|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Files in this Data Supplement:
Fig. S1. Cx30.2-lacZ expression is absent from the developing AV valves. Histological sections taken at high magnification (20×) of the developing AVC region are shown for the indicated time points. Note the β-Gal staining in the AV ring (arrowheads) but not in AV valve progenitor cells of the developing endocardial cushions (arrow).
Fig. S2. Cx30.2 enhancer deletion constructs direct lacZ expression to the AVCS. (A-C) Whole mount (left) and histological sections through the AVN (right, arrow) are shown for the following constructs: −4.0/0.0 (A); −2.9/−1.7 (B); and −2.9/−2.3 (C).
Fig. S3. AVN morphogenesis is unaffected in Gata4+/− mice. (A) E12.5 embryos with the indicated genotypes were sectioned through the AVC and subjected to radioactive in situ hybridization with a Tbx3 riboprobe. Shown are brightfield (upper panels) and darkfield (lower panels) images for each section. Note that, whereas Tbx3 levels are maintained in Gata4+/− mice, indicative of preserved AVCS morphology, Tbx3 is diminished in Tbx5+/− mice (arrow), consistent with its role in normal AVN morphogenesis. (B) E12.5 AVCs were microdissected and subjected to quantitative real-time PCR with a Tbx3 probe, confirming that overall Tbx3 expression is preserved in Gata4+/− E12.5 AVC tissue. At least three hearts were assayed in triplicate for each genotype. LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle.
Fig. S4. Gata4+/− mice have a short PR interval over a wide range of heart rates. EKGs were recorded continuously for 30 seconds on mice stimulated with isoproterenol to elevate the atrial rate. Shown is a scatter plot of heart rate versus PR interval at 10-second intervals for all animals studied with the indicated genotype (wild type, solid circles; Gata4+/−, open circles). Computer-generated lines were fit to each scatter plot (wild type, solid line; Gata4+/−, dashed line), demonstrating that the PR interval was shorter in Gata4+/− mice over a range of different heart rates. The table illustrates the slope (m) and intercept (b) associated with the regression lines along with corresponding P values. ns, not significant.
Fig. S5. Normal PR interval in Gata6+/− mice. (A) EKG intervals at baseline for Gata6+/− mice versus their respective wild-type littermates demonstrate that Gata6+/− mice have normal PR intervals. EKG intervals are represented as mean±s.e.m. (B) EKGs were recorded continuously for 30 seconds on mice stimulated with isoproterenol to elevate the atrial rate as in Fig. 6C. Shown is a scatter plot of heart rate versus PR interval at 10-second intervals for all animals studied with the indicated genotype (wild type, solid circles; Gata6+/−, open circles). Computer-generated lines were fit to each scatter plot (wild type, solid line; Gata6+/−, dashed line), showing no significant difference between wild-type and Gata6+/− mice over a wide range of heart rates. The table illustrates the slope (m) and intercept (b) associated with regression lines along with corresponding P values. ns, not significant.
Fig. S6. Cx40 expression is maintained in the AVC of Gata4+/− mice. E12.5 AVCs were microdissected and subjected to quantitative real-time PCR with a Cx40 probe, demonstrating that Cx40 expression is unchanged in Gata4+/− E12.5 AVC tissue compared with wild type. At least three hearts were assayed in triplicate for each genotype. ns, not significant.
| ||||||||||||||||||||