|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 7 February 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.02802
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Institute for Stem Cell Research, Centre Development in Stem Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ, UK.
Author for correspondence (e-mail:
Brian.Hendrich{at}ed.ac.uk)
Accepted 9 January 2007
| SUMMARY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Pluripotency, ES cells, Epiblast, Epigenetics, Mbd3, NuRD
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
25 cells at 4.5 dpc to
660 cells by 6.5 dpc (Snow and
Bennett, 1978
One of the striking differences between the pluripotent cell populations in
3.5 dpc ICMs, early epiblast and late epiblast, is the ability to produce
embryonic stem (ES) cells (Evans and
Kaufman, 1981
; Martin,
1981
; Smith,
2001
). ES cells, which can be maintained indefinitely in culture
while maintaining pluripotency, can be derived from cells of the ICM and early
epiblast, but not from late epiblast
(Brook and Gardner, 1997
). ES
cells share many properties with ICM/early epiblast cells, and are able to
differentiate into all embryonic cell types including the germ line
(Bradley et al., 1984
).
However, ES cells can be derived from only 30% of ICMs at best with
conventional methods (Brook and Gardner,
1997
), and the molecular mechanisms underlying the derivation of
ES cells, and the molecular differences between ES cells and ICM/early
epiblast cells, are largely unknown (Zwaka
and Thomson, 2005
).
The difference between early embryonic pluripotent cells and the
lineage-committed cells derived from them, or their transformed derivatives in
vitro (i.e. ES cells), is, by definition, epigenetic. Therefore, it stands to
reason that epigenetic silencing factors will play important roles in this
process. Several proteins involved in epigenetic silencing have been shown to
be important for early embryonic viability
(Bernstein et al., 2003
;
Cowley et al., 2005
;
Dannenberg et al., 2005
;
David et al., 2003
;
Dodge et al., 2004
;
Hendrich et al., 2001
;
O'Carroll et al., 2001
;
Rayasam et al., 2003
),
although it is not always clear why the mutant embryos do not survive. ES
cells appear to contain an unusual epigenetic profile consisting of both
active and silencing histone methylation marks, which tend to resolve into one
or the other upon differentiation (Azuara
et al., 2006
; Bernstein et al.,
2006
). Many genes which encode developmentally important
transcription factors are occupied by the Polycomb repressive complexes PRC1
and PRC2 in ES cells, and mouse ES cells deficient for PRC components fail to
maintain silencing at several of these loci
(Azuara et al., 2006
;
Boyer et al., 2006
;
Lee et al., 2006
). Although
the details of epigenetic modifications in pluripotent cells in vivo have been
lacking owing to the scarcity of relevant tissue, a recent study has revealed
that ICMs have more intense silencing marks than do ES cells, at in least some
genes (O'Neill et al.,
2006
).
The NuRD (Nucleosome Remodeling and Histone Deacetylation) co-repressor
complex is an abundant and biochemically well-characterised co-repressor which
is implicated in silencing in a number of contexts and in a variety of
organisms, including mammals, flies, nematodes and plants
(Ahringer, 2000
;
Bowen et al., 2004
). In
mammals, NuRD-mediated silencing has been implicated in cell fate decisions
during ES cell differentiation (Kaji et
al., 2006
) and haematopoietic development
(Fujita et al., 2004
;
Hong et al., 2005
;
Hutchins et al., 2002
;
Rodriguez et al., 2005
;
Williams et al., 2004
). One of
the core components of NuRD is the Mbd3 protein
(Wade et al., 1999
;
Zhang et al., 1999
). Mbd3 was
originally identified in mice and humans as a protein containing a region with
high homology to the methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) of MeCP2, but which did
not bind methylated DNA (Hendrich and
Bird, 1998
). Recently, we generated Mbd3-/- ES
cells by gene targeting and showed that Mbd3 is required for stable formation
of the NuRD complex in ES cells (Kaji et
al., 2006
). Mbd3-/- ES cells are viable and
maintain expression of genes associated with pluripotent cells such as Oct4
and Nanog, but fail to differentiate or silence expression of Oct4 upon
withdrawal of LIF in vitro or in chimeric embryos.
Mice lacking a functional Mbd3 gene die prior to midgestation
(Hendrich et al., 2001
), but
why these embryos fail to develop, and what role is played by Mbd3/NuRD in
early embryos has not been described. In this study, we have characterised the
function of Mbd3 in peri-implantation development. We find that Mbd3 is
required for ICM cells to develop into late epiblast after implantation, for
proliferation of epiblast cells in culture, and for the proper function of
extra-embryonic tissues immediately after implantation. We further identify a
number of gene expression differences between ICMs from 3.5 dpc embryos, 4.5
dpc embryos and ES cells, many of which show misregulation in mutant embryos
prior to the onset of morphological abnormalities. Together, these data
demonstrate that Mbd3/NuRD plays a key role in the transition of pluripotent
ICM cells towards an epiblast fate during peri-implantation development, and
for the acquisition of an ES cell fate.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immunofluorescence and RNA in situ hybridisation
Embryos were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilised with 0.25%
Triton X-100. After blocking with 1% skimmed milk and 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS,
embryos were stained with primary antibodies: anti-Mbd3 (sc-9402, Santa Cruz),
anti-Oct4 (sc-8628, sc-5279, Santa Cruz and Becton Dickinson), anti-Nanog
(provided by Ian Chambers, Institute for Stem Cell Research, Edinburgh, UK),
anti-Gata4 (sc-1237, Santa Cruz), anti-
7 integrin (provided by Ann
Sutherland, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA)
(Klaffky et al., 2001
),
anti-activated caspase-3 (AF-835, R&D Systems), anti-Ki67 (MAB4062,
Chemicon), followed by the appropriate secondary antibodies. Nuclei were
stained with DAPI (Molecular Probes). Images were captured with a confocal
microscope (Leica TSC SP2) and Leica confocal software. Whole-mount RNA in
situ hybridisation was performed as described
(Rosen and Beddington, 1993
).
Staining reactions were carried out for 2 days. The in situ probes for
Cdx2 and Mash2 have been described previously
(Buehr et al., 2003
;
Nichols et al., 1998
). Embryos
were genotyped by PCR.
Immunosurgery and ICM culture
Immunosurgery was carried out as described
(Solter and Knowles, 1975
),
with collection of trophectoderm lysates for genotype determination by PCR.
ICMs were cultured in the presence of 2000 U/ml of LIF and 20% FCS in GMEM on
gelatin-coated dishes.
Single-ICM and single-cell PCR
cDNA from single ICMs (30-40 cells) or single cells was amplified as
described (Iscove et al.,
2002
), except for the following modifications. The sequence of the
primer used for cDNA amplification is
5'-AAGCAGTGGTATCAACGCAGAGTGGCCATTACGGCCGTACT30-3'.
SuperRNaseIn (Ambion) and SuperScript III (Invitrogen) were used as RNase
inhibitor and reverse transcriptase, respectively. PCR was carried out with
ExTaq (Takara). The genotype of individual ICMs was confirmed by PCR with
trophectoderm lysates. cDNAs from seven 3.5-dpc ICMs, six 4.5-dpc ICMs, or
five single ES cells, respectively, were combined and the amount of cDNA was
normalised for Gapdh expression by PCR. See
Table 1 for information on
gene-specific primers. All PCRs for specific genes were performed with an
annealing temperature of 60°C.
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
7 integrin, a
marker of extra-embryonic ectoderm and trophectoderm
(Klaffky et al., 2001
7 integrin-expressing cells are distinct from and
surround the Oct4-expressing cells, mutant embryos do not form an organised
extra-embryonic ectoderm structure (Fig.
3A, bottom panels). Similarly, Mash2 (Ascl2 -
Mouse Genome Informatics) expression, which normally marks the developing
ectoplacental cone, was detectable over the entire mutant embryo
(Fig. 3B). Cdx2, which
is normally expressed in trophoblast stem cells and in extra-embryonic
ectoderm (Strumpf et al.,
2005
Staining embryos for Oct4 and Gata4, an endoderm marker, revealed that
although Mbd3-/- embryos show normal endoderm
specification at 4.5 dpc (Fig.
2B), by 5.5 dpc mutant embryos have failed to form the organised
visceral endoderm epithelium seen in wild-type embryos at this stage
(Fig. 3C). In addition to the
Gata4-positive cells and the Oct4-positive cells, presumably indicating
primitive endoderm and primitive ectoderm, respectively, mutant embryos also
contained Gata4-Oct4 double-positive cells (n=3)
(Fig. 3C). Oct4-Gata4
double-positive cells were never observed in wild-type embryos at this stage
(n=12), but were characteristic of early primitive endoderm cells in
the ICMs of 4.5 dpc embryos (e.g. Fig.
2B). This persistence of Oct4-Gata4 double-positive cells in 5.5
dpc Mbd3-/- embryos, as well as the lack of robust
expression of Hex (Hhex - Mouse Genome Informatics), a
marker of distal visceral endoderm in 5.5 dpc embryos
(Rodriguez et al., 2001
) (see
Fig. S2 in the supplementary material), indicates that primitive endoderm
formation is also abnormal in these embryos.
|
Mbd3 is required for epiblast expansion in vivo and ex vivo
Given the different developmental capacity of Mbd3-/-
ES cells and ICM cells in embryos, we sought to characterise more fully the
ICM phenotype of Mbd3-/- embryos independently of the
extra-embryonic phenotype. In order to determine whether the loss of
Oct4-expressing cells seen in postimplantation Mbd3-/-
embryos is due to an autonomous defect, or to some developmental or
environmental cue, the preimplantation period was extended by subjecting
blastocysts to diapause (Buehr and Smith,
2003
). In this context, epiblast cells and primitive endoderm
cells are spatially distinct, with the former expressing both Oct4 and Nanog
while the latter express Oct4 and Gata4
(Fig. 4A). As in non-delayed
5.5 dpc embryos, Mbd3-/- blastocysts subjected to diapause
for 2 days (i.e. at 5 days after fertilisation) generally contained few, if
any, Oct4/Nanog-expressing epiblast cells, whereas all embryos contained a
Gata4-expressing primitive endoderm layer that was comparable in size to that
see in wild-type or heterozygous littermates
(Fig. 4A). Thus, we conclude
that the loss of epiblast cells in Mbd3-null embryos occurs independently of
the process of implantation.
To exclude any possible influence of the trophectoderm on the growth of
mutant epiblasts, we next investigated the growth potential of isolated
Mbd3-/- ICMs ex vivo. ICMs from 3.5 dpc blastocysts were
isolated away from the surrounding trophectoderm by immunosurgery and cultured
in the presence of LIF. In most cases, the outgrowths from
Mbd3-/- ICMs were distinguishable from those of wild-type
or Mbd3+/- ICMs from the first or second day of culture,
producing a smaller cell mass and tighter cell junctions between outgrowing
endoderm cells (Fig. 4B). After
3 days in culture, only 32% of Mbd3-/- outgrowths
contained a recognisable cell mass as compared with 79% or 86% of wild-type or
heterozygous outgrowths, respectively (Fig.
4C). Mbd3-/- cell mass outgrowths were
invariably smaller than those produced by wild-type or heterozygous ICMs, and
contained few if any Oct4-positive cells
(Fig. 4B,D). By contrast, the
endoderm produced by Mbd3-/- outgrowths expressed Gata4
and Sparc, a marker of differentiated parietal endoderm
(Holland et al., 1987
) (data
not shown). Thus, we conclude that although dispensable for primitive endoderm
growth, Mbd3 is required for the expansion of Oct4-expressing cells during ICM
culture that is essential for ES cell derivation
(Buehr and Smith, 2003
).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several epigenetic silencing proteins have been reported to be important
for early murine development (Bernstein et
al., 2003
; Cowley et al.,
2005
; Dannenberg et al.,
2005
; David et al.,
2003
; Dodge et al.,
2004
; Hendrich et al.,
2001
; O'Carroll et al.,
2001
; Rayasam et al.,
2003
), and often a requirement in ES cells is inferred from the
failure of blastocysts to outgrow in culture. Here, we show that Mbd3, a
component of the NuRD co-repressor complex, is required for the initial step
of ES cell derivation, namely expansion of the early epiblast cell population,
despite being dispensable for ES cell self-renewal. This requirement in early
embryonic development and for the growth of ICM cells in vitro, but not for ES
cell maintenance, has been reported for only one other epigenetic silencing
protein, namely Dicer, a protein important in RNAi-mediated gene silencing
(Bernstein et al., 2003
;
Kanellopoulou et al., 2005
;
Murchison et al., 2005
).
Recently, O'Neill et al. identified differences in histone acetylation
patterns between ICMs and ES cells, possibly indicating epigenetic changes
important for ES cell derivation from ICMs
(O'Neill et al., 2006
).
Together, these data indicate that epigenetic silencing plays an important
role in the developmental and gene expression changes that occur during the
development of pluripotent cells in vivo and for ES cell derivation.
Mbd3/NuRD is required for programmed maturation of pluripotent ICM cells and development of extra-embryonic tissues
Maternal Mbd3 protein is lost in embryos by 3.5 dpc, at which point altered
gene expression patterns are detectable in ICM cells, followed by the
appearance of morphological abnormalities within 48 hours.
Mbd3-/- embryos at 5.5 dpc lack a mature late epiblast,
proper spatial organisation and distinct extra-embryonic ectoderm and visceral
endoderm structures, although they do contain cells expressing markers for
each of these lineages. Epiblast cells in 5.5 dpc Mbd3-/-
embryos display characteristics of 3.5 dpc ICM cells, such as a lack of
expansive growth or cavitation, proximal localisation and the presence of
Oct4-Gata4 double-positive cells. Mbd3-null embryos lose Oct4-expressing cells
by 7.5 dpc, while the ectoplacental cone continues to grow. Given that we
could find no evidence that the Oct4-expressing cells either die by apoptosis
or undergo cell cycle arrest, it may be that they fail to make the transition
from ICM cells to become late epiblast, and instead all gradually lose Oct4
expression while activating Gata4 expression and become primitive
endoderm.
|
It is also unlikely that the Mbd3-null embryonic phenotype is exclusively
due to an epiblast defect, as wild-type ES cells were unable to rescue the
mutant phenotype in chimeric embryos, and embryos lacking an epiblast due to
mutation in Foxd3, a member of the forkhead family of transcriptional
regulators, are able to form extra-embryonic ectoderm
(Hanna et al., 2002
). In
addition, whereas most Mbd3-/- ICMs were able to give rise
to adherent primitive endoderm cells expressing Gata4, even these cells showed
a more compact growth morphology than did wild-type primitive endoderm
outgrowths, indicating some defect in proliferation and/or adhesion consistent
with the disorganised visceral endoderm seen in mutant embryos at 5.5 dpc.
Further analysis of Mbd3-deficient extra-embryonic tissues and of Mbd3-null
trophectoderm stem cells and endoderm stem cells
(Kunath et al., 2005
;
Tanaka et al., 1998
) will be
important for defining the tissue-specific and general requirements for
Mbd3/NuRD during early postimplantation development.
Transcriptional misregulation in Mbd3-/- ICMs
Although it is becoming clear that in 3.5 dpc ICMs there may be distinct
cell populations fated to be either epiblast or primitive endoderm with
distinct gene expression patterns (Chazaud
et al., 2006
; Kurimoto et al.,
2006
), gene expression changes that accompany the maturation of
epiblast cells upon implantation remain largely uncharacterised. We identified
11 genes that show altered expression patterns in 3.5 and/or 4.5 dpc ICMs in
the absence of Mbd3/NuRD. Sohlh2, Sfrp1, Aes and Dazl show
increased expression immediately after loss of maternally-derived Mbd3 protein
at 3.5 dpc, and misregulation persists in 4.5 dpc ICMs and in ES cells, making
these genes good candidates to be predominantly and directly regulated by
Mbd3/NuRD. Sfrp1 is a secreted antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway
(Kawano and Kypta, 2003
); Aes
is a naturally occurring dominant-negative molecule alleviating
transcriptional repression by TLE/GRG proteins, which bind and repress various
transcription factors including Tcf proteins, the nuclear mediators of
canonical Wnt signaling (Brantjes et al.,
2001
). There are several Wnt pathway molecules expressed in
preimplantation embryos that can function in both canonical and non-canonical
Wnt pathways (Kemp et al.,
2005
). Therefore, it will be interesting to determine whether
misregulation of Sfrp1 and Aes, alone or in combination, can
affect the normal development of pluripotent cells.
The two other genes showing early misexpression, Dazl, an
RNA-binding translational regulator, and Sohlh2, a basic
helix-loop-helix (bHLH) protein, are both exclusively expressed in germ cells
(Ballow et al., 2006
;
Ruggiu et al., 1997
). By
contrast, expression of another germ cell-specific gene, Dppa3 (also
called Stella or Pgc7), is not disturbed in
Mbd3-/- ICMs despite the fact that it is strongly
downregulated in Mbd3-/- ES cells
(Fig. 5)
(Kaji et al., 2006
). Thus, it
is unlikely that misregulation of Dazl and Sohlh2 in
Mbd3-/- ICMs reflects some commitment towards the germ
cell lineage; however, it remains possible that their overexpression in
Mbd3-/- ICMs and ES cells interferes with normal
development and/or lineage commitment of pluripotent cells.
The Pramel (PRAME-like) genes encode proteins similar to the human
preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma, or PRAME, protein
(Bortvin et al., 2003
). PRAME
is an antigen expressed in a wide variety of human tumours
(van Baren et al., 1998
) and
was recently shown to act as a dominant repressor of retinoic acid receptor
signalling and to inhibit retinoic acid-induced differentiation of mouse
embryonal carcinoma cells (Epping et al.,
2005
). Although the function of the Pramel proteins is not known,
their preimplantation-specific expression pattern in mouse
(Fig. 5), and the existence of
families of Pramel genes in the genomes of other mammals, Xenopus
tropicalis and Gallus gallus, might indicate that they play some
conserved role in early vertebrate development
(Birtle et al., 2005
) (B.H.,
unpublished observations).
Molecular and transcriptional differences between ICM cells and ES cells
ES cells are derived from ICMs, inheriting their pluripotency and acquiring
the ability for indefinite self-renewal
(Brook and Gardner, 1997
). ES
cell derivation remains an inefficient process, the efficiency of which varies
between different inbred mouse strains and is currently not possible in other
rodent species (Buehr and Smith,
2003
; Robertson,
1987
). Despite the growing popularity of ES cell research,
surprisingly little is known about the molecular differences between
ICM/epiblast cells and ES cells. In addition to identifying Mbd3-dependent
gene expression patterns in the ICMs of preimplantation stage embryos and ES
cells, we also found seven genes (Pramel4, Pramel5, Pramel6, Pramel7,
Ppp2c2r, 2410076I21Rik and Sohlh2) downregulated and 2 genes
(Htra1 and Pak1) upregulated between 3.5 dpc and 4.5 dpc in
wild-type ICMs (Fig. 5). The
expression of most of these genes in wild-type ES cells is more similar to
that in 4.5 dpc ICMs than in 3.5 dpc ICMs. These molecular data support the
assertion that the origin of ES cells is early epiblast rather than 3.5 dpc
ICM (Brook and Gardner, 1997
).
This indicates that during ES cell derivation, pluripotent cells in 3.5 dpc
ICMs must first mature in culture to a 4.5 dpc-like state before undergoing
the necessary epigenetic changes that enable them to become ES cells
(Fig. 6). ICMs at 4.5 dpc,
which include the early epiblast, also show some gene expression differences
when compared with ES cells. Nanog is robustly expressed in ES cells,
but its mRNA levels are decreasing in 4.5 dpc ICMs
(Chambers et al., 2003
), and
Pak1 expression is also lower than in ES cells
(Fig. 5). By contrast,
expression of Pramel7, 2410076I21Rik and Htra1 is higher in
4.5 dpc ICMs than in ES cells. Two genes (Pak1 and Dppa3)
showed no significant misregulation in Mbd3-/- ICMs,
although these genes are misregulated in Mbd3-/- ES cells
(Fig. 5)
(Kaji et al., 2006
),
indicating a difference in control of epigenetic silencing between ICM cells
and ES cells.
The effect of loss of Mbd3 is different in 4.5 dpc ICMs than in ES cells.
Pak1 and Dppa3 expression is misregulated in
Mbd3-/- ES cells, but not in Mbd3-/-
4.5 dpc ICMs. Furthermore, whereas Mbd3-/- ICM cells fail
to initiate the rapid proliferation characteristic of late epiblast and do not
maintain expression of Oct4, Mbd3-/- ES cells show only a
modest growth defect and robustly express Oct4 even when induced to
differentiate (Kaji et al.,
2006
). While we cannot exclude the possibility that some of the
differences observed here come from the presence of primitive endoderm cells
in 4.5 dpc ICMs, these data further illuminate the differences between ICM
cells and ES cells. Although the molecular events that occur during ES cell
derivation are largely unknown, here we show that Mbd3 is necessary for ICM
cells to gain ES cell-like properties of increased proliferation and an
appropriate gene expression profile necessary for both in vivo development and
ES cell derivation.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material for this article is available at
http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/134/6/1123/DC1
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
7 integrin
antibody, Ian Chambers for the anti-Nanog antibody, Josh Brickman and Korinna
Henseleit for Hex-GFP mice, and Austin Smith, Val Wilson, Tilo Kunath, Laura
Batlle-Morera and Nicola Reynolds for advice, discussions and comments on the
manuscript. K.K. was the recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from the
Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science. This work was funded by the
Wellcome Trust, the UK Medical Research Council and by a BBSRC UK-Japan
Partnering Award. | Footnotes |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ahringer, J. (2000). NuRD and SIN3 histone deacetylase complexes in development. Trends Genet. 16,351 -356.[CrossRef][Medline]
Azuara, V., Perry, P., Sauer, S., Spivakov, M., Jorgensen, H. F., John, R. M., Gouti, M., Casanova, M., Warnes, G., Merkenschlager, M. et al. (2006). Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines. Nat. Cell Biol. 8,532 -538.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ballow, D. J., Xin, Y., Choi, Y., Pangas, S. A. and Rajkovic, A. (2006). Sohlh2 is a germ cell-specific bHLH transcription factor. Gene Expr. Patterns 6,1014 -1018.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bernstein, B. E., Mikkelsen, T. S., Xie, X., Kamal, M., Huebert, D. J., Cuff, J., Fry, B., Meissner, A., Wernig, M., Plath, K. et al. (2006). A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125,315 -326.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bernstein, E., Kim, S. Y., Carmell, M. A., Murchison, E. P., Alcorn, H., Li, M. Z., Mills, A. A., Elledge, S. J., Anderson, K. V. and Hannon, G. J. (2003). Dicer is essential for mouse development. Nat. Genet. 35,215 -217.[CrossRef][Medline]
Birtle, Z., Goodstadt, L. and Ponting, C. (2005). Duplication and positive selection among hominin-specific PRAME genes. BMC Genomics 6, 120.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bortvin, A., Eggan, K., Skaletsky, H., Akutsu, H., Berry, D. L.,
Yanagimachi, R., Page, D. C. and Jaenisch, R. (2003).
Incomplete reactivation of Oct4-related genes in mouse embryos cloned from
somatic nuclei. Development
130,1673
-1680.
Bowen, N. J., Fujita, N., Kajita, M. and Wade, P. A. (2004). Mi-2/NuRD: multiple complexes for many purposes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1677,52 -57.[Medline]
Boyer, L. A., Plath, K., Zeitlinger, J., Brambrink, T., Medeiros, L. A., Lee, T. I., Levine, S. S., Wernig, M., Tajonar, A., Ray, M. K. et al. (2006). Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 441,349 -353.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bradley, A., Evans, M., Kaufman, M. H. and Robertson, E. (1984). Formation of germ-line chimaeras from embryo-derived teratocarcinoma cell lines. Nature 309,255 -256.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brantjes, H., Roose, J., van De Wetering, M. and Clevers, H.
(2001). All Tcf HMG box transcription factors interact with
Groucho-related co-repressors. Nucleic Acids Res.
29,1410
-1419.
Brook, F. A. and Gardner, R. L. (1997). The
origin and efficient derivation of embryonic stem cells in the mouse.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94,5709
-5712.
Buehr, M. and Smith, A. (2003). Genesis of
embryonic stem cells. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol.
Sci. 358,1397
-1402.
Buehr, M., Nichols, J., Stenhouse, F., Mountford, P.,
Greenhalgh, C. J., Kantachuvesiri, S., Brooker, G., Mullins, J. and Smith, A.
G. (2003). Rapid loss of Oct-4 and pluripotency in cultured
rodent blastocysts and derivative cell lines. Biol.
Reprod. 68,222
-229.
Chambers, I., Colby, D., Robertson, M., Nichols, J., Lee, S., Tweedie, S. and Smith, A. (2003). Functional expression cloning of nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell 113,643 -655.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chazaud, C., Yamanaka, Y., Pawson, T. and Rossant, J. (2006). Early lineage segregation between epiblast and primitive endoderm in mouse blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK pathway. Dev. Cell 10,615 -624.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cowley, S. M., Iritani, B. M., Mendrysa, S. M., Xu, T., Cheng,
P. F., Yada, J., Liggitt, H. D. and Eisenman, R. N. (2005).
The mSin3A chromatin-modifying complex is essential for embryogenesis and
T-cell development. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25,6990
-7004.
Dannenberg, J. H., David, G., Zhong, S., van der Torre, J.,
Wong, W. H. and Depinho, R. A. (2005). mSin3A corepressor
regulates diverse transcriptional networks governing normal and neoplastic
growth and survival. Genes Dev.
19,1581
-1595.
David, G., Turner, G. M., Yao, Y., Protopopov, A. and DePinho,
R. A. (2003). mSin3-associated protein, mSds3, is essential
for pericentric heterochromatin formation and chromosome segregation in
mammalian cells. Genes Dev.
17,2396
-2405.
Dodge, J. E., Kang, Y. K., Beppu, H., Lei, H. and Li, E.
(2004). Histone H3-K9 methyltransferase ESET is essential for
early development. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24,2478
-2486.
Donnison, M., Beaton, A., Davey, H. W., Broadhurst, R.,
L'Huillier, P. and Pfeffer, P. L. (2005). Loss of the
extraembryonic ectoderm in Elf5 mutants leads to defects in embryonic
patterning. Development
132,2299
-2308.
Epping, M. T., Wang, L., Edel, M. J., Carlee, L., Hernandez, M. and Bernards, R. (2005). The human tumor antigen PRAME is a dominant repressor of retinoic acid receptor signaling. Cell 122,835 -847.[CrossRef][Medline]
Evans, M. J. and Kaufman, M. H. (1981). Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292,154 -156.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fujita, N., Jaye, D. L., Geigerman, C., Akyildiz, A., Mooney, M. R., Boss, J. M. and Wade, P. A. (2004). MTA3 and the Mi-2/NuRD complex regulate cell fate during B lymphocyte differentiation. Cell 119,75 -86.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gerdes, J. (1990). Ki-67 and other proliferation markers useful for immunohistological diagnostic and prognostic evaluations in human malignancies. Semin. Cancer Biol. 1, 199-206.[Medline]
Guzman-Ayala, M., Ben-Haim, N., Beck, S. and Constam, D. B.
(2004). Nodal protein processing and fibroblast growth factor 4
synergize to maintain a trophoblast stem cell microenvironment.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101,15656
-15660.
Hanna, L. A., Foreman, R. K., Tarasenko, I. A., Kessler, D. S.
and Labosky, P. A. (2002). Requirement for Foxd3 in
maintaining pluripotent cells of the early mouse embryo. Genes
Dev. 16,2650
-2661.
Hendrich, B. and Bird, A. (1998).
Identification and characterization of a family of mammalian methyl-CpG
binding proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,6538
-6547.
Hendrich, B., Guy, J., Ramsahoye, B., Wilson, V. A. and Bird,
A. (2001). Closely related proteins MBD2 and MBD3 play
distinctive but interacting roles in mouse development. Genes
Dev. 15,710
-723.
Holland, P., Harper, S., McVey, J. and Hogan, B.
(1987). In vivo expression of mRNA for the
Ca2+-binding protein SPARC (osteonectin) revealed by in situ
hybridization. J. Cell Biol.
105,473
-482.
Hong, W., Nakazawa, M., Chen, Y. Y., Kori, R., Vakoc, C. R., Rakowski, C. and Blobel, G. A. (2005). FOG-1 recruits the NuRD repressor complex to mediate transcriptional repression by GATA-1. EMBO J. 24,2367 -2378.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hutchins, A. S., Mullen, A. C., Lee, H. W., Sykes, K. J., High, F. A., Hendrich, B. D., Bird, A. P. and Reiner, S. L. (2002). Gene silencing quantitatively controls the function of a developmental trans-activator. Mol. Cell 10, 81-91.[CrossRef][Medline]
Iscove, N. N., Barbara, M., Gu, M., Gibson, M., Modi, C. and Winegarden, N. (2002). Representation is faithfully preserved in global cDNA amplified exponentially from sub-picogram quantities of mRNA. Nat. Biotechnol. 20,940 -943.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kaji, K., Caballero, I. M., MacLeod, R., Nichols, J., Wilson, V. A. and Hendrich, B. (2006). The NuRD component Mbd3 is required for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 8,285 -292.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kanellopoulou, C., Muljo, S. A., Kung, A. L., Ganesan, S.,
Drapkin, R., Jenuwein, T., Livingston, D. M. and Rajewsky, K.
(2005). Dicer-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells are defective
in differentiation and centromeric silencing. Genes
Dev. 19,489
-501.
Kawano, Y. and Kypta, R. (2003). Secreted
antagonists of the Wnt signalling pathway. J. Cell
Sci. 116,2627
-2634.
Kemp, C., Willems, E., Abdo, S., Lambiv, L. and Leyns, L. (2005). Expression of all Wnt genes and their secreted antagonists during mouse blastocyst and postimplantation development. Dev. Dyn. 233,1064 -1075.[CrossRef][Medline]
Klaffky, E., Williams, R., Yao, C. C., Ziober, B., Kramer, R. and Sutherland, A. (2001). Trophoblast-specific expression and function of the integrin alpha 7 subunit in the peri-implantation mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 239,161 -175.[CrossRef][Medline]
Krajewska, M., Wang, H. G., Krajewski, S., Zapata, J. M.,
Shabaik, A., Gascoyne, R. and Reed, J. C. (1997).
Immunohistochemical analysis of in vivo patterns of expression of CPP32
(Caspase-3), a cell death protease. Cancer Res.
57,1605
-1613.
Kunath, T., Arnaud, D., Uy, G. D., Okamoto, I., Chureau, C.,
Yamanaka, Y., Heard, E., Gardner, R. L., Avner, P. and Rossant, J.
(2005). Imprinted X-inactivation in extra-embryonic endoderm cell
lines from mouse blastocysts. Development
132,1649
-1661.
Kurimoto, K., Yabuta, Y., Ohinata, Y., Ono, Y., Uno, K. D.,
Yamada, R. G., Ueda, H. R. and Saitou, M. (2006). An improved
single-cell cDNA amplification method for efficient high-density
oligonucleotide microarray analysis. Nucleic Acids
Res. 34,e42
.
Lee, T. I., Jenner, R. G., Boyer, L. A., Guenther, M. G., Levine, S. S., Kumar, R. M., Chevalier, B., Johnstone, S. E., Cole, M. F., Isono, K. et al. (2006). Control of developmental regulators by Polycomb in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 125,301 -313.[CrossRef][Medline]
Martin, G. R. (1981). Isolation of a
pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned
by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 78,7634
-7638.
Meissner, A. and Jaenisch, R. (2006). Generation of nuclear transfer-derived pluripotent ES cells from cloned Cdx2-deficient blastocysts. Nature 439,212 -215.[CrossRef][Medline]
Murchison, E. P., Partridge, J. F., Tam, O. H., Cheloufi, S. and
Hannon, G. J. (2005). Characterization of Dicer-deficient
murine embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 102,12135
-12140.
Murray, P. and Edgar, D. (2000). Regulation of
programmed cell death by basement membranes in embryonic development.
J. Cell Biol. 150,1215
-1221.
Nichols, J., Zevnik, B., Anastassiadis, K., Niwa, H., Klewe-Nebenius, D., Chambers, I., Scholer, H. and Smith, A. (1998). Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell 95,379 -391.[CrossRef][Medline]
Niwa, H., Toyooka, Y., Shimosato, D., Strumpf, D., Takahashi, K., Yagi, R. and Rossant, J. (2005). Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 determines trophectoderm differentiation. Cell 123,917 -929.[CrossRef][Medline]
O'Carroll, D., Erhardt, S., Pagani, M., Barton, S. C., Surani,
M. A. and Jenuwein, T. (2001). The polycomb-group gene Ezh2
is required for early mouse development. Mol. Cell.
Biol. 21,4330
-4336.
O'Neill, L. P., Vermilyea, M. D. and Turner, B. M. (2006). Epigenetic characterization of the early embryo with a chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol applicable to small cell populations. Nat. Genet. 38,835 -841.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pelton, T. A., Sharma, S., Schulz, T. C., Rathjen, J. and
Rathjen, P. D. (2002). Transient pluripotent cell populations
during primitive ectoderm formation: correlation of in vivo and in vitro
pluripotent cell development. J. Cell Sci.
115,329
-339.
Pratt, T., Sharp, L., Nichols, J., Price, D. J. and Mason, J. O. (2000). Embryonic stem cells and transgenic mice ubiquitously expressing a tau-tagged green fluorescent protein. Dev. Biol. 228,19 -28.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rayasam, G. V., Wendling, O., Angrand, P. O., Mark, M., Niederreither, K., Song, L., Lerouge, T., Hager, G. L., Chambon, P. and Losson, R. (2003). NSD1 is essential for early post-implantation development and has a catalytically active SET domain. EMBO J. 22,3153 -3163.[CrossRef][Medline]
Robertson, E. J. (1987). Teratocarcinoma and Embryo-derived Stem Cells: A Practical Approach. Oxford: IRL Press.
Rodriguez, P., Bonte, E., Krijgsveld, J., Kolodziej, K. E., Guyot, B., Heck, A. J., Vyas, P., de Boer, E., Grosveld, F. and Strouboulis, J. (2005). GATA-1 forms distinct activating and repressive complexes in erythroid cells. EMBO J. 24,2354 -2366.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rodriguez, T. A., Casey, E. S., Harland, R. M., Smith, J. C. and Beddington, R. S. (2001). Distinct enhancer elements control Hex expression during gastrulation and early organogenesis. Dev. Biol. 234,304 -316.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rosen, B. and Beddington, R. S. (1993). Whole-mount in situ hybridization in the mouse embryo: gene expression in three dimensions. Trends Genet. 9, 162-167.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rossant, J. (1976). Postimplantation development of blastomeres isolated from 4- and 8-cell mouse eggs. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 36,283 -290.[Medline]
Ruggiu, M., Speed, R., Taggart, M., McKay, S. J., Kilanowski, F., Saunders, P., Dorin, J. and Cooke, H. J. (1997). The mouse Dazla gene encodes a cytoplasmic protein essential for gametogenesis. Nature 389,73 -77.[CrossRef][Medline]
Saba-El-Leil, M. K., Vella, F. D., Vernay, B., Voisin, L., Chen, L., Labrecque, N., Ang, S. L. and Meloche, S. (2003). An essential function of the mitogen-activated protein kinase Erk2 in mouse trophoblast development. EMBO Rep. 4, 964-968.[CrossRef][Medline]
Smith, A. G. (2001). Embryo-derived stem cells: of mice and men. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17,435 -462.[CrossRef][Medline]
Snow, M. H. and Bennett, D. (1978). Gastrulation in the mouse: assessment of cell populations in the epiblast of tw18/tw18 embryos. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 47, 39-52.[Medline]
Solter, D. and Knowles, B. B. (1975).
Immunosurgery of mouse blastocyst. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 72,5099
-5102.
Strumpf, D., Mao, C. A., Yamanaka, Y., Ralston, A.,
Chawengsaksophak, K., Beck, F. and Rossant, J. (2005). Cdx2
is required for correct cell fate specification and differentiation of
trophectoderm in the mouse blastocyst. Development
132,2093
-2102.
Tam, P. P. and Rossant, J. (2003). Mouse
embryonic chimeras: tools for studying mammalian development.
Development 130,6155
-6163.
Tanaka, S., Kunath, T., Hadjantonakis, A. K., Nagy, A. and
Rossant, J. (1998). Promotion of trophoblast stem cell
proliferation by FGF4. Science
282,2072
-2075.
van Baren, N., Chambost, H., Ferrant, A., Michaux, L., Ikeda, H., Millard, I., Olive, D., Boon, T. and Coulie, P. G. (1998). PRAME, a gene encoding an antigen recognized on a human melanoma by cytolytic T cells, is expressed in acute leukaemia cells. Br. J. Haematol. 102,1376 -1379.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wade, P. A., Gegonne, A., Jones, P. L., Ballestar, E., Aubry, F. and Wolffe, A. P. (1999). Mi-2 complex couples DNA methylation to chromatin remodelling and histone deacetylation. Nat. Genet. 23,62 -66.[Medline]
Williams, C. J., Naito, T., Arco, P. G., Seavitt, J. R., Cashman, S. M., De Souza, B., Qi, X., Keables, P., Von Andrian, U. H. and Georgopoulos, K. (2004). The chromatin remodeler Mi-2beta is required for CD4 expression and T cell development. Immunity 20,719 -733.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhang, Y., Ng, H. H., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., Bird,
A. and Reinberg, D. (1999). Analysis of the NuRD subunits
reveals a histone deacetylase core complex and a connection with DNA
methylation. Genes Dev.
13,1924
-1935.
Zwaka, T. P. and Thomson, J. A. (2005). A germ
cell origin of embryonic stem cells? Development
132,227
-233.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Deshpande, Y.-S. Dai, Y. Kim, J. Kim, L. Kimlin, K. Gao, and D. T. Wong Cdk2ap1 Is Required for Epigenetic Silencing of Oct4 during Murine Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation J. Biol. Chem., March 6, 2009; 284(10): 6043 - 6047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Lu, G. I. Kovalev, H. Chang, E. Kallin, G. Knudsen, L. Xia, N. Mishra, P. Ruiz, E. Li, L. Su, et al. Inactivation of NuRD Component Mta2 Causes Abnormal T Cell Activation and Lupus-like Autoimmune Disease in Mice J. Biol. Chem., May 16, 2008; 283(20): 13825 - 13833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Niwa Open conformation chromatin and pluripotency Genes & Dev., November 1, 2007; 21(21): 2671 - 2676. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||