spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 15 April 2009
doi: 10.1242/dev.030742

Development 136, 1697-1706 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.030742v1
136/10/1697    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cortes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cortes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, N. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Sulfation of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans is necessary for proper Indian hedgehog signaling in the developing growth plate

Mauricio Cortes1, Alexis T. Baria2 and Nancy B. Schwartz1,2,*

1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
2 Department of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: n-schwartz{at}uchicago.edu)

Accepted 10 March 2009


   SUMMARY
TOP
 SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In contrast to the functional role of heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), the importance of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) in modulating signaling pathways involving hedgehog proteins, wingless-related proteins and fibroblast growth factors remains unclear. To elucidate the importance of sulfated CSPGs in signaling paradigms required for endochondral bone formation, the brachymorphic (bm) mouse was used as a model for undersulfated CSPGs. The bm mouse exhibits a postnatal chondrodysplasia caused by a mutation in the phosphoadenosine phosphosulfate (PAPS) synthetase (Papss2) gene, leading to reduced levels of PAPS and undersulfated proteoglycans. Biochemical analysis of the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content in bm cartilage via sulfate labeling and fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis revealed preferential undersulfation of chondroitin chains (CS) and normal sulfation of heparan sulfate chains. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analysis of bm limb growth plates showed diminished Indian hedgehog (Ihh) signaling and abnormal Ihh protein distribution in the extracellular matrix. Consistent with the decrease in hedgehog signaling, BrdU incorporation exhibited a significant reduction in chondrocyte proliferation. Direct measurements of Ihh binding to defined GAG chains demonstrated that Ihh interacts with CS, particularly chondroitin-4-sulfate. Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that Ihh binds to the major cartilage CSPG aggrecan via its CS chains. Overall, this study demonstrates an important function for CSPGs in modulating Ihh signaling in the developing growth plate, and highlights the importance of carbohydrate sulfation in regulating growth factor signaling.

Key words: PAPS, GAG, Proteoglycan, CSPG, Ihh, Chondrocyte, Proliferation, Sulfation, Brachymorphic mouse


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 SUMMARY
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Endochondral bone formation is a complex developmental process that begins with differentiation of mesenchymal cells to chondroblasts, which then undergo a period of proliferation followed by exit from the cell cycle and terminal differentiation, first to pre-hypertrophic and then to hypertrophic chondrocytes. The latter undergo programmed cell death and are replaced by osteoblasts, which commence the transition to bone (Karsenty and Wagner, 2002Go). Several signaling molecules including Indian hedgehog (Ihh), parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP; Pthlp – Mouse Genome Informatics), fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), Wnt proteins and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), function in concert to tightly regulate this multistep process leading to endochondral bone formation (Kronenberg, 2003Go). Disruption of any of these signaling pathways results in defects in growth plate development (Karsenty and Wagner, 2002Go).

Ihh signaling is essential for normal chondrocyte maturation, regulating both proliferation and differentiation (St-Jacques et al., 1999Go). Ihh delays the onset of hypertrophy by inducing expression of PTHrP, which in turn signals to proliferative chondrocytes, preventing them from entering hypertrophy (Lanske et al., 1996Go). Ihh also regulates proliferation of chondrocytes independently of PTHrP, by directly controlling the rate of cell division of columnar/proliferative chondrocytes (Long et al., 2001Go), and by regulating transition of periarticular (resting) to proliferative chondrocytes (Kobayashi et al., 2005Go).

The mechanism of Ihh signaling is not clear, but there is evidence to suggest that Ihh can act both as a short and long-range morphogen (Chen et al., 2004Go; Gritli-Linde et al., 2001Go), despite being palmitoylated and cholesterol-modified (Pepinsky et al., 1998Go; Porter et al., 1996Go). It is postulated that Ihh moves through the extracellular matrix (ECM) to reach its target cells by forming multimeric aggregates (Chen et al., 2004Go; Vyas et al., 2008Go) or by association with lipoprotein particles known as argosomes (Eaton, 2006Go; Panakova et al., 2005Go).

The ECM is a complex micro-environment that is integral for proper cell-cell and cell-growth factor interactions, but the contribution of the ECM to regulating cell function is poorly understood. Proteoglycans are a major class of ECM molecules, comprised of protein-bound carbohydrate chains termed glycosaminoglycans (Schwartz, 2000Go) that play a pivotal role in regulating cell signaling (Hacker et al., 2005Go). Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) are two major classes of proteoglycans, differentiated by their GAG compositions and sulfation patterns (Habuchi et al., 2004Go). The importance of HSPGs in development and their role in regulating various signaling molecules, including hedgehog (Hh), have been described in several systems in fly and mouse (Bellaiche et al., 1998Go; Hacker et al., 1997Go; Lin et al., 1999Go; Lin and Perrimon, 1999Go; Paine-Saunders et al., 2000Go; Toyoda et al., 2000Go). In Drosophila, deletion of the gene tout-velu, which encodes a HS polymerizing enzyme, leads to abnormal signaling and restricted distribution of Hh (Bellaiche et al., 1998Go). In mouse, a hypomorphic mutation of Ext1 (mouse homolog of tout-velu) results in increased Ihh distribution in the growth plate (Koziel et al., 2004Go). Furthermore, biochemical studies have shown that Hh proteins bind HS (Zhang et al., 2007Go) via a conserved stretch of basic amino acids in the N-terminal region of all Hh proteins (Cardin and Weintraub, 1989Go; Rubin et al., 2002Go).

In contrast to HSPGs, the function of CSPGs (which are often the more abundant proteoglycans in tissues) in development is not well understood. Absence of the CSPG aggrecan, in both the nanomelic (nm) chicken and the cartilage-matrix-deficient mouse (cmd), results in lethal phenotypes that are characterized by altered growth plate architecture and significant reduction in the sizes of cartilaginous elements (Kimata et al., 1981Go; Krueger et al., 1999Go; Li et al., 1993Go; Schwartz and Domowicz, 2002Go; Watanabe et al., 1994Go). Despite the severe chondrodystrophies displayed by these aggrecan-deficient models, the underlying mechanisms responsible for the observed phenotypes have not been elucidated. An ES cell gene-trap screen for target genes of BMP signaling showed that chondroitin-4-sulfotransferase (C4st1)-deficient mice have a severe chondrodysplasia that is characterized by global reduction in chondroitin sulfate (CS) content in the growth plate and by increased TGFβ signaling (Kluppel et al., 2005Go). Interestingly, a recent gene trap mutant (JAWS) encoding a putative nucleotidase had a severe chondrodysplasia characterized by undersulfation of CS chains and abnormal synovial joint positioning (Sohaskey et al., 2008Go). These findings suggest that CSPGs are involved in regulating endochondral bone development, and, more importantly, provide evidence that sulfation of GAG chains is crucial for normal CSPG function.

HSPGs and CSPGs are highly sulfated molecules, and undersulfation of HSPGs results in Wnt and Hh signaling defects in Drosophila, as seen in the sulfateless (Sfl) mutant (Lin and Perrimon, 1999Go). To elucidate the importance of CS in endochondral bone formation, we are taking advantage of the brachymorphic (bm) mouse (Sugahara and Schwartz, 1979Go; Sugahara and Schwartz, 1982aGo; Sugahara and Schwartz, 1982bGo). The bm mouse has a mutation in the gene Papss2, which encodes PAPS synthetase 2 (PAPSS2), one of two isoforms in mammals that catalyze the synthesis of the universal sulfate donor PAPS (Kurima et al., 1998Go), thus resulting in severe undersulfation of CSPGs (Orkin et al., 1976Go). The bm mouse is characterized by a dome-shaped skull, short thick tail and shortened limbs (Lane and Dickie, 1968Go; Schwartz and Domowicz, 2002Go; Schwartz et al., 1978Go). At birth, bm mice are the same size as wild-type (wt) littermates, but as development proceeds, a limb defect becomes apparent at postnatal day 3. By maturity, bm mice exhibit 50% reduction of limb length and 25% reduction in axial skeleton length (Kurima et al., 1998Go). Histological studies of bm limbs revealed normally organized growth plates with reduction of both the columnar/proliferative and hypertrophic zones concomitant with undersulfation of CSPGs (Orkin et al., 1976Go; Schwartz et al., 1978Go).

In the present study, detailed analysis of the bm growth plate revealed normal HS sulfation and preferential undersulfation of CSPGs, as well as reduced Ihh signaling and abnormal Hh protein distribution. Direct evidence that Ihh binds sulfated CSPGs, specifically aggrecan, suggests a mechanism in which CSPGs together with HSPGs modulate Ihh signaling by controlling the distribution of secreted Ihh across the ECM. This is the first study to demonstrate a role for CSPGs in modulating Hh signaling and provides an explanation for how Ihh can act as a long-range morphogen by its interaction with ECM proteoglycans.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 SUMMARY
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Immunohistochemistry
Postnatal day 6 limbs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) overnight at 4°C. Paraffin sections (6 µm) were treated with 0.5 U/ml chondroitinase ABC (Seikagaku), and stained with anti-HS (10E4), anti-CS-4 (2-B-6), anti-CS-6 (3-B-3) and anti-CS-0 (1-B-5) (Seikagaku) diluted 1:100. Paraffin-embedded sections were treated with hyaluronidase (Sigma-Aldrich), incubated with anti-Ihh antibody (R&D systems, 1:50), and signal amplification and detection performed using fluorescent tyramide signal amplification (Perkin Elmer) as previously described (Gritli-Linde et al., 2001Go).

Sulfate labeling and GAG analysis
Day 6 wild-type or bm cartilage (100 mg) was incubated for 24 hours in 200 µCi/ml [S35]H2SO4 then homogenized in 0.5 M guanidine. Proteoglycans were purified by cesium chloride density gradient centrifugation, extensively dialyzed against 100 mM amonium acetate (pH 7.0) and digested with either chondroitinase ABC (1 U/ml) or heparatinase (0.5 U/ml). Digested proteoglycan samples were TCA/PTA precipitated to quantitate label released and retained after each digestion. Counts were normalized for total protein, and data from three independent experiments was analyzed using GraphPad Prism 4 software.

Fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (FACE)
FACE was performed as previously described (Calabro et al., 2000aGo; Calabro et al., 2000bGo; Calabro et al., 2001Go) with minor modifications. Briefly, 100 mg of day 6 wild-type or bm cartilage was digested with proteinase K, then digested with either 100 mU/ml of heparatinase (Glyko) or chondroitinase ABC. Disaccharide products were fluorescently labeled with 2-AMAC (Invitrogen). Disaccharide standards for HS/CS (Seikagaku) were labeled as described. Samples were electrophoresed in monosaccharide composition gels (Glyko) at 4°C at a constant current of 60 mA for 40 minutes, and quantified using the Bio-Rad ChemiDoc XRS imaging system. Three independent triplicate-sample experiments were performed and the data analyzed using GraphPad Prism 4.

RNA in situ hybridization
Hind limbs of wild-type and bm day 6 mice were perfused with and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Gelatin sections (40 µm) were mounted on silane-treated slides and processed as previously described (Domowicz et al., 2008Go). Probes were generated from the following mouse cDNA fragments: Col10a1 (3'UTR 1-280bp), Ihh (bp1-606), Ptch1 (bp3581-4276), Fgfr3 (bp1114-1740), Pthr1 (bp1100-1776) and Acan (4083-4652bp).

RNA preparation and Northern blot hybridization
Total RNA was extracted from wild-type and bm day 6 articular cartilage using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. To reduce proteoglycan contamination and prevent RNA degradation, RNA was precipitated with isopropanol/sodium citrate, resuspended in formamide and quantified using the RiboGreen RNA kit (Invitrogen). Northern blot hybridization was performed as previously described (Domowicz et al., 2008Go).

Semi-quantitative RT-PCR
OneStep RT-PCR mix (Qiagen) was used to amplify target RT-PCR fragments according to the manufacturer's protocol, using 0.5 µg of total wild-type or bm day 6 cartilage RNA. Cycling parameters for each PCR fragment were optimized by varying the annealing temperature, extension time and number of cycles (30-40) to ensure the amplification was in the exponential range. Primer sequences for each PCR target are available upon request. Amplified DNA was electrophoresed in 1% agarose gels, the bands imaged and quantified using the BioRad ChemiDoc XRS imaging system and results plotted using GraphPad Prism 4 software.

Limb lacZ staining
Limbs were fixed for 2 hours at 4°C in 2% paraformaldehyde, 0.2% glutaraldehyde, 0.02% sodium deoxycholate, 0.01% NP-40, 5 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2 in PBS, permeabilized for 3 hours in 0.02% sodium deoxycholate, 0.01% NP-40, 2 mM MgCl2 in PBS, incubated in 5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6], 5 mM K4[Fe(CN)6]·3H2O, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mg/ml X-gal in the dark for 1 hour at 37°C, then overnight at room temperature. Following staining, limbs were washed in PBS, post-fixed in 10% formalin and sectioned. Sections were counterstained with Eosin.

BrdU incorporation and tissue permeabilization
Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) (100 µg/g of mouse) was injected intraperitoneally into day 6 wild-type and bm mice (Stickens et al., 2004Go). After 1 hour of BrdU incorporation, mice were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Limbs were gelatin embedded and 10 µm sections were permeabilized, blocked and immunostained with an anti-BrdU antibody (Beckton-Dickinson, 1:500). Counting the number of BrdU-positive cells divided by the total number of cells (DAPI-positive) within the proliferative zone yielded the percentage of BrdU-positive cells.

Cloning and expression of N-IhhAP fusion protein
DNA encoding the N-terminal domain of Ihh (amino acids 1-202) was PCR amplified from mouse cartilage using Proofstart DNA polymerase (Qiagen) and cloned into the pAPTagNeo vector using the following primers: Ihh-F, 5'-GCAAGCTTCACCATGTCTCCCGCCTGGCTCCGGCCC-3'; Ihh-R, 5'-GAAGATCTGCCACCTGTCTTGGCAGCGGCCGA-3'. Stable cell lines expressing IhhAP were grown in serum-free medium for 4 days, and spent medium collected and concentrated 50-fold using Centricon YM-10 filters (Millipore). IhhAP concentration was determined using a standard protein curve for purified human alkaline phosphatase (Calbiochem).

Generation of N-IhhAP mutant
Multiple point mutations were generated in one step using a modified fusion PCR method. Two DNA fragments encoding the desired mutations were generated by PCR using the following primers: fragment A came from PCR with Ihh-F (5'-GCAAGCTTCACCATGTCTCCCGCCTGGCTCCGGCCC-3') and IhhmutR1 (phospho5'-CGGGTGGTGGGCAGCGCCGCGGCGCCGCGGCGCCGCGGCGCTGCCCACCACCCG-3'); fragment B came from PCR with Ihh-R (5'-GAAGATCTGCCACCTGTCTTGCGAGCGGCCGA-3') and IhhmutF1 (phospho5'-CCTGCCGCGCTCGTGCCTCTTGCCTACAAG-3'). Fragments were purified and blunt-end ligated, followed by a second round of PCR using the primers Ihh-F and Ihh-R.

N-IhhAP glycosaminoglycan binding assay
HS, CS-4 and CS-6 (Sigma), and CS-0 (Seikagaku) GAGs were bound to polylysine-treated 96-well plates at a concentration of 5 mg/ml. Plates were blocked with 1% BSA in TBS for 2 hours at 25°C. Serial dilutions of wild-type and mutant IhhAP were bound for 2 hours at 25°C, followed by three 0.5 M NaCl washes. Bound IhhAP was measured for 10 minutes by adding 1 mM 4-methylumbelliferone (Invitrogen). Fluorescence was measured with a Victor 3 plate reader (Perkin Elmer) at abs355/em460 nm.


Figure 1
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Altered glycosaminoglycan sulfation in the bm growth plate. (A-D') Immunofluorescence of postnatal day 6 proximal tibia of wild-type (A-D) and bm (A'-D') mice with monoclonal antibodies (red) specific to distinct sulfated GAG epitopes ({alpha}-CS4, {alpha}-CS 6, {alpha}-CS0 and {alpha}-HS) counterstained with DAPI (blue). Note decreased staining of chondroitin-4-sulfate (A,A'), and chondroitin-6-sulfate (B,B') in the bm growth plate. Conversely, chondroitin-0-sulfate staining increased in the bm growth plate (C,C'), whereas there was no consistent difference in heparan sulfate antibody staining (D,D'). Zones are marked as follows: resting (R), proliferative (P) and hypertrophic (H). Use the zone references on left side for wild-type sections and on right side for bm sections.

 
Ihh Co-immunoprecipitation
Proteoglycans were isolated from E14 chick cartilage by 0.5 M guanidine extraction. Triplicate samples (1 mg/ml total protein) were incubated with and without chondroitinase ABC (0.4 U/ml) for 5 hours at 37°C with protease inhibitors. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation, then incubated with 2.5 µg of IhhAP and with 100 µl of protein A beads previously conjugated with and without S103L antibody. After complex formation, beads were washed four times for 1 hour with TBS, followed by three 10-minute washes with TBS/0.5 M NaCl to disrupt non-specific interactions. Beads were equilibrated in 100 mM Tris (pH 9.5), followed by addition of 1 mM 4-methylumbelliferone substrate to measure IhhAP activity. After a 30-minute incubation, fluorescence was measured with a Victor 3 plate reader (Perkin Elmer) at abs355/em460 nm.


   RESULTS
TOP
 SUMMARY
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Undersulfation of CS chains in the bm growth plate
To characterize the sulfate content of the GAG chains in the bm mouse growth plate, day 6 limb sections were stained with a set of monoclonal antibodies that specifically recognize CS-4, CS-6 and CS-0. Immunohistochemistry revealed a reduction in the amounts of CS-4 and CS-6 epitopes, and increased staining for the CS-0 epitope in the ECM of the bm growth plate compared with cartilage from wt littermates (Fig. 1). The 10E4 antibody, which recognizes N-sulfated HS, showed comparable HS staining in both wild-type and bm growth plate, but significantly less staining compared with CS epitopes (Fig. 1). Note HS staining was localized around the cells rather than distributed in the ECM like the CS epitopes.

To complement the immunohistochemical results and to quantify the observed differences in sulfated CSPGs between wild type and bm, fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (FACE) of growth plate cartilage treated with chondroitinase ABC showed a 32% (P<0.05) decrease in CS-4 (the predominant isoform) and a twofold increase of non-sulfated CS-0 (P<0.05) (Fig. 2A). By contrast, treatment of cartilage samples with heparatinase revealed no significant differences in HS-GAG composition (Fig. 2B). The FACE data represent both pre-existing and newly synthesized CSPGs, and are consistent with 35SO4-incorporation experiments that measured only newly synthesized CSPGs, and showed a 41% (P<0.05) reduction in sulfate incorporation in CSPGs and no significant change in HS sulfate content from bm cartilage compared with wild type (Table 1). These results demonstrate that mutation of PAPSS2 in the bm mouse leads to preferential undersulfation of CS chains, resulting in reduction of the predominant CS-4 species, and establishes the bm mouse as a model for studying the role of chondroitin sulfation in cartilage development.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Sulfate incorporation of postnatal (P6) cartilage in wild-type and bm mice

 


Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. FACE analysis of glycosaminoglycan content in the bm growth plate. Fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (FACE) profile of wild-type and bm postnatal day 6 cartilage for chondroitin sulfate and heparan sulfate. (A) Relative percentage composition of the CS-4, CS-6 and CS-0 disaccharides generated upon chondroitinase digestion for wild-type and bm growth plates, demonstrating significant changes in sulfated CS content between bm and wild type. (B) HS-NS, HS-6S and HS-0S disaccharide composition generated upon heparatinase digestion for wild-type and bm cartilage, illustrating no significant differences in HS sulfation between wild-type and bm growth plates. For each experiment, cartilage samples were collected and pooled from the long bone epiphyses of at least six neonate pups. Three independent experiments were performed, each with triplicate samples for statistical purposes.

 
Analysis of the brachymorphic mouse growth plate
To determine whether the bm growth plate exhibited defects in chondrocyte proliferation or in differentiation or whether signaling pathways were affected by undersulfated CS, in situ hybridization was performed on postnatal day 6 limb growth plate sections with riboprobes against various chondrocyte markers and signaling molecules. In the wild-type growth plate, Papss2 mRNA was predominantly expressed by the pre-hypertrophic chondrocytes with some expression in the proliferative and resting chondrocytes (Fig. 3A). A marked reduction in Papss2 mRNA was observed in bm sections; similar to the reduction demonstrated by northern analysis (Kurima et al., 1998Go), and RT-PCR (Fig. 3H). Papss1, by contrast, was detected at very low levels in both wild-type and bm cartilage by in situ (data not shown), as previously demonstrated on mouse cartilage at late developmental stages (Stelzer et al., 2007Go). However, northern blot analysis (see Fig. S1 in the supplementary material) and RT-PCR (Fig. 3H) showed consistent levels of Papss1 mRNA in both wild-type and bm cartilage, probably accounting for the reduced but not complete loss of proteoglycan sulfation in the bm growth plate.


Figure 3
View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. Comparative analysis of wild-type and bm growth plate. (A-G) In situ hybridization of wild type and bm day 6 growth plates revealed comparable mRNA levels of Acan (B), Col10a1 (C) and Pthr1 (D), and varying degrees of decreased mRNA levels for Papss2 (A), Fgfr3 (E), Ihh (F) and Ptch1 (G). (H) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR for various growth plate markers showing a reduction in mRNA expression for Papss2, Fgfr3 and Ptch1 in the bm growth plate, and comparable expression of Acan, Col10a1, Pthr1 and Ihh.

 
Aggrecan (Acan) mRNA levels were comparable by in situ in wild-type and bm growth plates (Fig. 3B), with strong expression in the pre-hypertrophic region and significant expression throughout the proliferative and resting zones, despite the presumed undersulfation of aggrecan GAG chains in the bm growth plate. The dense packing and reduced size of the bm growth plate is well outlined by the aggrecan expression pattern. Collagen type X (Col10a1), a marker of hypertrophic chondrocytes, exhibited mRNA expression levels that were also comparable between normal and bm, despite an overall reduction of the hypertrophic zone in the bm growth plate (Fig. 3C). The PTHrP receptor (Pthr1), which is expressed at high levels in the pre-hypertrophic zone, also had similar levels of expression in the wild-type and bm growth plates (Fig. 3D). By contrast, probes to Fgfr3 (Fig. 3E), and to Ihh [which is predominantly expressed in the pre-hypertrophic zone (Fig. 3F)] and its receptor patched (Ptch1) [which is normally expressed in the proliferative chondrocytes (target cells of Ihh) (Fig. 3G)] revealed decreased mRNA levels in the bm growth plate compared with wild type. To complement the in situ hybridization experiments and to verify the observed mRNA differences between wild-type and bm growth plates, semi-quantitative RT-PCR was performed, and decreases in Papss2, Ptch1 and Fgfr3 mRNA expression in the bm growth plate were confirmed (Fig. 3H). By contrast, no significant changes were observed in the expression of Ihh (Fig. 3H). As Ptch1 has been shown to be a direct transcriptional downstream target of Ihh signaling (Goodrich et al., 1996Go), the reduction in Ptch1 mRNA in the bm growth plate suggests a Hh signaling defect.

Altered Ihh signaling in the bm growth plate
Ihh is a secreted protein known to act as a long-range signaling molecule in the developing growth plate (Gritli-Linde et al., 2001Go). Staining of wild-type growth plates with a polyclonal antibody that recognizes the mature secreted Ihh showed Ihh protein to be distributed in the extracellular space from the pre-hypertrophic source to the resting zone (Fig. 3F) with greater abundance in the proliferative zone (Fig. 4A). By contrast, bm growth plates had reduced staining overall, and an abnormal Ihh protein distribution pattern that did not appear to be uniformly dispersed between chondrocytes, as seen in wild-type growth plates (Fig. 4B); rather, it was marked by restricted Ihh diffusion (Fig. 4A',B', arrowhead) and protein aggregation, particularly in the proliferative zone (Fig. 4B'', arrowhead). The lack of extracellular Ihh protein deposition between and among the chondrocytes is most striking at higher magnifications (Fig. 4A'',B'')

To investigate whether the abnormal distribution of Ihh protein resulted in downstream defects in Ihh signaling, bm mice were crossed with Ptch1+/– mice, in which the Ptch1 allele is replaced with the LacZ gene; LacZ staining in Ptch1+/– accurately represents Ptch1 transcription (Goodrich et al., 1997Go). Papss2bm/bm and Ptch1+/– crosses generated homozygous bm mice carrying one copy of the Ptch1 mutant allele. β-Galactosidase (β-gal) staining of Papss2wt/wtPtch1+/– growth plates showed a gradient distribution of β-gal staining from the proliferative to the resting zone (Fig. 4C, black double arrows). By contrast, Papss2bm/bm Ptch1+/– mice had reduced distribution of β-gal-positive cells that was restricted to the proliferative zone with only a few β-gal-positive cells in the resting zone (Fig. 4C, yellow double arrows). Although Ptch1 mRNA expression is used as a direct readout for Ihh signal induction, the ratio of Gli activator (Gli1/Gli2) to Gli repressor (Gli3) is used to measure Ihh pathway activation (Hilton et al., 2005Go). Semi-quantitative RT-PCR for Gli1 and Gli3 revealed that homozygous bm mice had a 25% decrease in Gli1 mRNA, resulting in a reduced ratio of Gli activator to repressor, providing additional evidence of a decrease in Ihh signaling in the bm mouse growth plate (Fig. 4D).


Figure 4
View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 4. Abnormal Ihh signaling in the bm mouse growth plate. (A-B'') Representative immunostaining of wild-type (A-A'') and bm (B-B'') day 6 distal tibias for secreted Ihh (green), counterstained with DAPI (blue). The resting (R), proliferative (P) and hypertrophic (H) zones are indicated, respectively. Wild-type tissue shows graded distribution of Ihh throughout the ECM from the proliferative zone to the resting zone (A). By contrast, the bm growth plate displays abnormal Ihh distribution marked by aggregates in the proliferative zone (B). Higher magnification views (A',A'',B',B'') show the restricted diffusion of Ihh in the bm growth plate marked by the reduction in Ihh surrounding cells in the resting zone (A',B', arrowhead), and aggregation of Ihh in the proliferative zone (A'',B'', arrowheads). (C) β-Gal staining of proximal tibia growth plates from wild-type and bm mice heterozygous for the Ptch1lacZ mutant allele show that, in the bm mouse, there is a reduction in the range of β-gal-positive cells (black double-headed arrow), highlighted by an increase in the proportion of resting chondrocytes that are not β-gal positive (yellow double-headed arrow). (D) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR for the Ihh signaling activator (Gli1) and Ihh signaling repressor (Gli3), showing a reduction in Gli1 mRNA expression. Quantification of the shown RT-PCR, illustrating the reduction in both Gli1 mRNA and the ratio of Gli1/Gli3 in the bm growth plate.

 
Although Ihh signaling is clearly affected in the bm growth plate, CSPG undersulfation may also be modulating other signaling pathways, including BMPs and FGFs, which in turn may affect Ihh signaling (Minina et al., 2002Go; Minina et al., 2001Go; Yoon et al., 2006Go). To determine whether BMP signaling was affected, we examined phosphorylation of the Smad family of proteins, which have been shown to be direct downstream targets of BMP signaling (Kretzschmar and Massague, 1998Go). Immunohistochemistry with an antibody that recognizes phosphorylated Smad 1,5,8 revealed no detectable differences in BMP signaling in the bm growth plate (data not shown). Furthermore, antibody staining against phospho-STAT1, a direct target of FGFR3-mediated signaling (Su et al., 1997Go) showed only a slight decrease in phospho-STAT-1 staining (data not shown), in agreement with the decrease in Ffgr3 mRNA observed (Fig. 3H).


Figure 5
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 5. Proliferation defect in the bm growth plate. (A) Immunofluorescence of post-natal day 6 wild-type (+/+) and bm (–/–) growth plates with BrdU monoclonal antibody (red), and counterstained with DAPI nuclear stain (blue). The respective proliferative (P) zone for wild-type and bm sections is demarcated. (B) Quantification of BrdU incorporation in the proliferative region for wild-type and bm day 6 growth plates (*P<0.0001, n=9). The percentage of BrdU-positive cells was determined by dividing the number of BrdU-positive cells by the total number of DAPI-positive cells in the limb sections analyzed.

 
Chondrocyte proliferation is decreased in the bm growth plate
As Ihh has been shown to regulate chondrocyte proliferation (Long et al., 2001Go; St-Jacques et al., 1999Go), we determined whether chondrocyte proliferation was affected in the bm mouse. Decreased BrdU incorporation was observed when day 6 bm growth plate was compared with wild type (Fig. 5A). Quantification of the percentage of BrdU-labeled cells relative to the total number of cells in the proliferative region indicated a 38% reduction (wild type, 20.12±1.4%; bm, 12.47±0.48%; P<0.001) in BrdU incorporation in bm growth plates compared with wild type (Fig. 5B). The reduction in chondrocyte proliferation in the bm mouse growth plate was more apparent in the distal proliferative zone, near the resting/proliferative junction, which directly correlates with the region marked by restricted Ihh diffusion and decreased Ptch1 activation, suggesting that undersulfation of CSPGs in the bm growth plate affects the rate of chondrocyte cell division, which is likely to be attributable to a disruption in Ihh signaling.

Indian hedgehog interacts with CSPGs
Sonic hedgehog has been shown to interact with HSPGs via its highly conserved Cardin-Weintraub domain, xBBxxBBBx (Rubin et al., 2002Go) (Fig. 6A); however, there have been no biochemical studies to determine whether Ihh likewise interacts with other proteoglycans, particularly CSPGs. To test this possibility, HS and CS GAG chains were immobilized on poly-d-lysine treated plates. To measure Ihh binding to the GAG chains, the N-terminal signaling domain (amino acids 1-202) was fused to alkaline phosphatase (IhhAP) and AP activity was used to detect binding. Binding curves were generated for HS, CS-4, CS-6 and CS-0, respectively (Fig. 6B), which showed that IhhAP binds HS (Kd=2.7±0.2 µM) [as previously demonstrated for sonic hedgehog (Rubin et al., 2002Go)], as well as CS-4 (Kd=3.8±0.1 µM) and CS-6 (Kd=4.7±0.5 µM) chains, albeit with lower binding affinity (Fig. 6C). However, in agreement with the observed defects in Ihh protein distribution in the bm mouse, we observed even lower Ihh binding affinity for unsulfated CS (Kd=5.0±0.4 µM) compared to CS-4 (Fig. 6C), the predominant sulfated species in the murine growth plate (Fig. 2). To demonstrate that the Ihh interaction with CS chains is specific (via its N-terminal Cardin-Weintraub motif), the charged xxRRRPPRRxx domain was mutated to xxAAAPPAAxx. This mutation resulted in complete loss of IhhAP binding to both HS and CS chains (Fig. 6B), suggesting that the basic domain of the Hh family of proteins is required for the interaction of Hh proteins with both HS and CS.


Figure 6
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 6. Interaction of Ihh to sulfated glycosaminoglycans. (A) Alignment of the N-terminal domain of the three mammalian hedgehog family members: sonic (Shh), Indian (Ihh) and desert (Dhh). The basic stretch of amino acids is highlighted in blue. Sequence alignment was carried out using Accelerys DSGene software. (B) Binding curves of Ihh to various to GAGs. Ihh affinity to GAG chains was determined through binding of Ihh-alkaline phosphatase fusion protein (IhhAP) to distinct sulfated CS and HS chains. Similarly, the affinity of an IhhAP mutant (lacking the proteoglycan binding domain) was also determined. Relative fluorescent units (RFU) are plotted in relation to IhhAP concentration. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Binding of wild-type IhhAP fusion protein to various GAG chains revealed that Ihh binds to HS, CS4, CS6 and CS0 (closed symbols), with decreasing binding capacities and Ihh has the lowest binding capacity for non-sulfated CS. Binding assays with an IhhAP mutant harboring a mutation in the proteoglycan binding motif reveal complete loss of binding to all GAG chains tested (HS, CS4, CS6 and CSO, open symbols). (C) Curve fitting analysis for IhhAP binding affinity (Kd) and binding capacity (Bmax) for HS, CS4, CS6 and CS0, respectively. Curve fitting analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism 4.

 
To determine whether Ihh directly interacts with the CSPG aggrecan, E14 chicken cartilage lysates were incubated with IhhAP fusion protein and then immunoprecipitated using the S103L aggrecan core protein-specific monoclonal antibody (Krueger et al., 1990bGo). A threefold increase (P<0.05, n=3) in the amount of IhhAP co-immunoprecipitated with the S103L aggrecan antibody was observed compared with a control without antibody (Fig. 7). The interaction between aggrecan and Ihh was specific, as co-immunoprecipitation of IhhAP mutant protein lacking the Ihh proteoglycan binding domain showed no binding to aggrecan (supplementary material Fig. S2). Furthermore, treatment of the cartilage lysates with chondroitinase ABC, which specifically degrades CS chains, resulted in a 40% (P<0.05, n=3) decrease in IhhAP binding to aggrecan compared with non-treated samples (Fig. 7), demonstrating that this interaction was mediated by the CS component. The in vitro binding data using defined CS structures and the co-immunoprecipitation of IhhAP with aggrecan support a direct interaction between Ihh and CSPGs.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 SUMMARY
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Undersulfation of CSPGs in PAPSS2 deficient mice
Biochemical analysis of the bm growth plate revealed preferential reduction of CS sulfation, whereas HS sulfation remained normal, making the non-lethal bm mouse an excellent model with which to study the effect of the loss of PAPSS2 activity, and the contribution of sulfated CSPGs in postnatal cartilage development. Preferential undersulfation of CSPGs can be explained by the large amount of PAPS required to properly sulfate the CSPG-rich ECM, as aggrecan is the major CSPG produced by chondrocytes and requires high levels of PAPS in order to sulfate the numerous (>100) GAG chains per proteoglycan molecule (Krueger et al., 1990aGo). By contrast, cartilage HSPGs, like the hybrid CS/HS-bearing perlecan are sparse in quantity and contain far fewer GAG chains (3-4) that need to be sulfated (Knox and Whitelock, 2006Go); therefore, the requirement for PAPS is significantly less for HSPG and presumably satisfied by residual PAPSS1. Furthermore, kinetic parameters (e.g. higher affinity for PAPS) favoring HS sulfotransferases may result in preferential sulfation of HS chains when the cellular levels of PAPS are decreased. In agreement with our results, a recently reported mouse model harboring a mutation in a novel Golgi PAP phosphatase (gPAPP) resulted in a severe chondrodysplasia marked by undersulfation of CS and normal HS sulfation. It was postulated that the accumulation of PAP in the Golgi may alter PAPS use, by preferentially affecting CS sulfotransferases (Frederick et al., 2008Go). The preponderance of undersulfated CS chains in the bm mouse growth plate, the nucleotidase mutant JAWS (Sohaskey et al., 2008Go) and the PAP phosphatase mutant (gPAPP) (Frederick et al., 2008Go) highlight the importance of regulating sulfation to promote cartilage development and bone growth.

Overall, the severe-to-mild spectrum of chondrodysplasias observed in models deficient in CSPG synthesis and/or modifications directly correlates to the location of the underlying mutations in the biosynthetic pathway. Absence of CSPG core protein (nm and cmd) or reduction in CS chain content (C4st1) all lead to lethal phenotypes (Kluppel et al., 2005Go; Krueger et al., 1999Go; Li et al., 1993Go; Schwartz and Domowicz, 2002Go; Watanabe et al., 1994Go), whereas insufficient sulfation of CS chains (bm) is non-lethal, but still results in a severe growth retardation disorder.


Figure 7
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 7. Co-immunoprecipitation of Ihh and aggrecan. Embryonic day 14 chick cartilage lysates incubated with IhhAP fusion protein were immunoprecipitated in the absence (–S103L) or presence (+S103L) of the aggrecan-specific monoclonal antibody S103L. Significantly more IhhAP activity was measured in immunoprecipitates in the presence of S103L antibody (*P<0.05, n=3). Treatment of cartilage lysates with chondroitinase ABC (+S103L/+ChABC) prior to immunoprecipitation resulted in a significant decrease in the amount of IhhAP protein bound to aggrecan (**P<0.05, n=3).

 
Reduced chondroitin sulfation and reduction in long-range Ihh signaling in the postnatal growth plate
Several key signaling pathways have been implicated in the control of limb elongation, including Ihh and PTHrP (Lanske et al., 1996Go), which function together in a feedback loop to regulate the rate of proliferation and differentiation of growth plate chondrocytes (Vortkamp et al., 1996Go). Furthermore, Ihh signaling has recently been shown to be essential for postnatal growth plate maintenance (Maeda et al., 2007Go). In the present study, analysis of the postnatal bm growth plate revealed defects associated with Ihh signaling, including: (1) abnormal Ihh distribution in the ECM of the bm growth plate marked by reduced Ihh diffusion and abnormal aggregation; (2) reduction in Ptch1 mRNA expression which is a direct target of Ihh signaling and therefore indicative of reduced Hh signaling (Goodrich et al., 1996Go); (3) reduction in the ratio of the Gli1 activator to Gli3 repressor mRNA expression; (4) decreased range of β-gal-positive cells in the growth plate of PtchLacZ reporter mice; and (5) decreased chondrocyte proliferation, presumably as a consequence of reduced Ihh signaling. Altogether, the experimental evidence suggests that undersulfation of CSPGs results in restricted Ihh diffusion, which leads to reduced proliferation that significantly impacts cartilage development and postnatal skeletal growth. Interestingly, the phenotype associated with reduced chondroitin sulfation in the bm mouse is the opposite of the phenotype seen in HS synthesis mutants, particularly the Ext1 gene trap mutant, in which reduction of HS results in an increased range of Hh signaling marked by increases in Ptch1 and Pthrp mRNA, as well as increased chondrocyte proliferation and expansion of the proliferative zone (Koziel et al., 2004Go). The significant differences between the bm phenotype and that of the HS-deficient mutants, combined with our new data, provide evidence that HS likely does not contribute to the bm growth disorder. Thus, it would appear that sulfated CSPGs can function as modulators of Hh signaling, and in concert with HSPGs actively control long-range Ihh movement in the ECM. Disruption of the synthesis or sulfation of either one of these GAG types may result in increased or decreased Hh signaling. The HS/CS hybrid proteoglycan perlecan (Govindraj et al., 2002Go), has been shown to modulate Hh signaling in fly (Park et al., 2003Go) and mouse (Giros et al., 2007Go). Interestingly, perlecan-deficient mice exhibit skeletal defects marked by an unexplained decrease in the expression of the CSPG aggrecan (Arikawa-Hirasawa et al., 1999Go). In light of our findings, it will be important to dissect the relative contributions to Ihh signaling of the core protein of perlecan, HS- and CS-chains, from that of aggrecan and its CS chains.


Figure 8
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 8. Model for the function of sulfated CSPGs in modulating Ihh signaling in the developing growth plate. (A,B) The gradient CSPG expression is depicted in the wild-type (A) and bm (B) growth plates. Prehypertrophic chondrocytes (red) are the source of Ihh, which is secreted into the extracellular matrix and acts on the proliferative (blue) and resting (yellow) chondrocytes, inducing expression of Ptch1 and Pthrp. In the bm growth plate, undersulfation of CSPGs results in reduced and abnormal Ihh distribution, leading to reduced proliferation and diminished growth plate length. (C) In this model, a gradient of matrix-associated CSPGs (aggrecan) from the source of hedgehog expression to its target is established for the proper movement of hedgehog to its target cells (proliferative chondrocytes) by actively participating in the diffusion of hedgehog or by protecting hedgehog from degradation. Finally, cell-surface HSPGs (which have higher affinity for hedgehog) are required to be present on the target cells to bring hedgehog close to the plasma membrane for proper interaction with its receptor.

 
Indian hedgehog can directly interact with CSPGs
The Hh family of proteins have been shown both genetically and biochemically (Bellaiche et al., 1998Go; Rubin et al., 2002Go; Vyas et al., 2008Go) to interact with HSPGs through the Cardin-Weintraub motif, a stretch of basic amino acids (xBBBxxBx) conserved in all mammalian Hh family members (Fig. 6A). In vitro binding assays using an IhhAP fusion protein revealed that, similar to Shh, Ihh can also bind HS with high affinity (Fig. 6C). Furthermore, Ihh also binds CS-4, CS-6 and CS-0, albeit with decreasing affinities and binding capacities (Fig. 6C). As mutations in the Cardin-Weintraub motif completely abolish Ihh binding, the interaction between Ihh and CS is solely mediated via this motif. Interestingly, structural data revealed a second HS binding site necessary for Drosophila Hh and Ihog interaction (McLellan et al., 2006Go; Zhang et al., 2007Go). However, consistent with our results, structural data on the mammalian Hh homologue Shh interaction with the mammalian Ihog homologue CDO revealed no HS-mediated interaction between Shh and CDO; instead, this interaction was mediated by Ca2+ (McLellan et al., 2008Go).

The findings that CS-4 is the predominant species in the postnatal mouse growth plate (Fig. 2A) and the binding affinity and capacity of Ihh for CS-0 is lower compared with that for CS-4 (Fig. 6C), the reduction in CS-4 content and reciprocal increase in CS-0 content measured in the bm growth plate is commensurate with abnormal Ihh signaling. Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation of Ihh with the aggrecan-specific S103L antibody, no binding with Ihh mutant lacking the proteoglycan binding domain, and decreased binding after ChABC treatment, demonstrate that the major cartilage CSPG aggrecan directly interacts with Ihh (Fig. 7). These data, combined with the reduction of Ihh signaling in the bm growth plate, provide strong evidence that CSPGs contribute to modulating Ihh protein distribution throughout the ECM of the developing growth plate.

Undersulfation of CSPGs and other signaling pathways
BMP and FGF signaling also control growth plate proliferation and differentiation through opposing actions (Minina et al., 2002Go). BMP signaling is needed to maintain normal chondrocyte proliferation and prevent premature differentiation (Minina et al., 2001Go), whereas FGF signaling negatively regulates chondrocyte proliferation through FGFR3 and accelerates hypertrophic differentiation (Deng et al., 1996Go; Liu et al., 2002Go). The lack of detectable changes in phospho-Smads, downstream targets of BMP, suggest minimal contribution of BMP signaling to the bm phenotype. By contrast, the reduction in Fgfr3 expression (Fig. 3E) and the reduction in phospho-STAT-1 (data not shown) suggest that undersulfated CSPGs may negatively modulate FGF signaling to some extent. Reductions in Fgfr3 should result in increased cell proliferation and overgrowth, which could be altered in the bm growth plate as a mechanism to compensate for the decrease in Ihh signaling. However, studies on the role of FGFR3 suggest that FGF signaling may play a less significant role in postnatal, compared with embryonic, growth plate development (Naski et al., 1998Go). Furthermore, loss of postnatal Ihh signaling in cartilage results in a severe defect which can not be compensated by other signaling pathways such as FGF (Maeda et al., 2007Go), suggesting that in the postnatal growth plate Ihh is the primary pathway regulating proliferation. Alternatively, Ihh signaling may affect FGF signaling by regulating Fgfr3 expression in the proliferative chondrocytes or by inducing FGF expression from the perichondrium, as previously hypothesized (Ornitz and Marie, 2002Go). Recent studies in the nanomelic chick model suggest that loss of aggrecan results in defects in both Ihh and FGF signaling in early growth plate development (Domowicz et al., 2009Go), expanding the role of CSPGs in signaling and suggesting that CSPGs may be playing different roles in modulating growth factor signaling as cartilage development progresses.

Sulfated HSPGs and CSPGs are necessary for normal Ihh signaling in the growth plate
Based on previous data from HS synthesis mutants (Ext1) and the present study, we propose a mechanism in which cell-surface-associated HSPGs and matrix-associated CSPGs such as aggrecan function in concert to establish a morphogen gradient, thereby modulating Hh signaling in the epiphyseal growth plate. HSPGs, which have higher affinity for Hh, can act at the surface of the cells that are the source of Hh, causing them to retain a high local concentration of Hh and thus establish a sharp signaling gradient. Matrix-associated CSPGs are then needed for formation of the Hh gradient, either through affecting the diffusion of Hh by aiding in its trafficking, or by protecting Hh from degradation. Finally, cell-surface HSPGs act at the target cells to bring Hh close to the membrane for interaction with its receptor (Fig. 8). Therefore CSPGs and HSPGs probably work together as modulators to fine-tune signaling pathways during development.

The ability of Hh proteins to bind with different affinities to HSPG and differently sulfated CSPGs adds another level of complexity to understanding how the Hh proteins act as long-range morphogens and how gradients of these signaling molecules are established. Furthermore, the strength of the interactions between the Hh proteins and sulfated proteoglycans may also be responsible for differential potencies observed among the three Hh isoforms (Pathi et al., 2001Go). Importantly, despite the lower binding affinities and capacities observed for CS compared with HS chains in the in vitro assays, CSPGs are significantly more abundant than HSPGs in cartilage, therefore their contribution to Ihh distribution and signaling may be more important than previously recognized.

In summary, this is the first study to demonstrate that CSPGs can modulate Ihh signaling, and highlights the importance of the ECM in development. Owing to this new role of CSPGs in fine-tuning signaling pathways, it will be important to determine whether sulfated CSPGs are also required in modulating signaling pathways that regulate development in other tissues where proteoglycans are prevalent.


   Footnotes
 
Supplementary material

Supplementary material for this article is available at http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/136/10/1697/DC1

We thank Drs Miriam S. Domowicz and Leslie A. King for helpful discussions and technical advice, Judy Henry for tissue section preparation, and James Mensch for critical reading of this manuscript. The Ptch1 reporter mouse was a generous gift from Dr Wei Du. This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Health, HD-017332 (to N.B.S.) and HD-017332S, 5T32GM008720, 5T32HL007381 (to M.C.). Deposited in PMC for release after 12 months.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 SUMMARY
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 


Arikawa-Hirasawa, E., Watanabe, H., Takami, H., Hassell, J. R. and Yamada, Y. (1999). Perlecan is essential for cartilage and cephalic development. Nat. Genet. 23,354 -358.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bellaiche, Y., The, I. and Perrimon, N. (1998). Tout-velu is a Drosophila homologue of the putative tumour suppressor EXT-1 and is needed for Hh diffusion. Nature 394, 85-88.[CrossRef][Medline]
Calabro, A., Benavides, M., Tammi, M., Hascall, V. C. and Midura, R. J. (2000a). Microanalysis of enzyme digests of hyaluronan and chondroitin/dermatan sulfate by fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (FACE). Glycobiology 10,273 -281.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Calabro, A., Hascall, V. C. and Midura, R. J. (2000b). Adaptation of FACE methodology for microanalysis of total hyaluronan and chondroitin sulfate composition from cartilage. Glycobiology 10,283 -293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Calabro, A., Midura, R., Wang, A., West, L., Plaas, A. and Hascall, V. C. (2001). Fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (FACE) of glycosaminoglycans. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 9 Suppl. A,S16 -S22.[Medline]
Cardin, A. D. and Weintraub, H. J. (1989). Molecular modeling of protein-glycosaminoglycan interactions. Arteriosclerosis 9,21 -32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Chen, M. H., Li, Y. J., Kawakami, T., Xu, S. M. and Chuang, P. T. (2004). Palmitoylation is required for the production of a soluble multimeric Hedgehog protein complex and long-range signaling in vertebrates. Genes Dev. 18,641 -659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Deng, C., Wynshaw-Boris, A., Zhou, F., Kuo, A. and Leder, P. (1996). Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 is a negative regulator of bone growth. Cell 84,911 -921.[CrossRef][Medline]
Domowicz, M. S., Sanders, T. A., Ragsdale, C. W. and Schwartz, N. B. (2008). Aggrecan is expressed by embryonic brain glia and regulates astrocyte development. Dev. Biol. 315,114 -124.[CrossRef][Medline]
Domowicz, M., Cortes, M., Henry, J. and Schwartz, N. B. (2009). Aggrecan modulation of growth plate morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. (in press).
Eaton, S. (2006). Release and trafficking of lipid-linked morphogens. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16, 17-22.[CrossRef][Medline]
Frederick, J. P., Tafari, A. T., Wu, S. M., Megosh, L. C., Chiou, S. T., Irving, R. P. and York, J. D. (2008). A role for a lithium-inhibited Golgi nucleotidase in skeletal development and sulfation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105,11605 -11612.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Giros, A., Morante, J., Gil-Sanz, C., Fairen, A. and Costell, M. (2007). Perlecan controls neurogenesis in the developing telencephalon. BMC Dev. Biol. 7, 29.[CrossRef][Medline]
Goodrich, L. V., Johnson, R. L., Milenkovic, L., McMahon, J. A. and Scott, M. P. (1996). Conservation of the hedgehog/patched signaling pathway from flies to mice: induction of a mouse patched gene by Hedgehog. Genes Dev. 10,301 -312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Goodrich, L. V., Milenkovic, L., Higgins, K. M. and Scott, M. P. (1997). Altered neural cell fates and medulloblastoma in mouse patched mutants. Science 277,1109 -1113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Govindraj, P., West, L., Koob, T. J., Neame, P., Doege, K. and Hassell, J. R. (2002). Isolation and identification of the major heparan sulfate proteoglycans in the developing bovine rib growth plate. J. Biol. Chem. 277,19461 -19469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Gritli-Linde, A., Lewis, P., McMahon, A. P. and Linde, A. (2001). The whereabouts of a morphogen: direct evidence for short- and graded long-range activity of hedgehog signaling peptides. Dev. Biol. 236,364 -386.[CrossRef][Medline]
Habuchi, H., Habuchi, O. and Kimata, K. (2004). Sulfation pattern in glycosaminoglycan: does it have a code? Glycoconj. J. 21,47 -52.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hacker, U., Lin, X. and Perrimon, N. (1997). The Drosophila sugarless gene modulates Wingless signaling and encodes an enzyme involved in polysaccharide biosynthesis. Development 124,3565 -3573.[Abstract]
Hacker, U., Nybakken, K. and Perrimon, N. (2005). Heparan sulphate proteoglycans: the sweet side of development. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 530-541.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hilton, M. J., Tu, X., Cook, J., Hu, H. and Long, F. (2005). Ihh controls cartilage development by antagonizing Gli3, but requires additional effectors to regulate osteoblast and vascular development. Development 132,4339 -4351.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Karsenty, G. and Wagner, E. F. (2002). Reaching a genetic and molecular understanding of skeletal development. Dev. Cell 2,389 -406.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kimata, K., Barrach, H. J., Brown, K. S. and Pennypacker, J. P. (1981). Absence of proteoglycan core protein in cartilage from cmd/cmd (cartilage matrix deficiency) mice. J. Biol. Chem. 256,6961 -6968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kluppel, M., Wight, T. N., Chan, C., Hinek, A. and Wrana, J. L. (2005). Maintenance of chondroitin sulfation balance by chondroitin-4-sulfotransferase 1 is required for chondrocyte development and growth factor signaling during cartilage morphogenesis. Development 132,3989 -4003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Knox, S. M. and Whitelock, J. M. (2006). Perlecan: how does one molecule do so many things? Cell Mol. Life Sci. 63,2435 -2445.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kobayashi, T., Soegiarto, D. W., Yang, Y., Lanske, B., Schipani, E., McMahon, A. P. and Kronenberg, H. M. (2005). Indian hedgehog stimulates periarticular chondrocyte differentiation to regulate growth plate length independently of PTHrP. J. Clin. Invest. 115,1734 -1742.[CrossRef][Medline]
Koziel, L., Kunath, M., Kelly, O. G. and Vortkamp, A. (2004). Ext1-dependent heparan sulfate regulates the range of Ihh signaling during endochondral ossification. Dev. Cell 6, 801-813.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kretzschmar, M. and Massague, J. (1998). SMADs: mediators and regulators of TGF-beta signaling. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8,103 -111.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kronenberg, H. M. (2003). Developmental regulation of the growth plate. Nature 423,332 -336.[CrossRef][Medline]
Krueger, R. C., Fields, T. A., Hildreth, J. and Schwartz, N. B. (1990a). Chick cartilage chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan core protein I. Generation and characterization of peptides and specificity for glycosaminoglycan attachment. J. Biol. Chem. 265,12075 -12087.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Krueger, R. C., Fields, T. A., Mensch, J. R. and Schwartz, N. B. (1990b). Chick cartilage chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan core protein II. Nucleotide sequence of cDNA clone and localization of the S103L epitope. J. Biol. Chem. 265,12088 -12097.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Krueger, R. C., Kurima, K. and Schwartz, N. B. (1999). Completion of the mouse aggrecan structure and identification of the defect in the cmd-Bc as a near complete deletion of the murine aggrecan. Mamm. Genome 10,1119 -1125.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kurima, K., Warman, M. L., Krishnan, S., Domowicz, M., Krueger, R. C., Jr, Deyrup, A. and Schwartz, N. B. (1998). A member of a family of sulfate-activating enzymes causes murine brachymorphism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95,8681 -8685.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Lane, P. W. and Dickie, M. M. (1968). Three recessive mutations producing disproportionate dwarfing in mice. J. Hered. 65,297 -300.
Lanske, B., Karaplis, A. C., Lee, K., Luz, A., Vortkamp, A., Pirro, A., Karperien, M., Defize, L. H., Ho, C., Mulligan, R. C. et al. (1996). PTH/PTHrP receptor in early development and Indian hedgehog-regulated bone growth. Science 273,663 -666.[Abstract]
Li, H., Schwartz, N. B. and Vertel, B. M. (1993). cDNA cloning of chick cartilage chondroitin sulfate (aggrecan) core protein and identification of a stop codon in the aggrecan gene associated with the chondrodystrophy, nanomelia. J. Biol. Chem. 268,23504 -23511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Lin, X. and Perrimon, N. (1999). Dally cooperates with Drosophila Frizzled 2 to transduce Wingless signalling. Nature 400,281 -284.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lin, X., Buff, E. M., Perrimon, N. and Michelson, A. M. (1999). Heparan sulfate proteoglycans are essential for FGF receptor signaling during Drosophila embryonic development. Development 126,3715 -3723.[Abstract]
Liu, Z., Xu, J., Colvin, J. S. and Ornitz, D. M. (2002). Coordination of chondrogenesis and osteogenesis by fibroblast growth factor 18. Genes Dev. 16,859 -869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Long, F., Zhang, X. M., Karp, S., Yang, Y. and McMahon, A. P. (2001). Genetic manipulation of hedgehog signaling in the endochondral skeleton reveals a direct role in the regulation of chondrocyte proliferation. Development 128,5099 -5108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Maeda, Y., Nakamura, E., Nguyen, M. T., Suva, L. J., Swain, F. L., Razzaque, M. S., Mackem, S. and Lanske, B. (2007). Indian Hedgehog produced by postnatal chondrocytes is essential for maintaining a growth plate and trabecular bone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104,6382 -6387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
McLellan, J. S., Yao, S., Zheng, X., Geisbrecht, B. V., Ghirlando, R., Beachy, P. A. and Leahy, D. J. (2006). Structure of a heparin-dependent complex of Hedgehog and Ihog. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103,17208 -17213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
McLellan, J. S., Zheng, X., Hauk, G., Ghirlando, R., Beachy, P. A. and Leahy, D. J. (2008). The mode of Hedgehog binding to Ihog homologues is not conserved across different phyla. Nature 455,979 -983.[CrossRef][Medline]
Minina, E., Wenzel, H. M., Kreschel, C., Karp, S., Gaffield, W., McMahon, A. P. and Vortkamp, A. (2001). BMP and Ihh/PTHrP signaling interact to coordinate chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Development 128,4523 -4534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Minina, E., Kreschel, C., Naski, M. C., Ornitz, D. M. and Vortkamp, A. (2002). Interaction of FGF, Ihh/Pthlh, and BMP signaling integrates chondrocyte proliferation and hypertrophic differentiation. Dev. Cell 3, 439-449.[CrossRef][Medline]
Naski, M. C., Colvin, J. S., Coffin, J. D. and Ornitz, D. M. (1998). Repression of hedgehog signaling and BMP4 expression in growth plate cartilage by fibroblast growth factor receptor 3. Development 125,4977 -4988.[Abstract]
Orkin, R. W., Pratt, R. M. and Martin, G. R. (1976). Undersulfated chondroitin sulfate in the cartilage matrix of brachymorphic mice. Dev. Biol. 50, 82-94.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ornitz, D. M. and Marie, P. J. (2002). FGF signaling pathways in endochondral and intramembranous bone development and human genetic disease. Genes Dev. 16,1446 -1465.[Free Full Text]
Paine-Saunders, S., Viviano, B. L., Zupicich, J., Skarnes, W. C. and Saunders, S. (2000). glypican-3 controls cellular responses to Bmp4 in limb patterning and skeletal development. Dev. Biol. 225,179 -187.[CrossRef][Medline]
Panakova, D., Sprong, H., Marois, E., Thiele, C. and Eaton, S. (2005). Lipoprotein particles are required for Hedgehog and Wingless signalling. Nature 435, 58-65.[CrossRef][Medline]
Park, Y., Rangel, C., Reynolds, M. M., Caldwell, M. C., Johns, M., Nayak, M., Welsh, C. J., McDermott, S. and Datta, S. (2003). Drosophila perlecan modulates FGF and hedgehog signals to activate neural stem cell division. Dev. Biol. 253,247 -257.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pathi, S., Pagan-Westphal, S., Baker, D. P., Garber, E. A., Rayhorn, P., Bumcrot, D., Tabin, C. J., Blake Pepinsky, R. and Williams, K. P. (2001). Comparative biological responses to human Sonic, Indian, and Desert hedgehog. Mech. Dev. 106,107 -117.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pepinsky, R. B., Zeng, C., Wen, D., Rayhorn, P., Baker, D. P., Williams, K. P., Bixler, S. A., Ambrose, C. M., Garber, E. A., Miatkowski, K. et al. (1998). Identification of a palmitic acid-modified form of human Sonic hedgehog. J. Biol. Chem. 273,14037 -14045.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Porter, J. A., Young, K. E. and Beachy, P. A. (1996). Cholesterol modification of hedgehog signaling proteins in animal development. Science 274,255 -259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Rubin, J. B., Choi, Y. and Segal, R. A. (2002). Cerebellar proteoglycans regulate sonic hedgehog responses during development. Development 129,2223 -2232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Schwartz, N. B. (2000). Biosynthesis and regulation of expression of proteoglycans. Front. Biosci. 5,D649 -D655.[Medline]
Schwartz, N. B. and Domowicz, M. S. (2002). Chondrodysplasias due to proteoglycan defects. Glycobiology 12,57R -68R.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Schwartz, N. B., Ostrowski, V., Brown, K. S. and Pratt, R. (1978). Defective PAPS synthesis on epiphyseal cartilage from brachymorphic mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 82,173 -178.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sohaskey, M. L., Yu, J., Diaz, M. A., Plaas, A. H. and Harland, R. M. (2008). JAWS coordinates chondrogenesis and synovial joint positioning. Development 135,2215 -2220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
St-Jacques, B., Hammerschmidt, M. and McMahon, A. P. (1999). Indian hedgehog signaling regulates proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes and is essential for bone formation. Genes Dev. 13,2072 -2086.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Stelzer, C., Brimmer, A., Hermanns, P., Zabel, B. and Dietz, U. H. (2007). Expression profile of Papss2 (3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthase 2) during cartilage formation and skeletal development in the mouse embryo. Dev. Dyn. 236,1313 -1318.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stickens, D., Behonick, D. J., Ortega, N., Heyer, B., Hartenstein, B., Yu, Y., Fosang, A. J., Schorpp-Kistner, M., Angel, P. and Werb, Z. (2004). Altered endochondral bone development in matrix metalloproteinase 13-deficient mice. Development 131,5883 -5895.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Su, W. C., Kitagawa, M., Xue, N., Xie, B., Garofalo, S., Cho, J., Deng, C., Horton, W. A. and Fu, X. Y. (1997). Activation of Stat1 by mutant fibroblast growth-factor receptor in thanatophoric dysplasia type II dwarfism. Nature 386,288 -292.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sugahara, K. and Schwartz, N. B. (1979). Defect in 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate formation in brachymorphic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76,6615 -6618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Sugahara, K. and Schwartz, N. B. (1982a). Defect in 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthesis in brachymorphic mice. I. Characterization of the defect. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 214,589 -601.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sugahara, K. and Schwartz, N. B. (1982b). Defect in 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate synthesis in brachymorphic mice. II. Tissue distribution of the defect. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 214,602 -609.[CrossRef][Medline]
Toyoda, H., Kinoshita-Toyoda, A., Fox, B. and Selleck, S. B. (2000). Structural analysis of glycosaminoglycans in animals bearing mutations in sugarless, sulfateless, and tout-velu. Drosophila homologues of vertebrate genes encoding glycosaminoglycan biosynthetic enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 275,21856 -21861.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Vortkamp, A., Lee, K., Lanske, B., Segre, G. V., Kronenberg, H. M. and Tabin, C. J. (1996). Regulation of rate of cartilage differentiation by Indian hedgehog and PTH-related protein. Science 273,613 -622.[Abstract]
Vyas, N., Goswami, D., Manonmani, A., Sharma, P., Ranganath, H. A., VijayRaghavan, K., Shashidhara, L. S., Sowdhamini, R. and Mayor, S. (2008). Nanoscale organization of hedgehog is essential for long-range signaling. Cell 133,1214 -1227.[CrossRef][Medline]
Watanabe, H., Kimata, K., Line, S., Strong, D., Gao, L. Y., Kozak, C. A. and Yamada, Y. (1994). Mouse cartilage matrix deficiency (cmd) caused by a 7 bp deletion in the aggrecan gene. Nat. Genet. 7,154 -157.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yoon, B. S., Pogue, R., Ovchinnikov, D. A., Yoshii, I., Mishina, Y., Behringer, R. R. and Lyons, K. M. (2006). BMPs regulate multiple aspects of growth-plate chondrogenesis through opposing actions on FGF pathways. Development 133,4667 -4678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Zhang, F., McLellan, J. S., Ayala, A. M., Leahy, D. J. and Linhardt, R. J. (2007). Kinetic and structural studies on interactions between heparin or heparan sulfate and proteins of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Biochemistry 46,3933 -3941.[CrossRef][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in Development:

Sulphated proteoglycans meshing to the bone?

Development 2009 136: e1005. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.Home page
D. Yan and X. Lin
Shaping Morphogen Gradients by Proteoglycans
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, September 1, 2009; 1(3): a002493 - a002493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
K. Matsumoto, Y. Li, C. Jakuba, Y. Sugiyama, T. Sayo, M. Okuno, C. N. Dealy, B. P. Toole, J. Takeda, Y. Yamaguchi, et al.
Conditional inactivation of Has2 reveals a crucial role for hyaluronan in skeletal growth, patterning, chondrocyte maturation and joint formation in the developing limb
Development, August 15, 2009; 136(16): 2825 - 2835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. Cortes, A. T. Baria, and N. B. Schwartz
Sulfation of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans is necessary for proper Indian hedgehog signaling in the developing growth plate
J. Cell Sci., May 15, 2009; 122(10): e1007 - e1007.
[Full Text]

This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.030742v1
136/10/1697    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cortes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cortes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, N. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?