QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 29 August 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.004770

This Article Summary Figures Only Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dev.004770v1 134/19/3517    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhong, L. Articles by Belote, J. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhong, L. Articles by Belote, J. M.

The testis-specific proteasome subunit Pros6T of D. melanogaster is required for individualization and nuclear maturation during spermatogenesis

Department of Biology, Syracuse University, 130 College Place, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jbelote{at}syr.edu)

Accepted 22 July 2007

	SUMMARY

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Most regulated proteolysis in eukaryotes is carried out by the 26S proteasome. This large, multisubunit complex comprises a catalytic core particle (20S proteasome) and a regulatory particle (19S regulator) capping each end. In Drosophila, about a third of the 32 proteasome subunits are found to have testis-specific isoforms, encoded by paralogous genes. Here, we characterize in detail the spermatogenic expression of the core particle subunit Pros6 (Pros35) and its testis-specific isoform Pros6T. Using GFP-tagged transgenes, it is shown that whereas the Pros6 subunit is expressed in early stages of spermatogenesis, gradually fading away following meiosis, the testis-specific Pros6T becomes prominent in spermatid nuclei and cytoplasm after meiosis, and persists in mature sperm. In addition, these subunits are found in numerous `speckles' near individualization complexes, similar to the previously described expression pattern of the caspase Dronc (Nedd2-like caspase), suggesting a link to the apoptosis pathway. We also studied the phenotypes of a loss-of-function mutant of Pros6T generated by targeted homologous recombination. Homozygous males are sterile and show spermatogenic defects in sperm individualization and nuclear maturation, consistent with the expression pattern of Pros6T. The results demonstrate a functional role of testis-specific proteasomes during Drosophila spermatogenesis.

Key words: Apoptosis, Individualization, Proteasome, Spermatogenesis

	INTRODUCTION

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The proteasome is the protein degrading machine of the ubiquitin-mediated proteolytic pathway, which has been implicated in many cellular processes, including cell cycle progression, transcriptional regulation, signal transduction, and cell fate determination (Glickman and Ciechanover, 2002). This pathway also carries out an important quality control function by ridding cells of defective polypeptides. The highly conserved 26S proteasome is composed of two subcomplexes: a 20S catalytic core particle (CP) and 19S regulatory particles (RP) capping each end. The CP consists of two identical outer -rings and two identical inner ß-rings, each composed of seven evolutionarily related subunits (1-7 and ß1-7) that stack to form a hollow cylinder (Gröll et al., 2000; Unno et al., 2002). The RP includes a ring of six homologous AAA-family ATPase subunits that function to unfold protein substrates and translocate them into the CPs inner chamber. The functions of most of the twelve other RP subunits are less well understood but they include binding and removing polyubiquitin chains from proteins targeted for destruction (Glickman et al., 1998).

In addition to these integral proteasomal subunits, a number of more loosely, or transiently, associated proteins have recently been identified (Glickman and Raveh, 2005). These auxiliary proteins include ubiquitin-binding proteins that facilitate the delivery of substrates to the proteasome, ubiquitin ligases that build polyubiquitin chains onto the target proteins, and deubiquitinating enzymes that remove these tags (Schmidt et al., 2005).

The variety of proteasome-associated proteins suggests that proteasomes may be dynamic complexes with some diversity in composition. There is, however, another level of compositional diversity, as represented by the structurally heterogeneous proteasomes found in some species (Belote and Zhong, 2005). For example, in mammals, during the anti-viral immune response, -interferon induces the synthesis of three new ß-type subunits which take the places of their corresponding conventional subunits to form `immunoproteasomes' (Kloetzel, 2004) that are more efficient at producing peptide antigens for MHC class-I mediated antigen presentation. In Arabidopsis and rice, many of the proteasome subunits are represented by more than one gene, suggesting a high degree of structural heterogeneity in which different proteasome complexes are composed of different isoforms of several of the subunits (Fu et al., 1999; Yang et al., 2004; Oguchi et al., 2001; Shibahara et al., 2004). In this case, however, the functional significance of this proposed heterogeneity is unknown.

One of the most striking examples of this phenomenon is seen in Drosophila melanogaster, where about a third of the 26S proteasome subunits have two or three alternative isoforms encoded by paralogous genes (Yuan et al., 1996; Ma et al., 2002; Belote and Zhong, 2005). Molecular analyses have shown that, in every case, one form of each subunit is expressed in both sexes at all developmental stages examined (these will be referred to as conventional proteasome subunits), whereas all of the additional isoforms are testis specific. This represents a unique example of developmental regulation of alternative proteasome subunit expression, and suggests that there might be a specialization of proteasome function during spermatogenesis. Expression pattern studies of the testis-specific subunit Pros3T, using GFP-tagged reporters, found that this subunit is first detected during meiosis and becomes conspicuous during the late stages of spermiogenesis (Ma et al., 2002). By contrast, Pros3 (also known as Pros29 - FlyBase), representing the conventional counterpart of Pros3T, is expressed somatically and in the germline at the early stages of spermatogenesis, but gradually disappears after meiosis, and is not detected in mature sperm (Ma et al., 2002). Although the expression patterns of all testis-specific proteasome subunit genes have not been analyzed in detail, preliminary studies of a few of them suggest that they are expressed in a similar way (Yuan et al., 1996) (L.Z., unpublished; X. Li and J.M.B., unpublished). The large number of proteasome subunit isoform genes, and the collective shift of the expression patterns between the conventional subunit genes and their testis-specific counterparts, suggest that there might be a testis-specific proteasome that is dynamically assembled during Drosophila spermatogenesis. If so, what is its functional significance?

Here we characterize in detail the spermatogenic expression of the -type subunit Pros6 (also known as Pros35 - FlyBase) and its testis-specific isoform Pros6T. We also address the question of the functional significance of testis-specific proteasome subunits by studying the phenotypes of a knockout mutant of Pros6T. Mutants are male-sterile, with disruption of actin cone movement during sperm individualization, and abnormal nuclear maturation and morphology. These findings establish a necessary role of at least one of the testis-specific proteasome subunits in Drosophila spermatogenesis.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Fly strains
The Df(2L)ED784 and His2AvGFP stocks were obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center (stock nos 7421 and 5941, respectively). The y w; [ry⁺ 70FLP]4 [v⁺, 70 I-SceI]2B Sco/S² CyO and w¹¹¹⁸; [ry⁺, 70FLP] 10 lines were provided by Kent Golic (University of Utah).

Plasmid constructions and generation of transgenic flies
The construction of the Pros6T-GFP reporter gene and generation of transgenic flies were previously described by Ma et al. (Ma et al., 2002). For the construction of the Pros6-GFP reporter gene, a recombinant -phage containing the Pros35 gene (encoding the Pros6 proteasome subunit) was isolated as described by Ma et al. (Ma et al., 2002), and an 8.0 kb BamHI fragment was cut out of this and subcloned into pGEM4 (Promega) to give pGEM4/Pros6-8.0B. Site-directed mutagenesis, with primers Pros35Not5-(5'-AGCAGCGTCCAGCGGCCGCTAGGCATTTATAG-3') and Pros35Not3-(5'-CTATAAATGCCTAGCGGCCGCTGGACGCTGCT-3'), was carried out to create a NotI site at the 3' end of the Pros35 open reading frame (ORF) using the Quik Change Site-directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene), yielding pGEM4/Pros6-8.0B-Not. A NotI GFP cassette was made by PCR amplification of pEGFP (Invitrogen) using the following primers: EGFP Not5'-(GCGCGGCCGCCATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGAGCTGTTCAC-3') and EGFP Not3-(5'-AAGGGCCCGTACGGCCGACTAGTAGGCCTA-3'). This PCR product was cloned into pGEM-T Easy and then cut out with NotI and ligated into the newly created NotI site of pGEM4/Pros6-8.0B-Not. A 4.4 kb PstI-EcoRV fragment containing the GFP-tagged Pros35 gene was shuttled into pBlueScript KS+ (Stratagene), and then removed using PstI and XhoI and subcloned into the transformation vector pW8 to give pW8/Pros6-GFP.

For the generation of flies expressing fluorescently tagged protamine, a BAC clone (RPCI-98 33.C.24) of the genomic region containing the Mst35Ba (Protamine A) gene was obtained (Hoskins et al., 2000), and a 6.0 kb NruI-Asp700 fragment, containing the ProtA gene, was subcloned into pBlueScript to give pBS/ProtA6.0NA. To create the GFP fusion, site-directed mutagenesis was done to create a unique NdeI site at the C terminus of the ProtA coding region yielding pBS/ProtA-Nde. A GFP NdeI cassette was created by PCR amplification of pEGFP. This was inserted in-frame into the NdeI site of pBS/ProtA-Nde and the fusion construct then subcloned into pW8 to give pW8/ProtA-GFP.

A testis-specific expression vector, pW8/TS1, was created by modifying a genomic clone, pW8/Pros3T-2.8, containing the testis-specific Pros3T gene coding region flanked by 0.8 kb of upstream sequences and 1.1 kb of downstream sequences (Ma et al., 2002). Using site-directed mutagenesis, a KpnI site was inserted just before the start codon, and a NotI site was inserted just before the stop codon. The Pros3T coding region was then replaced by sequences between the KpnI and NotI sites of the multiple cloning region of pBlueScript KS+, yielding pW8/TS1. The Pros6 coding region was PCR amplified from genomic DNA and inserted into the NotI site of pW8/TS1 to give pW8/TS1-Pros6.

The various pW8 constructs were introduced into the genome by P-element transformation methods, with w¹¹¹⁸ as the host, and several transgenic lines established for all constructs.

Generation of the Pros6T¹ mutant by homologous recombination
For the construction of the Pros6T targeting donor plasmid, two oligonucleotides, 5'-GGCCTAGGGATAACAGGGTAAT-3' and 5'-GGCCATTACCCTGTTATCCCTA-3', were annealed to create an I-SceI cutting site flanked by 5'-GGCC-3' overhangs. This was used to replace the GFP-NotI cassette in pBS/Pros6T-GFP. To eliminate two unwanted PstI sites flanking the Pros6T gene, this plasmid was digested with HincII, ligated, digested with EcoRV and SmaI, and ligated. To create a frameshift in the 5' region of the Pros6T ORF, the resulting plasmid was digested with PstI, the 3' overhangs polished using the Strategene Polishing Kit (Strategene), and treated with ligase to yield plasmid pBS/Pros6T-KO-SceI. The insert was cut out with HindIII and XhoI and cloned into the corresponding sites of plasmid pBS(-Not), provided by Kent Golic. The insert was then cut out with NotI and cloned into the transformation vector pTV2, also provided by Kent Golic. The resulting plasmid, pTV2-Pros6T-KO-SceI, was then introduced into the fly genome by P-element germline transformation.

Flies with an X-linked TV2-Pros6T-KO-SceI targeting donor transgene were crossed to y w; [ry⁺ 70FLP]4 [v⁺, 70 I-SceI]2B Sco/S² CyO mates and 0- to 3-day-old F1 larvae were heat-shocked at 38°C for 90 minutes. Mosaic-eyed daughters were then crossed to w¹¹¹⁸; [ry⁺, 70FLP]10 males, and non-mosaic red-eyed F2 offspring, potentially representing homologous recombinants, were selected and crossed to w; Bl/CyO to establish balanced lines. Of the 79 candidate F2 flies, only one had the w^hs marker on chromosome 2, as expected for the homologous recombinant. Curly-winged flies from this line were crossed with w¹¹¹⁸; Bl/CyO; P{v[+t1.8]=hs-I-CreI.R}1A Sb¹/TM6 flies and F1 larvae heat-shocked at 36°C for 60 minutes. Resulting mosaic eyed, Curly-winged females were then crossed with w¹¹¹⁸; Bl/CyO males and selected for white-eyed, Curly-winged, non-Bristle offspring, which were the potential Pros6T mutants. Separate lines were established for each candidate mutant, balanced over CyO, and the Pros6T gene PCR amplified and checked by PstI digestion and DNA sequencing. Out of 11 candidate mutant lines, only one was found to have the desired mutation.

Male fertility tests
Individual males were placed with two virgin w¹¹¹⁸ females in culture vials for 7 days at 25°C. The flies were then removed and all resulting F1 progeny were counted. At least six vials were set up and scored for each genotype tested.

Immunofluorescence staining
Alexa Fluor 635 phalloidin, Alexa Fluor 532 phalloidin, Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin, Alexa Fluor 633 rabbit anti-mouse IgG, Alexa Fluor 532 rabbit anti-mouse IgG, Alexa Fluor 488 rabbit anti-mouse IgG, and TO-PRO-3 were obtained from Molecular Probes (Invitrogen). The anti-Pros7 monoclonal (clone MCP72) antibody was from Biomol (Exeter, UK). The anti-active Dronc (also known as Nedd-2 like caspase - FlyBase) antibody was generously provided by Bruce Hay (California Institute of Technology), and the CM1 antibody was a gift from Maya Bader and Hermann Steller (The Rockefeller University). For DNA and actin double staining, testes from newly eclosed males were dissected in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 130 mM NaCl, 7 mM Na₂HPO₄, 3 mM NaH₂PO₄, pH 7.2) and then fixed with EM grade 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscope Sciences) in PBST (PBS+0.3% Triton X-100) for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing with PBST, the testes were blocked with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 0.5 mg/ml RNaseA in PBST at room temperature for 1 hour. Then the testes were washed once in PBST, and twice in PBS, followed by incubation with 1 µM TO-PRO3 and 4 units/ml Alexa Fluor phalloidin in PBS for 30 minutes in the dark. They were then rinsed three times in PBS, and mounted in ProLong mounting solution (Molecular Probes). For anti-Pros7, active Dronc and CM1 antibody staining, after fixing and washing as described above, the testes were blocked with 10% FBS in PBST at room temperature for 1 hour, and then incubated with anti-Pros7 antibody, diluted 1:500 in PBST + 10% FBS, at 4°C overnight. After washing in PBST, the testes were incubated with secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 633 or 532 anti-mouse IgG, 1:1000 dilution in PBST + 10% FBS) at room temperature for 4 hours, rinsed three times in PBST, three times in PBS, and then mounted in ProLong. A Zeiss LSM5 Pascal confocal microscope was used for fluorescence imaging.

View larger version (128K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. The expression patterns of Pros6-GFP and Pros6T-GFP during spermatogenesis. (A-H) Pros6-GFP; (A'-H')Pros6T-GFP. (A,A') Apical ends of testes showing early spermatogonial stages. (B,B') 16-cell primary spermatocyte cysts (dotted lines, also in C-E). (B) Arrow, nucleolus; arrowhead, nucleus. (C,C') Late primary spermatocyte cysts. (D,D') Cysts undergoing meiosis I. (E,E') 64-cell onion-stage spermatid cysts. Nuclei are brightly fluorescing and nebenkerns are dark. (F,F') Elongated spermatid bundles. Nuclear bundles are brightly fluorescing in F' (arrows). (G,G') Spermatid bundles undergoing individualization. In G' the arrowhead indicates elongated and condensed nuclei and the arrow indicates spermatid bundles at the onset of individualization. (H,H') Seminal vesicles containing stored mature sperm (arrows). Scale bars: 20 µm in A-G,A'-G'; 150 µm in H,H'.

	RESULTS

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Spermatogenic expression patterns of Pros6and Pros6T

In the later stages of sperm development, known as spermiogenesis, the spermatids undergo tremendous elongation. The nuclei condense and experience a dramatic shape change to assume dense, needle-shaped configurations. The spermatids undergo individualization, during which the syncytial spermatid bundle is resolved into 64 separate sperm cells, and excess cytoplasmic contents are removed and accumulated into a `waste bag' that is subsequently degraded and reabsorbed. In the final stage of spermiogenesis, the sperm coil up, the cyst ruptures, and the mature sperm move into the seminal vesicle for storage.

In the present study, we have examined the spermatogenic expression patterns of Pros6 and Pros6T in detail, using GFP-tagged reporter transgenes. Similar to the expression pattern of Pros3-GFP, Pros6-GFP is seen in both cytoplasm and nuclei of spermatogonia, spermatocytes and early stage spermatids. During spermiogenesis, the Pros6-GFP signal begins to fade in elongated sperm bundles and condensed nuclei and is undetected in individualized, mature sperm (Fig. 1A-H). By contrast, Pros6T-GFP is not observed in pre-meiotic stages, but becomes prominent in the cytoplasm and nuclei of 64-cell spermatid cysts. The GFP fluorescent signal persists in the elongated and condensed spermatid nuclei and also in spermatid tail bundles and can be seen in the mature sperm heads and tails (Fig. 1A'-H').

In addition to being expressed in elongated nuclei and distributed along spermatid tail bundles, Pros6T-GFP also aggregates as `speckles' at certain positions along the sperm bundles (Fig. 2A). To better discern the precise localization of these speckles, Pros6T-GFP testes were fixed and incubated with Alexa-Fluor-phalloidin and TO-PRO3 to stain actin and nuclei, respectively (Fig. 2B). In the elongated spermatid bundles, Pros6T-GFP speckles were found near the individualization complex (IC), a cytoskeletal-membranous complex containing a cluster of 64 actin-rich structures, called actin cones, that mediate sperm individualization. During this process, the IC moves caudally down the bundle, eliminating all cytoplasmic bridges and pushing the excess cytoplasm and organelles into a `cystic bulge' that eventually becomes the waste bag. As the IC progresses down the bundle, each spermatid becomes sheathed in its own plasma membrane (Tokuyasu et al., 1972; Noguchi and Miller, 2003). The relative positions of the speckles and the actin cones depend on the position of the IC along the bundle. When the IC is first assembled around the elongated and condensed nuclei, the speckles are seen in front of the actin cones. As the IC moves away from the nuclei, the speckles first overlap the actin cones and then lag behind them. Similar speckles are also found in Pros3-GFP, Pros3T-GFP and Pros6-GFP sperm bundles, although speckles associated with the conventional subunits, Pros3-GFP and Pros6-GFP, are fainter than those of their testis-specific counterparts (Fig. 2C-E).

To test whether these speckles are really proteasome-related structures, and not merely artifactual aggregates of GFP-tagged proteins, testes were immunostained with an antibody directed against Pros7 (also known as Prosalpha7 - FlyBase), a conventional proteasome subunit that has no testis-specific isoform. As shown in Fig. 2F, similar speckles were detected. In addition, immunostaining testes of Pros3T-GFP (not shown) or Pros6T-GFP transgenic flies with anti-Pros7 antiserum shows colocalization of the GFP and antibody signals (Fig. 2G-I), confirming that these speckles are indeed proteasome-related structures. The subcellular nature of these structures is not known, and there are no obvious correlative structures in the published transmission electron micrographs of individualization complexes (Tokuyasu et al., 1972).

View larger version (122K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Proteasomal `speckles' associated with the individualization complex. (A) Elongated spermatid bundles showing Pros6T-GFP speckles (arrows, green). (B-E) Speckles (green) are located close to the actin cones (red): (B) Pros6T-GFP, (C) Pros6-GFP, (D) Pros3T-GFP, (E) Pros3-GFP. (F) Wild-type IC stained with anti-Pros7 antibody (green) and Alexa Fluor 635 phalloidin (red). (G-I) Pros6T-GFP (G, green) in an IC stained with anti-Pros7 antibody (H, red). (I) The merged image of G and H with the yellow signal indicating colocalization. Scale bars: 20 µm.

Pros6T¹ is a recessive male sterile mutant

View larger version (29K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Generation of the Pros6T1 mutant. (A) Pros6T knockout construct. The bent arrow to the left of the Pros6T coding region (hatched area) indicates the transcription direction. The two arrows beneath the Pros6T coding region indicate the positions of PCR primers used to verify the targeted Pros6T mutation. (B) Results of male fertility tests showing mean number of progeny per male±s.e.m.

Homozygous Pros6T¹ mutant testes are of normal size and shape, but there are no mature sperm in the seminal vesicle (Fig. 4A-D). Phase-contrast microscopy of testis squashes showed that all stages up through spermatid elongation were indistinguishable in Pros6T¹ mutants and wild type (Fig. 4E-L). However, there appeared to be defects in sperm individualization, and few, if any, mature, motile sperm were evident. The phenotype of Pros6T¹/Df(2L)ED784 hemizygotes is indistinguishable from that of Pros6T¹ homozygotes, suggesting that this mutant is a strong loss-of-function allele (not shown).

Individualization complexes are disrupted in Pros6T¹ mutants
The presence of proteasome-associated speckles in the IC of elongated sperm bundles, together with the observation that the Pros6T¹ mutant testes are unable to process elongated sperm bundles to mature sperm, suggest that at least one major function of the proteasome during spermatogenesis is to facilitate sperm individualization. To investigate this possibility, we stained wild-type and Pros6T¹ testes with Alexa Fluor phalloidin to visualize the actin cones in the IC.

In wild-type testes, actin cones have a characteristic triangular shape and they move in a coordinated fashion (Fig. 5A,B), with a few actin cones only occasionally falling out of synchronization (Fig. 5B, arrow). This fine coordination is disrupted in the Pros6T¹ mutants, and becomes more extreme as the actin cones move further down the spermatid bundles. The initial assembly of the actin cones, and their triangular shape are not affected in the mutants, indicating that the movement, and not the formation, of the IC, is malfunctioning (Fig. 5C,D). In addition, the proteasome-related speckles that are seen in the IC's of wild-type testes are absent in the Pros6T¹ mutants (Fig. 5E,F).

View larger version (121K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Phase-contrast microscopy of whole testes and pre-individualization stages of spermatogenesis of wild-type and Pros6T1 mutant males. (A,C) Wild-type and Pros6T1 testes. (B,D) Higher magnification of the seminal vesicle in A and C (boxed), respectively. (E-L) Comparison of different spermatogenic stages of wild-type (E-H) and Pros6T1 (I-L) testes. (E,I) Primary spermatocyte cysts at the 16-cell stage. (F,J) Onion (64-cell) stage spermatid cysts. (G,K) Early stage of elongating spermatid cysts. (H,L) Fully elongated spermatid cyst bundles. Scale bars: 150 µm in A-D,H,L; 10 µm in E-G,I-K.

Pros6T¹ affects caspase activation

View larger version (65K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. The individualization complexes are disrupted in Pros6T1 mutant testes. (A-D)Testes stained with Alexa-Fluor-phalloidin (green) showing actin cones of the ICs. (A,B) Actin cones (green) in wild-type ICs move synchronously, although occasionally a few actin cones lag behind (arrow). (C,D) In Pros6T1 testes, actin cone synchronization is disrupted. The further the ICs move along the tail bundles, the more scattered the actin cones become (compare D with C). (E,F) Wild-type (E) and Pros6T1 (F) testes stained with anti-Pros7 antibody (green) and Alexa-Fluor-phalloidin (red). Speckles (arrow) can be observed in the wild-type testis, whereas they are absent in the Pros6T1 testis. Two cystic bulges are shown in F. The actin cones are disorganized as a result of the mutation. Scale bars: 20 µm.

View larger version (79K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Caspase activation is affected in Pros6T1. (A,B) Anti-active Dronc staining (red) is observed in cystic bulges in wild-type testes (A), whereas it is absent in Pros6T1 testes (B). (C,D) Visualization of active Ice with anti-cleaved-caspase-3 antibody (CM1; red). CM1 staining is observed in the cystic bulge (arrow) and elongated spermatid bundles (arrowheads) in wild-type testes (C). However, CM1 staining is not detected in the cystic bulge (arrow) in Pros6T1 testes (D), and is weaker in elongated spermatid bundles (arrowheads) compared with wild type. Actin cones were visualized by Alexa-Fluor-phalloidin staining (green). Scale bars: 20 µm.

Pros6T¹ mutants show nuclear abnormalities in spermatid bundles

View larger version (40K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Pros6T1 mutant testes show abnormalities in nuclear bundles. Wild-type or Pros6T1 spermatid nuclei stained with TO-PRO3. (A) Wild-type nuclei are long, fully condensed and remain in register. (B) Some of the Pros6T1 nuclei are not fully condensed and they are often scattered. (C) Spermatid nuclei of the mutant are often contorted and frequently form circles (arrow). (D) Proportion of normal, scattered and curled spermatid nuclear bundles in young (black bars) versus old (hatched bars) flies. Scale bars: 20 µm.

Histone removal is delayed in the Pros6T¹ mutant but protamine incorporation occurs normally

Does this delay in histone removal affect the integration of protamines into the chromosomes? To address this question, a ProtA-GFP transgene was introduced into the Pros6T¹ mutant background. As expected, ProtA-GFP in control heterozygotes is first detected in the elongating nuclei, and it remains prominently visible in the individualized, mature sperm nuclei (Fig. 8M-R). In homozygous Pros6T¹ mutants, the ProtA-GFP signal is also first seen in the elongating nuclei, and it remains in the scattered and the curled nuclei (Fig. 8S-X). Because of the delay in histone disappearance, there is a more extensive overlap of expression of H2AvD-GFP and ProtA-GFP in mutant testes, but the Pros6T¹ mutant has no significant effect on the timing and degree of protamine incorporation. Given these results, there does not appear to be a strong link between the sperm nuclear shape defects of the Pros6T¹ mutant and the histone-protamine transition.

View larger version (58K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 8. The Pros6T1 mutant delays the disappearance of histone H2AvD but protamine incorporation is not affected. Images are of increasing age, left to right. Wild-type (A-F,M-R) or Pros6T1 (G-L,S-X) testes expressing either H2AvD-GFP (D-F,J-L; green) or ProtA-GFP (P-R,V-X; green) were stained with TO-PRO3 (A-C,G-I,M-O,S-U; red) to visualize nuclei. In wild-type testes, H2AvD-GFP signal is barely detectable in elongating and condensing nuclei (D), and completely disappears in mature nuclear bundles (E) and nuclei in individualized sperm (F). However, elongating and condensing nuclei in Pros6T1 testes still contain significant amounts of H2AvD-GFP (J), although the GFP signal disappears in mature nuclear bundles (K) and curled nuclei (L). ProtA-GFP is highly expressed in elongating and condensing nuclei in wild-type testes (P), and persists in the mature nuclear bundles (Q) and nuclei in individualized sperm (R). In Pros6T1 testes, ProA-GFP is observed in elongating and condensing nuclei (V), mature nuclear bundles (W) and curled nuclei (X). Scale bar: 20 µm.

Ectopic expression of Pros6 in late spermatogenesis can rescue the mutant phenotype of Pros6T¹

	DISCUSSION

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
One previously unanswered question concerns the functional significance of testis-specific proteasomes. The present study demonstrates, at least for Pros6T, the testis-specific subunit is required for normal sperm development. Examination of the phenotypic effects of the knockout allele, Pros6T¹, demonstrates essential roles for this gene in post-meiotic sperm cell differentiation, most notably in the processes of spermatid individualization and nuclear differentiation, consistent with the observed expression pattern of this subunit. Pros6-GFP can be detected throughout spermatogenesis, from early spermatogonia to elongating spermatids, but it begins fading away after meiosis, and completely disappears by the end of spermiogenesis. By contrast, the testis-specific subunit Pros6T-GFP is not detected in early stages until meiosis, after which it becomes prominent in both nuclei and cytoplasm. In elongated spermatids, it persists in the bundled sperm heads and tails, although the GFP signal in nuclei is reduced once nuclear elongation is complete and individualization begins.

Possible roles of testis-specific proteasomes in sperm individualization
The role of the proteasome in sperm individualization may be related to its localization to numerous small `speckles' within the IC, trailing the actin cones as they move along the bundle. We suggest there is a complex of protein degrading machinery that helps in the removal of unneeded cytosolic material, or assists in the release of actin so that movement of the IC can proceed. In Pros6T¹ mutants, where this does not occur efficiently, the actin cones soon lose their synchronous movement and the IC breaks down, thereby stalling individualization.

In addition to this general requirement of proteasome-mediated protein degradation during sperm individualization, there might be a specific role of proteasomes in mediating the activation of caspases to trigger the spermatogenesis-specific apoptotic pathway that facilitates the individualization process. It has been reported that the active form of caspase Dronc shows a punctate staining pattern associated with the IC, very similar to the proteasome speckles we have observed (Huh et al., 2004). Dronc is activated when bound to Dark, a homolog of the mammalian Apaf1 protein, triggering its autoprocessing (Muro et al., 2004). Normally, its activity is held in check by binding to the inhibitory protein Diap1 [also known as Thread (Th) - FlyBase]. During apoptosis, Diap1 is autoubiquitinylated, through the action of RHG [Rpr, Hid (also known as Wrinkled) and Grim] proteins, and is presumably degraded via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (Hays et al., 2002; Holley et al., 2002; Ryoo et al., 2002; Wing et al., 2002; Yoo et al., 2002). Dronc is thus released from the tether of Diap1 and able to cleave and activate the downstream caspases such as the caspase-3-like effector caspase Ice.

In recent years, increasing evidence has indicated that spermatogenesis borrows the apoptotic machinery to achieve non-apoptotic results (Cagan, 2003). Key apoptotic components such as active Dronc, active Ice, and Hid proteins have been found in elongated spermatids (Arama et al., 2003; Huh et al., 2004), and a Ice deletion mutant is defective in spermatid individualization (Muro et al., 2006). It has been shown that Dark- and Hid-dependent activation of Dronc happens in the cystic bulges where individualization takes place (Huh et al., 2004). Furthermore, when Diap1 or dominant-negative (Dn) Dronc is overexpressed using the testis-specific ß₂-tubulin promoter, the active Dronc speckles disappear, individualization is defective, and the synchronized movement of the actin cones is disrupted, producing a phenotype that is very similar to what is observed here with the Pros6T¹ mutant (Huh et al., 2004). These observations, along with the fact that Diap1 is ubiquitinylated during apoptosis (Wilson et al., 2002; Yoo et al., 2002), raise the possibility that testis-specific proteasomes play an important role in degrading DIAP1, which, in turn, triggers Dronc to activate downstream caspases, thus initiating the individualization process. Our observations that in the Pros6T¹ mutant, active Dronc disappears from the IC and active Ice is significantly reduced is consistent with this model. The fact that active Ice is not completely eliminated suggests that there might be an additional Dronc-independent pathway for Ice activation, as has been suggested by Huh et al. (Huh et al., 2004).

Testis-specific proteasomes might affect individualization by altering cytoskeletal protein dynamics
In Pros6T¹ mutant testes, coordinated actin cone movement is disrupted. A similar phenotype has been documented for a number of cytoskeletal protein mutations, including jar¹ (myosin VI), dtctex-1¹ (Dlc90F - FlyBase; Drosophila 14 kDa dynein light chain), ddlc1^ins (ctp - FlyBase; 8 kDa Drosophila dynein light chain 1), sw¹ (74 kDa intermediate chain) and MyoV^Q1052st (didum - FlyBase; myosin V) (Hicks et al., 1999; Li et al., 2004; Ghosh-Roy et al., 2005; Mermall et al., 2005). The spermatid nuclear bundles in these mutants are also disrupted. Although the mechanism of the actin cone movement has not been fully elucidated, it has been proposed that actin polymerization and depolymerization are the driving force (Noguchi and Miller, 2003). Myosin VI seems to be an actin cone structure stabilizer (Noguchi et al., 2006), and myosin V is required for actin cone formation (Mermall et al., 2005). Here, we demonstrate that the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is also important in IC movement. It is unclear at this time how proteasomes affect actin cone movement, but it is possible that they facilitate the movement by regulating the protein levels of some key components of the actin cone movement machinery. Alternatively, they could achieve this goal through regulation of the apoptosis pathway, as discussed above. Evidence for the latter possibility is that Dcp1, a caspase activated by Dronc, is required for the cytoskeletal reorganization that occurs during the dumping process of Drosophila oogenesis (McCall and Steller, 1998). Another possibility is that proteasome-mediated degradation of numerous cytosolic proteins might achieve the breakdown of cytoplasmic structure within the IC and facilitate the movement of actin cones as they push the digested material into the growing waste bag.

Efficient histone disappearance during spermatogenesis requires Pros6T but the histone to protamine transition does occur
We observed that in Pros6T¹ mutants, whereas the histone H2AvD does eventually disappear in the scattered and curled spermatid nuclei, this displacement is slightly delayed. One possible explanation for this delay is that during spermatogenesis the histones may be degraded via the Ub-proteasome pathway to facilitate their removal and replacement by the protamines. In the Pros6T¹ mutant, the Ub-proteasome pathway may be compromised at this late stage of spermatogenesis, thus inhibiting histone replacement. One possibility is that the mutation affects the removal of the histones from the chromatin. Alternatively, the histones might be removed normally, but then not efficiently degraded.

The incorporation of protamines does not appear to be affected in the Pros6T¹ mutant nuclei, indicating that the malformed sperm nuclei are not the result of a gross disruption of the histone-protamine transition. From these results, it is not clear why the sperm nuclei exhibit aberrant shapes in the mature spermatid bundles. One possibility is that the abnormal nuclear morphology arises at the end of spermiogenesis, when sperm undergo coiling and abnormal sperm are screened for elimination (Fuller, 1993). In this case, there would not be a direct link between this phenotype and reduced proteasome function in the nucleus.

Why have proteasome genes in Drosophila undergone extensive duplication and divergence to testes-specific isoforms?
The proteasome genes of D. melanogaster can be divided into those encoding subunits that are expressed throughout development and those whose expressions are limited to the late stages of spermatogenesis. The driving force for the evolution of this situation might be related to the unusual dynamics of gene expression during spermatogenesis (Fuller, 1993; Hiller et al., 2004). That is, because transcription of virtually all genes ceases after the primary spermatocyte stage, and because there is a very large amount of protein degradation occurring during the later stages of spermiogenesis, there might have been strong selective pressure to increase the levels of proteasome subunit expression in these cells. Gene duplication is one way to immediately increase the level of gene expression, and once it happens, one copy would be free to evolve a testis-specific expression pattern to ensure adequate levels of the subunit throughout spermatogenesis. The duplicated gene might then evolve to produce proteasome subunits that are better adapted to carry out the extensive protein breakdown that occurs as the spermatids eliminate their cytoplasm during the individualization process. Importantly, the observation reported here that driving spermatogenic expression of the conventional subunit Pros6 can functionally substitute for Pros6T rules out the possibility that the somatic and testis-specific forms of the proteasome have completely distinct functional properties. This situation is analogous to that of the spermatogenic-specific isoform of cytochrome C (Cyt-c-d), known as Blanks (Bln; FlyBase) (Arama et al., 2006). In that case, it was shown that whereas bln^- mutants are male sterile, the mutant phenotype can be rescued by driving testis-specific expression of the somatically expressed paralogous gene, Cyt-c-p.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
We thank Jing Ma and Evan Katz for constructing the Pros6T-GFP and Pros6-GFP reporters, and Sheree McClear for her assistance in generating the fluorescently tagged protamine construct. We are indebted to Kent Golic for providing the targeting vector pTV2 and several of the stocks used for the mutagenesis procedure, and to Yikang Rong for advice. We thank Bruce Hay and Jun Huh for the anti-active Dronc antibody, and Maya Bader and Hermann Steller for the CM1 antibody. We also thank Xiazhen Li and Jing Dai for helpful discussions, and Brian Calvi for comments on the manuscript. We thank Changyu Shen for his help. This work was supported by a grant to J.M.B. from the National Science Foundation (MCB-0416647).

	REFERENCES

TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

Arama, E., Agapite, J. and Steller, H. (2003). Caspase activity and a specific Cytochrome C are required for sperm differentiation in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 4, 687-697.[CrossRef][Medline]

Arama, E., Bader, M., Srivastava, M., Bergmann, A. and Steller, H. (2006). The two Drosophila cytochrome C proteins can function in both respiration and caspase activation. EMBO J. 25,232 -243.[CrossRef][Medline]

Belote, J. M. and Zhong, L. (2005). Proteasome gene duplications in mammals, flies and plants. Recent Res. Dev. Genes Genomes 1,107 -129.

Cagan, R. L. (2003). Spermatogenesis: borrowing the apoptotic machinery. Curr. Biol. 13,R600 -R602.[CrossRef][Medline]

Clarkson, M. and Saint, R. (1999). A His2AvDGFP fusion gene complements a lethal His2AvD mutant allele and provides an in vivo marker for Drosophila chromosome behavior. DNA Cell Biol. 18,457 -462.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dorstyn, L., Read, S., Cakouros, D., Huh, J. R., Hay, B. A. and Kumar, S. (2002). The role of cytochrome c in caspase activation in Drosophila melanogaster cell. J. Cell Biol. 156,1089 -1098.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fu, H., Girod, P. A., Doelling, J. H., van Nocker, S., Hochstrasser, M., Finley, D. and Vierstra, R. D. (1999). Structure and functional analysis of the 26S proteasome subunits from plants. Mol. Biol. Rep. 26,137 -146.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fuller, M. T. (1993). Spermatogenesis. In The Development of Drosophila melanogaster. Vol.1 (ed. M. Bate and A. Martinez Arias), pp.71 -147. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Ghosh-Roy, A., Desai, B. S. and Ray, K. (2005). Dynein light chain 1 regulates Dynamin mediated F-actin assembly during sperm individualization in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Cell 16,3107 -3116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Glickman, M. H. and Ciechanover, A. (2002). The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol. Rev. 82,373 -428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Glickman, M. H. and Raveh, D. (2005). Proteasome plasticity. FEBS Lett. 579,3214 -3223.[CrossRef][Medline]

Glickman, M. H., Rubin, D. M., Coux, O., Wefes, I., Pfeifer, G., Cjeka, Z., Baumeister, W., Fried, V. A. and Finley, D. (1998). A subcomplex of the proteasome regulatory particle required for ubiquitin-conjugate degradation and related to the COP9/signalosome and eIF3. Cell 94,615 -623.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gröll, M., Bajorek, M., Kohler, A., Moroder, L., Rubin, D. M., Huber, R., Glickman, M. H. and Finley, D. (2000). A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7,1062 -1067.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hays, R., Wickline, L. and Cagan, R. (2002). Morgue mediates apoptosis in the Drosophila melanogaster retina by promoting degradation of DIAP1. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 425-431.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hicks, J. L., Deng, W. M., Rogat, A. D., Miller, K. G. and Bownes, M. (1999). Class VI unconventional myosin is required for spermatogenesis in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Cell 10,4341 -4353.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hiller, M., Chen, X., Pringle, M. J., Suchorolski, M., Sancak, Y., Viswanathan, S., Bolival, B., Lin, T. Y., Marino, S. and Fuller, M. T. (2004). Testis-specific TAF homologs collaborate to control a tissue-specific transcription program. Development 131,5297 -5308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Holley, C. L., Olson, M. R., Colon-Ramos, D. A. and Kornbluth, S. (2002). Reaper eliminates IAP proteins through stimulated IAP degradation and generalized translational inhibition. Nat. Cell Biol. 4,439 -444.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hoskins, R. A., Nelson, C. R., Berman, B. P., Laverty, T. R., George, R. A., Ciesiolka, L., Naeemuddin, M., Arenson, A. D., Durbin, J., David, R. G. et al. (2000). A BAC-based physical map of the major autosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287,2271 -2274.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Huh, J. R., Vernooy, S. Y., Yu, H., Yan, N., Shi, Y., Guo, M. and Hay, B. (2004). Multiple Apoptotic Caspase Cascades are required in Nonapoptotic roles for Drosophila Spermatid Individualization. PLoS Biol. 2,43 -53.[CrossRef]

Jayaramaiah Raja, J. S. and Renkawitz-Pohl, R. (2005). Replacement by Drosophila melanogaster protamines and Mst77F of histones during chromatin condensation in late spermatids and role of sesame in the removal of these proteins from the male pronucleus. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25,6165 -6177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kloetzel, P. M. (2004). The proteasome and MHC class I antigen processing. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1695,225 -233.[Medline]

Li, M. G., Serr, M., Newman, E. A. and Hays, T. S. (2004). The Drosophila tctex-1 light chain is dispensable for essential cytoplasmic dynein functions but is required during spermatid differentiation. Mol. Biol. Cell 15,3005 -3014.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lindsley, D. and Tokuyasu, K. T. (1980). Spermatogenesis. In Genetics and Biology of Drosophila. Vol. 2d (ed. M. Ashburner and T. R. F. Wright), pp. 225-294. New York: Academic Press.

Ma, J., Katz, E. and Belote, J. M. (2002). Expression of proteasome subunit isoforms during spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Mol. Biol. 11,627 -639.[CrossRef][Medline]

McCall, K. and Steller, H. (1998). Requirement for Dcp-1 caspase during Drosophila oogenesis. Science 279,230 -234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mermall, V., Bonafe, N., Jones, L., Sellers, J. R., Cooley, L. and Mooseker, M. S. (2005). Drosophila myosin V is required for larval development and spermatid individualization. Dev. Biol. 286,238 -255.[CrossRef][Medline]

Muro, I., Monser, K. and Clem, R. J. (2004). Mechanism of Dronc activation in Drosophila cells. J. Cell Sci. 117,5035 -5041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Muro, I., Berry, D. L., Huh, J. R., Chen, C. H., Huang, H., Yoo, S. J., Guo, M., Baehrecke, E. H. and Hay, B. A. (2006). The Drosophila caspase Ice is important for many apoptotic cell deaths and for spermatid individualization, a nonapoptotic process. Development 133,3305 -3315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Noguchi, T. and Miller, K. G. (2003). A role for actin dynamics in individualization during spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Development 130,1805 -1816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Noguchi, T., Lenartowaska, M. and Miller, K. G. (2006). Myosin VI stabilizes an actin network during Drosophila spermatid individualization. Mol. Biol. Cell 17,2559 -2571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Oguchi, S., Sassa, H. and Hirano, H. (2001). OsPAA2, a distinct alpha 1 subunit gene for the 20S proteasome in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Gene 272,19 -23.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rathke, C., Baarends, W. M., Jayaramaiah-Raja, S., Bartkuhn, M., Renkawitz, R. and Renkawitz-Pohl, R. (2007). Transition from a nucleosome-based to a protamine-based chromatin configuration during spermiogenesis in Drosophila. J. Cell Sci. 120,1689 -1700.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rong, Y. S., Titen, S. W., Xie, H. B., Golic, M. M., Bastiani, M., Bandyopadhyay, P., Olivera, B. M., Brodsky, M., Rubin, G. M. and Golic, K. G. (2002). Targeted mutagenesis by homologous recombination in D. melanogaster. Genes Dev. 16,1568 -1581.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ryoo, H. D., Bergmann, A., Gonen, H., Ciechanover, A. and Steller, H. (2002). Regulation of Drosophila IAP1 degradation and apoptosis by reaper and ubcD1. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 432-438.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schmidt, M., Hanna, J., Elsasser, S. and Finley, D. (2005). Proteasome-associated proteins: regulation of a proteolytic machine. Biol. Chem. 386,725 -737.[CrossRef][Medline]

Shibahara, T., Kawasaki, H. and Hiranom, H. (2004). Mass spectrometric analysis of expression of ATPase subunits encoded by duplicated genes in the 19S regulatory particle of rice 26S proteasome. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 421, 34-41.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tokuyasu, K. T., Peacock, W. J. and Hardy, R. W. (1972). Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Individualization process. Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 124,479 -506.[CrossRef][Medline]

Unno, M., Mizushima, T., Morimoto, Y., Tomisugi, Y., Tanaka, K., Yasuoka, N. and Tsukihara, T. (2002). The structure of the mammalian 20S proteasome at 2.75 A resolution. Structure 10,609 -618.[Medline]

Wilson, R., Goyal, L., Ditzel, M., Zachariou, A., Baker, D. A., Agapite, J., Steller, H. and Meier, P. (2002). The DIAP1 RING finger mediates ubiquitination of Dronc and is indispensable for regulating apoptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 445-450.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wing, J. P., Schreader, B. A., Yokokura, T., Wang, Y., Andrews, P. S., Huseinovic, N., Dong, C. K., Ogdahl, J. L., Schwartz, L. M., White, K. et al. (2002). Drosophila Morgue is an F box/ubiquitin conjugase domain protein important for grim-reaper mediated apoptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 4,451 -456.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yang, P., Fu, H., Walker, J., Papa, C. M., Smalle, J., Ju, Y. M. and Vierstra, R. D. (2004). Purification of the Arabidopsis 26 S proteasome: biochemical and molecular analyses revealed the presence of multiple isoforms. J. Biol. Chem. 279,6401 -6413.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yoo, S. J., Huh, J. R., Muro, I., Yu, H., Wang, L., Wang, S. L., Feldman, R. M., Clem, R. J., Muller, H. A. and Hay, B. A. (2002). Hid, Rpr and Grim negatively regulate DIAP1 levels through distinct mechanisms. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 416-424.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yuan, X., Miller, M. and Belote, J. M. (1996). Duplicated proteasome subunit genes in Drosophila melanogaster encoding testes-specific isoforms. Genetics 144,147 -157.[Abstract]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. M. Mikhaylova, K. Nguyen, and D. I. Nurminsky Analysis of the Drosophila melanogaster Testes Transcriptome Reveals Coordinate Regulation of Paralogous Genes Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 305 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article