|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 28 February 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.02828
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-tubulin distribution and microtubule architecture during epithelial cell shape changeDepartment of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, and Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: wallingford{at}mail.utexas.edu)
Accepted 19 January 2007
| SUMMARY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-tubulin. Moreover, this change in
-tubulin distribution
underlies the assembly of aligned arrays of microtubules that drive apicobasal
cell elongation. Finally, experiments with the related protein, Shroom1,
demonstrate that
-tubulin regulation is a conserved feature of this
protein family. Together, the data demonstrate that Shroom family proteins
govern epithelial cell behaviors by coordinating the assembly of both
microtubule and actin cytoskeletons.
Key words: Shroom, gamma-tubulin, microtubule, neural tube defect, morphogenesis, Xenopus
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Whereas the molecular control of apical constriction has been at least
partially defined (see below), the molecules governing apicobasal cell
elongation remain almost entirely obscure. Electron microscopy and inhibitor
studies have implicated microtubules (MTs) as the causative cytoskeletal agent
in cell elongation, but how discrete populations of MTs are assembled as
embryonic epithelial cells change shape remains unclear
(Brun and Garson, 1983
;
Burnside, 1973
;
Karfunkel, 1971
;
Messier, 1978
;
Schroeder, 1970
). In other
epithelial cell types, apicobasally aligned MTs are assembled from a diffuse
microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) beneath the apical surface
(Bacallao et al., 1989
;
Bre et al., 1990
;
Meads and Schroer, 1995
;
Rizzolo and Joshi, 1993
). One
central regulator of MT assembly is
-tubulin, a minus-end anchoring
protein that is a component of the protein complex that nucleates MTs
(Gunawardane et al., 2000
;
Job et al., 2003
;
Stearns et al., 1991
).
-tubulin is probably a key player in the assembly of the robust MT
arrays observed in elongating neural epithelial cells, but how its activity
may be regulated during cell shape change in developing embryos has not been
addressed.
Apicobasal cell elongation is tightly linked to apical constriction.
Because the MT and actin cytoskeletons are often jointly regulated
(Rodriguez et al., 2003
), we
asked whether molecules governing apical constriction were also required for
cell elongation. Recently, we found that the novel protein Shroom3 was
sufficient to drive apical constriction and apical actin accumulation in
naïve cells, suggesting that this protein lies near the top of the
molecular hierarchy controlling this cell behavior
(Haigo et al., 2003
).
Moreover, this actin-binding protein is essential for neural tube closure in
both mice and frogs (Haigo et al.,
2003
; Hildebrand and Soriano,
1999
). Shroom3 (previously simply known as Shroom) is a member of
a new family of proteins, all of which have been associated with the actin
cytoskeleton (Hagens et al.,
2006
). These proteins were renamed recently to reflect the
similarities of the proteins within the family and to reflect the order in
which they were identified (Hagens et al.,
2006
).
In this study, we show that Shroom family proteins govern MT architecture
in developing epithelia. We show that Shroom3 is both necessary and sufficient
to induce a redistribution of the MT regulator
-tubulin, and that this
action underlies the assembly of robust, parallel MTs that drive apicobasal
cell elongation. Shroom3 is thereby necessary and sufficient to drive both
apicobasal cell elongation and apical constriction in the neural epithelium
during neural tube closure. Experiments with the related protein, Shroom1,
demonstrate that the control of
-tubulin distribution is a conserved
feature of this protein family. In light of our previous finding that Shroom3
is sufficient to drive actin-based apical constriction
(Haigo et al., 2003
), the data
presented here demonstrate that Shroom family proteins govern distinct
epithelial cell behaviors by coordinating assembly of actin and tubulin
cytoskeletons. These results thus identify a novel mechanism by which actin
and MT cytoskeletons are coordinated to control cell shape in developing
embryos.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Morpholino, DNA and mRNA injection
Capped mRNA was synthesized using mMessage mMachine kit (Ambion). DNA, mRNA
or antisense morpholino oligonucleotide
(Haigo et al., 2003
) was
injected into one or two dorsal blastomeres at the four-cell stage. Embryos
were incubated until appropriate stages and were fixed in MEMFA
(Davidson and Wallingford,
2005
). Embryos were staged according to Nieuwkoop and Faber
(Nieuwkoop and Faber,
1994
).
Actin filament staining
Two units of Alexa Fluor-green-phalloidin (Molecular Probes) in methanol
were completely dried before use and were resuspended in 500 µl of PBT (PBS
plus 0.1% Tween 20). Fixed embryos were rinsed with PBT and were stained with
the phalloidin solution at 4°C overnight. To visualize nuclei, DAPI (4
µg/ml, Sigma) or propidium iodide (20 µg/ml, Sigma) was added to
phalloidin solution.
Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization
Fixed embryos were dehydrated completely in methanol and were bleached in
10% hydrogen peroxide and 67% methanol for 3 hours and rehydrated
consecutively with TBS (155 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4). To reduce
autofluorescence of yolk platelets, the embryos were incubated with 100 mM
NaBH4 in TBS for 4 hours at room temperature or overnight at
4°C and rinsed in TBST (0.1% Triton X-100 in TBS).
Primary antibodies used were monoclonal anti-
-tubulin antibody
(1:400 dilution, DM1A; Sigma), rabbit polyclonal anti-
-tubulin
antibodies [1:200 dilution (Abcam) or as in Stearns et al.
(Stearns et al., 1991
);
identical results were obtained with either of the two different
-tubulin antibodies (data not shown)], polyclonal rabbit ZO-1 antibody
(1:200 dilution; Zymed Laboratories) and monoclonal anti-Myc antibody (1:300
dilution, clone9E10; Abcam).
Antibodies were diluted in fetal bovine serum (FBS) solution [TBS containing 10% FBS and 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)]. Primary antibodies were detected with Alexa Fluor-488 goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Molecular Probes), Alexa Fluor-488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes) or Alexa Fluor-555 IgG (Molecular Probes) diluted 1:250 in FBS solution. To stain nuclei, propidium iodide or DAPI was added in secondary antibody solution. Embryos were cleared in Murray's Clear solution (benzyl benzoate:benzyl alcoho1, 2:1).
In situ hybridization was performed according to Sive et al.
(Sive et al., 2000
), with
digoxygenin-labeled, antisense full-length probes to Xenopus Shroom3
and Shroom1 (previously known as APX)
(Staub et al., 1992
).
Imaging and image analysis
Imaging procedures were generally as described in Davidson and Wallingford
(Davidson and Wallingford,
2005
). Phalloidin-stained intact embryos in PBT were placed on a
culture dish and embryos cleared in Murray's solution were placed in a culture
chamber with a cover-glass bottom. For cross-sections, embryos were embedded
in 2% agarose, and thick (250-300 µm) sections were cut with a Vibratome
1000 system (Davidson and Wallingford,
2005
).
The imaging was performed with a Zeiss LSM5 Pascal confocal microscope. The images for bright field and fluorescence view were captured on a stereomicroscope (Leica MZ16FA). Cell height and nuclear position were measured with LSM5 Pascal software and cell surface area was measured with ImageProPlus software. Images used throughout this study have been enhanced using the Unsharp Mask filter in Adobe Photoshop.
Immunoblotting
Embryos were lysed in RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5%
deoxycholate, 2 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0) containing protease inhibitors.
After centrifugation, 10 µg supernatant was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and
western blot assays were performed using standard protocols. Primary
antibodies used were monoclonal anti-Myc antibody (1:2000 dilution, clone
9E10; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-actin antibody (1:2000 dilution; Abcam)
and rabbit polyclonal anti-
-tubulin antibody (1:4000 dilution; Abcam).
Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) signals were detected by SuperSignal West Pico
Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce).
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because Shroom3 induces apical constriction in neural epithelial cells
(Haigo et al., 2003
), we asked
whether this protein was also involved in the control of cell elongation. We
disrupted Shroom3 function using an antisense morpholino oligonucleotide (MO)
that effectively blocks proper splicing of Shroom3; introduction of this MO
results in translation of a non-functional Shroom3 protein and disrupts neural
plate bending when injected into Xenopus embryos
(Haigo et al., 2003
).
Confocal imaging of cells within the neural plate revealed that embryos injected unilaterally with Shroom3 MO (morphants) develop with obvious defects in cell elongation on the injected side of the embryo (Fig. 2A,a'). Cell shape change progressed normally on the uninjected side of these embryos. Disruption of Shroom3 function by injection of the Shroom3-MO blocked apicobasal elongation of neural plate cells, such that the length of cells lacking Shroom3 function was approximately half that of control cells (Fig. 2B). By mid-neurulation, these cells are only as long as wild-type cells were at the onset of neurulation.
A failure of apical constriction in Shroom3 morphants was also apparent. Cells on the uninjected side of embryos took on the characteristic wedge shape, whereas cells on the injected side remained columnar (Fig. 2A,a'). We quantified apical constriction in the neural plate by measuring the apical surface area of neural cells in the robustly constricting hingepoint regions and also in the intermediate regions, where less constriction occurs (Fig. 2D,E). Apical surface areas in both regions were significantly increased in Shroom3 morphants (Fig. 2C).
To confirm our findings, we disrupted Shroom3 function using an alternative
method. We showed previously that expression of the dominant-negative fragment
Shroom3754-1108 (DN-Shrm3) potently disrupts the activity of
co-expressed Shroom3 in an in vitro assay
(Haigo et al., 2003
). When we
expressed DN-Shrm3 in neural epithelial cells, we observed clear defects in
apicobasal cell elongation, similar to that observed in Shroom3 morphants. In
addition, expression of DN-Shrm3 reduced apical constriction and cell
elongation throughout the neural plate to a degree comparable to the
Shroom3-MO (Fig. S2c' in the supplementary material). These results
demonstrate that Shroom3 is required for apicobasal cell elongation in neural
epithelial cells in addition to its role in apical constriction.
Shroom3 is required for the assembly of parallel MT arrays in the apical region of neural epithelial cells
We next pursued the mechanism by which Shroom3 mediates changes in cell
length. Like most epithelia, neural epithelial cells contain parallel arrays
of MTs aligned along their apicobasal axis, and increasing cell height is
associated with the assembly of a much more dense array of these aligned MTs
(Burnside, 1973
;
Karfunkel, 1971
). We examined
MTs using confocal microscopy and an antibody against
-tubulin. Apical
MT arrays were readily apparent in wedging neuroepithelial cells
(Fig. 3A,a'). We observed
thick, parallel arrays of MTs emanating from the apical cell surface and
extending through approximately the apical third of the cell
(Fig. 3A,a'), consistent
with previous electron microscopy studies in Xenopus
(Karfunkel, 1971
).
|
Finally, we observed that the failure of MT organization and the failure of cell shape change in Shroom3 morphants did not stem from general defects in apicobasal cell polarity. First, we observed that in Shroom3 morphants, nuclear positioning was highly uniform (Fig. 2A) and the position of nuclei relative to the basal cell surface was identical to that in normal neural cells (Fig. 2B). These findings are consistent with the normal appearance of perinuclear MTs in Shroom3 morphants (Fig. 3A,B). Second, we found that apical markers were maintained in the absence of Shroom3 function. For example, in control embryos, ZO-1 and Par3 were tightly localized at apical cell-cell junctions of elongating neural plate cells (Fig. 3C and data not shown). In Shroom3 morphants, ZO-1 and Par3 remained localized normally, even in cells that lacked robust apicobasal MT arrays and that failed to constrict and elongate (Fig. 3D and data not shown).
Cell elongation and assembly of apical MT arrays are associated with Shroom3-dependent redistribution of
-tubulin in neural epithelial cells
To begin to characterize the molecular basis of MT organization in the
developing neural plate, we examined the distribution of
-tubulin in
the neural epithelium by immunohistochemistry. In many epithelial cell types,
centrosome-like foci of
-tubulin are observed near the apical cell
surface, from which MTs are thought to be organized
(Meads and Schroer, 1995
;
Müsch, 2004
;
Rizzolo and Joshi, 1993
).
By contrast, we observed that in neural plate cells
-tubulin was
distributed as a thick cloud with many brighter foci per cell
(Fig. 4A,B). This broad
accumulation of
-tubulin filled approximately the apical third of each
elongating neural plate cell during neural tube closure, thus correlating in
time and space with the assembly of the robust apicobasally aligned MT arrays
described above (Fig.
4A,a').
-tubulin accumulated apically at the early
neurula stages, prior to the onset of robust apical constriction (stage 16;
Fig. S2A,B in the supplementary material), demonstrating that the apical
concentration of
-tubulin was not a function of the constricting apical
surface of neuroepithelial cells. We obtained identical results with two
different
-tubulin antibodies (data not shown).
The broad, intense distribution of
-tubulin throughout the apical
region of neural plate cells was unexpected, and, to our knowledge, such a
distribution in interphase epithelial cells has not been previously reported.
To ask whether this unique redistribution of
-tubulin could be mediated
by Shroom3, we examined neural epithelial cells after the completion of neural
tube closure, when Shroom3 expression is rapidly downregulated
(Haigo et al., 2003
). We found
that after neural tube closure was complete, our
-tubulin antibody
detected centrosome-like foci at the apical cell surface
(Fig. 4C,c',D), similar
to that described for mature mammalian neuroepithelial cells
(Chenn et al., 1998
). These
data suggest that the broad apical accumulation of
-tubulin may result
directly from the action of Shroom3.
In light of these findings, we asked whether loss of Shroom3 function
affected the apical accumulation of
-tubulin. We observed that
injection of the Shroom3-MO completely eliminated the accumulation of
-tubulin in the neural plate, coincident with the failure of cells to
form aligned MT arrays and to elongate
(Fig. 4E,e'). To confirm
this result, we expressed the DN-Shrm3 fragment. As was the case for
morphants, cells expressing DN-Shrm3 also failed to accumulate
-tubulin
apically (Fig. S2C in the supplementary material). Western blotting revealed
that the total levels of
-tubulin in the dorsal tissues of
Shroom3-MO-injected embryos were not affected (Fig. S3A in the supplementary
material), suggesting that Shroom3 directs a redistribution of
-tubulin
in apical regions of neuroepithelial cells.
|
|
|
-tubulin in naïve epithelial cells
-tubulin
(Fig. 4). To explore this
hypothesis further, we again took advantage of the naïve epithelial cells
that surround the cleavage-stage Xenopus embryo (see
Fig. 5A). Ectopic expression of
Shroom3 resulted in a dramatic accumulation of
-tubulin at apical cell
surfaces (Fig. 6). At early
stages, prior to a change in cell shape, the accumulated
-tubulin in
Shroom3-expressing cells localized tightly to the apical cell surface
(Fig. 6D,d'). At later
stages, when Shroom3-expressing cells have assumed a wedge shape and have
increased their height, a broader, more diffuse accumulation of
-tubulin was observed throughout the apical region of the cells
(Fig.
6E,e',e'').
|
-tubulin in naïve
cells expressing Shroom3 was not associated with a change in the total amount
of
-tubulin present (Fig. S3B in the supplementary material). These
findings therefore suggest that Shroom3 acts to alter the spatial
distribution, rather than absolute levels, of
-tubulin in epithelial
cells. Moreover, we found that the ectopically expressed Shroom3 protein did
not colocalize with
-tubulin, but instead occupies a domain immediately
apical to the region of accumulated
-tubulin
(Fig. 6E,e',e'').
Consistent with the localization data, co-immunoprecipitation experiments
failed to detect a physical interaction between Shroom3 and
-tubulin
(data not shown).
Together with our loss-of-function data
(Fig. 4, and see above), these
results demonstrate that Shroom3 is not only necessary but also sufficient to
drive apical redistribution of
-tubulin in epithelial cells. We suggest
that this effect on
-tubulin localization underlies the capacity of
Shroom3 to organize apicobasal MT arrays and drive apicobasal cell
elongation.
Expression of Shroom3 is sufficient to drive assembly of apicobasally aligned MTs in epithelial cells
Expression of Shroom3 in blastomeres recapitulates many features of
neuroepithelial cell shape change, including actin accumulation, apical
constriction, cell elongation and
-tubulin accumulation. However, the
very dense yolk of Xenopus blastomeres significantly hinders imaging
of MTs. To analyze the result of Shroom3 gain-of-function on the MT
cytoskeleton, we used plasmid DNA injections into early embryos to mosaically
express Myc-tagged Shroom3 in the mature epidermis (see
Vize et al., 1991
).
|
-tubulin that is associated with MT assembly
and cell elongation (Fig.
7C,D,d'). As is the case for normal neural plate cells,
accumulation of
-tubulin in Shroom3-expresssing epidermal cells was
associated with cell elongation even in cells that have yet to fully constrict
their apical surface (compare Fig.
7D,d' with Fig. S2A,a' in the supplementary material).
Thus, expression of Shroom3 in epidermal cells recapitulates with remarkable
accuracy the cell shape changes and the underlying subcellular events observed
in hingepoint cells in the neural epithelium.
Shroom3-mediated elongation occurs cell-autonomously
It is possible that Shroom3 drives elongation cell-autonomously, but it is
also possible that elongation is a by-product of Shroom3-mediated changes in
overall tissue geometry. To address this question, we again examined embryos
mosaically expressing Shroom3 in the epidermis. We found many cases in which
single epidermal cells expressed Shroom3 and were surrounded by non-expressing
epidermal cells. In all cases, individual, isolated Shroom3-expressing cells
were apically constricted and significantly elongated in the apicobasal axis
(Fig. 7E,e'). This result
demonstrates that cell elongation mediated by Shroom3 is cell autonomous and
is consistent with a previous finding that elongation is cell-autonomous in
neural epithelial cells (Holtfreter,
1946
).
Joint control of
-tubulin and actin distribution by Shroom3
Shroom3 could directly impact both MT and actin assembly, or alternatively,
one of the effects could be secondary to the other. The uncoupling of cell
elongation from apical constriction in neural cells
(Fig. 1C) raises the
possibility that Shroom3 may independently control actin- and MT-based cell
shape changes.
To begin to probe this possibility, we turned again to our gain-of-function
assay using naïve blastomeres (see
Fig. 5A). We reasoned that if
one activity was primary and the other secondary, then such would be reflected
in the timing of actin and
-tubulin accumulation at the apical surface.
When we expressed Shroom3 by mRNA injection at the four-cell stage, we
observed simultaneous accumulation of
-tubulin and actin at the apical
cell surface within less than 1 hour (Fig.
8A,B). In no case did we observe apical accumulation of one
component prior to that of the other.
Moreover, the patterns of accumulated
-tubulin and actin at the
apical surfaces of Shroom3-expressing cells also argued that their
accumulation was not strictly interdependent. Some cells that accumulated
large amounts of
-tubulin did not accumulate actin
(Fig. 8D,d',d'',
bracket), and conversely some cells that accumulated high levels of actin
failed to accumulate significant amounts of
-tubulin
(Fig. 8D,d',d'',
arrow).
Shroom family proteins are associated with MT-based elongation and accumulation of
-tubulin in non-neural epithelial cells
The Xenopus, mouse and human genomes each contain additional
proteins that are closely related in sequence to Shroom3
(Hagens et al., 2006
).
Previous reports have associated each of these proteins with the actin
cytoskeleton, but our data above demonstrate that Shroom3 can coordinate the
response of both MT and actin cytoskeletons to induce diverse cell shape
changes. To ask whether MT-regulating activity is a conserved feature of this
protein family, we studied the related protein Shroom1
(Hagens et al., 2006
;
Staub et al., 1992
).
In situ hybridization revealed that both Shroom3 and Shroom1 were expressed
in epithelial cells of the cement gland
(Fig. 9A,B), an adhesive organ
of amphibian embryos (Perry and
Waddington, 1966
). This strong expression was intriguing because
these cells undergo a radical apicobasal elongation, but constrict only
slightly (Fig. 9C-E). As in
neural cells, cement gland cells undergo periods in which cell elongation
occurs independently of apical constriction; indeed, cells increased their
height by over 30 µm during a time when apical constriction was negligible
(see stages 22-25 in Fig.
9D).
|
-tubulin throughout the
apical regions of these cells (Fig.
9F,G,g').
We next tested the activity of Shroom1 using our naïve blastomere
assay system (see Fig. 5A).
Unlike Shroom3, expression of Shroom1 failed to elicit apical accumulation of
actin microfilaments and did not induce apical constriction (data not shown).
Nonetheless, ectopic expression of Shroom1 did elicit apical accumulation of
-tubulin in naïve epithelial cells
(Fig. 10A,B,b'),
consistent with a role for Shroom1 in governing MT architecture.
Interestingly, whereas Shroom3 drove accumulation of
-tubulin across
the apical cell surface, Shroom1 drove accumulation of
-tubulin
specifically at cell-cell junctions.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-tubulin, the assembly of robust apicobasal MT
arrays, and apicobasal cell elongation in epithelial cells. Shroom3 is a
member of a small family of proteins, all of which have been associated in
some way with the actin cytoskeleton
(Dietz et al., 2006
-tubulin in naïve epithelial cells.
The mechanisms by which Shroom family proteins function remain obscure, but
it was shown recently that Shroom3 drives the apical localization of myosin II
in both cultured cells and in the mouse neural plate, and that myosin II
function is essential for Shroom3-mediated apical constriction in naïve
cells (Hildebrand, 2005
). How
this actin-myosin system is linked with
-tubulin accumulation is not
yet clear, but there is evidence to suggest that these effects are at least
partially independent of one another. For example, in Shroom3-expressing
blastomeres, actin and
-tubulin can accumulate independently
(Fig. 8). Moreover, Shroom1 and
also another family member, Shroom2, can each drive apical accumulation of
-tubulin, but neither can elicit significant actin assembly or apical
constriction (Fig. 10A)
(Fairbank et al., 2006
).
Finally, Shroom3 drives both apical constriction and cell elongation, and
these two cell shape changes can occur independently in both neural and cement
gland epithelial cells (Fig.
1C; Fig. 9D).
Combining our data with that of others (e.g.
Hildebrand, 2005
), we propose
a preliminary model whereby apically localized Shroom3 directs accumulation of
both actomyosin and
-tubulin, thus affecting both apical constriction
and apicobasal cell heightening (Fig.
10C).
|
-tubulin during Shroom3-mediated cell
elongation remains to be discovered. The broad distribution of
-tubulin
in elongating neural epithelial cells has not to our knowledge been reported
in non-mitotic cells, but it is reminiscent of
-tubulin distribution in
mitotic spindles (Lajoie-Mazenc et al.,
1994
-tubulin is generally
associated with MT minus-ends, but in the mitotic spindle it associates with
the sides of MTs (Gunawardane et al.,
2000
-tubulin interacts with the MTs that elongate neural epithelial cells
and how Shroom proteins regulate the distribution of
-tubulin. Specific
proteins, such as GCP-WD, are known to regulate
-tubulin targeting
during mitosis (Luders et al.,
2006
-tubulin redistribution.
Common mechanisms of apical constriction in vertebrates and invertebrates
How conserved is the mechanism of cell shape change across evolutionarily
diverse cell types? Apical localization and contraction of actin and myosin
appear to be universal, driving apical constriction in Volvox, Drosophila,
Caenorhabditis elegans and vertebrates
(Hildebrand, 2005
;
Lee and Goldstein, 2003
;
Nance and Priess, 2002
;
Nishii and Ogihara, 1999
;
Young et al., 1993
). Likewise,
an increase in cell length is observed in apically constricting cells across
taxa, including Volvox, Drosophila, shrimps, sand dollars, mice,
chicks and frogs (Burnside,
1973
; Hertzler and Clark, Jr,
1992
; Kam et al.,
1991
; Kominami and Takata,
2000
; Nishii and Ogihara,
1999
; Schoenwolf and Franks,
1984
; Schroeder,
1970
; Sweeton et al.,
1991
; Viamontes and Kirk,
1977
).
We have shown here that Shroom3 governs both apicobasal elongation and
apical constriction by organizing both MTs and actin. Recent studies likewise
implicate a single molecule in the governance of these two cell shape events
in Drosophila. An exchange factor for the small GTPase Rho, DRhoGEF2,
appears to be both necessary and sufficient to induce apical constriction and
cell elongation (Barrett et al.,
1997
; Hacker and Perrimon,
1998
; Nikolaidou and Barrett,
2004
; Rogers et al.,
2004
). Like Shroom3, this molecule is implicated in not only
myosin II localization, but also in MT organization, in this case through
localization of the MT plus-end-associated protein EB1
(Dawes-Hoang et al., 2005
;
Rogers et al., 2004
). A very
close linkage of MT and actin organization, in some cases by a single
molecule, thus appears to underlie the almost ubiquitous coincidence of cell
heightening and apical constriction.
Although such unifying features are important, several discrepancies must
be noted. For example, apical constriction in the roundworm is not apparently
associated with apicobasal cell heightening
(Lee and Goldstein, 2003
;
Nance and Priess, 2002
).
Moreover, Shroom3 controls the apical accumulation of
-tubulin, a MT
minus-end-associated protein (Figs
4,
6), whereas DRhoGEF2 directs
the apical localization of EB1, a plus-end binding protein
(Rogers et al., 2004
).
Finally, the crucial role for a RhoGEF in Drosophila is perhaps
surprising given that dominant-negative Rho constructs clearly cannot block
Shroom-mediated apical constriction (Haigo
et al., 2003
; Hildebrand,
2005
). In fact, the opposite appears to be true, as it is loss of
a RhoGAP, rather than a RhoGEF, that disrupts apical constriction in
vertebrates (Brouns et al.,
2000
). An understanding of such discrepancies will be required
before a comprehensive picture of these cell shape changes will be brought
into focus.
Cell polarity in developing epithelia
One interesting implication of the results in this study concerns the
nature of cell polarity within epithelia during morphogenesis. Unlike most
epithelia, we find that in neural plate cells engaged in apical constriction,
-tubulin is not tightly associated with the apical cell membrane, nor
is it localized in centrosome-like foci at the apical surface. Instead, we
find that
-tubulin accumulates in a broad distribution throughout the
apical region of elongating neural epithelial cells
(Fig. 4). This odd distribution
of
-tubulin is coincident with expression of Shroom3, and a similar
-tubulin distribution was observed in Shroom1-expressing cells in the
Xenopus cement gland (Fig.
9).
This distribution of
-tubulin may reflect the partial downregulation
of apicobasal polarity previously reported for neural epithelial cells during
neural tube closure: whereas some polarity markers remain apically localized
during neural tube closure, others do not
(Aaku-Saraste et al., 1996
;
Aaku-Saraste et al., 1997
).
These findings suggest that cytoskeletal elements maintaining overall cell
polarity can be uncoupled from those elements driving cell shape change. This
interpretation is consistent with our findings that whereas both actin- and
MT-based cell shape changes are disrupted in embryos lacking Shroom3 function,
ZO-1 and Par3 remain apically localized
(Fig. 3). In sum, our data
suggest that Shroom family proteins play a central role in controlling the
assembly of discrete cytoskeletal elements that drive cell shape changes in
developing epithelia. Moreover, we suggest that partial depolarization may be
a common mechanism underlying morphogenetic events involving epithelial
sheets.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material for this article is available at
http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/134/7/1431/DC1
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
-tubulin
antibody. This work was supported by a UT Austin/University Co-op
Undergraduate Research Fellowship to H.M.S., a Career Award in the Biomedical
Sciences from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund to J.B.W. and by the NIH/NIGMS
(1RO1GM74104). | REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aaku-Saraste, E., Hellwig, A. and Huttner, W. B. (1996). Loss of occludin and functional tight junctions, but not ZO-1, during neural tube closure - remodeling of the neuroepithelium prior to neurogenesis. Dev. Biol. 180,664 -679.[CrossRef][Medline]
Aaku-Saraste, E., Oback, B., Hellwig, A. and Huttner, W. B. (1997). Neuroepithelial cells downregulate their plasma membrane polarity prior to neural tube closure and neurogenesis. Mech. Dev. 69,71 -81.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bacallao, R., Antony, C., Dotti, C., Karsenti, E., Stelzer, E.
H. and Simons, K. (1989). The subcellular organization of
Madin-Darby canine kidney cells during the formation of a polarized
epithelium. J. Cell Biol.
109,2817
-2832.
Barrett, K., Leptin, M. and Settleman, J. (1997). The Rho GTPase and a putative RhoGEF mediate a signaling pathway for the cell shape changes in Drosophila gastrulation. Cell 91,905 -915.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bre, M. H., Pepperkok, R., Hill, A. M., Levilliers, N., Ansorge,
W., Stelzer, E. H. and Karsenti, E. (1990). Regulation of
microtubule dynamics and nucleation during polarization in MDCK II cells.
J. Cell Biol. 111,3013
-3021.
Brouns, M. R., Matheson, S. F., Hu, K. Q., Delalle, I., Caviness, V. S., Silver, J., Bronson, R. T. and Settleman, J. (2000). The adhesion signaling molecule p190 RhoGAP is required for morphogenetic processes in neural development. Development 127,4891 -4903.[Abstract]
Brun, R. B. and Garson, J. A. (1983). Neurulation in the Mexican salamander (Ambystoma mexicanum): a drug study and cell shape analysis of the epidermis and the neural plate. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 74,275 -295.[Medline]
Burnside, B. (1973). Microtubules and microfilaments in amphibian neurulation. Am. Zool. 13,989 -1006.
Chalmers, A. D., Pambos, M., Mason, J., Lang, S., Wylie, C. and
Papalopulu, N. (2005). aPKC, Crumbs3 and Lgl2 control
apicobasal polarity in early vertebrate development.
Development 132,977
-986.
Chenn, A., Zhang, Y. A., Chang, B. T. and McConnell, S. K. (1998). Intrinsic polarity of mammalian neuroepithelial cells. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 11,183 -193.[CrossRef][Medline]
Davidson, L. A. and Wallingford, J. B. (2005). Visualizing morphogenesis in frog embryos. In Imaging in Neuroscience and Development (ed. R. Yuste and A. Konnerth), pp.125 -136. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Dawes-Hoang, R. E., Parmar, K. M., Christiansen, A. E., Phelps,
C. B., Brand, A. H. and Wieschaus, E. F. (2005). folded
gastrulation, cell shape change and the control of myosin localization.
Development 132,4165
-4178.
Dietz, M. L., Bernaciak, T. M., Vendetti, F. and Hildebrand, J.
D. (2006). Differential actin-dependent localization
modulates the evolutionarily conserved activity of shroom-family proteins.
J. Biol. Chem. 281,20542
-20554.
Dollar, G. L., Weber, U., Mlodzik, M. and Sokol, S. Y. (2005). Regulation of Lethal giant larvae by Dishevelled. Nature 437,1376 -1380.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fairbank, P. D., Lee, C. J., Ellis, A., Hildebrand, J. D.,
Gross, J. M. and Wallingford, J. B. (2006). Shroom2 (APXL)
regulates melanosome biogenesis and localization in the retinal pigment
epithelium. Development
133,4109
-4118.
Fristrom, D. (1988). The cellular basis of epithelial morphogenesis. Tissue Cell 20,645 -690.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gunawardane, R. N., Lizarraga, S. B., Wiese, C., Wilde, A. and Zheng, Y. (2000). gamma-Tubulin complexes and their role in microtubule nucleation. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 49, 55-73.[Medline]
Hacker, U. and Perrimon, N. (1998). DRhoGEF2
encodes a member of the Dbl family of oncogenes and controls cell shape
changes during gastrulation in Drosophila. Genes Dev.
12,274
-284.
Hagens, O., Dubos, A., Abidi, F., Barbi, G., Van Zutven, L., Hoeltzenbein, M., Tommerup, N., Moraine, C., Fryns, J. P., Chelly, J. et al. (2005). Disruptions of the novel KIAA1202 gene are associated with X-linked mental retardation. Hum. Genet. 118,578 -590.
Hagens, O., Ballabio, A., Kalscheuer, V., Kraehenbuhl, J. P., Schiaffino, M. V., Smith, P. R., Staub, O., Hildebrand, J. and Wallingford, J. B. (2006). A new standard nomenclature for proteins related to Apx and Shroom. BMC Cell Biol. 7, 18.[CrossRef][Medline]
Haigo, S. L., Hildebrand, J. D., Harland, R. M. and Wallingford, J. B. (2003). Shroom induces apical constriction and is required for hingepoint formation during neural tube closure. Curr. Biol. 13,2125 -2137.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hertzler, P. L. and Clark, W. H., Jr (1992). Cleavage and gastrulation in the shrimp Sicyonia ingentis: invagination is accompanied by oriented cell division. Development 116,127 -140.[Abstract]
Hildebrand, J. D. (2005). Shroom regulates
epithelial cell shape via the apical positioning of an actomyosin network.
J. Cell Sci. 118,5191
-5203.
Hildebrand, J. D. and Soriano, P. (1999). Shroom, a PDZ domain-containing actin-binding protein, is required for neural tube morphogenesis in mice. Cell 99,485 -497.[CrossRef][Medline]
Holtfreter, J. (1946). Structure, motility and locomotion in isolated embryonic amphibian cells. J. Morphol. 79,27 -62.
Job, D., Valiron, O. and Oakley, B. (2003). Microtubule nucleation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15,111 -117.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kam, Z., Minden, J. S., Agard, D. A., Sedat, J. W. and Leptin, M. (1991). Drosophila gastrulation: analysis of cell shape changes in living embryos by three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy. Development 112,365 -370.[Abstract]
Karfunkel, P. (1971). The role of microtubules and microfilaments in neurulation in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 25,30 -56.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kominami, T. and Takata, H. (2000). Cellular basis of gastrulation in the sand dollar Scaphechinus mirabilis. Biol. Bull. 199,287 -297.[Abstract]
Lajoie-Mazenc, I., Tollon, Y., Detraves, C., Julian, M., Moisand, A., Gueth-Hallonet, C., Debec, A., Salles-Passador, I., Puget, A., Mazarguil, H. et al. (1994). Recruitment of antigenic gamma-tubulin during mitosis in animal cells: presence of gamma-tubulin in the mitotic spindle. J. Cell Sci. 107,2825 -2837.[Abstract]
Lee, J. Y. and Goldstein, B. (2003). Mechanisms
of cell positioning during C. elegans gastrulation.
Development 130,307
-320.
Luders, J., Patel, U. K. and Stearns, T. (2006). GCP-WD is a gamma-tubulin targeting factor required for centrosomal and chromatin-mediated microtubule nucleation. Nat. Cell Biol. 8,137 -147.[CrossRef][Medline]
Meads, T. and Schroer, T. A. (1995). Polarity and nucleation of microtubules in polarized epithelial cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 32,273 -288.[CrossRef][Medline]
Messier, P. E. (1978). Microtubules, interkinetic nuclear migration and neurulation. Experientia 34,289 -296.[CrossRef][Medline]
Müsch, A. (2004). Microtubule organization and function in epithelial cells. Traffic 5, 1-9.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nance, J. and Priess, J. R. (2002). Cell polarity and gastrulation in C. elegans. Development 129,387 -397.
Nieuwkoop, P. D. and Faber, J. (1994). Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). New York: Garland.
Nikolaidou, K. K. and Barrett, K. (2004). A Rho GTPase signaling pathway is used reiteratively in epithelial folding and potentially selects the outcome of Rho activation. Curr. Biol. 14,1822 -1826.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nishii, I. and Ogihara, S. (1999). Actomyosin contraction of the posterior hemisphere is required for inversion of the Volvox embryo. Development 126,2117 -2127.[Abstract]
Perry, M. M. and Waddington, C. H. (1966). The
ultrastructure of the Xenopus cement gland. J. Cell.
Sci. 1,193
-200.
Picard, J. J. (1976). Ultrastructure of the cement gland of Xenopus laevis. J. Morphol. 148,193 -208.[CrossRef][Medline]
Prat, A. G., Holtzman, E. J., Brown, D., Cunningham, C. C.,
Reisin, I. L., Kleyman, T. R., McLaughlin, M., Jackson, G. R., Jr, Lydon, J.
and Cantiello, H. F. (1996). Renal epithelial protein (Apx)
is an actin cytoskeleton-regulated Na+ channel. J. Biol.
Chem. 271,18045
-18053.
Rizzolo, L. J. and Joshi, H. C. (1993). Apical orientation of the microtubule organizing center and associated gamma-tubulin during the polarization of the retinal pigment epithelium in vivo. Dev. Biol. 157,147 -156.[CrossRef][Medline]
Roberts, S. J., Leaf, D. S., Moore, H. P. and Gerhart, J. C. (1992). The establishment of polarized membrane traffic in Xenopus laevis embryos. J. Cell Biol. 118,1359 -1369.