|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online December 21, 2007
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.008904
1 Developmental Biology Laboratory, Cardiovascular Research Center,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
2 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
3 The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
* Authors for correspondence (e-mails: jyeh1{at}partners.org; peterson{at}cvrc.mgh.harvard.edu)
Accepted 18 October 2007
| SUMMARY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Hematopoiesis, Myeloid, Leukemia, Zebrafish
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2, RUNX1 and PEBP
B) gene
and the ETO (also known as MTG8) gene
(Downing, 1999
AML1 by itself plays an important role in hematopoiesis. Normally, AML1
forms a complex with CBFβ, called the core-binding factor (CBF) complex.
This complex binds the enhancer core motif and activates tissue-specific
expression of a number of hematopoietic genes
(Borregaard et al., 2001
;
Lutterbach and Hiebert, 2000
).
By contrast, ETO normally functions by recruiting the nuclear receptor
co-repressor (N-CoR)/mSin3/histone deacetylase (HDAC) complex
(Licht, 2001
). The chromosomal
translocation juxtaposes the region encoding the DNA-binding domain of the
AML1 protein to the region encoding almost all of the ETO protein. Thus, the
AML1-ETO fusion product is thought to antagonize the functions of AML1. In
addition, previous studies indicate that this fusion protein has additional
activities other than antagonizing AML1 function. For example, AML1-ETO
knock-in mouse embryos contain abnormal hematopoietic progenitor cells that
are not found in AML1-deficient mouse embryos
(Okuda et al., 1998
;
Yergeau et al., 1997
).
Moreover, many of the AML1-ETO target genes that have been identified are not
affected by AML1 (Shimada et al.,
2000
). At present, the full range of AML1-ETO target genes and
their roles in AML pathogenesis remain poorly understood.
Many lines of evidence indicate that the (8;21) chromosomal translocation
is likely to occur in a primitive hematopoietic progenitor cell capable of
generating all hematopoietic lineages. For example, transcripts of the
AML1-ETO fusion gene can be found in hematopoietic cells of
non-myeloid lineages in some patients
(Miyamoto et al., 2000
).
Moreover, it has been demonstrated that the cells capable of initiating
leukemia are CD34+CD38-, a characteristic of
non-committed primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells
(Bonnet and Dick, 1997
). Thus,
it is important to know how AML1-ETO affects the specification of various
hematopoietic lineages from multipotent progenitor cells. Unfortunately,
AML1-ETO knock-in mouse embryos die in early gestation, making it difficult to
analyze the effect of AML1-ETO in these models
(Okuda et al., 1998
;
Yergeau et al., 1997
).
Interestingly, it has been shown that AML1-ETO can promote myelopoiesis in
adult mice (de Guzman et al.,
2002
; Fenske et al.,
2004
; Schwieger et al.,
2002
). However, these mouse models manifest phenotypes only after
several months of latency. Thus, it is difficult to identify the immediate
transcriptional and cytological changes that lead to the observed AML1-ETO
effects.
During embryonic development of mammals, hematopoiesis starts and continues
as two successive waves. The first wave, named primitive hematopoiesis, begins
in the blood islands of the yolk sac at embryonic day 7 (E7.0) in the mouse.
Although it is generally thought that only erythrocytes and macrophages are
produced during primitive hematopoiesis in mammals, multilineage precursors
are detected in the later, but still pre-circulation, yolk sac
(Palis et al., 2001
). The
second wave of hematopoiesis, named definitive hematopoiesis, begins at E8.5
in the aorta-gonad-mesonephros (AGM) region. Definitive hematopoiesis produces
HSCs that not only give rise to all blood lineages, but also possess
self-renewal capabilities. Studies of zebrafish embryonic development have
also identified two waves of hematopoiesis, a primitive wave beginning at 12
hours post-fertilization (hpf), and a definitive wave beginning at 24 hpf
(Davidson and Zon, 2004
).
There is some evidence that the myeloerythoid progenitor cells (MPCs) arising
from zebrafish primitive hematopoiesis are functionally equivalent to the
common myeloid progenitors (CMPs) arising from mammalian definitive
hematopoeisis, and many of the pathways governing hematopoietic cell fate
decisions may be shared between these cells
(Galloway et al., 2005
;
Rhodes et al., 2005
). The MPCs
of the primitive wave of hematopoiesis reside in two distinct embryonic
locations that appear to influence their ultimate cell fates. MPCs of the
rostral blood island (RBI) express the myeloid-specific transcription factor
Pu.1 (Spi1 - Zebrafish Information Network) and produce cells of the myeloid
lineage including macrophages and granulocytes, whereas MPCs of the
intermediate cell mass (ICM) region express the erythroid-specific
transcription factor Gata1 and produce erythrocytes
(Davidson and Zon, 2004
). It
has been shown that abrogation of pu.1 expression in zebrafish
embryos results in erythropoiesis in the RBI. Conversely, abrogation of
gata1 expression results in myelopoiesis in the ICM region
(Galloway et al., 2005
;
Rhodes et al., 2005
). These
results suggest that the primitive hematopoietic cells of the RBI and ICM are
multipotent MPCs.
The zebrafish may be a useful model for uncovering the in vivo effects of
AML1-ETO expression. Zebrafish MPCs arise in predictable locations and
differentiate in synchrony, making it possible to assess the effects of
AML1-ETO on reprogramming cell fate decisions. Manipulation of gene expression
and tracking of specific cell lineages are straightforward in zebrafish,
making it possible to identify the direct effects of AML1-ETO expression in
vivo. In addition, zebrafish embryos can be readily adapted for
high-throughput chemical screens to identify compounds that modify the effects
of AML1-ETO in vivo. Here, we report the generation of an inducible zebrafish
AML1-ETO model. Previously, it had been shown that injection of the human
AML1-ETO cDNA can cause hematopoietic defects in zebrafish embryos
(Kalev-Zylinska et al., 2002
).
However, the effects of AML1-ETO expression on cell fate decisions
had not been explored, and temporal control of AML1-ETO expression
was not possible. Using our stable, inducible transgenic line, we demonstrate
that AML1-ETO expression in zebrafish disrupts both primitive and
definitive hematopoiesis. We show that AML1-ETO reprograms erythropoiesis to
granulopoiesis, resulting in a robust phenotype that exhibits cytological and
transcriptional characteristics similar to those seen in human AML. We also
show that the cell fate changes caused by AML1-ETO expression are
preceded by and dependent upon a rapid downregulation of the hematopoietic
stem cell factor Scl (also known as Tal1), and that a small molecule histone
deacetylase inhibitor is able to rescue many of the effects of
AML1-ETO expression on hematopoiesis.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Generation of the Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) zebrafish line
To construct pHSP/AML1-ETO, we first amplified a 1.5-kb zebrafish
hsp70 promoter fragment from pHSP70/4
(Xiao et al., 2003
) and cloned
it into the HindIII and PstI sites of the pG1 vector.
Subsequently, the GFP fragment in pG1 was removed and replaced with the
XbaI fragment containing the human AML1-ETO gene from
pCS2cmv-RUNX1-CBF2T1 (Kalev-Zylinska et
al., 2002
). The transgenic line is maintained in TL strain
background. The zebrafish carrying the transgene were identified by fin
clipping and genotyping, using PCR primers AML1-f
(5'-GGAAGAGGGAAAAGCTTCAC-3') and ETO-r
(5'-GAGTAGTTGGGGGAGGTGG-3').
Heat treatments
Initially, zebrafish embryos were heat shocked in a 37-42°C incubator
for 1 hour. The heat treatment was repeated three to four times every 12 hours
from 4 hpf (Fig. 1,
Fig. 2B,C, Figs
3,
4; Fig. S1 in the supplementary
material). Later on, we found that incubation at 38°C for 1 hour once
between 14 to 19.5 hpf is enough to reproducibly induce the AML1-ETO
phenotypes, and, thus, this regimen was used in all subsequent experiments
(Fig. 2A, Figs
5,
6,
7,
8 and
9; Fig. S2, Figs S3-S6, Table
S1 in the supplementary material).
Morpholino oligonucleotides and microinjection
The morpholino antisense oligonucleotides hAML1-MO
(5'-CTGGCATCTACGGGGATACGCATCA-3') and pu.1-MO
(5'-GATGATGTACCCCTCCATTCTGTAC-3') were obtained from Gene-Tools,
LLC. The Gata1-MO was purchased from Open Biosystems. For microinjection, 500
µM hAML1-MO, 200 µM pu.1-MO or 250 µM Gata1-MO in 0.3xDanieau's
buffer were prepared and injected as described
(Nasevicius and Ekker, 2000
).
For scl mRNA injection, scl mRNA was transcribed from
Danio rerio full-length IMAGE cDNA clone (catalog number MDR1734,
Open Biosystems) using SP6 mMESSAGE mMACHINE (Ambion), subjected to a Poly (A)
tailing reaction (Ambion), and was then injected at 100-200 ng/µl
concentrations.
Fluorescence microangiography
Fluorescence microangiography was performed as described
(Weinstein et al., 1995
).
Isolation of hematopoietic cells from zebrafish embryos
For embryos older than 26 hpf, hematopoietic cells were isolated as
follows. Anesthetized embryos were transferred into phosphate buffered saline
(PBS) containing 50 U/ml heparin, 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.006% tricaine.
Tails were excised posterior to the yolk extension using a scalpel, and blood
cells were extruded from the site of excision with the scalpel and collected
using a micropipette.
For embryos younger than 26 hpf, hematopoietic cells were isolated as
follows. Homozygous gata1-DsRed transgenic fish were crossed with
wild-type or Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) fish. Embryos were dechorionated and
deyolked as described (Westerfield,
2000
). The embryos were then rinsed in calcium-free Ringer's
solution (116 mM NaCl, 2.9 mM KCl and 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.2), and incubated in
0.05% Trypsin-EDTA solution (GIBCO) at 28.5°C for 30 minutes. Finally,
dissociated cells were rinsed with PBS and filtered through 40 µm meshes to
obtain a single cell suspension. The cell suspension was processed with a flow
cytometer and fluorescent cells were collected at the Massachusetts General
Hospital Flow Cytometry Core.
Cytology
For cytological analyses, blood cells collected from the zebrafish embryos
were transferred onto glass slides by cytospin and stained by Protocol®
Wright-Giemsa stain (Fisher Diagnostics) following the manufacturer's
instructions.
|
|
In situ hybridization
Digoxigenin-labeled antisense riboprobes for gata1, mpo, l-plastin,
scl, flk1, aml1, cmyb and c/ebp
were made according to
previous publications (Bennett et al.,
2001
; Burns et al.,
2005
; Lyons et al.,
2001
; Thompson et al.,
1998
). Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed as
described (Ransom et al.,
1996
).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Using an antisense morpholino oligonucleotide against AML1-ETO, we have confirmed that this phenotype is dependent on the induced expression of AML1-ETO (see Fig. S1 in the supplementary material). In addition, we find that inducing AML1-ETO expression after 21 hpf greatly diminishes its effect (see Fig. S2 in the supplementary material).
AML1-ETO transgenic zebrafish possess a functional cardiovascular system despite a lack of circulating cells
In order to determine whether the loss-of-circulation and blood cell
accumulation phenotypes are caused by cardiovascular defects in these embryos,
we first analyzed the expression of the endothelial lineage marker
flk1 at 21 and 36 hpf. We found that, at 21 hpf, flk1
expression is slightly decreased in Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos
(Fig. 2A). However, at 36 hpf,
there are no significant differences between the expression levels and
patterns of flk1 in wild-type embryos and those in
Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos (Fig.
2A). We also crossed Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) fish with an
endothelial reporter line carrying the fli1-EGFP transgene
(Lawson and Weinstein, 2002
)
and found that, in the double transgenic embryos, fli1-EGFP
expression is largely normal, except for a mildly reduced expression in the
intersomitic vessels and an expansion in the ventral tail region
(Fig. 2B). These results
indicate that, if vascular development is affected in
Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos, the defect is subtle. Finally, we employed
fluorescent microangiography to test cardiovascular structure and function,
and showed that fluorescein-coupled latex beads injected into the inflow tract
of the atrium are able to perfuse the whole vascular system of
Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos (Fig.
2C). These data indicate that Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos
possess functional hearts, as well as lumenized and patterned circulatory
systems. In contrast to our results, Kalev-Zylinska et al. have shown that
injections of DNA containing the AML1-ETO cDNA elicit a vascular
patterning defect (Kalev-Zylinska et al.,
2002
). The discrepancy between our results and those previously
reported may be due to differences in the timing and duration of
AML1-ETO expression in these two models.
|
|
Transcriptional changes in the blood of Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos parallel those observed in human AML
To test whether transcriptional profiles in the zebrafish AML1-ETO model
are similar to expression signatures of human AML, we performed microarray
analysis using blood cells from wild-type and Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO)
embryos isolated at 38-40 hpf. We found that the scl, gata1, cmyb,
nfe2 and znfn1a1 genes are downregulated in
Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) zebrafish blood
(Fig. 4). The scl,
gata1 and cmyb genes are all expressed in primitive erythroid
cells. The reduction of their expression is likely to reflect a reduction of
erythropoiesis in Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) zebrafish. Decreases in
SCL expression have also been shown in leukemia samples harboring the
t(8;21) translocation (Shimamoto et al.,
1995
). In addition, it has been shown that MYB expression
is downregulated in human AML patients but upregulated in acute lymphoblastic
leukemia (ALL) patients (Golub et al.,
1999
). The NFE2 and ZNFN1A1 (also called
Ikaros) genes, both involved in hematopoietic differentiation, are
downregulated by AML1-ETO in a human mononuclear cell line
(Alcalay et al., 2003
).
The lmo1, hoxa9, hoxa10, robo1 and caveolin 1 genes are
upregulated in Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) zebrafish blood
(Fig. 4). lmo1
upregulation by AML1-ETO has been shown in a cell culture study
(Alcalay et al., 2003
). In
addition, it has been shown that both HOXA9 and HOXA10 genes
are strongly upregulated in myeloid but not lymphoid leukemias
(Golub et al., 1999
;
Lawrence et al., 1995
).
Moreover, the upregulation of ROBO1 and Caveolin 1 have been
demonstrated as expression signatures of pediatric AML associated with
AML1-ETO (Ross et al.,
2004
).
|
|
AML1-ETO disrupts definitive hematopoiesis
In zebrafish, definitive hematopoiesis begins between 24-48 hpf, as the
hematopoietic stem cell markers aml1 and cmyb begin to be
expressed in the ventral wall of the dorsal aorta. It has been shown that
AML1-ETO disrupts definitive hematopoiesis in mice
(Okuda et al., 1998
;
Yergeau et al., 1997
). Thus,
we examined whether AML1-ETO also affects definitive hematopoiesis in
zebrafish. We incubated wild-type and Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos at
38°C for 1 hour at 18 hpf, and fixed the embryos at 33 hpf for
aml1 and cmyb in situ hybridization. Although both
aml1 and cmyb are expressed in wild-type embryos, they fail
to be expressed in Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos
(Fig. 5). These results
indicate that AML1-ETO disrupts definitive hematopoiesis in zebrafish
embryos.
AML1-ETO rapidly shuts down gata1 expression and converts erythropoiesis to granulopoiesis in the myeloerythroid progenitor cells
Next, we sought to understand how AML1-ETO exerts the observed
hematopoietic phenotype. Interestingly, the blood accumulation site in
Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos corresponds to the posterior blood island,
or intermediate cell mass (ICM) of zebrafish embryos. The ICM contains
multipotent MPCs capable of producing cells of the erythroid and myeloid
lineages. However, for reasons still to be identified, MPCs in the ICM
homogeneously express Gata1, a transcription factor essential for
erythropoiesis, and are developmentally programmed to adopt erythroid cell
fates (Galloway et al., 2005
;
Rhodes et al., 2005
). By in
situ hybridization, we found that gata1 expression is completely
abolished in the ICM region of Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos one hour
after AML1-ETO induction (Fig.
6A). The reduction in gata1 expression suggests that
AML1-ETO inhibits the normal erythropoietic process
(Fig. 6B). In addition, three
hours after we observed the downregulation of gata1, we detected
increased pu.1 expression in the ICM region of
Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos, as shown by an increase in the number and
intensity of the fluorescent cells in AML1-ETO and
zpu.1-EGFP double transgenic embryos
(Hsu et al., 2004
)
(Fig. 6A). Pu.1 is a master
regulator and marker of myeloid cells. Thus, these results suggest that
AML1-ETO reprograms the cell fate decision of many of the multipotent
hematopoietic progenitor cells, converting the erythroid cell fate to the
myeloid cell fate (Fig.
6B).
|
|
Moreover, it has been shown that the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein
(C/ebp
) plays a crucial role in the maturation of granulocytes, and
that human t(8;21) blasts express very low levels of CEBPA
(Pabst et al., 2001a
;
Pabst et al., 2001b
). We find
that hematopoietic cells in the trunk region of Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO)
embryos do not express C/ebp
(see Fig. S5 in the supplementary
material). Thus, the loss of cebpa expression may cause a defect in
the maturation of myeloblasts (Fig.
6B), resulting in the accumulation of hematopoietic blasts
observed in Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos
(Fig. 3).
AML1-ETO suppresses the monocytic cell fate
It has been shown that, in zebrafish embryos, injections of gata1
antisense morpholino oligonucleotides result in increased expression of
pu.1 and myelopoiesis in the ICM
(Galloway et al., 2005
;
Rhodes et al., 2005
). These
results suggest that pu.1 expression in the ICM is normally inhibited
by Gata1. Subsequently, the hematopoietic cells in the ICM of gata1
morpholino-injected embryos (morphants) express both the granulocytic cell
marker mpo and the monocytic cell marker l-plastin
(Galloway et al., 2005
;
Rhodes et al., 2005
). We have
shown that AML1-ETO also inhibits gata1 expression, leading to
increased expression of pu.1 (Fig.
6A). However, in Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos, the
accumulated hematopoietic cells in the ICM express only mpo and not
l-plastin. Thus, it is tempting to hypothesize that AML1-ETO actively
suppresses the specification of the monocytic cell fate in hematopoietic
progenitor cells. To test this hypothesis, we injected gata1
morpholinos into Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos and heat shocked half of
the injected embryos only to induce AML1-ETO expression. We find that
induced expression of AML1-ETO not only reduces l-plastin
expression in the gata1 morphants, but also enhances mpo
expression in these embryos (Fig.
7A). These effects can be seen in all of the embryos treated. In
addition, it has been shown that injections of chordin antisense
morpholino oligonucleotides result in an expanded pool of blood cells
consisting of mostly erythrocytes and some monocytes in the ICM
(Leung et al., 2005
). We find
that induced expression of AML1-ETO in the chordin morphants
also results in downregulation of gata1 and l-plastin, but
upregulation of mpo (see Fig. S6 in the supplementary material).
These data strongly suggest that AML1-ETO suppresses the monocytic cell fate
and promotes the granulocytic cell fate.
Interestingly, when we examined pu.1 expression, we found that
gata1 morphants express very high levels of pu.1, but
induced expression of AML1-ETO reduces the extent of pu.1
induction in gata1 morphants (Fig.
7A). Thus, pu.1 is kept at a moderate level of induction
in the ICM of Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos compared with that of
gata1 morphants. It has been shown that Pu.1 is expressed at
a higher level in monocytic cells than its level in granulocytic cells
(Dahl et al., 2003
). Thus, a
moderate level of pu.1 induction in Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos
may not be able to support the monocytic cell specification in these embryos.
To test whether this moderate level of pu.1 induction is required for
the MPCs to adopt the granulocytic cell fate in Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO)
embryos, we injected pu.1 morpholinos into Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO)
embryos. We found that expression of the granulocytic lineage marker
mpo in the ICM is reduced in pu.1 morphants, suggesting that
pu.1 expression is required for granulocytic cell specification in
Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos (Fig.
7B).
|
22 hpf), we
crossed wild-type and Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) fish to the
gata1-DsRed transgenic zebrafish line
(Traver et al., 2003
Overexpression of scl reverses the effects of AML1-ETO induction
The scl gene encodes a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription
factor involved in the specification of both hematopoietic and endothelial
cells (Gering et al., 1998
;
Liao et al., 1998
). It has
also been shown that Scl plays important roles in both primitive and
definitive hematopoiesis in mice and in zebrafish
(Begley and Green, 1999
). The
rapid and dramatic downregulation of scl observed in our microarray
analyses prompted us to investigate whether it mediates some of the early
effects of AML1-ETO expression. To confirm that scl is
downstream of AML1-ETO, we heat-shocked wild-type and
Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos at 18 hpf for 1 hour and harvested the
embryos 1 hour after the heat treatment for scl in situ
hybridization. As shown in Fig.
8A, scl expression is rapidly downregulated in
Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos. Interestingly, this downregulation seems to
be specific to hematopoietic cells in the ICM region, as scl
expression in the head (Fig.
8A, asterisk), which will contribute to both cranial vasculature
and primitive macrophages, in the trunk above the yolk
(Fig. 8A, arrowhead), which is
likely to be the precursors of the endothelium of the ducts of Cuvier, and in
the posterior tail region (Fig.
8A, arrow) is not affected
(Zhang and Rodaway, 2007
).
To investigate whether scl downregulation may mediate some of the early effects of AML1-ETO expression that we observed, we injected scl mRNA into Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos and induced AML1-ETO expression in these embryos. We found that injections of scl mRNA restores gata1 expression (in 47 out of 52 embryos injected; Fig. 8B). Next, we tested if scl expression could also rescue the effect of AML1-ETO on pu.1 and mpo expression. As shown in Fig. 8B,C, we found that injections of scl mRNA can abolish the upregulation of pu.1 and mpo in the presence of AML1-ETO expression (Fig. 8B, 39 out of 46 embryos injected; Fig. 8C, 20 out of 56 embryos injected). These data indicate that AML1-ETO leads to the downregulation of gata1 and the upregulation of pu.1 and mpo through scl, and that scl is an important mediator of the effect of AML1-ETO on the specification of multipotent hematopoietic progenitors.
Trichostatin A (TSA) suppresses the effect of AML1-ETO in zebrafish embryos
The recruitment of histone deacetylase (HDAC) by the ETO domain of AML1-ETO
is believed to play an important role in AML1-ETO-mediated pathogenesis
(Wang et al., 1999
). To test
whether the observed AML1-ETO effects can be suppressed pharmacologically, we
added TSA, an HDAC inhibitor, to the embryo media two hours before the heat
treatment. We found that 0.5 µM TSA blocks AML1-ETO-mediated downregulation
of both scl and gata1, as shown by in situ hybridization
(Fig. 9A,B). In addition,
adding 0.5 µM TSA to embryos before (data not shown) or after 1-hour heat
treatment also reverses the ability of AML1-ETO to induce the accumulation of
Mpo+ cells (Fig.
9C). These results indicate that the zebrafish AML1-ETO phenotype
may be dependent on HDAC activity. Moreover, the zebrafish AML1-ETO phenotype
can be reversed by treatment with small molecules and may enable facile
identification by high-throughput screens of novel compounds that suppress the
effect of AML1-ETO in vivo.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Induced expression of AML1-ETO in zebrafish results in an
accumulation of non-circulating hematopoietic cells. Our results suggest that
the loss-of-circulation phenotype is likely to be due to intrinsic defects in
hematopoietic cells rather than to a general disruption of cardiovascular
function. By histological analyses, we know that at least some hematopoietic
cells are able to leave their niche and enter the vasculature (data not
shown). In addition, we occasionally observe some circulating cells bypassing
a pool of non-circulating blood cells. Interestingly, granulocytic sarcomas
(chloromas or myeloblastomas) are a common clinical manifestation of t(8;21)
AML (Schwyzer et al., 1998
;
Tallman et al., 1993
).
Granulocytic sarcoma is a solid tumor composed of myeloblasts. In this
situation, the myeloblasts are very adhesive and have a high tendency to form
aggregates. Whether the blood cells in Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos are
more adhesive than those in wild-type embryos is not clear at present.
We show that induced expression of AML1-ETO results in
gata1 downregulation and pu.1 upregulation in multipotent
hematopoietic progenitor cells, suppressing erythropoiesis and promoting
myelopoiesis. These results corroborate the finding that AML1-ETO inhibits
erythropoiesis of purified human hematopoietic progenitor cells
(Choi et al., 2006
), and the
finding that it suppresses erythropoiesis and stimulates granulopoiesis in
mice (Schwieger et al., 2002
).
Our results indicate that the level of pu.1 expression is determined
by the ability of AML1-ETO to regulate both gata1 and pu.1.
AML1-ETO downregulates gata1. As a result, pu.1 is induced.
Conversely, AML1-ETO may directly suppress pu.1 expression. It has
been shown that AML1-ETO can bind to Pu.1 and inhibit its function
(Vangala et al., 2003
). Such
interaction may pose an inhibitory effect on the autoregulation of the
pu.1 gene (Chen et al.,
1995
). The ability of AML1-ETO to fine tune the level of
pu.1 induction is likely to be very important for its leukemogenic
effect. Supporting this idea, it has been shown that the hypomorphic allele,
but not the null allele, of the Pu.1 gene in mice leads to AML-like
phenotypes, suggesting the importance of Pu.1 gene dose in
leukemogenesis (Rosenbauer et al.,
2005
).
Although we demonstrate that AML1-ETO causes cell fate changes, converting erythropoiesis to myelopoiesis, there are clearly still some erythrocytes in Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos (Fig. 3). We have observed that both induced expression of AML1-ETO and the loss of gata1 expression last only for a few hours after the heat shock (data not shown). Thus, some hematopoietic cells may eventually commit to the erythroid cell fate as a result of the restoration of gata1 expression.
During primitive hematopoiesis, zebrafish mpo expression initiates
between 18 and 20 hpf, first in the ICM and then in the RBI. At 24 hpf,
myeloblasts can be identified morphologically only in the RBI and not in the
ICM, although granulocytes are reliably found in the circulation by 48 hpf
(Bennett et al., 2001
;
Lieschke et al., 2001
). The
source of these circulating granulocytes is not totally clear at this moment.
For example, it is not known whether the Mpo+ cells observed in the
ICM at 20 hpf can become mature in situ. In our model, induced expression of
AML1-ETO causes an enrichment of Mpo+ cells and morphologically
immature hematopoietic blasts in the ICM. The accumulation of hematopoietic
blasts is only partially reversed as AML1-ETO expression ceases (see
Fig. S3 in the supplementary material). What causes the long-lasting effect of
transient induction of AML1-ETO on the blockade of maturation of
these cells is not clear. It could be that these cells cannot migrate to the
environment that supports their maturation, that the environmental signals
that induce the maturation of these cells no longer exist, or that a factor
that is required for maturation, such as C/ebp
, can no longer be
expressed after AML1-ETO expression diminishes.
We were able to identify several early downstream targets of AML1-ETO by
isolating hematopoietic cells only two hours after the induction of
AML1-ETO expression. We show that induced expression of AML1-ETO
rapidly downregulates scl expression. Even though decreased
scl expression has been shown in t(8;21) leukemia samples, a direct
link between AML1-ETO and scl expression had not been
established previously (Shimamoto et al.,
1995
). We have not been able to identify potential Aml1 binding
sites upstream of the coding region of scl, indicating that AML1-ETO
may inhibit scl expression through binding with other factors.
Interestingly, the downregulation of scl is seen only in
hematopoietic progenitor cells and not in cells that will give rise to the
endothelial lineage in Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos. It has been shown
that the heat shock promoter used to drive the human AML1-ETO gene
results in ubiquitous expression upon induction
(Xiao et al., 2003
). Thus,
these results suggest that other hematopoietic-specific cofactors may be
required for AML1-ETO function.
Overexpression of scl can block the ability of AML1-ETO to reprogram hematopoietic cell fate, as shown by the reversal of gata1, pu.1 and mpo dysregulation in Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos. However, Scl-mediated rescue of the early effects of AML1-ETO on hematopoiesis does not completely rescue the circulation defect in Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryos. This may be because of additional defects caused by ubiquitous scl overexpression, or by non-Scl-mediated effects of AML1-ETO at later stages of development. Nevertheless, these results indicate that scl is an important effector that mediates the earliest observable effects of AML1-ETO in hematopoietic progenitor cells.
Induced expression of AML1-ETO in zebrafish embryos before 21 hpf disrupts definitive hematopoiesis but also enables us to study the in vivo effects of AML1-ETO in MPCs generated during primitive hematopoiesis. The transcriptional profile of Tg(hsp:AML1-ETO) embryo blood at 40 hpf presents expressional signatures of human AML, suggesting that the regulatory mechanisms of cell specification and maturation in these cells resemble those in progenitors of adult human blood. However, MPCs in zebrafish embryos may not have the self-renewal capability that is also essential for leukemogenesis. Thus, the effects of AML1-ETO on the self-renewal capability of hematopoietic progenitor cells may not be accessible using this model. Additionally, in humans and mice, AML1-ETO is not sufficient to induce leukemia in the absence of secondary mutations, so the blast cells observed in AML1-ETO-expressing fish are unlikely to possess full leukemogenic potential. In future studies, it will be interesting to combine AML1-ETO expression with known collaborating mutations, and to characterize the effects of AML1-ETO expression in hematopoietic stem cells by inducing AML1-ETO expression at later stages of development, or in adults.
Understanding the molecular mechanisms by which AML1-ETO exerts its
influence on hematopoietic progenitor cells may help us develop targeted
therapeutics. For example, compounds that block SCL or GATA1
downregulation in the presence of AML1-ETO expression may prove useful in
treating AML associated with t(8;21) translocation. It has been shown that
compounds that enhance Cebpa (C/ebp
) transcriptional activity
induce differentiation of AML cell lines
(Jiang et al., 2005
).
Moreover, high-throughput screening is feasible in the zebrafish
(Yeh and Crews, 2003
;
Zon and Peterson, 2005
). We
have shown that some of the effects of AML1-ETO can be suppressed by a histone
deacetylase inhibitor Trichostatin A. Therefore, in addition to the
fundamental insights into the mechanism of AML1-ETO function already provided
by this model, it may ultimately provide a unique opportunity to conduct
whole-organism chemical suppressor screens to identify compounds that can
reverse AML1-ETO function in vivo.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material for this article is available at
http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/135/2/401/DC1
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Alcalay, M., Meani, N., Gelmetti, V., Fantozzi, A., Fagioli, M., Orleth, A., Riganelli, D., Sebastiani, C., Cappelli, E., Casciari, C. et al. (2003). Acute myeloid leukemia fusion proteins deregulate genes involved in stem cell maintenance and DNA repair. J. Clin. Invest. 112,1751 -1761.[CrossRef][Medline]
Begley, C. G. and Green, A. R. (1999). The SCL
gene: from case report to critical hematopoietic regulator.
Blood 93,2760
-2770.
Bennett, C. M., Kanki, J. P., Rhodes, J., Liu, T. X., Paw, B.
H., Kieran, M. W., Langenau, D. M., Delahaye-Brown, A., Zon, L. I., Fleming,
M. D. et al. (2001). Myelopoiesis in the zebrafish, Danio
rerio. Blood 98,643
-651.
Bonnet, D. and Dick, J. E. (1997). Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat. Med. 3, 730-737.[CrossRef][Medline]
Borregaard, N., Theilgaard-Monch, K., Sorensen, O. E. and Cowland, J. B. (2001). Regulation of human neutrophil granule protein expression. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 8, 23-27.[CrossRef][Medline]
Burns, C. E., Traver, D., Mayhall, E., Shepard, J. L. and Zon,
L. I. (2005). Hematopoietic stem cell fate is established by
the Notch-Runx pathway. Genes Dev.
19,2331
-2342.
Chen, H., Ray-Gallet, D., Zhang, P., Hetherington, C. J., Gonzalez, D. A., Zhang, D. E., Moreau-Gachelin, F. and Tenen, D. G. (1995). PU.1 (Spi-1) autoregulates its expression in myeloid cells. Oncogene 11,1549 -1560.[Medline]
Choi, Y., Elagib, K. E., Delehanty, L. L. and Goldfarb, A.
N. (2006). Erythroid inhibition by the leukemic fusion
AML1-ETO is associated with impaired acetylation of the major erythroid
transcription factor GATA-1. Cancer Res.
66,2990
-2996.
Dahl, R., Walsh, J. C., Lancki, D., Laslo, P., Iyer, S. R., Singh, H. and Simon, M. C. (2003). Regulation of macrophage and neutrophil cell fates by the PU.1:C/EBPalpha ratio and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Nat. Immunol. 4,1029 -1036.[CrossRef][Medline]
Davidson, A. J. and Zon, L. I. (2004). The `definitive' (and `primitive') guide to zebrafish hematopoiesis. Oncogene 23,7233 -7246.[CrossRef][Medline]
de Guzman, C. G., Warren, A. J., Zhang, Z., Gartland, L.,
Erickson, P., Drabkin, H., Hiebert, S. W. and Klug, C. A.
(2002). Hematopoietic stem cell expansion and distinct myeloid
developmental abnormalities in a murine model of the AML1-ETO translocation.
Mol. Cell. Biol. 22,5506
-5517.
Downing, J. R. (1999). The AML1-ETO chimaeric transcription factor in acute myeloid leukaemia: biology and clinical significance. Br. J. Haematol. 106,296 -308.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fenske, T. S., Pengue, G., Mathews, V., Hanson, P. T., Hamm, S.
E., Riaz, N. and Graubert, T. A. (2004). Stem cell expression
of the AML1/ETO fusion protein induces a myeloproliferative disorder in mice.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101,15184
-15189.
Galloway, J. L., Wingert, R. A., Thisse, C., Thisse, B. and Zon, L. I. (2005). Loss of gata1 but not gata2 converts erythropoiesis to myelopoiesis in zebrafish embryos. Dev. Cell 8,109 -116.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gering, M., Rodaway, A. R., Gottgens, B., Patient, R. K. and Green, A. R. (1998). The SCL gene specifies haemangioblast development from early mesoderm. EMBO J. 17,4029 -4045.[CrossRef][Medline]
Golub, T. R., Slonim, D. K., Tamayo, P., Huard, C., Gaasenbeek,
M., Mesirov, J. P., Coller, H., Loh, M. L., Downing, J. R., Caligiuri, M. A.
et al. (1999). Molecular classification of cancer: class
discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring.
Science 286,531
-537.
Hsu, K., Traver, D., Kutok, J. L., Hagen, A., Liu, T. X., Paw,
B. H., Rhodes, J., Berman, J. N., Zon, L. I., Kanki, J. P. et al.
(2004). The pu.1 promoter drives myeloid gene expression in
zebrafish. Blood 104,1291
-1297.
Jiang, Y., Xue, Z. H., Shen, W. Z., Du, K. M., Yan, H., Yu, Y., Peng, Z. G., Song, M. G., Tong, J. H., Chen, Z. et al. (2005). Desferrioxamine induces leukemic cell differentiation potentially by hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha that augments transcriptional activity of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-alpha. Leukemia 19,1239 -1247.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kalev-Zylinska, M. L., Horsfield, J. A., Flores, M. V., Postlethwait, J. H., Vitas, M. R., Baas, A. M., Crosier, P. S. and Crosier, K. E. (2002). Runx1 is required for zebrafish blood and vessel development and expression of a human RUNX1-CBF2T1 transgene advances a model for studies of leukemogenesis. Development 129,2015 -2030.[Medline]
Kimmel, C. B., Ballard, W. W., Kimmel, S. R., Ullmann, B. and Schilling, T. F. (1995). Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 203,253 -310.[Medline]
Lawrence, H. J., Sauvageau, G., Ahmadi, N., Lopez, A. R., LeBeau, M. M., Link, M., Humphries, K. and Largman, C. (1995). Stage- and lineage-specific expression of the HOXA10 homeobox gene in normal and leukemic hematopoietic cells. Exp. Hematol. 23,1160 -1166.[Medline]
Lawson, N. D. and Weinstein, B. M. (2002). In vivo imaging of embryonic vascular development using transgenic zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 248,307 -318.[CrossRef][Medline]
Leung, A. Y., Mendenhall, E. M., Kwan, T. T., Liang, R., Eckfeldt, C., Chen, E., Hammerschmidt, M., Grindley, S., Ekker, S. C. and Verfaillie, C. M. (2005). Characterization of expanded intermediate cell mass in zebrafish chordin morphant embryos. Dev. Biol. 277,235 -254.[CrossRef][Medline]
Liao, E. C., Paw, B. H., Oates, A. C., Pratt, S. J.,
Postlethwait, J. H. and Zon, L. I. (1998). SCL/Tal-1
transcription factor acts downstream of cloche to specify hematopoietic and
vascular progenitors in zebrafish. Genes Dev.
12,621
-626.
Licht, J. D. (2001). AML1 and the AML1-ETO fusion protein in the pathogenesis of t (8;21) AML. Oncogene 20,5660 -5679.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lieschke, G. J., Oates, A. C., Crowhurst, M. O., Ward, A. C. and
Layton, J. E. (2001). Morphologic and functional
characterization of granulocytes and macrophages in embryonic and adult
zebrafish. Blood 98,3087
-3096.
Lutterbach, B. and Hiebert, S. W. (2000). Role of the transcription factor AML-1 in acute leukemia and hematopoietic differentiation. Gene 245,223 -235.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lyons, S. E., Shue, B. C., Lei, L., Oates, A. C., Zon, L. I. and Liu, P. P. (2001). Molecular cloning, genetic mapping, and expression analysis of four zebrafish c/ebp genes. Gene 281,43 -51.[CrossRef][Medline]
Miyamoto, T., Weissman, I. L. and Akashi, K.
(2000). AML1/ETO-expressing nonleukemic stem cells in acute
myelogenous leukemia with 8;21 chromosomal translocation. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97,7521
-7526.
Nasevicius, A. and Ekker, S. C. (2000). Effective targeted gene `knockdown' in zebrafish. Nat. Genet. 26,216 -220.[CrossRef][Medline]
Okuda, T., Cai, Z., Yang, S., Lenny, N., Lyu, C. J., van
Deursen, J. M., Harada, H. and Downing, J. R. (1998).
Expression of a knocked-in AML1-ETO leukemia gene inhibits the establishment
of normal definitive hematopoiesis and directly generates dysplastic
hematopoietic progenitors. Blood
91,3134
-3143.
Pabst, T., Mueller, B. U., Harakawa, N., Schoch, C., Haferlach, T., Behre, G., Hiddemann, W., Zhang, D. E. and Tenen, D. G. (2001a). AML1-ETO downregulates the granulocytic differentiation factor C/EBPalpha in t (8;21) myeloid leukemia. Nat. Med. 7,444 -451.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pabst, T., Mueller, B. U., Zhang, P., Radomska, H. S., Narravula, S., Schnittger, S., Behre, G., Hiddemann, W. and Tenen, D. G. (2001b). Dominant-negative mutations of CEBPA, encoding CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha (C/EBPalpha), in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat. Genet. 27,263 -270.[CrossRef][Medline]
Palis, J., Chan, R. J., Koniski, A., Patel, R., Starr, M. and
Yoder, M. C. (2001). Spatial and temporal emergence of high
proliferative potential hematopoietic precursors during murine embryogenesis.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98,4528
-4533.
Peterson, L. F. and Zhang, D. E. (2004). The 8;21 translocation in leukemogenesis. Oncogene 23,4255 -4262.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ransom, D. G., Haffter, P., Odenthal, J., Brownlie, A., Vogelsang, E., Kelsh, R. N., Brand, M., van Eeden, F. J., Furutani-Seiki, M., Granato, M. et al. (1996). Characterization of zebrafish mutants with defects in embryonic hematopoiesis. Development 123,311 -319.[Abstract]
Rhodes, J., Hagen, A., Hsu, K., Deng, M., Liu, T. X., Look, A. T. and Kanki, J. P. (2005). Interplay of pu.1 and gata1 determines myelo-erythroid progenitor cell fate in zebrafish. Dev. Cell 8,97 -108.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rosenbauer, F., Koschmieder, S., Steidl, U. and Tenen, D. G.
(2005). Effect of transcription-factor concentrations on leukemic
stem cells. Blood 106,1519
-1524.
Ross, M. E., Mahfouz, R., Onciu, M., Liu, H. C., Zhou, X., Song,
G., Shurtleff, S. A., Pounds, S., Cheng, C., Ma, J. et al.
(2004). Gene expression profiling of pediatric acute myelogenous
leukemia. Blood 104,3679
-3687.
Schwieger, M., Lohler, J., Friel, J., Scheller, M., Horak, I.
and Stocking, C. (2002). AML1-ETO inhibits maturation of
multiple lymphohematopoietic lineages and induces myeloblast transformation in
synergy with ICSBP deficiency. J. Exp. Med.
196,1227
-1240.
Schwyzer, R., Sherman, G. G., Cohn, R. J., Poole, J. E. and Willem, P. (1998). Granulocytic sarcoma in children with acute myeloblastic leukemia and t (8;21). Med. Pediatr. Oncol. 31,144 -149.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shimada, H., Ichikawa, H., Nakamura, S., Katsu, R., Iwasa, M.,
Kitabayashi, I. and Ohki, M. (2000). Analysis of genes under
the downstream control of the t (8;21) fusion protein AML1-MTG8:
overexpression of the TIS11b (ERF-1, cMG1) gene induces myeloid cell
proliferation in response to G-CSF. Blood
96,655
-663.
Shimamoto, T., Ohyashiki, K., Ohyashiki, J. H., Kawakubo, K.,
Fujimura, T., Iwama, H., Nakazawa, S. and Toyama, K. (1995).
The expression pattern of erythrocyte/megakaryocyte-related transcription
factors GATA-1 and the stem cell leukemia gene correlates with hematopoietic
differentiation and is associated with outcome of acute myeloid leukemia.
Blood 86,3173
-3180.
Stone, R. M., O'Donnell, M. R. and Sekeres, M. A. (2004). Acute myeloid leukemia. Hematology Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program 2004,98 -117.
Tallman, M. S., Hakimian, D., Shaw, J. M., Lissner, G. S., Russell, E. J. and Variakojis, D. (1993). Granulocytic sarcoma is associated with the 8;21 translocation in acute myeloid leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 11,690 -697.[Abstract]
Tenen, D. G. (2003). Disruption of differentiation in human cancer: AML shows the way. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3,89 -101.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thompson, M. A., Ransom, D. G., Pratt, S. J., MacLennan, H., Kieran, M. W., Detrich, H. W., 3rd, Vail, B., Huber, T. L., Paw, B., Brownlie, A. J. et al. (1998). The cloche and spadetail genes differentially affect hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis. Dev. Biol. 197,248 -269.[CrossRef][Medline]
Traver, D., Paw, B. H., Poss, K. D., Penberthy, W. T., Lin, S. and Zon, L. I. (2003). Transplantation and in vivo imaging of multilineage engraftment in zebrafish bloodless mutants. Nat. Immunol. 4,1238 -1246.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vangala, R. K., Heiss-Neumann, M. S., Rangatia, J. S., Singh, S.
M., Schoch, C., Tenen, D. G., Hiddemann, W. and Behre, G.
(2003). The myeloid master regulator transcription factor PU.1 is
inactivated by AML1-ETO in t (8;21) myeloid leukemia.
Blood 101,270
-277.
Wang, J., Saunthararajah, Y., Redner, R. L. and Liu, J. M.
(1999). Inhibitors of histone deacetylase relieve ETO-mediated
repression and induce differentiation of AML1-ETO leukemia cells.
Cancer Res. 59,2766
-2769.
Weinstein, B. M., Stemple, D. L., Driever, W. and Fishman, M. C. (1995). Gridlock, a localized heritable vascular patterning defect in the zebrafish. Nat. Med. 1,1143 -1147.[CrossRef][Medline]
Westerfield, M. (2000). The Zebrafish Book. A Guide for the Laboratory use of Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Eugene: University of Oregon Press.
Xiao, T., Shoji, W., Zhou, W., Su, F. and Kuwada, J. Y.
(2003). Transmembrane sema4E guides branchiomotor axons to their
targets in zebrafish. J. Neurosci.
23,4190
-4198.