|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 5 December 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.010389
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Genetics, Development, and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-3260, USA.
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: ccoffman{at}iastate.edu)
Accepted 15 October 2007
| SUMMARY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: p53, outsiders, Programmed cell death, Germ cells, Monocarboxylate transporter, Drosophila
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In Drosophila melanogaster, PGCs undergo efficient PCD during
embryogenesis (Underwood et al.,
1980
; Technau and
Campos-Ortega, 1986
; Coffman
et al., 2002
; Coffman,
2003
; Sano et al.,
2005
). However, the molecular machinery responsible for regulating
germ cell PCD is poorly understood. Both extracellular cues and
cell-autonomous determinants are thought to regulate germ cell migration and
death. Maternally provided wun2 in germ cells is necessary and
sufficient for germ cell survival, and overexpression of lipid phosphate
phosphatases Wun or Wun2 in somatic tissues is sufficient to trigger germ cell
death (Starz-Gaiano and Lehmann,
2001
; Burnett and Howard,
2003
; Hanyu-Nakamura et al.,
2004
; Renault et al.,
2004
; Sano et al.,
2005
). The downstream effectors of Wun/Wun2 action are not known.
In wild-type, wun or wun2 mutant embryos, germ cell PCD does
not require the function of the proapopotic genes grim, reaper or
head involution defective (hid). Germ cell death is not
affected by the expression of the inhibitor-of-apoptosis proteins DIAP1, DIAP2
or p35, nor is it altered by the expression of a dominant negative form of the
initiator caspase Nc/Dronc (Hanyu-Nakamura
et al., 2004
; Renault et al.,
2004
; Sano et al.,
2005
) (Y.Y., unpublished results). Therefore, caspase-mediated
apoptosis is not the predominant mechanism of PCD in Drosophila germ
cells.
The relatively small number of PGCs produced in the Drosophila
embryo allows the detection of subtle differences in cell death phenotypes,
providing a powerful system to study the molecular mechanisms regulating these
processes. In addition, the movements of PGCs through the developing embryo
are well characterized. PGCs form at the posterior pole of the embryo and
divide 0-2 times to produce
30-40 cells
(Rabinowitz, 1941
;
Sonnenblick, 1941
;
Underwood et al., 1980
;
Technau and Campos-Ortega,
1986
; Hay et al.,
1988
; Williamson and Lehmann,
1996
). Soon after these divisions, wild-type PGCs enter mitotic
arrest and remain nonproliferative until the end of embryogenesis
(Sonnenblick, 1941
;
Deshpande et al., 1999
).
Another feature of wild-type PGCs is that transcription is repressed. The germ
cells remain transcriptionally quiescent until stages 8-9 of embryogenesis, a
point just before the germ cells begin migrating
(Zalokar, 1976
;
Van Doren et al., 1998
).
Therefore, germ cell development requires both maternally and zygotically
supplied gene products. Approximately 50% of PGCs initially formed
successfully migrate and are incorporated into the gonads. Classic studies
have shown that the remaining PGCs do not transdifferentiate but are
eliminated (Sonnenblick, 1950
;
Underwood et al., 1980
;
Technau and Campos-Ortega,
1986
).
In previous studies, we used a mutagenic screen to identify genes required
for Drosophila germ cell development
(Coffman et al., 2002
). This
screen isolated multiple alleles of out, a gene that, when mutated,
disrupts germ cell death, but not migration. Embryos mutant for out
had wild-type numbers of germ cells within the gonads plus 10-15 germ cells in
ectopic locations. Ectopic germ cells were rare in wild-type embryos.
To elucidate more key components of germ cell development, we studied the
literature to identify central regulators of PCD. The p53 tumor
suppressor gene was of particular interest because it had demonstrated roles
in multiple forms of PCD in diverse organisms. Extensive studies have shown
that p53 plays pivotal roles in genome integrity and stability (reviewed by
Sutcliffe and Brehm, 2004
).
Mutations in p53 are present in approximately 50% of tumors
(Greenblatt et al., 1994
).
Remarkably, loss-of-function mutations of Drosophila p53 alone do not
result in any obvious phenotypic defects. In sensitized backgrounds,
p53 has been shown to be involved in DNA-damage-induced PCD and in
growth arrest associated with tissue damage
(Brodsky et al., 2000
;
Ollmann et al., 2000
;
Rong et al., 2002
;
Sogame et al., 2003
;
Brodsky et al., 2004
;
Jaklevic and Su, 2004
;
Wells et al., 2006
). In situ
data of p53 transcripts reveal global maternal expression followed by
zygotic expression in the PGCs and hindgut cells about half way through
embryogenesis (Ollmann et al.,
2000
; Tomancak et al.,
2002
). The extensive roles of p53 in programmed cell
death and development, along with its germ cell expression pattern, prompted
us to investigate potential roles for p53 in PGC death.
Here we show that PGC elimination occurs between stages 10 and 12. Loss-of-function p53 and out embryos exhibit abnormal cell death with ectopic germ cells persisting outside the gonads. Germ cell migration in p53 mutants is normal with a wild-type number of germ cells reaching the gonads. The phenotype of p53 mutants is remarkably similar to out. We have identified out as a gene encoding a putative monocarboxylate transporter. Genetic analyses suggest that p53 and out may function in a common pathway to eliminate a subset of PGCs during embryogenesis. We discuss possible PCD mechanisms that are mediated by p53 and its potential interactions with out during PGC development.
| MATERIALS & METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immunocytochemistry
Immunostaining was performed following established methods
(Johansen and Johansen, 2003
).
Embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Primary antibodies used for
immunostaining of embryos were: Chicken anti-Vasa (a gift from K. Howard,
University College, London, UK; 1:10,000), mouse anti-β-galactosidase
(40-1a Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank; 1:50), mouse-anti-clift (Eya10H6
Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank; 1:25)
(Bonini et al., 1993
).
Secondary antibodies used were: biotinylated anti-mouse IgG, biotinylated
anti-chicken, Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse (Invitrogen; 1:500),
and Alexa Fluor 568-conjugated goat anti-chicken antibodies (Invitrogen;
1:500). The ABC Elite Kit (Vector Labs) was applied to complex the
biotinylated secondary antibodies with avidin conjugated to horseradish
peroxidase. Peroxidase activity was visualized using diaminobenzidine as a
substrate.
Germ cell counts
Germ cells were labeled using an anti-Vasa antibody. Germ cells were
counted using differential interference contrast microscopy. Staging of
embryos was done based on morphological criteria
(Campos-Ortega and Hartensein,
1997
). For bilateral segregation assays, PGCs were scored as
middle cells when the cells remained close to the midline while other PGCs had
moved laterally forming bilateral clusters. For stage 14 embryos, the gonadal
sheath cells were used to determine whether germ cells were inside or outside
of the gonads. Our criterion for a mutant phenotype in stage 14 embryos was
more than three germ cells ectopic to the gonads.
Sequencing
Genomic templates of out1, out2, out4,
out5, KG07784 and wild-type (w1118,
P{w+, fat facets-lacZ}) were PCR amplified using the
TripleMaster Taq system (Eppendorf). Primers used to amplify exons 2-5 of
CG8062 were: 5'-caagttggtatatgggctcacc-3' (forward) and
5'-caagccctcgaatttctgg-3' (reverse). The entire translated region
of 3200 bp was sequenced. Sequence analyses revealed nonsense mutations in
out1, out2 and out5. These
mutations were confirmed through repeated sequencing of both strands. No
sequence changes that would affect protein coding of regions were observed in
out4 and KG07784.
Removal of lethality through chromosomal recombination
The original out4 and out5 X
chromosomes were lethal (Coffman et al.,
2002
) owing to second mutations on these chromosomes.
Recombination was performed to remove the lethality. Heterozygous
out4 and out5 females were crossed to
w1118 cv1 wy74i f1/Y
males. Recombination took place in F1 (w1118 cv+
wy+ out- f+ P{w+, fat
facets-lacZ}/w1118 cv1 wy74i
f1) females. These females were then crossed to FM7Z/Y males.
Subsequently, viable P{w+, fat facets-lacZ}/Y males were
collected. Stocks were established using these recombined chromosomes and
tested for retention of the out mutations.
Reverse transcriptase PCR
To study expression of the out transcript, total RNA was isolated
from 0-15 hour out1, out2, out4,
out5, KG07784 and wild-type embryos using Trizol (Invitrogen).
RNA samples were treated with RQ1 RNase-free DNase (Promega) to remove genomic
DNA contamination. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using
AffinityScriptTM QPCR cDNA Synthesis Kit (Stratagene) using an oligo (dT)
primer. To detect the presence of the out cDNA in the samples, the
following primers were used for PCR: 5'-gatgccaagcaaaccacg-3'
(forward) and 5'-gcctccgtcaagataccaag-3' (reverse) to amplify a
634 bp fragment spanning exons 3-4 of CG8062. As a positive control,
constitutively expressed ribosomal protein 49
(rp49)-specific primers [5'-gcgcaccaagcacttcatc-3'
(forward) and 5'-gacgcactctgttgtcgatacc-3' (reverse)] were used to
ensure the quality of the cDNA templates
(O'Connell and Rosbash, 1984
).
To distinguish cDNA from genomic contamination, all primer pairs spanned
introns. PCR was performed using Taq DNA polymerase (Eppendorf) using 35
cycles of DNA amplification.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
p53 mutants are defective in germ cell PCD
The molecular mechanisms responsible for germ cell PCD in wild-type
Drosophila embryos are largely unknown, but multiple observations
suggested that p53 might have a role in Drosophila germ cell
development. First, p53 has been shown to mediate programmed cell
death in other systems (Jin,
2005
; Crighton et al.,
2006
; Green and Chipuk,
2006
). In Drosophila, p53 has been shown to mediate
DNA-damage-induced PCD (Jaklevic and Su,
2004
; Qi et al.,
2004
). Second, p53 RNA expression during early
Drosophila embryogenesis coincides with the timing and location of
PGC death. p53 maternal transcripts and zygotic expression is high in
mesoderm, gut (stage 10), and PGCs (stages 10-16)
(Ollmann et al., 2000
;
Tomancak et al., 2002
).
|
Next, we examined the requirements for maternal and zygotic expression of p53. Penetrance of the mutant phenotype in homozygous mutant stocks was 93% and 96% for the p535A-1-4 and p5311-1B-1 alleles, respectively (Table 1). When p53 homozygous mutant mothers were crossed to wild-type males, 30-35% of these heterozygous (p53/+) embryos displayed abnormal germ cell death. When heterozygous p53/+ mothers were crossed to homozygous mutant p53/p53 males, half of the embryos were homozygous for the mutant p53. The penetrance of the mutant phenotype in these embryos was 42%. Thus although there was a maternal effect for p53, the role of zygotic expression of the gene accounted for most of the PGC phenotype.
|
Because differences in germ cell PCD were noted at stage 11, we inspected where PGCs are positioned at this stage. A failure of germ cells to exit the posterior midgut and transition to the mesoderm results in a phenotype where the germ cells remain associated with the endoderm. Analyses of PGC locations during stages 11 and 12 showed that p53 mutant germ cells exited the PMG (Fig. 2G,H and Fig. 3D).
Subsequent to exiting the PMG the germ cells separate into two clusters of
cells. It had been shown that the functions of wunen/wunen2
(wun/wun2) expressed in the central nervous system were
necessary and sufficient to direct bilateral segregation of PGCs during stage
11 (Sano et al., 2005
). We
investigated whether the PGCs in p53 mutants, including those fated
to become ectopic PGCs, were able to respond to wun/wun2
guidance cues and form bilateral clusters. To address this issue, we counted
PGCs that failed to respond to midline repulsive signaling and remained in the
middle of the embryo (see Table S2 in the supplementary material). We found
averages of 1.9 PGCs in p535A-1-4, 2.5 PGCs in
p5311-1B-1 and 0.3 PGCs in
p535A-1-4/p53-ns left in the midline
of stage 11 embryos. These numbers were similar to the wild-type average of
1.8. Thus, PGCs in p53 mutants successfully migrated away from the
midline. Counts of PGCs at the midline in stage 12 and 13 p53 embryos
showed that PGCs continued to stay organized in two elongated bilateral
clusters, largely avoiding the midline. Notably, between stages 11 and 13, the
midline PGCs in wild-type embryos appeared to undergo PCD, the average number
of midline PGCs declined from 1.8 to 0.4 between stages 11 and 12. This
reduction in PGC number at the midline did not occur in p53
mutants.
To investigate whether p53 mutant PGCs could correctly migrate
towards and associate with SGPs, we double labeled embryos with a SGP marker
(anti-EYA-antibody) (Boyle et al.,
1997
) and a PGC marker (anti-VASA-antibody). SGPs are specified at
stage 11 in bilateral clusters of 9-12 cells in parasegments 10 to 12. We
found that PGCs in stage 11 p53 mutants were able to properly form
clusters moving towards the SGPs (Fig.
4E,F). Also, at stage 13, double labeling for PGCs and SGPs showed
alignment of PGCs with SGPs (Fig.
4G,H). However, isolation of some PGCs was also noted
(Fig. 4G arrows).
|
Collectively, these data support the conclusion that mutations in p53 result in survival of additional germ cells ectopic to the gonads because of impaired PCD rather than delays in the initiation of migration, an inability of the germ cells to leave the midline of the embryo or because of a failure of normal numbers of germ cells to associate with SGPs.
out germ phenotypes are strikingly similar to p53
In previous studies, we isolated six alleles of the out gene
(Coffman et al., 2002
). These
preliminary studies indicated that the programmed cell death of out
germ cells was disrupted. The similarities between the germ cell phenotypes of
out and p53 prompted us to investigate the out phenotype in
greater depth. We examined germ cell development patterns in five out
alleles (out1, out2, out4,
out5 and KG07784), four from our original screen plus an
amorphic P-element-containing line (see below)
(Crosby et al., 2007
), to look
for similarities and differences between out and p53
mutants.
As shown in Fig. 1 and see Table S1 in the supplementary material, the total numbers of germ cells observed in out and p53 mutants overlapped, and PGC elimination followed a parallel pattern during stages 10 to 14. As shown in Figs 2 and 3, the general features of germ cell development were the same in out and p53 embryos. Double labeling of PGCs and SGPs (Fig. 4A-D) showed that in out mutants, the somatic gonad cells formed normally, and germ cells were able to coalesce with SGPs. However, there were subtle differences. All of the out alleles had slightly more germ cells ectopic to the gonads at stage 14 than the p53 alleles (Fig. 5 and see Table S3 in the supplementary material). This may reflect differences in genetic background because we observed strain-specific differences in germ cell numbers. Interestingly, the out1, out4 and out5 alleles may represent an allelic series that reflects the severity of the amino acid truncation of the protein (see below) with out2 being the most severe. This was apparent when the number of germ cells ectopic to the gonads (Fig. 5 and see Table S3 in the supplementary material) and the number of germ cells that failed to migrate away from the midline (see Table S2 in the supplementary material) were compared.
p53 and out interact genetically and overexpression of p53 suppresses the out phenotype
The similarities between the p53 and out phenotypes were
intriguing. This prompted us to test the hypothesis that p53 and
out were involved in common PCD signaling networks. To do this, we
tested for genetic interactions by creating embryos that were mutant for both
p53 and out.
First, we asked whether p53 and out were required for the death of the same or different subsets of germ cells. If p53 and out function in a common PCD signaling pathway, the number of germ cells that fail to die in double mutants would be very similar to that of either p53 or out single mutants. Alternatively, if p53 and out function in separate pathways responsible for elimination of different germ cells, the number of surviving germ cells ectopic to the gonads would be greater in double mutant embryos. In order to address this possibility, out1; p535A-1-4 double mutants were assayed (Fig. 6E and see Table S3 in the supplementary material). Germ cell counts showed that the number of germ cells ectopic to the gonads was only slightly lower in out1; p53 double mutants (12.0) compared with out1 mutants (13.4). Wild-type numbers of germ cells were incorporated into the gonads: 13.2 and 14.8 in the double mutants and out1 mutants, respectively. This evidence suggested that p53 and out functions are required for the elimination of the same subset of germ cells.
|
|
Finally, we examined the hypothesis that p53 functions downstream
of out in signaling the death of germ cells that are ectopic to the
gonads. To do this, we overexpressed p53 specifically in PGCs in
out mutant embryos using the nos-Gal4:VP16
germ-cell-specific driver (Van Doren et
al., 1998
). The results showed that p53 expression in
PGCs can partially rescue the defective germ cell PCD in out mutants
(Table 2). When there was no
p53 expression in PGCs, 47% of the embryos displayed the mutant
phenotype. When p53 expression was driven in PGCs, 32% of the embryos
had more than three germ cells ectopic to the gonads. p53 expression
in wild-type embryos did not affect survival of PGCs in the gonads. These data
support a model where p53 functions downstream of, or in parallel to
out to induce PCD when expressed in PGCs.
|
The KG07784 P-element was reported to be inserted into the first intron of
the gene CG8062 (Crosby et al.,
2007
). We confirmed the location of the P-element insertion by
performing inverse PCR. Recovered flanking sequences were located in the first
intron of CG8062 (Fig. 7A).
These results provided preliminary evidence that disruption of CG8062 caused
defective PCD of the ectopic germ cells.
Predicted molecular function of the Out protein
The CG8062 sequence is predicted to encode a protein of 655 amino acids
encoding a potential monocarboxylate transporter (MCT)
(Fig. 7B). Secondary structure
prediction and domain analysis programs indicated 12 potential transmembrane
domains, a sugar transporter domain, and a carbohydrate transporter domain
(Fig. 7C)
(Krogh et al., 2001
;
Juretic et al., 2002
;
Marchler-Bauer and Bryant,
2004
). The Drosophila genome contains 18 genes predicted
to encode MCTs (Crosby et al.,
2007
), but little is known about their molecular or developmental
functions. Studies in other organisms have shown that MCTs localize in the
plasma membrane and/or mitochondrial membrane, allowing trafficking of
molecules such as lactate, pyruvate and protons, which are all major factors
in cell metabolism (Halestrap and Price,
1999
; Enerson and Drewes,
2003
; Izumi et al.,
2003
; Halestrap and Meredith,
2004
; Pierre and Pellerin,
2005
).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Roles for p53 in germ cell development and PCD
Studies in other metazoans have shown significant roles of p53 in
germline development. In C. elegans, the p53 homolog
cep-1 is required for proper chromosome segregation during meiosis
and DNA-damage-induced germ cell death
(Derry et al., 2001
). In mice,
p53 acts to maintain the integrity of the germ line. Mice lacking
p53 exhibited reduced spontaneous germ cell death and increased
levels of abnormal sperm (Beumer et al.,
1998
; Yin et al.,
1998
). Furthermore, murine p53 has been shown to
positively regulate PGC apoptosis associated with loss of Connexin 43, a gap
junction component expressed in PGCs
(Francis and Lo, 2006
). PGCs
in Connexin-43-knockout mice exhibit abnormally increased levels of activated
p53 and apoptosis. This increased PGC death can be rescued by
injections with a p53 inhibitor. These observations, together with our work,
clearly show that p53 is an essential mediator of germ cell PCD.
Our observations indicate that PGCs in wild-type embryos undergo extensive
PCD between stages 10-12 of embryogenesis. However, the mechanisms of
Drosophila PGC death are not understood. Accumulating evidence
suggests that Drosophila germ cell PCD is context dependent, and both
apoptotic and non-apoptotic cell death can occur. Embryos homozygous for the
Df (3L)H99 deletion, which removes the potent apoptotic inducers grim,
rpr and hid, show normal germ cell PCD
(Sano et al., 2005
) (Y.Y.,
unpublished results). Altered expression of the caspase inhibitors p35, DIAP1,
DIAP2 or a dominant negative form of Nc/Dronc did not affect Wun/Wun2-mediated
PGC death (Hanyu-Nakamura et al.,
2004
; Renault et al.,
2004
). Cells dying in response to Wun/Wun2-mediated signals were
negative for TUNEL staining and did not label for another marker of apoptosis,
cleaved caspase 3. These observations argue that during normal development,
PGC death does not occur by apoptosis. However, it is important to note that
germ cells are capable of undergoing caspase-mediated PCD. Expression of
hid or rpr in PGCs induces extensive PCD
(Sano et al., 2005
) (Y.Y.,
unpublished). In addition, germ cells mutant for nanos fail to
maintain the germ cell fate and undergo apoptosis
(Hayashi et al., 2004
).
There are reports demonstrating that p53 has roles in
caspase-independent modes of PCD (Feng et
al., 2005
; Coureuil et al.,
2006
; Crighton et al.,
2006
). For example, death of terminally differentiating murine
germ cells induced by p53 overexpression is mediated by calpains
rather than caspases (Coureuil et al.,
2006
).
There is accumulating evidence that PCD is context dependent and that cell
death does not always occur by a single mechanism
(Edinger and Thompson, 2004
;
Lockshin and Zakeri, 2004
).
Therefore, the possibility of crosstalk between different cell death pathways
and hybrid forms of cell death need to be considered. For example, when
apoptosis is blocked by caspase inhibition, mammalian neurons can still
undergo PCD via autophagy (Lang-Rollin et
al., 2003
). This raises an intriguing possibility that PGCs use
multiple cell death mechanisms. In support of this hypothesis, ectopic PGCs,
which normally undergo Bax-mediated apoptosis, still undergo PCD in
Bax-deficient mouse embryos suggesting that there must be Bax-independent PCD
mechanisms (Stallock et al.,
2003
).
p53 expression in PGCs eliminates errant PGCs in out mutants
Our data show that p53 genetically interacts with out, a
predicted MCT, in germ cell PCD. Additionally, out and p53
show nonallelic noncomplementation suggesting that they may be involved in
closely linked functions. Partial rescue of the defective germ cell PCD by
overexpression of p53 in out mutants suggests that
p53 may function downstream of out. This incomplete zygotic
rescue may reflect the fact that p53 shows a maternal effect.
Alternatively, p53 and out may function in parallel
pathways. Importantly, PGC expression of p53 in wild-type embryos
does not affect PGCs within the gonads. Forced expression of p53
induces PCD only in the errant PGCs in out mutants. These
observations implicate potential mechanisms that distinguish between
subpopulations of germ cells. Such mechanisms may involve activation of
downstream antagonists of p53-mediated PCD in surviving PGCs.
The MCT family, of which out is a member, consists of eighteen
predicted Drosophila genes
(Crosby et al., 2007
). Very
little is known about their cellular functions. The mammalian MCT family of
proteins includes 14 members, 4 of them with experimentally demonstrated
functions for catalysis of the proton-linked transport of monocarboxylates
(Halestrap and Meredith,
2004
). It has been shown that MCTs localize at the plasma membrane
and/or mitochondrial membranes, and their substrates include major factors in
cellular metabolism such as lactate and pyruvate
(Halestrap and Price,
1999
).
Some recent reports suggest interesting possibilities for links between
MCTs, cell metabolism, p53 and programmed cell death
(Bensaad and Vousden, 2007
;
Danial et al., 2003
;
Feng et al., 2007
). First, low
nutrient levels negatively regulate mTOR and promote autophagy
(Kamada et al., 2004
;
Lum et al., 2005
). mTOR,
together with insulin-like growth factor 1, monitors levels of nutrients and
mitogens to regulate cell growth and division. Downstream components of these
regulators include Akt-1 kinase. Akt negatively regulates both autophagy and
apoptosis (Rasoulpour et al.,
2006
; Quevedo et al.,
2007
). Caenorhabditis elegans homologs of Akt have been
shown to suppress DNA-damage-induced germ cell death, involving
cep-1, the p53 homolog
(Quevedo et al., 2007
). Germ
cell death was significantly decreased in akt-1 gain-of-function
mutants. Loss of cep-1/p53 completely blocks apoptotic
hypersensitivity in akt-1 loss-of-function mutants.
Second, the functions of the SLC5A8 Na+-coupled MCT were linked
to induction of pyruvate-dependent inhibition of histone deacetylases (HDAC),
elevated levels of p53 and apoptosis in tumor cell cultures,
suggesting pro-PCD functions of this MCT within the dying cells
(Thangaraju et al., 2006
).
Although the exact mechanism as to how pyruvate uptake leads to cell death is
unknown, the correlation with upregulated p53 expression and HDAC
inhibition is intriguing. Interestingly, studies in Drosophila wing
development show that cell death mechanisms require functions of a histone
acetyltransferase (HAT). This activity is antagonized by a HDAC
(Miotto et al., 2006
).
Additionally, p53 function is linked to histone acetylation. It has
been shown that p53 is important for maintenance of histone H3
acetylation after irradiation (Rebollar et
al., 2006
).
Drosophila PGCs appear capable of undergoing multiple forms of PCD. Our demonstration that p53 is involved in some form of PGC death suggests interesting hypotheses to test. Our observations of pro-cell death roles for out, an MCT that can be suppressed by p53 overexpression, provide tantalizing clues. Clearly p53 and out are two pieces of a much larger puzzle potentially linking cell metabolism to cell death or survival signaling.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material for this article is available at
http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/135/2/207/DC1
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bensaad, K. and Vousden, K. H. (2007). p53: new roles in metabolism. Trends Cell Biol. 17.286 -291.[CrossRef][Medline]
Beumer, T. L., Roepers-Gajadien, H. L., Gademan, I. S., van Buul, P. P., Gil-Gomez, G., Rutgers, D. H. and de Rooij, D. G. (1998). The role of the tumor suppressor p53 in spermatogenesis. Cell Death Differ. 5,669 -677.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bonini, N. M., Leiserson, W. M. and Benzer, S. (1993). The eyes absent gene: genetic control of cell survival and differentiation in the developing Drosophila eye. Cell 72,379 -395.[CrossRef][Medline]
Boyle, M. and DiNardo, S. (1995). Specification, migration and assembly of the somatic cells of the Drosophila gonad. Development 121,1815 -1825.[Abstract]
Boyle, M., Bonini, N. and DiNardo, S. (1997). Expression and function of clift in the development of somatic gonadal precursors within the Drosophila mesoderm. Development 124,971 -982.[Abstract]
Brodsky, M. H., Nordstrom, W., Tsang, G., Kwan, E., Rubin, G. M. and Abrams, J. M. (2000). Drosophila p53 binds a damage response element at the reaper locus. Cell 101,103 -113.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brodsky, M. H., Weinert, B. T., Tsang, G., Rong, Y. S.,
McGinnis, N. M., Golic, K. G., Rio, D. C. and Rubin, G. M.
(2004). Drosophila melanogaster MNK/Chk2 and p53 regulate
multiple DNA repair and apoptotic pathways following DNA damage.
Mol. Cell. Biol. 24,1219
-1231.
Brookman, J. J., Toosy, A. T., Shashidhara, L. S. and White, R. A. (1992). The 412 retrotransposon and the development of gonadal mesoderm in Drosophila. Development 116,1185 -1192.[Abstract]
Burnett, C. and Howard, K. (2003). Fly and mammalian lipid phosphate phosphatase isoforms differ in activity both in vitro and in vivo. EMBO Rep. 4, 793-799.[CrossRef][Medline]
Callaini, G., Riparbelli, M. G. and Dallai, R. (1995). Pole cell migration through the gut wall of the Drosophila embryo: analysis of cell interactions. Dev. Biol. 170,365 -375.[CrossRef][Medline]
Campos-Ortega, A. J. and Hartensein, V. (1997). The Embryonic Development of Drosophila melanogaster. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Coffman, C. R. (2003). Cell migration and programmed cell death of Drosophila germ cells. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 995,117 -126.[Medline]
Coffman, C. R., Strohm, R. C., Oakley, F. D., Yamada, Y.,
Przychodzin, D. and Boswell, R. E. (2002). Identification of
X-linked genes required for migration and programmed cell death of Drosophila
melanogaster germ cells. Genetics
162,273
-284.
Coureuil, M., Fouchet, P., Prat, M., Letallec, B., Barroca, V., Dos Santos, C., Racine, C. and Allemand, I. (2006). Caspase-independent death of meiotic and postmeiotic cells overexpressing p53: calpain involvement. Cell Death Differ. 13,1927 -1937.[CrossRef][Medline]
Crighton, D., Wilkinson, S., O'Prey, J., Syed, N., Smith, P., Harrison, P. R., Gasco, M., Garrone, O., Crook, T. and Ryan, K. M. (2006). DRAM, a p53-induced modulator of autophagy, is critical for apoptosis. Cell 126,121 -134.[CrossRef][Medline]
Crosby, M. A., Goodman, J. L., Strelets, V. B., Zhang, P. and Gelbart, W. M. (2007). FlyBase: genomes by the dozen. Nucleic Acids Res. 35,D486 -D491.[CrossRef][Medline]
Danial, N. N., Gramm, C. F., Scorrano, L., Zhang, C. Y., Krauss, S., Ranger, A. M., Datta, S. R., Greenberg, M. E., Licklider, L. J., Lowell, B. B. et al. (2003). BAD and glucokinase reside in a mitochondrial complex that integrates glycolysis and apoptosis. Nature 424,952 -956.[CrossRef][Medline]
de Silva, K. S., Kanumakala, S., Grover, S. R., Chow, C. W. and Warne, G. L. (2004). Ovarian lesions in children and adolescents - an 11-year review. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 17,951 -957.[Medline]
Derry, W. B., Putzke, A. P. and Rothman, J. H.
(2001). Caenorhabditis elegans p53: role in apoptosis, meiosis,
and stress resistance. Science
294,591
-595.
Deshpande, G., Calhoun, G., Yanowitz, J. L. and Schedl, P. D. (1999). Novel functions of nanos in downregulating mitosis and transcription during the development of the Drosophila germline. Cell 99,271 -281.[CrossRef][Medline]
Edinger, A. L. and Thompson, C. B. (2004). Death by design: apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16,663 -669.[CrossRef][Medline]
Enerson, B. E. and Drewes, L. R. (2003). Molecular features, regulation, and function of monocarboxylate transporters: implications for drug delivery. J. Pharm. Sci. 92,1531 -1544.[CrossRef][Medline]
Feng, Z., Zhang, H., Levine, A. J. and Jin, S.
(2005). The coordinate regulation of the p53 and mTOR pathways in
cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102,8204
-8209.
Feng, Z., Hu, W., de Stanchina, E., Teresky, A. K., Jin, S.,
Lowe, S. and Levine, A. J. (2007). The regulation of AMPK
beta1, TSC2, and PTEN expression by p53: stress, cell and tissue specificity,
and the role of these gene products in modulating the IGF-1-AKT-mTOR pathways.
Cancer Res. 67,3043
-3053.
Fischer-Vize, J. A., Rubin, G. M. and Lehmann, R. (1992). The fat facets gene is required for Drosophila eye and embryo development. Development 116,985 -1000.[Abstract]
Francis, R. J. and Lo, C. W. (2006). Primordial
germ cell deficiency in the connexin 43 knockout mouse arises from apoptosis
associated with abnormal p53 activation. Development
133,3451
-3460.
Göbel, U., Schneider, D. T., Calaminus, G., Haas, R. J.,
Schmidt, P. and Harms, D. (2000). Germ-cell tumors in
childhood and adolescence. Ann. Oncol.
11,263
-271.
Green, D. R. and Chipuk, J. E. (2006). p53 and metabolism: inside the TIGAR. Cell 126, 30-32.[CrossRef][Medline]
Greenblatt, M. S., Bennett, W. P., Hollstein, M. and Harris, C.
C. (1994). Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: clues
to cancer etiology and molecular pathogenesis. Cancer
Res. 54,4855
-4878.
Halestrap, A. P. and Price, N. T. (1999). The proton-linked monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) family: structure, function and regulation. Biochem. J. 343,281 -299.[CrossRef][Medline]
Halestrap, A. P. and Meredith, D. (2004). The SLC16 gene family-from monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) to aromatic amino acid transporters and beyond. Pflugers Arch. 447,619 -628.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hanyu-Nakamura, K., Kobayashi, S. and Nakamura, A.
(2004). Germ cell-autonomous Wunen2 is required for germline
development in Drosophila embryos. Development
131,4545
-4553.
Hay, B., Ackerman, L., Barbel, S., Jan, L. Y. and Jan, Y. N.
(1988). Identification of a component of Drosophila polar
granules. Development
103,625
-640.
Hayashi, Y., Hayashi, M. and Kobayashi, S.
(2004). Nanos suppresses somatic cell fate in Drosophila germ
line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101,10338
-10342.
Izumi, H., Torigoe, T., Ishiguchi, H., Uramoto, H., Yoshida, Y., Tanabe, M., Ise, T., Murakami, T., Yoshida, T., Nomoto, M. et al. (2003). Cellular pH regulators: potentially promising molecular targets for cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Treat. Rev. 29,541 -549.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jaglarz, M. K. and Howard, K. R. (1995). The active migration of Drosophila primordial germ cells. Development 121,3495 -3503.[Abstract]
Jaklevic, B. R. and Su, T. T. (2004). Relative contribution of DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoints, and cell death to survival after DNA damage in Drosophila larvae. Curr. Biol. 14, 23-32.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jin, S. (2005). p53, Autophagy and tumor suppression. Autophagy 1, 171-173.[Medline]
Jin, S., DiPaola, R. S., Mathew, R. and White, E.
(2007). Metabolic catastrophe as a means to cancer cell death.
J. Cell Sci. 120,379
-383.
Johansen, K. M. and Johansen, J. (2003). Studying nuclear organization in embryos using antibody tools. In Drosophila Cytogenetics Protocols (ed. D. S. Henderson), pp. 215-234. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
Juretic, D., Zoranic, L. and Zucic, D. (2002). Basic charge clusters and predictions of membrane protein topology. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42,620 -632.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kamada, Y., Sekito, T. and Ohsumi, Y. (2004). Autophagy in yeast: a TOR-mediated response to nutrient starvation. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 279, 73-84.[Medline]
Krogh, A., Larsson, B., von Heijne, G. and Sonnhammer, E. L. (2001). Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 305,567 -580.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kunwar, P. S., Starz-Gaiano, M., Bainton, R. J., Heberlein, U. and Lehmann, R. (2003). Tre1, a G protein-coupled receptor, directs transepithelial migration of Drosophila germ cells. PLoS Biol. 1,E80 .[CrossRef][Medline]
Lang-Rollin, I. C., Rideout, H. J., Noticewala, M. and Stefanis,
L. (2003). Mechanisms of caspase-independent neuronal death:
energy depletion and free radical generation. J.
Neurosci. 23,11015
-11025.
Lee, S. D. (2004). Epidemiological and clinical behavior of prepubertal testicular tumors in Korea. J. Urol. 172,674 -678.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lockshin, R. A. and Zakeri, Z. (2004). Apoptosis, autophagy, and more. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 36,2405 -2419.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lum, J. J., Bauer, D. E., Kong, M., Harris, M. H., Li, C., Lindsten, T. and Thompson, C. B. (2005). Growth factor regulation of autophagy and cell survival in the absence of apoptosis. Cell 120,237 -248.[CrossRef][Medline]
Marchler-Bauer, A. and Bryant, S. H. (2004).
CD-Search: protein domain annotations on the fly. Nucleic Acids
Res. 32,W327
-W331.
Miotto, B., Sagnier, T., Berenger, H., Bohmann, D., Pradel, J.
and Graba, Y. (2006). Chameau HAT and DRpd3 HDAC function as
antagonistic cofactors of JNK/AP-1-dependent transcription during Drosophila
metamorphosis. Genes Dev.
20,101
-112.
Moore, L. A., Broihier, H. T., Van Doren, M., Lunsford, L. B. and Lehmann, R. (1998). Identification of genes controlling germ cell migration and embryonic gonad formation in Drosophila. Development 125,667 -678.[Abstract]