|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 28 November 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.011288
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1000,
Houston, TX 77030, USA.
2 The Genes and Development Graduate Program, The University of Texas Graduate
School of Biomedical Sciences, 6767 Bertner Avenue, Houston, TX 77030,
USA.
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: abergman{at}mdanderson.org)
Accepted 27 September 2007
| SUMMARY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Uba1, E1, Ubiquitin-activating enzyme, Apoptosis, Proliferation, Drosophila, Autonomous control, Non autonomous control
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Alterations in the ubiquitination machinery are often associated with human
diseases such as cancer, neurodegenerative disorders and inflammation
(Devoy et al., 2005
;
Mukhopadhyay and Riezman,
2007
; Reinstein and
Ciechanover, 2006
). On the other hand, targeting the
ubiquitination system for therapeutic purposes holds promise in the clinic
(Nalepa et al., 2006
). Thus, a
detailed understanding of the role of ubiquitination for proper homeostasis
and physiology of multi-cellular organisms is critical.
E1 ubiquitin-activating enzymes catalyze the first step in the
ubiquitination cycle, the ATP-dependent formation of a thioester bond between
the C-terminal glycine residue of ubiquitin and the active site cysteine of
the E1 (Haas and Siepmann,
1997
; Pickart,
2001
). This is followed by the transfer of ubiquitin from the E1
to a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2). The final step is the conjugation of
ubiquitin to target proteins mediated by ubiquitin ligases (E3). The
specificity of the ubiquitination process is conferred to by E3 ubiquitin
ligases. The genomes of eukaryotic organisms contain hundreds of different
E3-encoding genes required for the regulated protein turnover in many cellular
processes (Hicke et al., 2005
;
Petroski and Deshaies, 2005
).
By contrast, there are considerably fewer E1 and E2 enzymes. For example, the
Drosophila genome encodes only one E1 enzyme, termed Uba1
(Watts et al., 2003
). This low
complexity suggests that the primary function of the E1 enzyme is to provide
activated ubiquitin for all ubiquitin-dependent reactions. This has indeed
been observed in yeast. Genetic inactivation of the yeast gene Uba1
blocks most, if not all ubiquitin conjugation
(Ghaboosi and Deshaies, 2007
;
McGrath et al., 1991
;
Swanson and Hochstrasser,
2000
). There are mammalian cell lines containing
temperature-sensitive alleles of E1. These cell lines have been of great
importance for understanding the role of ubiquitin-mediated degradation of
cyclins for progression through the cell cycle, and have further suggested an
essential function of E1 enzymes to provide activated ubiquitin for
conjugation of target proteins (Ciechanover
et al., 1984
; Ciechanover et
al., 1985
; Finley et al.,
1984
; Kulka et al.,
1988
; Salvat et al.,
2000
).
|
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fly stocks
Uba1D6, Uba1H33 and
Uba1H42 (this study); Uba1s3484
(Watts et al., 2003
);
Uba103405, Notch264-39 (obtained
from Bloomington Stock Center); GMR-hid ey-FLP (GheF)
(Xu et al., 2005
);
GMR-hid[w-]
(Herz et al., 2006
);
UASp-p35 (Werz et al.,
2005
); ey-FLP; FRT42D P[ubi-GFP] and
E(spl)m8 2.61-lacZ (obtained from G. Halder, MD Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, TX); stat9285c9 (obtained from E. Bach,
New York University School of Medicine, NY).
Induction of Uba1 clones and immunohistochemistry
Uba1 clones were induced by the FLP/FRT-mitotic
recombination system using either ey- or hs-FLP
(Newsome et al., 2000
;
Xu and Rubin, 1993
). If
hs-FLP was used, heat-shock was induced in first instar larvae at
37°C for 1 hour in a water bath. Dissection and immunohistochemistry of
larval and pupal discs was done using standard protocols
(Fan et al., 2005
). Antibodies
against the following proteins were used: mono and poly-ubiquitylated
conjugates (clone FK2; 1:100; Biomol); ubiquitin (Sigma, 1:10; or Chemicon,
1:500); cleaved caspase 3 (Cas3*; 1:100; Cell Signaling
Technology); pSTAT (1:100; Cell Signaling Technology); Diap1 [1:500
(Ryoo et al., 2002
)]; Dronc
[1:500 (Wilson et al., 2002
)];
BrdU (1:50; Becton Dickinson); β-gal (1:250; Promega); Discs large (Dlg)
(1:250), cyclin A (1:20), Cyclin B (1:20), Elav (1:60), Notch (clone C17.9C6;
1:20) (all DHSB).
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To molecularly identify the gene, we meiotically mapped the mutant
phenotype to 46A1 on the polytene chromosome. One of the genes mapping to this
region is Uba1, encoding an E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme. Two
existing Uba1 alleles, Uba1s3484 and
Uba103405, failed to complement the lethality of D6,
H33 and H42. Uba1s3484 and
Uba103405 are caused by P element insertions
(www.flybase.org).
Precise excision of Uba1s3484, which carries the P element
insertion in the first intron (Watts et
al., 2003
), restores viability of Uba1s3484
itself, and viability in trans to D6, H33 and H42. This
analysis demonstrates that the lethality of Uba1s3484 is
indeed caused by the P element insertion in Uba1, and that the new
mutants are allelic to Uba1. Sequencing of the Uba1 gene in
these mutants revealed that Pro884 is changed to Leu in D6 and
H33. Pro884 is a highly conserved residue in all E1
ubiquitin-activating enzymes ranging from yeast to humans
(Fig. 1H). As determined by
RT-PCR (Fig. 1I), the third
allele, H42, contains a new splicing donor site, which results in
inappropriate splicing causing an internal in-frame deletion of residues
162-255 (Fig. 1G). Finally, for
clonal analysis, we recombined the P allele Uba1s3484 onto
the FRT42D chromosome and obtained similar results to the analysis of
the new alleles (see below; data not shown). Taken together, these results
indicate that the suppressors of GMR-hid, D6, H33 and
H42 encode new alleles of Uba1. We refer to these mutants as
Uba1D6, Uba1H33 and
Uba1H42.
We have recently shown that mutants obtained in our screens can either
suppress GMR-hid in an autonomous or non-autonomous manner
(Herz et al., 2006
;
Srivastava et al., 2007
).
Thus, we tested whether the new Uba1 alleles suppress
GMR-hid in an autonomous or non-autonomous manner. A
GMR-hid transgene that does not carry the
white+ minigene (GMR-hid[w-];
Fig. 1D) allows determination
of the genetic identity of the rescued eye tissue based on red/white pigment
selection in a clonal analysis. This analysis showed that the rescued eye
tissue in GMR-hid[w-]; Uba1 mosaics is
genetically Uba1-, which is marked by the absence of red
eye pigment, i.e. is phenotypically white-
(Fig. 1E,F). Thus, the
moderately suppressed GMR-hid eye phenotype is largely due
to Uba1 mutant tissue, indicating that the suppression of
GMR-hid-induced apoptosis occurs in an autonomous
manner.
Strong Uba1 alleles cause non-autonomous overgrowth
To further characterize the Uba1 mutant phenotype, we performed a
clonal analysis using ey-FLP without GMR-hid. When
the flies were incubated at 25°C, ey-FLP-induced Uba1
mutant clones survived well and occasionally occupied an even larger area than
the wild-type twin-spot (Fig.
2A-C). However, during the course of this work, we noticed that
Uba1H33 and Uba1D6 are
temperature-sensitive (ts) alleles, whereas the third allele,
Uba1H42, is not. At 29°C, ey-FLP-induced
clones of Uba1H33 (Fig.
2E) and Uba1D6 (not shown) could not be
recovered in adult eyes whereas ey-FLP-induced clones of the non-ts
allele Uba1H42 survived well
(Fig. 2F). This suggests that
Uba1D6 and Uba1H33 mutant clones are
cell lethal at 29°C. As will be shown below, Uba1D6
and Uba1H33 clones undergo apoptosis at 29°C.
Surprisingly, however, despite the absence of Uba1H33 and
Uba1D6 clones, the eyes were often larger than normal and
contained folds, indicative of overgrowth
(Fig. 2D,E). The overgrowth
phenotype also affected the size of the heads of Uba1D6
and Uba1H33 mosaics. Strikingly, we recovered several
Uba1H33 and Uba1D6 mosaic animals
(Fig. 2G) in which one half of
the head did not contain Uba1 clones (as judged by the absence of
twin-spots) and this half was normal in size, thus serving as an internal
control (see right half of the head in Fig.
2G), whereas the other side of the head contained twin-spots and
was overgrown (left half in Fig.
2G). Third instar larval eye-antennal imaginal discs of
Uba1D6 and Uba1H33 mosaics reared at
29°C were overgrown compared to similarly staged wild-type controls
(Fig. 2H,I). Interestingly, in
imaginal discs clones with strong Uba1 alleles are present. However,
although the entire disc was overgrown, Uba1H33 clones are
relatively small compared with controls
(Fig. 2H,I) and thus do not
contribute to the overgrowth. To verify that the overgrowth phenotype is
caused by mutations in Uba1 itself, and not by an unrelated ts
mutation, we tested the independently obtained Uba1s3484
allele. In mosaic animals, this allele gives rise to a similar overgrowth
phenotype at both 25°C and 29°C, i.e. in a temperature-independent
manner (Fig. 2D).
Uba1s3484 mosaic eye discs are also overgrown in a
temperature-independent manner (data not shown). Precise excision of the P
element in Uba1s3484 reverts the overgrowth phenotype
(data not shown), suggesting that this phenotype is caused by genetic
inactivation of the Uba1 locus.
|
Strong Uba1 alleles impair general ubiquitin conjugation
E1 ubiquitin-activating enzymes catalyze the first step in the
ubiquitination cycle, the ATP-dependent formation of a thioester bond between
the C-terminal glycine residue of ubiquitin and the active site cysteine of E1
(Haas and Siepmann, 1997
;
Pickart, 2001
). Thus, E1
enzymes are required to provide most, if not all, activated ubiquitin for
conjugation of target proteins. Uba1 encodes the only E1
ubiquitin-activating enzyme in Drosophila
(Watts et al., 2003
).
Therefore, genetic inactivation of Uba1 should result in reduction of
general ubiquitination.
To test this prediction, we analyzed the Uba1 mutants for loss of
ubiquitin conjugation using the FK2 antibody which specifically recognizes
mono- and poly-ubiquitinated proteins, but not unconjugated ubiquitin
(Fujimuro et al., 1994
;
Fujimuro et al., 1997
). We
tested this prediction first in larval eye imaginal discs of mosaics of the
strong P allele Uba1s3484. A significant decrease in FK2
immunolabeling was detected in Uba1s3484 mutant clones
(Fig. 3A). However, due to the
apoptotic phenotype of strong Uba1 alleles (see below), clones were
small and difficult to recover. The ts alleles Uba1D6/H33
provide a convenient alternative to obtain large clones for analysis. After
induction of Uba1D6/H33 clones, these mosaics were
incubated at 25°C. The animals were shifted to 29°C 12 hours before
dissection and fixation of the discs. When Uba1D6/H33
mosaics were treated in this way, larger clones were obtained. FK2 labeling
was significantly reduced in Uba1D6/H33 clones incubated
at 29°C (Fig. 3B),
suggesting that mono- and poly-ubiquitination was affected in strong
Uba1 allele clones. Weak alleles also reduced FK2 immunoreactivity;
however, this reduction was much more subtle compared to the strong alleles
(Fig. 3C).
|
Taken together, these data illustrate that Uba1 is required to provide activated ubiquitin for protein conjugation, which is essential for ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation and other ubiquitin-dependent processes. With this knowledge in mind, we analyzed the observed apoptotic and growth phenotypes in more detail.
Weak Uba1 alleles protect from cell death, whereas clones of strong Uba1 alleles are apoptotic
We have identified weak Uba1 alleles as suppressors of
GMR-hid-induced apoptosis
(Fig. 1). Therefore, we
analyzed the cause of the suppression of GMR-hid by
Uba1. GMR-hid eye discs are characterized by two zones of apoptotic
cell death, as shown by cleaved caspase 3 (Cas3*) labeling
(Fig. 4A)
(Srivastava et al., 2007
).
Consistent with the expectation, Cas3* activity induced by
GMR-hid is significantly reduced in
Uba1D6/H33 mutant clones in GMR-hid eye
imaginal discs at 25°C (white arrows in
Fig. 4B,B'). However, we
also noticed that suppression of GMR-hid-induced cell death does not
occur in all Uba1 clones. In some areas (red arrow in
Fig. 4B,B'),
Cas3*-positive cell death still occurs in Uba1 mutant
clones. This region-specific behavior was consistently observed, even at lower
temperature (22°C). It appears to be located at the midline, although we
have not been able to pinpoint what distinguishes this region from others.
Interestingly, this region-specific behavior suggests that there may be a form
of hid-induced apoptosis that is independent of ubiquitin
conjugation. This selective behavior may also explain why the suppression of
GMR-hid by Uba1 is only moderately strong, and not as
complete as observed for mutants of other components of the cell death pathway
(Srivastava et al., 2007
;
Xu et al., 2005
).
Nevertheless, this analysis demonstrates that Uba1 directly or
indirectly controls caspase activation.
We also analyzed whether Uba1 function is needed for normal
physiologically occurring cell death. During normal eye development between 26
and 30 hours after puparium formation (APF), cell death is required to remove
all cells that have not adopted a cell fate
(Cagan and Ready, 1989
;
Cordero et al., 2004
;
Wolff and Ready, 1991
).
Uba1D6/H33 mutant clones raised at 25°C contain
significantly less Cas3*-positive cells compared with wild-type
tissue (Fig. 4C-C''),
consistent with a genetic requirement of Uba1 for normal cell death.
This lack of cell death results in increase in the number of interommatidial
cells (IOCs). Wild-type ommatidia contain exactly nine IOCs. However,
Uba1 clones contain up to 16 IOCs
(Fig. 4D-D''). Thus,
consistent with the Uba1 mutants being suppressors of
GMR-hid, Uba1 is generally required for the control of
normal cell death during Drosophila development.
Because activation of ubiquitin is the only known function of Uba1, these
observations suggest that Uba1 is required for a
ubiquitination-dependent event during cell death. Two components of the cell
death pathway, the caspase inhibitor Diap1 [also known as Thread (Th) -
FlyBase] and the initiator caspase Dronc [also known as Nedd2-like caspase
(Nc) - FlyBase], are subject to ubiquitin-mediated degradation
(Chai et al., 2003
;
Herman-Bachinsky et al., 2007
;
Holley et al., 2002
;
Ryoo et al., 2002
;
Wilson et al., 2002
;
Yoo et al., 2002
). Whereas
Dronc degradation occurs in surviving cells, Diap1 degradation is triggered in
response to apoptotic stimuli. The degradation of both proteins depends on the
E3-ligase activity of Diap1
(Herman-Bachinsky et al.,
2007
; Holley et al.,
2002
; Ryoo et al.,
2002
; Wilson et al.,
2002
; Yoo et al.,
2002
). Thus, we analyzed the protein levels of Diap1 and Dronc in
Uba1 clones. Interestingly, whereas Diap1 protein levels are
increased in Uba1 mutant clones
(Fig. 4E-E''), Dronc
protein levels are reduced (Fig.
4F-F''), consistent with previous reports showing that Diap1
controls the protein levels of Dronc (Chai
et al., 2003
; Ryoo et al.,
2004
; Wilson et al.,
2002
). Because increased levels of Diap1 do protect cells more
efficiently from cell death (Hay et al.,
1995
), this observation suggests that the anti-apoptotic phenotype
of Uba1 clones may be mediated by increased levels of Diap1. The fact
that Dronc levels are reduced implies that ubiquitin conjugation still occurs
in Uba1D6/H33 mutant clones at 25°C, providing further
evidence that the Uba1 alleles isolated in our study are weak
loss-of-function alleles.
|
|
|
Interestingly, cell proliferation in Uba1D6/H33 mosaics incubated at 29°C as demonstrated by BrdU incorporation is significantly increased in tissue adjacent to the mutant clones (Fig. 6A). This was also observed for the P allele Uba1s3484 (data not shown). Control discs (mosaic for the weak non-ts allele Uba1H42) show a homogenous distribution of proliferating cells both within and outside the clones (Fig. 6B). Thus, strong Uba1 clones appear to be the origin of increased proliferation in adjacent tissue, and the overgrowth phenotype in Uba1D6/H33 mosaics (Fig. 2) can most likely be explained by emission of signaling molecules from the mutant cells initiating non-autonomous proliferation in the adjacent wild-type tissue (see below).
In summary, consistent with previous reports, lack of ubiquitin conjugation
causes cell cycle arrest, presumably through failure to proteolytically
degrade cyclin proteins (Pines,
2006
). Surprisingly, however, this study also reveals an
unanticipated function of Uba1, the negative control of the cell
cycle in neighboring cells.
Notch activity causes non-autonomous overgrowth in mosaics of strong Uba1 alleles
The non-autonomous overgrowth of mosaics of strong Uba1 alleles
came as a surprise. However, we and others have recently reported a similar
non-autonomous overgrowth phenotype caused by mutations in the ESCRT
(endosomal sorting complex required for transport) components vps23
[also known as erupted (ept) and tsg101 - FlyBase]
and vps25 (Herz et al.,
2006
; Moberg et al.,
2005
; Thompson et al.,
2005
; Vaccari and Bilder,
2005
). ESCRT components are required at the early endosome for the
sorting and targeting of activated cell surface receptors for lysosomal
degradation (Babst, 2005
;
Gruenberg and Stenmark, 2004
;
Katzmann et al., 2002
).
Similar to Uba1 clones, vps23 and vps25 clones are
highly apoptotic, but stimulate cell proliferation in neighboring tissue and
non-autonomous overgrowth (Herz et al.,
2006
; Moberg et al.,
2005
; Thompson et al.,
2005
; Vaccari and Bilder,
2005
). Interestingly, the signal for endocytosis and endosomal
protein sorting is provided by ubiquitination of activated cell surface
receptors (Haglund and Dikic,
2005
); Gruenberg and Stenmark,
2004
). Thus, in Uba1 mutants, endocytosis and endosomal
protein sorting may be affected, too. In the case of vps23 and
vps25, signaling by the Notch receptor is inappropriately increased,
leading to secretion of the cytokine Unpaired which stimulates proliferation
of neighboring cells by activation of the Jak/STAT pathway
(Herz et al., 2006
;
Moberg et al., 2005
;
Thompson et al., 2005
;
Vaccari and Bilder, 2005
).
Therefore, we tested whether a similar mechanism causes non-autonomous
proliferation and overgrowth in Uba1 mosaics.
In accord, we observe increased protein levels of Notch in Uba1D6/H33 mutant clones raised at 29°C (Fig. 7A). Using the Notch reporter E(spl)m8 2.61-lacZ, increased Notch activity was found in Uba1 mutant clones (Fig. 7B). Moreover, increased STAT activity, as judged by labeling with an antibody recognizing phosphorylated, i.e. activated STAT protein (pSTAT), is increased in a band of cells immediately adjacent to Uba1 clones, i.e. in a non-autonomous manner (Fig. 7D). Thus, similar to vps23 and vps25, Uba1 clones contain increased Notch activity resulting in activation of the Jak/STAT pathway in neighboring cells. Surprisingly, we also detected Notch activity in Uba1D6 clones raised at 25°C (Fig. 7C), although at this temperature non-autonomous activation of Jak/STAT signaling and overgrowth are not observed (data not shown; see Discussion).
To test for a genetic requirement of Notch and Jak/STAT for the non-autonomous overgrowth phenotype, we analyzed Uba1 mosaics in a heterozygous Notch or stat92 mutant background. As a marker in this assay, we used the bulging phenotype of Uba1 mosaic eyes (Fig. 2D, Fig. 7E). Heterozygosity for Notch or stat92 dominantly suppressed the overgrowth phenotype of strong Uba1 mosaics (Uba1D6/H33 at 29°C; Fig. 7F,G). Together, these data strongly suggest that the overgrowth phenotype of strong Uba1 mosaics is caused by inappropriate Notch signaling, which triggers activation of the Jak/STAT signaling pathway in neighboring cells (see Discussion).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Phenotypes affecting cell death
We identified Uba1 alleles as suppressors of the apoptotic
phenotype caused by GMR-hid, and showed that Uba1 is also
required for normal developmental cell death. This requirement is probably
mediated through the control of Diap1 protein levels which in turn mediates
ubiquitination of the caspase Dronc (Chai
et al., 2003
; Wilson et al.,
2002
). However, the GMR-hid-suppressing Uba1
alleles are weak. They affect overall ubiquitin conjugation only mildly
(Fig. 3C) suggesting that
ubiquitin-mediated degradation can still occur in an almost normal manner. In
accord, the increased protein levels of Diap1 are even able to reduce the
protein levels of Dronc in clones expressing weak Uba1 alleles.
It is interesting to note that whereas Diap1 protein levels are increased
in clones expressing weak Uba1 alleles
(Fig. 4E), other proteins such
as Ci, Arm (not shown) or Dronc (Fig.
4F) are normal in abundance or even reduced, respectively. This
suggests that some proteins such as Diap1 respond in a very sensitive manner
to partial loss of activated ubiquitin, whereas other proteins do not. Because
Diap1 has a fairly short half-life (
30-40 minutes) compared to Dronc
(
3 hours) (Wilson et al.,
2002
; Yoo et al.,
2002
), the requirement of a fully functional ubiquitination
machinery may be much stricter for Diap1, providing an explanation for why
Diap1 responds so sensitively to a small reduction of activated ubiquitin for
protein conjugation.
Alternatively, it is also possible that the Uba1 alleles isolated
in this study specifically affect the interaction with UbcD1, the
E2-conjugating-enzyme which targets Diap1 for ubiquitin-mediated degradation
(Ryoo et al., 2002
;
Yoo, 2005
). Thus, the
interaction with other E2 enzymes may be normal, so that ubiquitin conjugation
and degradation of other proteins may be normal. We have not tested which of
these two possibilities applies.
Strong Uba1 alleles, which significantly reduce ubiquitin
conjugation, affect the levels of all proteins we have analyzed. For example,
although Diap1 levels are increased with strong Uba1 alleles, Dronc
is no longer efficiently degraded. Instead, Dronc protein accumulates,
suggesting that activated ubiquitin required for conjugation and degradation
is no longer available. However, it is unclear why cells in Uba1
clones die. Dronc needs to be cleaved for activation, and Diap1 can directly
bind to and inhibit caspases without degradation, at least in vitro
(Chai et al., 2003
;
Meier et al., 2000
;
Zachariou et al., 2003
). Thus,
the increased Diap1 levels should still be able to inhibit the accumulated
Dronc protein. Mutants in ark (also known as D-Apaf-1, hac-1
and dark), which encodes an adaptor protein required for Dronc
activation (Kanuka et al.,
1999
; Mendes et al.,
2006
; Rodriguez et al.,
1999
; Srivastava et al.,
2007
; Zhou et al.,
1999
), block cell death in Uba1 (data not shown),
suggesting that cell death in Uba1 mutants is indeed mediated via
Dronc. Thus, simple binding of Diap1 to Dronc may not be sufficient to
completely inhibit Dronc activity. Instead, ubiquitination may be required for
full inactivation of Dronc.
Phenotypes affecting cell proliferation
Consistent with the expectation, loss of ubiquitin conjugation in strong
Uba1 alleles causes cell cycle arrest. This correlates with increased
protein levels of Cyclins A and B, the ubiquitin-dependent degradation of
which is required for cell cycle progression (reviewed by
Pines, 2006
).
However, the non-autonomous overgrowth phenotype was unexpected. Strong Uba1 clones appear to be able to secrete a growth factor that promotes cell proliferation and overgrowth in adjacent wild-type tissue. In this capacity, Uba1 qualifies as a tumor suppressor gene.
It is interesting to note that the phenotypes observed for Uba1
are very similar to those of vps23 and vps25
(Herz et al., 2006
;
Moberg et al., 2005
;
Thompson et al., 2005
;
Vaccari and Bilder, 2005
). In
both cases, Notch signaling is inappropriately increased. Notch triggers
Jak/STAT signaling in neighboring wild-type tissue, presumably through
secretion of Unpaired, which encodes an Interleukin-like factor
(Harrison et al., 1998
) and
acts as the ligand of the receptor of the Jak/STAT signaling pathway
(Chao et al., 2004
;
Reynolds-Kenneally and Mlodzik,
2005
; Tsai and Sun,
2004
). However, the ultimate cause of Notch activation may be
different. In the case of vps23 and vps25, Notch is
internalized via endocytosis, however, endosomal protein sorting is impaired,
thus turnover of Notch is affected. In the case of Uba1, it is not
clear whether the lack of ubiquitination affects endocytosis of
membrane-localized Notch or ubiquitin-mediated degradation of intracellular
Notch in the nucleus. Failure of either may cause inappropriate signaling. The
accumulation of Notch in Uba1 clones is not as striking as in
vps25 clones, making it difficult to identify the subcellular
localization of accumulated Notch.
Another interesting observation is the fact that we do observe increased
Notch activity in clones of Uba1D6 at 25°C, at which
temperature non-autonomous cell proliferation is not observed. Consistently,
we do not detect increased STAT signaling under these conditions. If Notch
signaling is increased at 25°C, why does this not induce non-autonomous
proliferation? One potential reason may lie in the fact that Uba1
clones at 25°C are protected from apoptosis, whereas at 29°C they are
apoptotic. Thus, an apoptotic environment may be necessary for the induction
of non-autonomous proliferation. A similar phenomenon, referred to as
apoptosis-induced compensatory proliferation, has recently been reported
(Huh et al., 2004
;
Kondo et al., 2006
;
Perez-Garijo et al., 2004
;
Ryoo et al., 2004
;
Wells et al., 2006
). In these
studies, apoptotic cells trigger the secretion of Dpp and Wg which promote
proliferation in neighboring cells. An involvement of Notch was not reported.
However, in the aforementioned studies, apoptosis-induced compensatory
proliferation is only detectable if cell death is simultaneously blocked. In
the case of Uba1, vps23 and vps25, overgrowth occurs without
inhibition of apoptosis (Herz et al.,
2006
; Moberg et al.,
2005
; Thompson et al.,
2005
; Vaccari and Bilder,
2005
). Therefore, there may be different forms of compensatory
proliferation in response to different apoptotic triggers.
In summary, we have largely focused on the effects of loss of ubiquitin conjugation for apoptosis and cell proliferation. Our analysis demonstrates that the loss of ubiquitin conjugation has significant consequences for the organism, and may implicate Uba1 as a tumor suppressor gene in Drosophila. The Uba1 alleles identified in this study will be of further use to analyze a general requirement of ubiquitination for other cellular processes as well.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material for this article is available at
http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/135/1/43/DC1
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Babst, M. (2005). A protein's final ESCRT. Traffic 6,2 -9.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cagan, R. L. and Ready, D. F. (1989). The emergence of order in the Drosophila pupal retina. Dev. Biol. 136,346 -362.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cashio, P., Lee, T. V. and Bergmann, A. (2005). Genetic control of programmed cell death in Drosophila melanogaster. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 16,225 -235.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chai, J., Yan, N., Huh, J. R., Wu, J. W., Li, W., Hay, B. A. and Shi, Y. (2003). Molecular mechanism of Reaper-Grim-Hid-mediated suppression of DIAP1-dependent Dronc ubiquitination. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10,892 -898.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chao, J. L., Tsai, Y. C., Chiu, S. J. and Sun, Y. H.
(2004). Localized Notch signal acts through eyg and
upd to promote global growth in Drosophila eye.
Development 131,3839
-3847.
Chen, Z. J. (2005). Ubiquitin signalling in the NF-kappaB pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 758-765.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ciechanover, A., Finley, D. and Varshavsky, A. (1984). Ubiquitin dependence of selective protein degradation demonstrated in the mammalian cell cycle mutant ts85. Cell 37,57 -66.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ciechanover, A., Finley, D. and Varshavsky, A. (1985). Mammalian cell cycle mutant defective in intracellular protein degradation and ubiquitin-protein conjugation. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 180,17 -31.[Medline]
Cordero, J., Jassim, O., Bao, S. and Cagan, R. (2004). A role for wingless in an early pupal cell death event that contributes to patterning the Drosophila eye. Mech. Dev. 121,1523 -1530.[CrossRef][Medline]
Devoy, A., Soane, T., Welchman, R. and Mayer, R. J. (2005). The ubiquitin-proteasome system and cancer. Essays Biochem. 41,187 -203.[Medline]
Fan, Y., Soller, M., Flister, S., Hollmann, M., Muller, M., Bello, B., Egger, B., White, K., Schafer, M. A. and Reichert, H. (2005). The egghead gene is required for compartmentalization in Drosophila optic lobe development. Dev. Biol. 287, 61-73.[CrossRef][Medline]
Finley, D., Ciechanover, A. and Varshavsky, A. (1984). Thermolability of ubiquitin-activating enzyme from the mammalian cell cycle mutant ts85. Cell 37, 43-55.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fujimuro, M., Sawada, H. and Yokosawa, H. (1994). Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific to multi-ubiquitin chains of polyubiquitinated proteins. FEBS Lett. 349,173 -180.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fujimuro, M., Sawada, H. and Yokosawa, H. (1997). Dynamics of ubiquitin conjugation during heat-shock response revealed by using a monoclonal antibody specific to multi-ubiquitin chains. Eur. J. Biochem. 249,427 -433.[Medline]
Ghaboosi, N. and Deshaies, R. J. (2007). A
conditional yeast E1 mutant blocks the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and
reveals a role for ubiquitin conjugates in targeting Rad23 to the proteasome.
Mol. Biol. Cell 18,1953
-1963.
Glickman, M. H. and Ciechanover, A. (2002). The
ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of
construction. Physiol. Rev.
82,373
-428.
Grether, M. E., Abrams, J. M., Agapite, J., White, K. and
Steller, H. (1995). The head involution defective gene of
Drosophila melanogaster functions in programmed cell death. Genes
Dev. 9,1694
-1708.
Gruenberg, J. and Stenmark, H. (2004). The biogenesis of multivesicular endosomes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5,317 -323.[CrossRef][Medline]
Haas, A. L. and Siepmann, T. J. (1997). Pathways of ubiquitin conjugation. FASEB J. 11,1257 -1268.[Abstract]
Haglund, K. and Dikic, I. (2005). Ubiquitylation and cell signaling. EMBO J. 24,3353 -3359.[CrossRef][Medline]
Harrison, D. A., McCoon, P. E., Binari, R., Gilman, M. and
Perrimon, N. (1998). Drosophila unpaired encodes a secreted
protein that activates the JAK signaling pathway. Genes
Dev. 12,3252
-3263.
Hay, B. A., Wassarman, D. A. and Rubin, G. M. (1995). Drosophila homologs of baculovirus inhibitor of apoptosis proteins function to block cell death. Cell 83,1253 -1262.[CrossRef][Medline]
Herman-Bachinsky, Y., Ryoo, H. D., Ciechanover, A. and Gonen, H. (2007). Regulation of the Drosophila ubiquitin ligase DIAP1 is mediated via several distinct ubiquitin system pathways. Cell Death Differ. 14,861 -871.[CrossRef][Medline]
Herz, H. M., Chen, Z., Scherr, H., Lackey, M., Bolduc, C. and
Bergmann, A. (2006). vps25 mosaics display non-autonomous
cell survival and overgrowth, and autonomous apoptosis.
Development 133,1871
-1880.
Hicke, L., Schubert, H. L. and Hill, C. P. (2005). Ubiquitin-binding domains. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6,610 -621.[CrossRef][Medline]
Holley, C. L., Olson, M. R., Colon-Ramos, D. A. and Kornbluth, S. (2002). Reaper eliminates IAP proteins through stimulated IAP degradation and generalized translational inhibition. Nat. Cell Biol. 4,439 -444.[CrossRef][Medline]
Huang, H., Joazeiro, C. A., Bonfoco, E., Kamada, S., Leverson,
J. D. and Hunter, T. (2000). The inhibitor of apoptosis,
cIAP2, functions as a ubiquitin-protein ligase and promotes in vitro
monoubiquitination of caspases 3 and 7. J. Biol. Chem.
275,26661
-26664.
Huh, J. R., Guo, M. and Hay, B. A. (2004). Compensatory proliferation induced by cell death in the Drosophila wing disc requires activity of the apical cell death caspase Dronc in a nonapoptotic role. Curr. Biol. 14,1262 -1266.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kanuka, H., Sawamoto, K., Inohara, N., Matsuno, K., Okano, H. and Miura, M. (1999). Control of the cell death pathway by Dapaf-1, a Drosophila Apaf-1/CED-4-related caspase activator. Mol. Cell 4,757 -769.[CrossRef][Medline]
Katzmann, D. J., Odorizzi, G. and Emr, S. D. (2002). Receptor downregulation and multivesicular-body sorting. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 893-905.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kondo, S., Senoo-Matsuda, N., Hiromi, Y. and Miura, M.
(2006). DRONC coordinates cell death and compensatory
proliferation. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26,7258
-7268.
Kulka, R. G., Raboy, B., Schuster, R., Parag, H. A., Diamond,
G., Ciechanover, A. and Marcus, M. (1988). A Chinese hamster
cell cycle mutant arrested at G2 phase has a temperature-sensitive
ubiquitin-activating enzyme, E1. J. Biol. Chem.
263,15726
-15731.
Kuo, C. T., Zhu, S., Younger, S., Jan, L. Y. and Jan, Y. N. (2006). Identification of E2/E3 ubiquitinating enzymes and caspase activity regulating Drosophila sensory neuron dendrite pruning. Neuron 51,283 -290.[CrossRef][Medline]
McGrath, J. P., Jentsch, S. and Varshavsky, A. (1991). UBA 1, an essential yeast gene encoding ubiquitin-activating enzyme. EMBO J. 10,227 -236.[Medline]
Meier, P., Silke, J., Leevers, S. J. and Evan, G. I. (2000). The Drosophila caspase DRONC is regulated by DIAP1. EMBO J. 19,598 -611.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mendes, C. S., Arama, E., Brown, S., Scherr, H., Srivastava, M., Bergmann, A., Steller, H. and Mollereau, B. (2006). Cytochrome c-d regulates developmental apoptosis in the Drosophila retina. EMBO Rep. 7,933 -939.[CrossRef][Medline]
Moberg, K. H., Schelble, S., Burdick, S. K. and Hariharan, I. K. (2005). Mutations in erupted, the Drosophila ortholog of mammalian tumor susceptibility gene 101, elicit non-cell-autonomous overgrowth. Dev. Cell 9,699 -710.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mukhopadhyay, D. and Riezman, H. (2007).
Proteasome-independent functions of ubiquitin in endocytosis and signaling.
Science 315,201
-205.
Nalepa, G., Rolfe, M. and Harper, J. W. (2006). Drug discovery in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 5,596 -613.[CrossRef][Medline]
Newsome, T. P., Asling, B. and Dickson, B. J. (2000). Analysis of Drosophila photoreceptor axon guidance in eye-specific mosaics. Development 127,851 -860.[Abstract]
Perez-Garijo, A., Martin, F. A. and Morata, G.
(2004). Caspase inhibition during apoptosis causes abnormal
signalling and developmental aberrations in Drosophila.
Development 131,5591
-5598.
Petroski, M. D. and Deshaies, R. J. (2005). Function and regulation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6,9 -20.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pfleger, C. M., Harvey, K. F., Yan, H. and Hariharan, I. K. (2007). Mutation of the gene encoding the ubiquitin activating enzyme Uba1 causes tissue overgrowth in Drosophila. Fly 1,95 -105.
Pickart, C. M. (2001). Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70,503 -533.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pickart, C. M. (2004). Back to the future with ubiquitin. Cell 116,181 -190.[CrossRef]