spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 2


Fig. 2. Observation of Rex1-GFP/Oct3/4-CFP double knock-in ES cells by microscopy and flow cytometry. (A-H) Morphology and fluorescence of colonies of Oct3/4+/Rex1+ and Oct3/4+/Rex1- cells in culture of Rex1-GFP/Oct3/4+-CFP double-knock-in ES cell line under puromycin selection (selection for cells expressing Oct3/4). (A,C,F) GFP fluorescence, (D,G) CFP fluorescence and (B,E,H) bright field. (A,B) Low magnification of knock-in ES cells. A small number of GFP (Rex1)-negative cells was observed. Arrows in B indicate colonies of Rex1-/Oct3/4+ (GFP-) cells. (C,D,E) High magnification of colonies in which Rex1+ cells were dominant. (F,G,H) High magnification of colonies in which Rex1- cells were dominant. (I,J) Result of analysis of knock-in cells by flow cytometry. (I) Comparison of GFP fluorescence of Rex1-knock in cells with the parental cell line (OLC2-1). (J) GFP fluorescence of Rex1 knock-in cells disappeared within 3 days when differentiated by withdrawal of LIF. (K) Rex1 knock-in cells were stained with anti-PECAM-1 monoclonal antibody conjugated with PE and analyzed by flow cytometry. Most GFP-positive cells reacted with PECAM-1 antibodies. Scale bars: 50 µm.





Right arrow Return to article