spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 5


Fig. 5. Neural crest-derived and mesoderm-derived periosteal cells have distinct proliferation and osteogenic differentiation potentials. (A) Skeletal progenitor cells from the mandibular periosteum and GFP-positive tibial periosteum were co-cultured for 0, 3, 5 and 7 days; cell nuclei were labeled with Hoechst and viewed using fluorescent imaging. (B) Quantification of the co-culture showed a linear increase in the number of GFP-positive mesoderm-derived cells and only a minor increase in the number of neural crest-derived cells. (C) BrdU incorporation assay at 3, 5 and 7 days showed higher proliferation rates for mesoderm-derived cells at all time points. (D,E) Alizarin Red staining of mesoderm-derived and neural crest-derived skeletal progenitor cell cultures after 10, 12 and 14 days in osteogenic differentiation media. (F) Quantification of Alizarin Red mineralization showed a statistically significant increase in the amount of mineralized matrix in neural crest-derived samples. (G) qRT-PCR performed on RNA isolated from cell populations after 4 days in vitro. Neural crest-derived cells showed an increase in the expression of Runx2 and Col1a. (H) qRT-PCR performed on RNA isolated from cell populations after 10 days in vitro demonstrated that neural crest-derived cells showed an increase in the expression of all osteogenic markers, including Runx2, osteopontin (op), Col1a and osteocalcin (oc). *P≤0.01.





Right arrow Return to article