,111 -112.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hollyday, M., McMahon, J. A. and McMahon, A. P. (1995). Wnt expression patterns in chick embryo nervous system. Mech. Dev. 52,9 -25.[CrossRef][Medline]
Johnston, L. A. and Schubiger, G. (1996). Ectopic expression of wingless in imaginal discs interferes with decapentaplegic expression and alters cell determination. Development 122,3519 -3529.[Abstract]
Kadowaki, T., Wilder, E., Klingensmith, J., Zachary, K. and
Perrimon, N. (1996). The segment polarity gene porcupine
encodes a putative multitransmembrane protein involved in Wingless processing.
Genes Dev. 10,3116
-3128.
Kawakami, Y., Wada, N., Nishimatsu, S. and Nohno, T. (2000). Involvement of frizzled-10 in Wnt-7a signaling during chick limb development. Dev. Growth Differ. 42,561 -569.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kaykas, A. and Moon, R. T. (2004). A plasmid-based system for expressing small interfering RNA libraries in mammalian cells. BMC Cell Biol. 5, 16.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kiecker, C. and Niehrs, C. (2001). A morphogen
gradient of Wnt/beta-catenin signalling regulates anteroposterior neural
patterning in Xenopus. Development
128,4189
-4201.
Kirkpatrick, C. A., Dimitroff, B. D., Rawson, J. M. and Selleck, S. B. (2004). Spatial regulation of Wingless morphogen distribution and signaling by Dally-like protein. Dev. Cell 7,513 -523.[CrossRef][Medline]
Komekado, H., Yamamoto, H., Chiba, T. and Kikuchi, A.
(2007). Glycosylation and palmitoylation of Wnt-3a are coupled to
produce an active form of Wnt-3a. Genes Cells
12,521
-534.
Kurayoshi, M., Yamamoto, H., Izumi, S. and Kikuchi, A. (2007). Post-translational palmitoylation and glycosylation of Wnt-5a are necessary for its signalling. Biochem. J. 402,515 -523.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lawrence, P. A., Sanson, B. and Vincent, J. P. (1996). Compartments, wingless and engrailed: patterning the ventral epidermis of Drosophila embryos. Development 122,4095 -4103.[Abstract]
Lee, J. D. and Treisman, J. E. (2001). Sightless has homology to transmembrane acyltransferases and is required to generate active Hedgehog protein. Curr. Biol. 11,1147 -1152.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lin, S., Lu, X., Chang, C. C. Y. and Chang, T.-Y.
(2003). Human acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase
expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells: membrane topology and active site
location. Mol. Biol. Cell
14,2447
-2460.
Logan, C. Y. and Nusse, R. (2004). The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20,781 -810.[CrossRef][Medline]
Maretto, S., Cordenonsi, M., Dupont, S., Braghetta, P.,
Broccoli, V., Hassan, A. B., Volpin, D., Bressan, G. M. and Piccolo, S.
(2003). Mapping Wnt/beta-catenin signaling during mouse
development and in colorectal tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 100,3299
-3304.
Mason, J. O., Kitajewski, J. and Varmus, H. E. (1992). Mutational analysis of mouse Wnt-1 identifies two temperature-sensitive alleles and attributes of Wnt-1 protein essential for transformation of a mammary cell line. Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 521-533.[Abstract]
Megason, S. G. and McMahon, A. P. (2002). A
mitogen gradient of dorsal midline Wnts organizes growth in the CNS.
Development 129,2087
-2098.
Micchelli, C. A., The, I., Selva, E., Mogila, V. and Perrimon, N. (2002). Rasp, a putative transmembrane acyltransferase, is required for Hedgehog signaling. Development 129,843 -851.[Medline]
Miura, G. I., Buglino, J., Alvarado, D., Lemmon, M. A., Resh, M. D. and Treisman, J. E. (2006). Palmitoylation of the EGFR ligand Spitz by Rasp increases Spitz activity by restricting its diffusion. Dev. Cell 10,167 -176.[CrossRef][Medline]
Moon, R. T., Kohn, A. D., De Ferrari, G. V. and Kaykas, A. (2004). WNT and beta-catenin signalling: diseases and therapies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5,691 -701.[CrossRef][Medline]
Neumann, C. J. and Cohen, S. M. (1997). Long-range action of Wingless organizes the dorsal-ventral axis of the Drosophila wing. Development 124,871 -880.[Abstract]
Noordermeer, J., Klingensmith, J. and Nusse, R. (1995). Differential requirements for segment polarity genes in wingless signaling. Mech. Dev. 51,145 -155.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nusse, R. (2003). Wnts and Hedgehogs:
lipid-modified proteins and similarities in signaling mechanisms at the cell
surface. Development
130,5297
-5305.
Panakova, D., Sprong, H., Marois, E., Thiele, C. and Eaton, S. (2005). Lipoprotein particles are required for Hedgehog and Wingless signalling. Nature 435, 58-65.[CrossRef][Medline]
Papkoff, J., Brown, A. M. and Varmus, H. E.
(1987). The int-1 proto-oncogene products are glycoproteins that
appear to enter the secretory pathway. Mol. Cell.
Biol. 7,3978
-3984.
Pepinsky, R. B., Zeng, C., Wen, D., Rayhorn, P., Baker, D. P., Williams, K. P., Bixler, S. A., Ambrose, C. M., Garber, E. A., Miatkowski, K. et al.<
40 kDa, whereas tubulin
migrates at 50 kDa. In the presence of GFP alone, Wnt3a is in both aqueous (A)
and detergent (T) phases. Whereas the presence of ectopic porcupine promotes
the partitioning of Wnt3a into the hydrophobic phase, ectopic mPorcD(H341D)
and mPorcD(H341Q) failed to show a similar effect.
