spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online April 25, 2008


Development 135, 104e (2008)
© The Company of Biologists Limited
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In this issue

Notch and Sox: different routes to progenitor maintenance


Figure 1

During development of the chick nervous system, a combination of Notch signalling and SoxB1 transcription factors (Sox1, Sox2 and Sox3) maintains a pool of self-renewing stem and progenitor cells. On p. 1843, Jonas Muhr and colleagues investigate whether Notch and SoxB1 proteins suppress neuronal differentiation through the same, or different, pathways. By expressing dominant-negative components of these pathways in chick embryos, they show that, although Notch requires SoxB1 to maintain progenitor characteristics, SoxB1 activity blocks neurogenesis independently of Notch. Notch represses the activity of bHLH proneural proteins via the bHLH transcription factors Hes1 and Hes5, but, the researchers found, also represses E-proteins - the heterodimerizing partners of proneural proteins - through a Hes-independent mechanism. SoxB1 proteins, by contrast, seem to maintain progenitors by creating a molecular environment in which E-proteins and proneural proteins cannot promote neuronal differentiation. As Notch, Sox and bHLH proteins are also expressed in muscle and neural crest progenitor populations, the authors suggest their results could be of broader relevance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in Development:

SoxB1 transcription factors and Notch signaling use distinct mechanisms to regulate proneural gene function and neural progenitor differentiation
Johan Holmberg, Emil Hansson, Michal Malewicz, Magnus Sandberg, Thomas Perlmann, Urban Lendahl, and Jonas Muhr
Development 2008 135: 1843-1851. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?