spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 9


Fig. 9. Possible role of Cdx protein gradients in the refinement of Hox expression boundaries. It is proposed that the rate and extent of co-linear activation of Hox genes (temporal co-linearity) varies with the concentration of Cdx protein (grey). Early expression of each Hox gene (A,B) occurs in the primitive streak/tailbud (TB), assumed here to extend forward to the level of the node. Anterior to this, within neurectoderm, presomitic, somitic and lateral plate mesoderms, each Cdx protein forms a posterior-to-anterior gradient by time-dependent decay. A Hox gene with high sensitivity to Cdx dose may become progressively activated along the Cdx gradient in a spreading wave that moves forward ahead of cell position (such as Hox1, blue in B). An example would be Hoxb8 expression in the mouse neural tube (Forlani et al., 2003). The spreading wave stops when Cdx protein concentration becomes limiting, and the time at which this occurs is influenced by the continuous regression of the Cdx gradient. A Hox gene less sensitive to Cdx dose may not spread forward, and may indeed show some posterior regression relative to cell position owing to Cdx gradient regression (Hox2, red in C). Examples here might be Hoxb8 expression in mouse paraxial mesoderm (Forlani et al., 2003) and Hoxb9 expression in chick neurectoderm (Bel-Vialar et al., 2002). The Cdx morphogen gradient may thus operate by adjusting Hox boundaries forwards or backwards according to Hox gene sensitivities. We assume here that similar mechanisms operate in neural and mesoderm tissues, and the more anterior Hox boundaries in neural tissue may then be explained by the more anterior boundaries of Cdx proteins in neural versus mesoderm tissues (Fig. 4). At a specific point in the maturation of neural and mesoderm tissues, it is envisaged that the boundaries of Hox gene expression become fixed by mechanisms such as auto- and crossregulation between Hox genes and their products (Gould et al., 1997; Zappavigna et al., 1991), and/or by establishment of the Polycomb silencing mechanism (Akasaka et al., 2001).





Right arrow Return to article