spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif ARCHIVE ANNOUNCEMENT! spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 4


Fig. 4. Homeodomain, bZIP, TCF-like, Oct, Sox, Smad and Myb-like binding sites are important for R-module transcriptional activity. (A) Alignment of the P. lividus R-module with the corresponding S. purpuratus and L. variegatus sequences. The conserved sites mutated in the functional analysis are underlined in black and the colored boxes indicate putative transcription factor binding sites identified using MatInspector. Arrowheads indicate the limit of the R-module. (B) Sequence comparisons of predicted binding sites within the R-module with known consensus sequences for transcription factors. (C) Effects of Smad, homeodomain, bZIP, TCF-like, Oct and Sox site mutations on the transcriptional activity of the R-module at the hatched blastula stage. The homeodomain site mutation data are from a triple mutant, whereas TCF-like, bZIP, Oct and Sox correspond to single mutations within the R-module. (D) Mutation of a putative Myb-like site increases the transcriptional activity of the R-module and R-module Smad(-) constructs. The data are presented as the ratio of luciferase expression between EpGluc and the wild-type module. (E) Effect of the Myb-like binding site mutation on the spatial expression of a GFP reporter driven by the R-module.





Right arrow Return to article