spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 11 February 2009
doi: 10.1242/dev.029868

Development 136, 965-973 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.029868v1
136/6/965    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chi, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Jeang, K.-T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chi, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Jeang, K.-T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Requirement for Sun1 in the expression of meiotic reproductive genes and piRNA

Ya-Hui Chi1,2, Lily I. Cheng3, Tim Myers4, Jerrold M. Ward3, Elizabeth Williams3, Qin Su4, Larry Faucette3, Jing-Ya Wang2 and Kuan-Teh Jeang1,*

1 Molecular Virology Section, Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
2 Institute of Cellular and System Medicine, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan 35053, Taiwan.
3 Infectious Disease Pathogenesis Section, Comparative Medicine Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
4 Microarray Research Facility, Genomic Technologies Section, Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: kj7e{at}nih.gov)

Accepted 16 January 2009


   SUMMARY
TOP
 SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The inner nuclear envelope (NE) proteins interact with the nuclear lamina and participate in the architectural compartmentalization of chromosomes. The association of NE proteins with DNA contributes to the spatial rearrangement of chromosomes and their gene expression. Sun1 is an inner nuclear membrane (INM) protein that locates to telomeres and anchors chromosome movement in the prophase of meiosis. Here, we have created Sun1–/– mice and have found that these mice are born and grow normally but are reproductively infertile. Detailed molecular analyses showed that Sun1–/– P14 testes are repressed for the expression of reproductive genes and have no detectable piRNA. These findings raise a heretofore unrecognized role of Sun1 in the selective gene expression of coding and non-coding RNAs needed for gametogenesis.

Key words: Sun1, Sad1, Unc84, Nuclear envelope, Gametogenesis, piRNA, Mouse


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 SUMMARY
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The nuclear envelope (NE) sequesters chromosomes in the nucleus, separating them from the cytoplasm. In addition to providing anchoring sites for chromatin, the nuclear membrane is important for cellular metabolic activities. For example, the nuclear pore complex (NPC) supports the selective exchange of macromolecules between the nucleus and the cytoplasm (Schneider and Grosschedl, 2007Go), and the nuclear lamina can bind chromatin and regulate DNA replication and transcription (Ellis, 2006Go). Moreover, the loss of NE function has been linked to a variety of dystrophies, collectively termed `nuclear envelopathies' (Schirmer et al., 2003Go). These diseases have phenotypes that include cardiac and skeletal myopathies, lipodystrophy, peripheral neuropathy and premature aging (Burke et al., 2001Go; Burke, 2001Go; Burke and Stewart, 2002Go; Espada et al., 2008Go; Worman and Courvalin, 2004Go).

How genes in the nucleus become accessible for processes such as transcription, replication or repair, and what factors are involved in these regulatory machineries are incompletely understood (Trinkle-Mulcahy and Lamond, 2007Go). One notion is that the NE proteins participate in modulating chromosome organization via direct contact or through indirect epigenetic events (Akhtar and Gasser, 2007Go; Shaklai et al., 2007Go). While transcriptionally active genes are frequently associated with the nuclear pore complex (Akhtar and Gasser, 2007Go), genome-wide studies of nuclear lamina-interacting loci have shown that the lamina-associated gene clusters are mostly repressed transcriptionally (Guelen et al., 2008Go; Pickersgill et al., 2006Go; Reddy et al., 2008Go). There is evidence that two LEM-domain-containing NE proteins, Emerin and Man1, play roles in tethering repressed genes to the nuclear periphery (Liu et al., 2003Go).

Sun1 is a mammalian INM protein that has a Sad1p-Unc84 (SUN) domain at its C terminus (Malone et al., 1999Go). The Sad1p protein in Schizosaccharomyces pombe is a constituent of the spindle pole body (SPB), which contacts the telomere complex (Chikashige et al., 2006Go). Disruption of the SPB abolishes its association with telomeres and obstructs meiotic recombination (Cooper et al., 1998Go). Conversely, the Caenorhabditis elegans SUN-domain protein Unc-84 is required for nuclear migration and anchorage (Lee et al., 2002Go). In mammalian cells, the N terminus of Sun1 targets the protein to the inner nuclear membrane (Chi et al., 2007Go), while the C terminus of the protein connects to cytoplasmic actin through a direct interaction with Nesprin (Crisp et al., 2006Go; Padmakumar et al., 2005Go). In somatic cells, human SUN1 has been described to be one of the early INM factors that associate with segregated daughter chromosomes in anaphase, participating in post-mitotic chromatin de-condensation by recruiting a membrane-associated histone acetyl transferase, hALP (Chi et al., 2007Go).

To gain additional physiological insights into the function(s) of Sun1, we created Sun1–/– mice. Sun1–/– mice are born and grow normally; however, they are reproductively sterile. Gametogenesis in these mice was halted at meiotic prophase I. An analysis of the Sun1–/– mice revealed a prevalent loss in the expression of reproductive genes and small non-coding piRNAs. Although it has been suggested that the sterility of Sun1–/– mice arose from the loss of the mechanical function of Sun1 at meiotic telomeres (Ding et al., 2007Go), our current findings support that failed expression of reproductive genes and piRNAs further explains Sun1–/– sterility.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 SUMMARY
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Construction of Sun1 knockout mice
The Sun1 knockout vector was constructed by cloning a 0.9 kb fragment containing exon 10, intron 10 and exon 11 of the mouse Sun1 gene into vector pGEM-7 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Neo was positioned upstream of exon 10. A 3.0 kb DNA fragment upstream of exon 10 and a 3.4 kb fragment downstream of exon 11 were placed before the 5' end of Neo and after the 3' end of exon 11, respectively (Fig. 1A). The HSV-TK gene was placed at the 5' end for negative selection. In addition, three loxP (locus of X-over of bacteriophage P1) sites were created at 5' end of Neo, between Neo and exon 10, and at 3' end of exon 11, respectively (Fig. 1A). Sun1 knockout mice were generated by the Mouse Genome Engineering Facility at the University of Nebraska. In brief, the Sun1 target vector was introduced into embryonic stem (ES) cells by electroporation and doubly selected using G418 and ganciclovir. Surviving clones were confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Heterozygous ES cells were injected into C57BL/6J blastocysts. Mosaic founder animals were screened for germline transmission of the knockout genotype by breeding to C57BL/6J mice. F1 mice heterozygous for the knockout allele were mated to a Cre-expressing transgenic mouse [strain B6.FVB-Tg(EIIa-cre)C5379Lmgd/J, the Jackson Laboratory] resulting in the deletion of exon 10 and 11 of Sun1 (Fig. 1A) in some offspring. Loss of exon 10-exon 11 was verified by PCR using primers: 5'-GGCAAGTGGATCTCTTGTGAATTCTTGAC-3' and 5'-GTAGCACCCACCTTGGTGAGCTGGTAC-3'. Cre expression was confirmed using primers: 5'-GCGGTCTGGCAGTAAAAACTATC-3' and 5'-GTGAAACAGCATTGCTGTCACTT-3'.

Preparation of anti-mouse Sun1 antibody
A DNA fragment corresponding to amino acids 701-913 of mouse Sun1 was cloned into the pET47b+ vector (Novagen, Gibbstown, NJ, USA) and expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cells. The recombinant His-tagged mouse Sun1 (701-913) protein was purified using Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), and the purified protein was used for rabbit immunization (Spring Valley Laboratories, Woodbine, MD, USA). Rabbit mouse Sun1 antiserum ({alpha}musSun1-C) was further purified using protein A-agarose (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Immunohistochemistry
Sections from paraffin-embedded fixed tissues were deparaffinized and rehydrated using xylene and ethanol. Antigen retrieval was achieved by placing the slides in boiling citrate buffer, pH 6.4 for 20 minutes. After cooling at room temperature for 20 minutes, slides were rinsed with ddH2O and TBST (Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20) successively. Endogenous peroxides were quenched by 3% H2O2 treatment for 10 minutes. To prevent non-specific binding, slides were blocked with background eraser (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA, USA) containing 10% goat serum for 5 minutes. Thereafter, primary (i.e. {alpha}musSun1-C) antibody diluted with TBST was applied and slides were incubated in a humidified chamber for 1 hour. After rinsing with TBST, a biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody was added followed by incubation with a peroxidase-based Vectastain avidin-biotin complex (ABC, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Color was developed using DAB (3,3'-diaminobenzidine) substrate-chromogen. The nucleus was counterstained with Methyl Green.

Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy
Cells or frozen sections were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 minutes at room temperature. To avoid non-specific binding, cells were equilibrated with 1% BSA in PBS for 30 minutes. Antibodies against Sun1 ({alpha}musSun1-C), {gamma}H2AX (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), Scp3 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), lamin B1 (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), Trf1 were added and slides were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Alexa-488-, Alexa-594- or Alexa-647-conjugated secondary antibodies were used for immunofluorescent detection. Fluorescent-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were used for detection. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (Invitrogen). Cells on the coverslips were mounted on glass slides with antifade reagent (Invitrogen). Slides were monitored using a Leica TCS-NP/SP confocal microscope.

Microarray analysis
Total RNA was isolated from E14.5 mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and whole testes of day 9, 14 or 28 mice using the RNeasy kit form Qiagen. cDNA was prepared by reverse transcription using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) incorporated with Cy3- or Cy5-labeled dUTP. Thereafter, parental RNA was degraded by treating with 1 M NaOH at 70°C for 10 minutes; the reaction was neutralized by the addition of an equal volume of 1 M HCl. cDNA samples from paired (same parents) wild-type (Cy3-labeled) and Sun1–/– (Cy5-labeled) mice were mixed and hybridized to a 38 k, self-printed microarray (NCBI GEO accession number GPL6806). This array encompassed approximately 25,000 murine genes. Arrays were scanned by a GenePix 4000B fluorescent scanner (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Three sets of arrays were compared for each type of tissue. Data were analyzed by mAdb (MicroArray DataBase) developed by CIT (Central for Information Technology, NIH) and IPA (Ingenuity pathways analysis, Ingenuity Systems) software.

Northern blotting
Northern blots for detecting miRNAs, Mili- or Miwi-associated piRNAs were performed according to published protocols (Aravin et al., 2006Go; Girard et al., 2006Go). In brief, 10 µg of total RNA were loaded per well. The oligodeoxynucleotide probes were for Mili-associated piRNAs on chromosomes 9 (5'-TCCCTAGGAGAAAATACTAGACCTAGAA-3') and 17 (5'-TCCTTGTTAGTTCTCACTCGTCTTTTA-3'), for Miwi-associated piRNAs (piR-1, 5'-AAAGCTATCTGAGCACCTGTGTTCATGTCA-3'; piR-2, 5'-ACCAGCAGACACCGTCGTATGCATCACACa-3'; piR-3, 5'-ACCACTAAACATTTAGATGCCACTCTCA-3'), and for miR-16 (5'-GCCAATATTTACGTGCTGCTA-3') and U6 snRNA (5'-GCAGGGGCCATGCTAATCTTCTCTGTATCG-3'). The probes were radiolabeled with [{alpha}-32P]-UTP using T7-RNA polymerase. After the reaction, the template DNA was degraded by DNase I and the probe was purified by gel filtration through a G-25 column (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Hybridization using these probes was performed at 30°C in ULTRAhyb (Applied Biosystems, Austin, TX, USA) buffer for 24 hours. The membrane was washed three times with 2xSSC, 0.1% SDS solution at 30°C. Membranes were exposed to an IP plate, which was then scanned using a FLA-7000 imager (Fujifilm, Stamford, CT, USA).

RT-PCR of small RNAs
Total RNA from mouse testis was prepared, and small RNA (<200 nucleotides) was enriched using the mirVana miRNA isolation kit (Applied Biosystems, Austin, TX, USA). The extracted total small RNAs were poly-A extended at their 3' ends using poly(A) polymerase (Applied Biosystems). After annealing with a poly(T) adapter (5'-GCGAGCACAGAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGGTTTTTTTTTTTTVN-3'; V=A,C,G; N=A,T,C,G), RNA was reverse transcribed using Superscript II reverse transcriptase. PCR was performed using a universal reverse primer (5'-GCGAGCACAGAATTAATACGACT-3') and a forward primer corresponding to individual piRNA or miR-16, respectively, as described above in the northern blot section. The RT-PCR products of small RNAs were analyzed by 15% denaturing urea-polyacrylamide gels. Primer sequences used for RT-PCR of Line-1 type A element (Line-1 A-F1, 5'-GAGTTTTTGAGTCTGTATCC-3'; Line-1 A-R1, 5'-CTCTCCTTAGTTTCAGTGG-3') were from Kuramochi-Miyagawa et al. (Kuramochi-Miyagawa et al., 2008Go).


   RESULTS
TOP
 SUMMARY
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Construction of Sun1–/– mice
Mouse Sun1 is an inner nuclear membrane protein with three nuclear transmembrane domains spanning amino acids 358 to 431 (Padmakumar et al., 2005Go). The N terminus of Sun1 is required for its inner nuclear membrane localization (Chi et al., 2007Go; Liu et al., 2007Go), while the SUN C terminus connects to the cytoskeleton through nesprin (Padmakumar et al., 2005Go). To investigate the physiological function of mammalian Sun1, we generated a Sun1 knockout mouse by targeted deletion of exons 10 and 11 (amino acids 344 to 408) that correspond to the transmembrane domains. To guard against embryonic lethality of Sun1 homozygous null animals, we created first a conditionally knocked out mouse. As illustrated in Fig. 1A, independent founder mice with three loxP sequences flanking a Neo (neomycin) gene, exon 10, and exon 11 were created; germ line transmission from founder to F1 offspring was confirmed by PCR (Fig. 1B, left panel). Next, to delete exons 10 and 11 from Sun1, we mated F1 animals to a strain of transgenic mouse from the Jackson Laboratory [strain B6.FVB-Tg(EIIa-cre)C5379Lmgd/J] that expresses an adenovirus EIIa promoter-driven Cre-expression vector (Fig. 1A). Cre-mediated removal of loxP-flanked exon 10 and exon 11 in F2 mice (Sun1+/–) was confirmed by PCR (Fig. 1B, right panel). We then bred pairs of Sun1+/– mice and successfully generated Sun1–/– offspring.


Figure 1
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Defective gametogenesis in Sun1–/– mice. (A) Schematic representation of the wild-type allele, the targeting vector and the mutated locus. The targeting vector contains the PGK-Neo gene (Neo) and the thymidine kinase gene (TK). Three loxP sites (denoted by black triangles) were placed at the 5' end of Neo, between Neo and exon 10 (E10) and at the 3' end of exon 11. Sun1 was removed by crossing mice carrying the Sun1 targeting vector with whole-body Cre transgenic mice. Gray arrows indicate the relative positions of primers used for genotyping by PCR. (B) PCR analysis of representative Sun1 offspring from heterozygous matings. PCR of wild-type genomic DNA generates a 1262 bp fragment, whereas the targeting vector (left) generates a 2570 bp fragment. The sequence between the loxP sites was removed after Cre induction (right), and a 263 bp fragment was generated. (C) Comparison of testes from 4-week- and 7-month-old Sun1+/+ and homologous mutant Sun1–/– mice. Testes from Sun1–/– mice are smaller in both cases. Clear weight differences were observed at about 4-weeks post birth. (D) Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained sections (200x and 1000x magnifications) of testis from 4-week-old mice. In Sun1+/+ testis, a clear progression of the first wave of spermatogenesis with differentiated spermatids (sd) was observed. No spermatid was found in the Sun1–/– mice. Instead, accumulation of zygotene-like spermatocytes was frequently detected in the Sun1–/– seminiferous tubules. sg, spermatogonia; st, sertoli cells; sc, spermatocyte; sd, spermatid.

 
Sun1–/– mice are reproductively sterile
Although Sun1 is expressed ubiquitously in most mouse tissues (see Fig. S1A in the supplementary material) (Crisp et al., 2006Go), Sun1–/– mice were born grossly normal, and they grew to 7 months of age with body weights that were indistinguishable from those of wild-type siblings (see Fig. S1B in the supplementary material). However, when we paired Sun1–/– mice for mating, we discovered that the mice were infertile. This observation agrees with the results from a previously reported, albeit non-identical, Sun1 knockout (KO) mouse (Ding et al., 2007Go). The reproductive sterility of our Sun1–/– mice was confirmed by multiple parings of 6-week-old male Sun1+/+ with female Sun1–/– (four pairs) and male Sun1–/– with female Sun1+/+ (four pairs) animals. None of the eight paired animals produced any pregnancy, supporting that both male and female Sun1–/– mice are infertile.

When the mice were sacrificed and necropsies were performed, we observed that adult Sun1–/– male gonads were significantly smaller than their counterpart wild-type organs (Fig. 1C). Large weight differences in the male gonads were seen when the animals were compared at 28 days post birth (Fig. 1C). Moreover, when compared to Sun1+/+ mice, no sperm was seen in the epididymides of adult Sun1–/– testes (Fig. 1C; data not shown). In female Sun1–/– mice, no follicle was detected in the uterine tubes (see Fig. S1C in the supplementary material).

Four-week-old Sun1+/+ testes had well-differentiated spermatocytes and spermatids (Fig. 1D); however, in Sun1–/– mice, the seminiferous tubules were blocked at the prophase of meiosis I (Fig. 1D). In the Sun1–/– mice, increased numbers of apoptotic cells were observed by TUNEL assay (see Fig. S1D in the supplementary material). Additionally, 4-week-old Sun1–/– ovaries contained no oocytes (see Fig. S1E in the supplementary material). The phenotype of our Sun1 knockout mice is similar to that reported by Ding et al. (Ding et al., 2007Go). Unlike female mice whose oogenesis at meiosis I completes before birth, the first wave of spermatogenesis initiates 2 days postnatal. To further characterize which stage of meiosis was affected by Sun1 depletion, we focused our analysis on postnatal male, rather than prenatal female, mice due to their easier experimental accessibility.


Figure 2
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. Comparison of {gamma}H2AX staining in Sun1+/+ versus Sun1–/– mice. Distribution of {gamma}H2AX (red, Alexa-594) in Sun1+/+ (A-O) and Sun1–/– (P-U) testes at meiosis prophase I using spermatocyte spread (A-L,S-U) or cryosection (M-R). SCP3 (green, Alexa-488) staining denotes the stage of meiosis. A-L show single wild-type cells stained with {gamma}H2AX and SCP3. Overviews of testis cells (cryosections) in Sun1+/+ (M-O) and Sun1–/– (P-R) are shown. A massive accumulation of {gamma}H2AX-stained cells was observed in Sun1–/– (P-R) but not in Sun1+/+ (M-O) mice. In Sun1+/+ leptotene spermatocytes, {gamma}H2AX was distributed all over the chromosome (panels 1-3). From zygotene to pachytene, {gamma}H2AX staining decreased gradually, and finally was restricted to the gonosomal chromatin in late zygotene/early pachytene spermatocytes (G-L). By contrast, Sun1–/– cells (spermatocyte spread) showed a general {gamma}H2AX staining pattern, similar to zygotene spermatocytes (P-U). Arrows in K and N denote the XY body.

 
To characterize the gametogenesis defect, we used SCP3 (also called SYCP3) as an indicator for synaptonemal complex (SC) formation, and phosphorylation of histone H2A at Ser139 (i.e. {gamma}H2AX) as a marker for synapsis (Viera et al., 2004Go). SCP3 is a part of the lateral element of SC, a meiosis-specific protein structure that forms between two homologous chromosomes during meiosis and is essential for synapsis of homologous chromosomes (Zickler, 2006Go). Accumulation of {gamma}H2AX is an early response to induced double-strand breaks (DSBs), such as those seen in meiotic recombination. In the budding yeast and in the mouse, the initiation of synapsis is dependent on the occurrence of DSBs during leptotene and zygotene (Viera et al., 2004Go). During normal meiotic progression, SCP3 and {gamma}H2AX first appear diffusely in the leptotene stage of spermatocytes (Fig. 2A-C). As meiosis progresses to the zygotene stage, SCP3 forms a line-shaped structure, and {gamma}H2AX configures into discrete loci (Fig. 2D-F). In late zygotene and pachytene, {gamma}H2AX staining becomes restricted to the sex (XY) body, and prominent synapsis marked by SCP3 was observed [Fig. 2G-L, indicated by arrow) (Hamer et al., 2003Go; Sciurano et al., 2007Go). Intriguingly, although wild-type cells showed above expected progression in SCP3 and {gamma}H2AX staining (Fig. 2M-O), the distribution of {gamma}H2AX in Sun1–/– cells failed at the step of congression to the XY body (Fig. 2P-U). Thus, {gamma}H2AX in Sun1–/– cells remained multiply retained on various chromosomes (Fig. 2P-U), indicating that meiotic chromosome synapsis is impaired in Sun1-depleted cells.

Sun1 localization during spermatogenesis
To further investigate the role of Sun1 in gonad maturation, we generated an antibody ({alpha}musSun1-C) to mouse Sun1. As shown in Fig. 3A, {alpha}musSun1-C stained the nuclear envelope of mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), consistent with previous Sun1 localization studies (Chi et al., 2007Go; Padmakumar et al., 2005Go). Using {alpha}musSun1-C, we performed immunohistochemical staining of mouse testes (Fig. 3B, part a), using Davidson's fixative with paraffin-embedding to preserve the organization of the tissue and the morphology of the cells. Employing Methyl Green to counterstain the nuclei, Sun1 was localized in progressively dividing meiotic cells (Fig. 3B, part a) and was found initially at the nuclear periphery in spermatogonia (Fig. 3B, part b). As the cells entered meiotic prophase I, the chromosomes condensed and Sun1 concentrated at the chromosome ends (Fig. 3B, parts c-f). Using a telomere marker, Trf1 (Scherthan et al., 2000Go), Sun1 stained coincidently, although did not completely overlap, with Trf1 at the telomeres; moreover, Sun1 was also associated with the nuclear membrane, as revealed by lamin B1 staining (Fig. 3C). By the second stage of meiosis when haploid chromatids were produced, Sun1 reappeared at the nuclear periphery (Fig. 3B, part g). As the spermatids elongated, an acrosome-acroplaxome-manchette complex formed to shape the chromatid head for packaging chromatin (Kierszenbaum and Tres, 2004Go). At this juncture, Sun1 located to the acrosome-like structure (Fig. 3B, part h). Subsequently, Sun1 staining was extinguished in spermatozoa (Fig. 3B, part i). These localization changes are compatible with dynamic roles for Sun1 in gamete production.

Prevalently changed meiotic gene expression in Sun1–/– versus control testes
The spatial organization of chromosomes in the nucleus can influence gene expression (Kumaran et al., 2008Go; Marshall, 2007Go; Stewart et al., 2007Go). Evidence suggests that a Sun1-telomere interaction tethers the chromosomes to the nuclear periphery, compartmentalizing DNA during the various stages of meiosis (Fig. 3). We wondered next how the depletion of Sun1 in Sun1–/– animals might impact meiotic gene expression.


Figure 3
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. Localization of Sun1 in the wild-type testis. (A) Immunofluorescent staining of Sun1 in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) using {alpha}musSun1-C. A clear nuclear envelope localization of Sun1 (green, Alexa-488) was seen. DNA stained by DAPI is in red. (B) Localization of Sun1 in the wild-type adult testis (Davidson's fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue section), as detected by immunohistochemistry. Sun1 is stained brown, and the nuclei were counterstained with Methyl Green (green). Part a shows an overall view of Sun1 staining in seminiferous tubule. Sun1 was localized to the nuclear periphery in spermatogonia (b) and round spermatids (g), showed punctate staining at chromosome ends in prophase I (c-f), and decorated an acrosome-like structure in elongated spermatids (h). Sun1 staining was not seen in spermatozoa (i). (C) Immunofluorescent staining of a frozen testis section (28-day-old) by {alpha}musSun1-C (green, Alexa-488), anti-Trf1 (red, Alexa-594) and anti-lamin B1 (gray, Alexa-633) antibodies. Nuclei are labeled by DAPI (blue). Insets show higher-magnification images of the framed sections. sc, spermatocyte; sp, spermatozoan; Esd, elongated spermatid.

 
In postnatal mice, the first wave of spermatogenesis transpires stepwise within the testis (Fig. 4A) (Goetz et al., 1984Go). At defined times, new germ cell types populate the testis, and the more immature cells progress to mature cells until the entire spectrum of germ cells is generated (Fig. 4A). To investigate how Sun1 might affect gene transcription, we compared male Sun1+/+ and Sun1–/– germ cells in the initial stages of mouse spermatogenesis by using cDNA microarrays. The cell composition of P9 and P14 testes was quantified (Fig. 4B,C) according to the cell morphologies described by Russell et al. (Russell et al., 1990Go) and Bellve et al. (Bellve et al., 1977Go). The morphological and spatial arrangements of cells in Sun1+/+ and Sun1–/– P9 testes were not grossly different (Fig. 4B,C). However, although the composition of cells was similar (Fig. 4C), the wild-type mice showed a clear bouquet structure at P14 (Fig. 4B,C), while the counterpart chromosomal appearance in Sun1–/– P14 testis was amorphous (Fig. 4B, part d). The consequences of bouquet formation or no bouquet formation in Sun1+/+ or Sun1–/– mice were assessed next by comparing the gene expression profiles of P9 and P14 testes.


Figure 4
View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 4. Histology of testes from Sun1+/+ and Sun1–/– mice during the first wave of spermatogenesis. (A) A schematic time line for the first wave of mouse spermatogenesis. (B) H&E stainings of testes from 9- and 14-day-old Sun1+/+ and Sun1–/– mice are shown. Insets show higher-magnification images of the tissues. In P9 testes (a,b), no significant morphological difference was observed between Sun1+/+ and Sun1–/– mice. In P14 mice, although the distribution of spermatogonia/sertoli cells and meiotic prophase I spermatocytes are similar (quantified in C) in the wild-type and Sun1–/– testes, wild type mostly showed clear `bouquet' structures (c) while Sun1–/– cells did not (d). Cell stages later than pachytene were not observed in either P9 or P14 testes. (C) Cell compositions in P9 and P14 Sun1+/+ and Sun1–/– testes. Two thousand cells were counted in each set.

 
Total RNAs were extracted from 9- (P9, before prophase I) and 14- (P14, zygotene/pachytene) day-old mouse testes (Fig. 4A,B) and were analyzed using a 38 k gene chip representing 25,000 known mouse genes (NCBI GEO accession number GPL6806). cDNA expression from three pairs of Sun1–/– versus Sun1+/+ animals was evaluated at each of the two time points. We also compared the expression profiles of Sun1–/– versus Sun1+/+ mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). Not all 25,000 array points were detected in the samples; however, the reproducibly detectable signals (P<0.05, t-test) from three separate assays were collated. Overall, 10,043 (P9 testes), 9280 (P14 testes) and 6414 (MEFs) data points were captured (Table 1). Comparing the Sun1–/– versus Sun1+/+ samples, the expression of control `housekeeping' genes such as actin or Gapdh was unchanged, and as expected Sun1 (i.e. Unc84A) was consistently low in the Sun1–/– cDNA arrays (see Table S1 in the supplementary material).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Summary of cDNA microarray analysis* of Sun1–/– versus Sun1+/+ gene expression in P9, P14 testis and MEFs

 
The expression profiles of P9 Sun1–/– and Sun1+/+ mouse testes showed that 9448 cDNAs were essentially unchanged, and approximately an equal number of genes were either two fold up- (222 out of 10,043, 2.2%) or down- (373 out of 10,043, 3.7%) regulated [a ratio of 1:1.6 in up- versus down-regulated genes (Table 1)]. This pattern became significantly different at P14 when the first wave of spermatogenesis proceeded to a stage between zygotene and pachytene and when bouquet structures were observed in most of the wild-type (Fig. 4B, part c) but not the Sun1–/– (Fig. 4B, part d) testis cells. At P14, 1.2% (109 out of 9280) of genes were upregulated and 9.0% (834 out of 9280) of genes were downregulated [a ratio of 1:7.5 in up- versus down-regulated genes (Table 1)]. Conversely, in non-germ control cells (i.e. MEFs), we actually noted that more genes were upregulated than were downregulated in the Sun1–/– compared with the Sun1+/+ sample [a ratio of 1:0.5 in up- versus down-regulated genes (compare 643 to 323; Table 1)]. Collectively, these numbers suggest that a loss of Sun1 results in selectively downregulated gene expression in P14 germ cells.

Because Sun1–/– mice are infertile, we considered next whether reproductive genes (ontology analyses were made with the mAdb software developed by CIT, NIH, USA) were specifically repressed in these animals. We detected microarray signals for 119 reproductive genes in P9, and 162 reproductive genes in P14 germ cells. Although Sun1–/– and Sun1+/+ P9 samples expressed essentially the same reproductive genes, P14 cells showed a 1:29 ratio in up- versus down-regulated genes in Sun1+/+ samples (see Table 2). Of note, several genes, such as Gykl1, Acr, Spag6, Odf4 and Piwil1, were repressed more than 10-fold [i.e. log2(Sun1–/–/wt)<–3.3] in P14 Sun1–/– compared with Sun1+/+ testis (see Table S2 in the supplementary material).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. Number of genes more than 2-fold changed that are associated with reproduction

 
Reduction in Mili- and Miwi-associated piRNA in Sun1–/– testis
In our cDNA microarrays, reduced expression of Miwi (i.e. Piwil1; see Table S2 in the supplementary material) was seen in the Sun1–/– samples. Miwi and Mili are murine Piwi gene family members whose expression is restricted to mouse germ cells (Deng and Lin, 2002Go; Kuramochi-Miyagawa et al., 2004Go); they have been implicated in stem cell renewal, RNA silencing and germ cell development (Hartig et al., 2007Go; Klattenhoff and Theurkauf, 2008Go; Seto et al., 2007Go). To confirm the microarray results, we employed a semi-quantitative RT-PCR assay to measure the expression of Miwi and other reproduction-relevant genes in P9, P14 and P28 testes (Fig. 5A). Indeed, a reduction in Miwi, Mili and Mvh1, but not Mlh1, was observed.

Mili expression is crucial for germ cell progression to spermatids (Deng and Lin, 2002Go). The reduced expression of Mili could create a block in meiosis at a stage prior to pachytene in Sun1–/– cells. Mvh1 and Mili function before the zygotene stage (Kuramochi-Miyagawa et al., 2004Go; Tanaka et al., 2000Go), and it is intriguing that these two factors were also repressed in Sun1–/– animals. We noted that not all meiotic factors were affected. For example, the synaptonemal complex protein Scp3, the expression of which is restricted in leptotene to diplotene spermatocytes (Di Carlo et al., 2000Go; Meuwissen et al., 1992Go), was unchanged (Fig. 5A). Thus, the collective results suggested that an absence of Sun1 selectively reduced the expression of many, but not all, reproductive genes.

Mili and Miwi function in the biogenesis of a novel class of 24- to 29-nucleotide piRNAs that accumulate during meiosis (Aravin et al., 2006Go; Girard et al., 2006Go). In addition, Mili forms a complex with Mvh1 in germ cells (Kuramochi-Miyagawa et al., 2004Go). Above, we documented the reduced expression of Mili and Mvh1 in Sun1–/– germ cells (Fig. 5A). Because Mili and Miwi are necessary for piRNA production, their reduction could be independently confirmed by verifying the reduced expression of piRNA. To this end, we end-labeled total RNA with [{gamma}-32P]-ATP and assayed the abundance of small RNAs by denaturing gels. Notably, although wild-type mice harbored a surfeit of ~30-nucleotide piRNAs, these small RNA signals were not detected in 28-day-old Sun1–/– mice (Fig. 5B). Northern blotting using piRNA-specific probes (see Materials and methods) confirmed that the expected Mili- and Miwi-associated piRNAs were not seen in 28-day-old Sun1–/– testis (Fig. 5C). Moreover, we characterized the expression of several individual piRNAs using a highly sensitive RT-PCR assay. Thus, while Mili- and Miwi-associated piRNAs were seen in P14 Sun1+/+ testis, little to no piRNAs were detected in P14 or P28 Sun1–/– testis by RT-PCR (Fig. 5D).


Figure 5
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 5. Reduced Mili- and Miwi-associated piRNA expression in Sun–/– germ cells. (A) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was used to validate the expression of spermatogenesis-related genes at P9, P14 and P28 testes. Gapdh was used for normalization. (B) Radioactive labeling of total RNAs isolated from 28-day-old mouse testis. Sun1+/+ mice showed an abundant ~30-nucleotide small-RNA fraction while no detectable ~30-nucleotide small RNAs were seen in Sun1–/– mice. M, radio-labeled RNA ladder. (C) Northern blot hybridization for Mili- or Miwi-associated piRNAs. Ten micrograms of total mouse RNA were loaded in each lane. A mixture of probes against Mili-associated piRNAs from chromosome 9 and 17 or Miwi-associated piRNAs (piR-1, piR-2, piR-3) were used. A probe for microRNA miR-16 was hybridized simultaneously as a control. Blots were re-probed with a U6 antisense probe for comparison. (D) Semi-quantitative analysis of individual Mili- and Miwi-associated piRNA by RT-PCR. Expression of miR-16 is shown for normalization. C, control lane (no RNA was loaded in the reaction). (E) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis of Line-1 type A element in Sun1–/– and Sun1+/+ P14 testes. Gapdh expression was used as a control. Equal amounts of total RNA were used for RT-PCR cycles (25, 30 and 35 cycles from left to right, respectively).

 
The silencing of transposable elements via de novo DNA methylation is required during gametogenesis, and the loss of Mili and Miwi2 is associated with the activation of retrotransposons (Kuramochi-Miyagawa et al., 2008Go). To investigate whether the reduction in Mili and Miwi caused by Sun1 depletion affected the expression of retrotransposons, we checked a representative Line-1 element using semi-quantitative RT-PCR (Kuramochi-Miyagawa et al., 2008Go). Indeed similar to findings from Mili–/– mice, the expression of type A Line-1 was de-repressed in two-week-old Sun1–/– testis (Fig. 5E).


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 SUMMARY
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
The nuclear membrane and its associated proteins affect many cellular processes, including the spatial architecture of the DNA in the eukaryotic nucleus, which influences gene expression (Schneider and Grosschedl, 2007Go). We previously reported on the contribution of the inner nuclear membrane protein Sun1 to somatic cell mitosis and cell cycle progression (Chi et al., 2007Go). Others have presented findings that Sun1 provides a structural bridge that connects the nucleus to cytoplasmic actin and is involved in nuclear anchorage (Crisp et al., 2006Go; Padmakumar et al., 2005Go). Here, we have created a Sun1 knockout mouse, and have found, surprisingly, that the mouse is born somatically normal, and that the major in vivo developmental deficit in the Sun1–/– animal is reproductive infertility with failed gametogenesis.

Our experimental results agree with those of Ding et al. (Ding et al., 2007Go) that Sun1 locates to telomeres during the prophase of meiosis I (Fig. 3B,C). In lower eukaryotes that do not undergo meiotic reproduction, the published literature suggests that Sun1 behaves differently. For instance, the S. pombe Sun1 homolog Sad1 is a component of the spindle pole body (SPB) that serves as a microtubule organization center (Chikashige et al., 2006Go; Raff, 1999Go; Tomita and Cooper, 2006Go), and Matefin/SUN-1 of C. elegans has been reported to mediate the attachment of centrosomes to the nucleus (Penkner et al., 2007Go). In mammalian germ cells, Sun1 tethers telomeres to the nuclear periphery (Fig. 3) (Ding et al., 2007Go; Kierszenbaum and Tres, 2004Go). Our current study suggests that loss of this DNA compartmentalization reshapes the meiotic gene expression needed for normal gametogenesis (Table 2).

The report from Ding et al. (Ding et al., 2007Go) suggested that the association of Sun1 with telomeres is a prerequisite for efficient homolog paring and synapsis. At the initial stages of meiosis, paternal and maternal chromosomes converge and pair. Subsequently, homologous recombination could occur, and meiosis would then proceed to the next phase (Meier and Ahmed, 2001Go). Ding et al. (Ding et al., 2007Go) hypothesized that Sun1 functions in telomere clustering and bouquet formation, and that the bouquet structure facilitates the probability of encounter between chromosomes for recombination (Chikashige et al., 2006Go; Tomita and Cooper, 2006Go). Although this attractive hypothesis provides details on how Sun1 might contribute to bouquet formation and synapsis, it does not explain how these events mechanistically influence downstream gametogenesis. Our data do not question the influence of Sun1 on bouquet formation, but they do suggest that loss of Sun1 further results in failed expression of selective reproductive genes and piRNAs, which would causally impact gametogenesis.

The cDNA microarray analyses revealed that in Sun1–/– versus Sun1+/+ P9 testis, the ratio of up- versus down-regulated genes (1:1.6) was significantly different to the same ratio (1:7.5) in P14 testes (see Table 1). In Sun1–/– P9 testes, out of 119 reproductive genes with detectable signals, only two were different between Sun1–/– and Sun1+/+ animals, whereas in P14 testes 30 reproductive genes were different, and 29 of these were repressed in Sun1–/– animals. How then does one link a loss of Sun1 to selectively changed meiotic gene expression? The answer is not known; however, recent experiments do show that siRNA-depletion of Sun1 interfered with the organization of the INM (inner nuclear membrane) constituents and the NPC (Chi et al., 2007Go; Liu et al., 2007Go). Transcriptionally active genes are frequently NPC associated (Taddei et al., 2006Go). Perhaps, a Sun1-depletion effect on the NPC could, in part, explain the selectively perturbed transcription in P14 Sun1–/– testes.

That Sun1 contributes to meiotic transcription is consistent with emerging data that some nuclear proteins previously touted only for their structural roles do significantly affect gene expression. For example, the cohesin protein whose function was attributed exclusively to connecting sister chromatids during mitosis and meiosis has recently been shown to serve a role in developmental gene regulation (Hallson et al., 2008Go; Misulovin et al., 2008Go). Likewise, the inner nuclear membrane protein Src1 was also revealed to regulate subtelomeric gene expression (Grund et al., 2008Go). Sun1 is a lamin A-binding protein (Crisp et al., 2006Go; Haque et al., 2006Go), and its currently invoked role in selective gene transcription may have implications for the competing models, the `mechanical model' versus the `gene expression model', that explain the pathogenesis of human laminopathies which arise from lamin A mutation (Wagner and Krohne, 2007Go). In the mechanical model, lamin A mutation weakens the cytoskeletal structure leading to disease pathology. By contrast, the gene expression model posits that lamin A mutation affects either directly or indirectly the expression of disease-associated genes that engender pathology. In considering the gametogenesis defect in Sun1–/– mice, one surmises that this could arise in two ways. First, Sun1 depletion could abrogate proper chromosomal organization, interrupting meiosis and arresting gene expression. Second, Sun1 depletion could selectively interfere with gene expression, whereby the loss of expression interrupts meiosis preventing proper chromosomal organization. Currently, the findings from Sun1–/– mice do not fully differentiate between whether Sun1 depletion impacts first chromosome organization or gene expression, or both simultaneously. Indeed, further dissection of the Sun1 knockout mouse could potentially permit the delineation of which genes are involved in meiotic progression before and after bouquet formation.

Sun1 tethers lamin A through nesprin to cytoplasmic actin (Haque et al., 2006Go), and loss of Sun1 might be expected to show a similar mechano-structural weakness to that seen with a lamin A mutation. Sun1–/– mice, unlike Lmna–/– mice (Sullivan et al., 1999Go), however, do not exhibit a laminopathy. We speculate that the Sun1 function in Sun1–/– somatic cells may be redundantly constituted by the expression of other Sun domain proteins. However, based on our finding of selective repression of reproductive genes in Sun1–/– versus Sun1+/+ testes, it may be worthwhile comparing in detail the gene expression patterns of relevant somatic tissues from Lmna–/– versus Lmna+/+ mice for correlation with the development of pathology.

Another unanticipated observation to emerge from our work was the requirement for mouse Sun1 in the expression of Piwi-like proteins, Mili and Miwi. Mili and Miwi are expressed highly in testes and bind 24- to 29-nucleotide piRNAs. Both genes are required for male fertility as mice knocked out for either the Mili or the Miwi gene have degenerative male germ cells (Deng and Lin, 2002Go; Kuramochi-Miyagawa et al., 2004Go). In flies, piRNA mutations lead to the activation of retrotransposons. Mobilization of retrotransposition can create germline DNA damage and trigger cellular apoptotic responses (Brennecke et al., 2007Go). Indeed, piRNAs may serve ubiquitously to control chromatin organization, gene transcription, RNA stability or translation (Klattenhoff and Theurkauf, 2008Go). Consistent with these data, our results show that Sun1–/– germ cells do have higher retrotransposon expression (Fig. 5E). The detailed linkage between piRNA processing and Sun1 and the absence of piRNAs in Sun1–/– germ line cells needs further investigation, which could reveal a gamete-specific mechanism(s) that accounts for reproductive infertility.


   Footnotes
 
We thank members of the Jeang laboratory for critical readings of this manuscript. This work was supported by in part NIAID/NIH intramural funds, the Intramural AIDS Targeted Anti-viral Program (IATAP), an NIAID contract to SoBran, and by intramural grants to Y.-H.C. from the National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan. Deposited in PMC for release after 12 months.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material for this article is available at http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/136/6/965/DC1


   REFERENCES
TOP
 SUMMARY
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 


Akhtar, A. and Gasser, S. M. (2007). The nuclear envelope and transcriptional control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8,507 -517.[CrossRef][Medline]
Aravin, A., Gaidatzis, D., Pfeffer, S., Lagos-Quintana, M., Landgraf, P., Iovino, N., Morris, P., Brownstein, M. J., Kuramochi-Miyagawa, S., Nakano, T. et al. (2006). A novel class of small RNAs bind to MILI protein in mouse testes. Nature 442,203 -207.[Medline]
Bellve, A. R., Cavicchia, J. C., Millette, C. F., O'Brien, D. A., Bhatnagar, Y. M. and Dym, M. (1977). Spermatogenic cells of the prepuberal mouse. Isolation and morphological characterization. J. Cell Biol. 74,68 -85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Brennecke, J., Aravin, A. A., Stark, A., Dus, M., Kellis, M., Sachidanandam, R. and Hannon, G. J. (2007). Discrete small RNA-generating loci as master regulators of transposon activity in Drosophila. Cell 128,1089 -1103.[CrossRef][Medline]
Burke, B. (2001). The nuclear envelope: filling in gaps. Nat. Cell Biol. 3,E273 -E274.[CrossRef][Medline]
Burke, B. and Stewart, C. L. (2002). Life at the edge: the nuclear envelope and human disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 3,575 -585.[CrossRef][Medline]
Burke, B., Mounkes, L. C. and Stewart, C. L. (2001). The nuclear envelope in muscular dystrophy and cardiovascular diseases. Traffic 2, 675-683.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chi, Y. H., Haller, K., Peloponese, J. M., Jr and Jeang, K. T. (2007). Histone acetyltransferase hALP and nuclear membrane protein hsSUN1 function in de-condensation of mitotic chromosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 282,27447 -27458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Chikashige, Y., Tsutsumi, C., Yamane, M., Okamasa, K., Haraguchi, T. and Hiraoka, Y. (2006). Meiotic proteins bqt1 and bqt2 tether telomeres to form the bouquet arrangement of chromosomes. Cell 125,59 -69.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cooper, J. P., Watanabe, Y. and Nurse, P. (1998). Fission yeast Taz1 protein is required for meiotic telomere clustering and recombination. Nature 392,828 -831.[CrossRef][Medline]
Crisp, M., Liu, Q., Roux, K., Rattner, J. B., Shanahan, C., Burke, B., Stahl, P. D. and Hodzic, D. (2006). Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: role of the LINC complex. J. Cell Biol. 172,41 -53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Deng, W. and Lin, H. (2002). miwi, a murine homolog of piwi, encodes a cytoplasmic protein essential for spermatogenesis. Dev. Cell 2,819 -830.[CrossRef][Medline]
Di Carlo, A. D., Travia, G. and De Felici, M. (2000). The meiotic specific synaptonemal complex protein SCP3 is expressed by female and male primordial germ cells of the mouse embryo. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 44,241 -244.[Medline]
Ding, X., Xu, R., Yu, J., Xu, T., Zhuang, Y. and Han, M. (2007). SUN1 is required for telomere attachment to nuclear envelope and gametogenesis in mice. Dev. Cell 12,863 -872.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ellis, J. A. (2006). Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy at the nuclear envelope: 10 years on. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 63,2702 -2709.[CrossRef][Medline]
Espada, J., Varela, I., Flores, I., Ugalde, A. P., Cadinanos, J., Pendas, A. M., Stewart, C. L., Tryggvason, K., Blasco, M. A., Freije, J. M. et al. (2008). Nuclear envelope defects cause stem cell dysfunction in premature-aging mice. J. Cell Biol. 181, 9-13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Girard, A., Sachidanandam, R., Hannon, G. J. and Carmell, M. A. (2006). A germline-specific class of small RNAs binds mammalian Piwi proteins. Nature 442,199 -202.[Medline]
Goetz, P., Chandley, A. C. and Speed, R. M. (1984). Morphological and temporal sequence of meiotic prophase development at puberty in the male mouse. J. Cell Sci. 65,249 -263.[Abstract]
Grund, S. E., Fischer, T., Cabal, G. G., Antunez, O., Perez-Ortin, J. E. and Hurt, E. (2008). The inner nuclear membrane protein Src1 associates with subtelomeric genes and alters their regulated gene expression. J. Cell Biol. 182,897 -910.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Guelen, L., Pagie, L., Brasset, E., Meuleman, W., Faza, M. B., Talhout, W., Eussen, B. H., de Klein, A., Wessels, L., de Laat, W. et al. (2008). Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 453,948 -951.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hallson, G., Syrzycka, M., Beck, S. A., Kennison, J. A., Dorsett, D., Page, S. L., Hunter, S. M., Keall, R., Warren, W. D., Brock, H. W. et al. (2008). The Drosophila cohesin subunit Rad21 is a trithorax group (trxG) protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105,12405 -12410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Hamer, G., Roepers-Gajadien, H. L., van Duyn-Goedhart, A., Gademan, I. S., Kal, H. B., van Buul, P. P. and de Rooij, D. G. (2003). DNA double-strand breaks and gamma-H2AX signaling in the testis. Biol. Reprod. 68,628 -634.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Haque, F., Lloyd, D. J., Smallwood, D. T., Dent, C. L., Shanahan, C. M., Fry, A. M., Trembath, R. C. and Shackleton, S. (2006). SUN1 interacts with nuclear lamin A and cytoplasmic nesprins to provide a physical connection between the nuclear lamina and the cytoskeleton. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26,3738 -3751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Hartig, J. V., Tomari, Y. and Forstemann, K. (2007). piRNAs-the ancient hunters of genome invaders. Genes Dev. 21,1707 -1713.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kierszenbaum, A. L. and Tres, L. L. (2004). The acrosome-acroplaxome-manchette complex and the shaping of the spermatid head. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 67,271 -284.[CrossRef][Medline]
Klattenhoff, C. and Theurkauf, W. (2008). Biogenesis and germline functions of piRNAs. Development 135,3 -9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kumaran, R. I., Thakar, R. and Spector, D. L. (2008). Chromatin dynamics and gene positioning. Cell 132,929 -934.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kuramochi-Miyagawa, S., Kimura, T., Ijiri, T. W., Isobe, T., Asada, N., Fujita, Y., Ikawa, M., Iwai, N., Okabe, M., Deng, W. et al. (2004). Mili, a mammalian member of piwi family gene, is essential for spermatogenesis. Development 131,839 -849.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kuramochi-Miyagawa, S., Watanabe, T., Gotoh, K., Totoki, Y., Toyoda, A., Ikawa, M., Asada, N., Kojima, K., Yamaguchi, Y., Ijiri, T. W. et al. (2008). DNA methylation of retrotransposon genes is regulated by Piwi family members MILI and MIWI2 in murine fetal testes. Genes Dev. 22,908 -917.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Lee, K. K., Starr, D., Cohen, M., Liu, J., Han, M., Wilson, K. L. and Gruenbaum, Y. (2002). Lamin-dependent localization of UNC-84, a protein required for nuclear migration in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Biol. Cell 13,892 -901.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Liu, J., Lee, K. K., Segura-Totten, M., Neufeld, E., Wilson, K. L. and Gruenbaum, Y. (2003). MAN1 and emerin have overlapping function(s) essential for chromosome segregation and cell division in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100,4598 -4603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Liu, Q., Pante, N., Misteli, T., Elsagga, M., Crisp, M., Hodzic, D., Burke, B. and Roux, K. J. (2007). Functional association of Sun1 with nuclear pore complexes. J. Cell Biol. 178,785 -798.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Malone, C. J., Fixsen, W. D., Horvitz, H. R. and Han, M. (1999). UNC-84 localizes to the nuclear envelope and is required for nuclear migration and anchoring during C. elegans development. Development 126,3171 -3181.[Abstract]
Marshall, W. F. (2007). Centriole assembly: the origin of nine-ness. Curr. Biol. 17,R1057 -R1059.[CrossRef][Medline]
Meier, B. and Ahmed, S. (2001). Checkpoints: chromosome pairing takes an unexpected twist. Curr. Biol. 11,R865 -R868.[CrossRef][Medline]
Meuwissen, R. L., Offenberg, H. H., Dietrich, A. J., Riesewijk, A., van, I. M. and Heyting, C. (1992). A coiled-coil related protein specific for synapsed regions of meiotic prophase chromosomes. EMBO J. 11,5091 -5100.[Medline]
Misulovin, Z., Schwartz, Y. B., Li, X. Y., Kahn, T. G., Gause, M., MacArthur, S., Fay, J. C., Eisen, M. B., Pirrotta, V., Biggin, M. D. et al. (2008). Association of cohesin and Nipped-B with transcriptionally active regions of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Chromosoma 117,89 -102.[CrossRef][Medline]
Padmakumar, V. C., Libotte, T., Lu, W., Zaim, H., Abraham, S., Noegel, A. A., Gotzmann, J., Foisner, R. and Karakesisoglou, I. (2005). The inner nuclear membrane protein Sun1 mediates the anchorage of Nesprin-2 to the nuclear envelope. J. Cell Sci. 118,3419 -3430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Penkner, A., Tang, L., Novatchkova, M., Ladurner, M., Fridkin, A., Gruenbaum, Y., Schweizer, D., Loidl, J. and Jantsch, V. (2007). The nuclear envelope protein Matefin/SUN-1 is required for homologous pairing in C. elegans meiosis. Dev. Cell 12,873 -885.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pickersgill, H., Kalverda, B., de W. E., Talhout, W., Fornerod, M. and van Steensel, B. (2006). Characterization of the Drosophila melanogaster genome at the nuclear lamina. Nat. Genet. 38,1005 -1014.[CrossRef][Medline]
Raff, J. W. (1999). The missing (L) UNC? Curr. Biol. 9,R708 -R710.[CrossRef][Medline]
Reddy, K. L., Zullo, J. M., Bertolino, E. and Singh, H. (2008). Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature 452,243 -247.[CrossRef][Medline]
Russell, L., Ettlin, R., Sinha, A. and Clegg, E. (1990). Histological and Histopathological Evaluation of the Testis. Clearwater, FL: Cache River Press.
Scherthan, H., Jerratsch, M., Li, B., Smith, S., Hulten, M., Lock, T. and de Lange, T. (2000). Mammalian meiotic telomeres: protein composition and redistribution in relation to nuclear pores. Mol. Biol. Cell 11,4189 -4203.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Schirmer, E. C., Florens, L., Guan, T., Yates, J. R., 3rd and Gerace, L. (2003). Nuclear membrane proteins with potential disease links found by subtractive proteomics. Science 301,1380 -1382.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Schneider, R. and Grosschedl, R. (2007). Dynamics and interplay of nuclear architecture, genome organization, and gene expression. Genes Dev. 21,3027 -3043.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Sciurano, R., Rahn, M., Rey-Valzacchi, G. and Solari, A. J. (2007). The asynaptic chromatin in spermatocytes of translocation carriers contains the histone variant gamma-H2AX and associates with the XY body. Hum. Reprod. 22,142 -150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Seto, A. G., Kingston, R. E. and Lau, N. C. (2007). The coming of age for Piwi proteins. Mol. Cell 26,603 -609.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shaklai, S., Amariglio, N., Rechavi, G. and Simon, A. J. (2007). Gene silencing at the nuclear periphery. FEBS J. 274,1383 -1392.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stewart, C. L., Roux, K. J. and Burke, B. (2007). Blurring the boundary: the nuclear envelope extends its reach. Science 318,1408 -1412.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Sullivan, T., Escalante-Alcalde, D., Bhatt, H., Anver, M., Bhat, N., Nagashima, K., Stewart, C. L. and Burke, B. (1999). Loss of A-type lamin expression compromises nuclear envelope integrity leading to muscular dystrophy. J. Cell Biol. 147,913 -920.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Taddei, A., Van Houwe, G., Hediger, F., Kalck, V., Cubizolles, F., Schober, H. and Gasser, S. M. (2006). Nuclear pore association confers optimal expression levels for an inducible yeast gene. Nature 441,774 -778.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tanaka, S. S., Toyooka, Y., Akasu, R., Katoh-Fukui, Y., Nakahara, Y., Suzuki, R., Yokoyama, M. and Noce, T. (2000). The mouse homolog of Drosophila Vasa is required for the development of male germ cells. Genes Dev. 14,841 -853.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Tomita, K. and Cooper, J. P. (2006). The meiotic chromosomal bouquet: SUN collects flowers. Cell 125,19 -21.[CrossRef][Medline]
Trinkle-Mulcahy, L. and Lamond, A. I. (2007). Toward a high-resolution view of nuclear dynamics. Science 318,1402 -1407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Viera, A., Santos, J. L., Page, J., Parra, M. T., Calvente, A., Cifuentes, M., Gomez, R., Lira, R., Suja, J. A. and Rufas, J. S. (2004). DNA double-strand breaks, recombination and synapsis: the timing of meiosis differs in grasshoppers and flies. EMBO Rep. 5,385 -391.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wagner, N. and Krohne, G. (2007). LEM-Domain proteins: new insights into lamin-interacting proteins. Int. Rev. Cytol. 261,1 -46.[Medline]
Worman, H. J. and Courvalin, J. C. (2004). How do mutations in lamins A and C cause disease? J. Clin. Invest. 113,349 -351.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zickler, D. (2006). From early homologue recognition to synaptonemal complex formation. Chromosoma 115,158 -174.[CrossRef][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in Development:

Piwis and fertility hit by Sun1 down

Development 2009 136: e605. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. L. Yeung, Y. Bennasser, K. Watashi, S.-Y. Le, L. Houzet, and K.-T. Jeang
Pyrosequencing of small non-coding RNAs in HIV-1 infected cells: evidence for the processing of a viral-cellular double-stranded RNA hybrid
Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2009; 37(19): 6575 - 6586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. Lei, X. Zhang, X. Ding, X. Guo, M. Chen, B. Zhu, T. Xu, Y. Zhuang, R. Xu, and M. Han
SUN1 and SUN2 play critical but partially redundant roles in anchoring nuclei in skeletal muscle cells in mice
PNAS, June 23, 2009; 106(25): 10207 - 10212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.029868v1
136/6/965    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chi, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Jeang, K.-T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chi, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Jeang, K.-T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?