|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Files in this Data Supplement:
Fig. S1. Expression of patterning genes in wing discs with uniform Dpp pathway activity. (A,B) Triple stainings for wg, ptc-lacZ and pH-H3 in wild-type (A) and C765>dpp (B) discs. Uniform Dpp signaling leads to an expanded wing pouch, as demonstrated by the ring of Wg staining. Thus, the wing pouch in such discs overlaps with the medial and lateral areas defined in Fig. 3B. ptc-lacZ staining indicates that Hedgehog signaling is not altered in C765>dpp discs. (C,D) omb-lacZ expression in wild-type (C) and C765>dpp (D) discs. The latter genotype shows extensive misexpression of omb. (E-G) vg expression in wild-type (E), C765>dpp (F) and dpp12/14;brkXA double-mutant (G) discs. The vg expression domain is expanded in the overgrowing discs (E,F). (H-J) sal expression in wild-type (H), C765>dpp (I) and dpp12/14;brkXA double-mutant (J) discs. The sal domain widens into the expanded wing pouch similarly in C765>dpp and dpp12/14;brkXA double-mutant discs. The rate of sal transcription within its expression domain depends in part on a direct Dpp input (Marty et al., 2000; Barrio and de Celis, 2004). This effect explains the minor differences in the expression levels seen in I and J. Scale bars: 50 µm in A-J.
References
Barrio, R. and de Celis, J. F. (2004). Regulation of spalt expression in the Drosophila wing blade in response to the Decapentaplegic signaling pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6021-6026.
Fig. S2. Comparison of cell proliferation and disc size between wild-type discs and discs with altered Dpp pathway activity during the mid-third instar stage. (A,B) Wild-type (A) and C765>dpp (B) discs dissected 96 hours AEL stained for pMad and pH-H3. Slight differences in the proliferation rate of medial and lateral cells can already be seen in C765>dpp discs at that stage. (C,D) Wild-type (C) and C765>dpp (D) discs 96 hours AEL assayed for proliferation with BrdU. Uniform proliferation seen in wild-type discs is lost in C765>dpp discs. (E) The size of wild-type discs compared with C765>dpp discs 96 hours AEL. Wild type, n=18; C765>dpp, n=21. Error bars indicate the 95% CIs. Scale bars: 50 µm.
Fig. S3. Uniform activation of the Dpp pathway by TkvQ235D leads to disc overgrowth with enhanced proliferation rates in the lateral areas as compared with the medial area. (A) C765>tkvQ235D disc. BrdU staining reveals enhanced proliferation in the lateral region compared with the medial region. (B) Disc from esg>tkvQ235D animal. Again, BrdU staining is elevated in the lateral region. (C) The size of C765>tkvQ235D discs and esg>tkvQ235D discs. Discs of both genotypes overgrow to the same extent as discs in which dpp was uniformly expressed (compare with Fig. 4C). C765>tkvQ235D, n=11; esg>tkvQ235D, n=28. Error bars represent 95% CIs. Scale bars: 50 µm.
Fig. S4. The disc size depends on brk levels. (A,B) Discs of C765>brk (A) and C765>brk,tkvQ235D (B) animals. GFP expression shows the C765-Gal4 driver activity. (C) The size of discs of the two genotypes. Note that the difference in size, as compared with the equivalent experiment conducted with the esg-Gal4 driver (esg>brk and esg>brk,dpp), is due to the later onset of expression of the C765-Gal4 driver. C765>brk discs, n=30; C765>brk,tkvQ235D discs, n=19. Error bars represent 95%CIs. Scale bars: 50 µm.
Fig. S5. Graded Dpp pathway activity levels in the medial area of the wing disc are not required to drive cell proliferation. (A-A′′) Third instar wing disc of larvae expressing tkvQ235D under the omb-Gal4 driver. Gal80ts inhibited tkvQ235D expression during embryogenesis; 24 hours AEL, larvae were shifted for 96 hours to the permissive temperature (29°C). The inset in A shows a second instar disc expressing tkvQ235D and GFP under the omb-Gal4 driver. Gal4 function was inhibited during early embryogenesis by the Gal80ts system; 24 hours AEL, embryos were shifted for 48 hours from 18°C to 29°C. Note that although the Dpp pathway was uniformly activated within the omb expression domain (indicated by pMad staining in A), proliferation was uniform (see BrdU staining in A′), and significant growth did occur during wing disc development (compare omb expression domain between second instar and third instar discs).
| ||||||||||||||||||||