spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 3


Fig. 3. Alteration of bone formation and resorption in Bmpr1a cKO mice. (A) QRT-PCR for bone formation markers (Runx2, Sp7, Ibsp, Akp2 and Bglap2 using E16.5 and E18.5 calvariae). Values are expressed relative to wild type at E16.5. (B) QRT-PCR for bone resorption markers expressed by osteoclasts (Mmp9, Ctsk and Trap), and Rankl and Opg expressed by osteoblasts using E18.5 and E19.5 calvariae. Values are expressed relative to wild type at E18.5. (C) Relative ratio of Rankl to Opg expression levels calculated from Fig. 3B. Values are expressed relative to wild type at E18.5. (D) Evaluation of osteoclast activity by TRAP staining using E18.5 calvariae. The positive cells localized randomly in cKO calvariae compared with wild type (left two panels, red arrows). The percent of TRAP-positive cells per total cells in bone area detected by DAPI was significantly reduced in cKO calvariae (wild type, 13.9%; cKO, 6.4%, right panel). Scale bars: 50 µm. (E) QRT-PCR for BMP type I receptors (Bmpr1b, Acvr1), type II receptors (Bmpr2, Acvr2a and Acvr2b) and potential ligands for these receptors (Bmp2, Bmp4, Bmp6 and Bmp7) using E18.5 calvariae. Values in A-E represent mean±s.d. from a minimum of three independent experiments using wild-type and cKO bones. Student's t-test; *P<0.05.





Right arrow Return to article