|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 18 February 2009
doi: 10.1242/dev.029926
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Orthopaedic Hospital/UCLA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen
School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
2 Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA,
Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
3 Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of
California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: klyons{at}mednet.ucla.edu)
Accepted 2 February 2009
| SUMMARY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: BMP, Smad, Growth plate, Chondrogenesis, Mouse
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BMPs transduce signals by binding to complexes of type I and II
serine/threonine kinase receptors. Ligand binding induces phosphorylation of
the receptors, which then activate canonical signaling via receptor Smads
(R-Smads) 1, 5 and 8 (Smad8 is also known as Smad9 - Mouse Genome Informatics)
(Massague et al., 2005
).
R-Smads contain two domains connected via a linker region. R-Smads are
phosphorylated at the C-terminus by the activated type I receptor. They then
complex with Smad4, triggering nuclear translocation.
Overexpression of BMPs leads to increased chondrocyte proliferation and
fused skeletal elements (Brunet et al.,
1998
; Duprez et al.,
1996
; Wijgerde et al.,
2005
). Conversely, mice lacking BMP receptors exhibit almost
complete loss of cartilage (Yoon et al.,
2005
). In contrast to these severe phenotypes, cartilage-specific
loss of Smad4 results in only mild defects
(Zhang et al., 2005
). These
divergent phenotypes raise the possibility that canonical Smad signaling is
largely dispensable in the growth plate, or that R-Smads signal independently
of Smad4. BMPs trigger non-Smad (noncanonical) pathways in chondrocytes in
vitro by inducing Tgfβ-activated kinase (Tak1; Map3k7), activating p38
MAPK (Mapk1). The relative roles of canonical versus noncanonical pathways,
and whether they act independently, cooperate
(Qiao et al., 2005
;
Reilly et al., 2005
;
Stanton et al., 2004
) or
antagonize (Hoffmann et al.,
2005
) each other in chondrocytes, are unknown.
FGFs inhibit chondrocyte proliferation
(Ornitz, 2005
;
Murakami et al., 2004
;
Raucci et al., 2004
;
Sahni et al., 2001
), and the
BMP and FGF pathways antagonize each other in cartilage
(Minina et al., 2005
;
Yoon et al., 2006
). FGFs
reduce Bmp4 and Ihh expression through undefined pathways
(Chen et al., 2001
;
Naski et al., 1998
).
Phosphorylation of the Smad linker region represents one potential mechanism
of FGF-mediated antagonism. The linker region contains consensus sites for
phosphorylation by Erk1/2 (Mapk3/1), leading to inhibition of Smad activity
(Fuentealba et al., 2007
;
Kretzschmar et al., 1997
;
Pera et al., 2003
;
Sapkota et al., 2007
).
The secreted factor Indian hedgehog (Ihh) is expressed in the
prehypertrophic zone, and maintains chondrocyte proliferation by promoting
Pthrp (Pthlh) expression in distal cells of the cartilage
anlagen. PTHrP binds to the PTHrP receptor (PPR; Pth1r) and negatively
regulates Ihh expression in a feedback loop
(Kronenberg, 2003
). The
Ihh/PTHrP pathway acts cooperatively with BMPs
(Kronenberg, 2003
;
Minina et al., 2001
;
Pathi et al., 1999
;
Grimsrud et al., 2001
;
Pateder et al., 2000
), and BMP
receptor Smads can directly activate the Ihh promoter
(Seki and Hata, 2004
).
We show here that ablation of Smad1 and Smad5 in mice
results in a nearly complete block in chondrocyte differentiation, and in
imbalances in signaling cross-talk between the BMP, FGF and Ihh/PTHrP
pathways. This is in marked contrast to the mild phenotype in mice lacking
Smad4 in cartilage (Zhang et al.,
2005
). These results demonstrate that canonical Smad signaling is
the major mechanism of BMP signal transduction in endochondral bone, and that
Smad1 and Smad5 are key regulators of BMP canonical signaling in the growth
plate. The data also demonstrate that Smad4 is not required for the majority
of canonical BMP signaling. Finally, we provide evidence that linker
phosphorylation of Smads represents a physiologically significant mechanism
regulating BMP signaling in the growth plate, but that the inhibitory effects
of FGFs are likely to be mediated through different mechanisms.
|
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Histology
Skeletal preparations were generated as described
(Ivkovic et al., 2003
;
Yoon et al., 2006
). Alcian
Blue/nuclear Fast Red staining was performed as described
(Luna, 1992
). Von Kossa
staining was performed by incubation in 1% silver nitrate under UV light for
20 minutes and counterstaining with nuclear Fast Red. Safranin O staining was
performed by staining in Weigert's iron hematoxylin solution for 10 minutes,
followed by Fast Green (0.001%) and Safranin O (0.1%) for 5 minutes each.
For immunofluorescence, sections were boiled for 15 minutes in citrate
buffer (Ivkovic et al., 2003
).
Sections were blocked with 5% goat or donkey serum for 1 hour and incubated
with primary antibody overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with
secondary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature, then with fluorophore for
30 minutes at room temperature. Primary antibodies were as follows:
phospho-Smad1/5/8 and phospho-Smad1/5 (Cell Signaling Technology); type II
collagen and Pth1r (Abcam); type I collagen (Southern Biotech); type X
collagen (a kind gift from Robin Poole, Shriners Hospitals for Children,
Montreal, Québec, Canada); aggrecan (Developmental Studies Hybridoma
Bank, Iowa City, USA); Pcna (Zymed); Fgfr1 and Stat1 (Sigma); phospho-Smad1L
(a kind gift from Eddy De Robertis, University of California, Los Angeles, CA,
USA). Secondary antibodies were conjugated with AlexaFluor-555 and
AlexaFluor-488. Sections were counterstained with DAPI (Vectashield). For
TUNEL staining, the fluorescein In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche) was
used according to the manufacturer's protocol. In situ hybridization was
performed as described (Song et al.,
2007
).
Limb culture
Embryos were harvested at 16.5 days of gestation (E16.5). Forelimbs were
isolated and cultured as described (Minina
et al., 2001
; Minina et al.,
2002
). The contralateral limb was cultured in the presence of
recombinant human FGF18 (10 ng/ml; Invitrogen) or the FGFR inhibitor SU5402
(10 µM; Calbiochem). In all cases, the right forelimb served as the
untreated control. A total of six limbs were examined for each condition, in
two separate experiments.
RT-PCR and western analysis of growth plate cartilage
RNA was extracted from proximal humeri using the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen).
Synthesis of cDNA was performed with Superscript III (Invitrogen). Reverse
transcriptase (RT)-PCR reactions comprised 35-42 cycles of 95°C for 1
minute, 55°C for 1 minute, 72°C for 1 minute. For western blotting,
growth plate cartilage was isolated and homogenized in RIPA buffer.
Whole-tissue lysates were run on 10-15% SDS-polyacrylamide gels.
Cell culture
Rat chondrosarcoma (RCS) cells were cultured and transfected as described
(Yoon et al., 2006
). The 1.8
kb fragment of the mouse Msx2 promoter has been described previously
(Brugger et al., 2004
). The
mouse proximal 2HC8 and 994 bp Ihh promoters were gifts from Akiko
Hata (Seki and Hata, 2004
) and
Toshihisa Komori (Yoshida et al.,
2004
). The Smad1 expression constructs were gifts from Eddy
DeRobertis (Pera et al.,
2003
). Cells were stimulated with recombinant human BMP2, FGF2
(R&D Systems), ERK inhibitor (PD98059, 10 µM; Calbiochem) or p38
inhibitor (SB202190, 10 µM; Calbiochem). BMP2 was used at 100 ng/ml. Unless
otherwise stated, FGF2 was used at 10 ng/ml. Induction was measured by the
dual luciferase assay. All experiments were performed in triplicate and
repeated three times; representative experiments are shown. Statistical
significance was assessed by Student's t-test;
*P<0.05.
Primary sternal chondrocytes were isolated as described
(Lefebvre et al., 1994
). Cells
were seeded at 1x106 cells/well in 6-well plates, and
cultured in MEMalpha supplemented with 10% FBS and pen/strep. For western blot
and RT-PCR, cells were serum starved in MEMalpha containing 1% FBS overnight,
then stimulated the next day with 50-100 ng/ml BMP2, 10 ng/ml FGF2, or 10
ng/ml noggin (R&D Systems) for 60 minutes. For immunocytochemistry, cells
were trypsinized and reseeded at 4x105 cells/well into an
8-well chamber slide overnight.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mice deleted for individual Smads, or harboring heterozygous allelic combinations, were recovered in Mendelian ratios and showed no abnormalities (Fig. 2). Mice harboring combined deletions of Smad1 and Smad8 (Smad1CKO;Smad8-/-), and mice with only one functional allele of Smad5 (Smad1CKO;Smad5fx/+;Smad8-/-) were also normal (Fig. 2, and data not shown), demonstrating that a single allele of Smad5 is sufficient to transduce BMP signals in cartilage.
|
|
Skeletal preparations revealed no major differences between Smad1/5CKO double and Smad1/5CKO;Smad8-/- triple mutants (Fig. 2). Similarly, no additional defects were seen in Smad1CKO;Smad8-/- and Smad5CKO;Smad8-/- mice as compared with Smad1CKO and Smad5CKO mice (not shown). However, cartilage condensations were slightly smaller in Smad1/5CKO;Smad8-/- triple mutants as compared with Smad1/5CKO;Smad8+/- mice (Fig. 3E-G). Thus, although Smad8 may play a role in chondrogenesis, its contribution is minor.
Smad1 and Smad5 are required for limb development
Because Smad8 has a minor role in chondrogenesis, subsequent analysis
focused on Smad1/5CKO mice. In WT embryos, concentric
layers of elongated fibroblasts surround the cartilage
(Fig. 4A,B). There were fewer
layers around condensations in mutants, suggesting that the initial stages of
condensation require canonical Smad signaling for cell recruitment.
Long bones were shorter in E14.5 Smad1/5CKO mutants than in the WT. Cells in the center of the cartilage anlagen exhibited a hypertrophic morphology, but were smaller than in WT littermates (Fig. 4C,D), and DAPI staining (Fig. 4E,F) revealed that cells in mutant growth plates were more densely packed. This can be attributed to impaired type II collagen production. Moreover, a thicker type I collagen-producing perichondrium was seen in mutants (Fig. 4F).
Distinct zones of resting, columnar and hypertrophic chondrocytes can be seen in WT growth plates by E16.5 (Fig. 4G). Loss of Smad1/5 led to growth plate disorganization and loss of hypertrophic chondrocytes (Fig. 4H). It is likely that the hypertrophic chondrocytes seen at E14.5 in mutants are descendents of cells that were committed to differentiation prior to completion of Cre-mediated excision of all four alleles of Smad1 and Smad5, and by E16.5 these cells are cleared from the growth plate.
|
There was no evidence of stratification of chondrocytes in Smad1/5CKO mutants up to P0 (Fig. 4M,N). The lack of trabecular bone and vascular invasion persisted in mutants. Cortical bone extended into the marrow cavity and surrounded the rudimentary cartilage template (Fig. 4M,N). Hence, loss of canonical Smads leads to a failure in osteoblast invasion into the cartilage. Consistent with the presence of chondrocytes embedded in the thickened periosteum (Fig. 4L), ectopic cartilage formed at the edge of the bone collar in mutants (Fig. 4M,N).
BMP canonical Smad signaling is required for chondrocyte proliferation, survival and differentiation
Mutant chondrocytes were rounder and more densely packed in mutants than in
WT littermates (Fig. 5A,B), and
the hypertrophic zone was absent (Fig.
5C,D). Pcna staining revealed little proliferation in mutants
(Fig. 5E,F), and was confined
to the perichondrial cells. Histomorphometric analysis revealed no differences
in the percentage of Pcna-positive cells in the perichondrium of WT and mutant
littermates (data not shown). Apoptosis is normally confined to the
hypertrophic zone (Fig. 5G).
However, apoptosis was expanded in mutant cartilage
(Fig. 5H). Thus, loss of BMP
canonical Smad signaling leads to reduced chondrocyte proliferation and
increased apoptosis.
Cartilage-specific extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins are required for
growth plate organization (Gustafsson et
al., 2003
; Li and Schwartz,
1995
; Watanabe and Yamada,
1999
). Smad1/5CKO mutants exhibited no defects
in proteoglycan production as assessed by Alcian Blue or Safranin O staining
(Fig. 4;
Fig. 5;
Fig. 6A,B); however, whereas
aggrecan is present in the WT growth plate
(Fig. 6C), it was sporadic and
intracellular in mutants (Fig.
6D). Smad1/5CKO mice also exhibited a severe
reduction in type II collagen deposition, suggesting that mutant chondrocytes
are not fully differentiated (Fig.
6E,F). Type X collagen is produced in hypertrophic chondrocytes
(Fig. 6G), but little could be
seen in Smad1/5CKO mutants
(Fig. 6H), suggesting a defect
in terminal differentiation.
The transcription factor Sox9 is required for chondrocyte survival and
expression of ECM components (Bell et al.,
1997
; Bi et al.,
1999
; Lefebvre et al.,
1997
). RT-PCR analysis revealed decreased levels of Sox9
in mutant cartilage (Fig. 6I),
and that the deficits in collagens II and X in mutants occur at the
transcriptional level. The detectable, albeit decreased, expression of
Col10a1 and Runx2 (Fig.
6I) suggests that at least a few cells with the characteristics of
hypertrophic chondrocytes were present in mutants. However, these cells were
not organized into a distinct layer (Fig.
6A,B). Expression of alkaline phosphatase was examined to test
whether the paucity of hypertrophic chondrocytes in mutants is due to
accelerated conversion of these cells to late hypertrophic chondrocytes. The
decreased level of alkaline phosphatase in mutants
(Fig. 6I) argues against this
possibility, and supports the alternative hypothesis that chondrocyte
maturation is blocked. We tested this by examining Ucma expression.
Ucma is a marker for upper (resting) chondrocytes
(Tagariello et al., 2008
;
Surmann-Schmitt et al., 2008
).
Ucma was expressed as robustly in mutant as in WT cartilage
(Fig. 6I). Hence,
Smad1/5CKO chondrocytes are impaired in their ability to
undergo terminal differentiation and retain characteristics of resting
chondrocytes.
|
|
Loss of canonical Smad proteins disrupts expression of BMP signaling components
The Smad1/5CKO phenotype is similar to that of
Bmpr1aCKO;Bmpr1b-/- mice
(Yoon et al., 2005
),
suggesting that the canonical pathway is the major transducer of BMP signals
in cartilage. Unexpectedly, the Smad1/5CKO phenotype is
markedly more severe than the Smad4CKO phenotype
(Zhang et al., 2005
), even
though Col2-Cre was used to drive cartilage-specific excision in both
models. These divergent phenotypes challenge the dogma that Smad4 is required
to mediate canonical Smad signaling in chondrogenesis.
Smad4 and BMP receptor expression was examined in mutant cartilage to
investigate the basis for this divergence
(Fig. 6J). RT-PCR analysis
indicated that Smad4 is expressed in mutant cartilage. Therefore, the
severe chondrodysplasia in Smad1/5CKO mice does not
correlate with altered Smad4 expression. However, the expression of
type II (Bmpr2) and type I (Bmpr1a and Bmpr1b) BMP
receptors was reduced. Thus, the similarity in the receptor-deficient and
Smad-deficient cartilage phenotypes might be a consequence of reduced BMP
receptor expression in Smad1/5CKO mutants. The results
reveal the presence of a positive-feedback loop involving BMP receptors and
BMP receptor Smads. Acvr1, the gene encoding the type I BMP receptor
ActRI (Alk2), is expressed at apparently normal levels in mutants, but ActRI
alone is unable to support chondrogenesis in vivo
(Yoon et al., 2005
).
|
The BMP canonical Smad pathway is required for the Ihh/PTHrP signaling loop in vivo
Ihh and PTHrP form a signaling loop in the growth plate that regulates
chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. This loop is modulated by BMP
and FGF pathways; transgenic mice overexpressing FGFs in cartilage display
decreased expression of Bmp4, Ihh and PTHrP receptor (PPR)
(Chen et al., 2001
;
Naski et al., 1998
). FGFs also
inhibit BMP- and Ihh-mediated proliferation in limb cultures
(Minina et al., 2002
). We
showed previously that Ihh signaling is positively regulated by BMPs in vivo
(Yoon et al., 2006
). We
extended this analysis by examining Ihh signaling in primary chondrocytes and
Smad1/5CKO mutants. RT-PCR analysis showed that BMPs
induce both Ihh and PPR expression. By contrast,
Pthrp expression was only moderately increased by BMPs
(Fig. 7A). We then tested
whether the Ihh signaling loop is impaired in mutant cartilage. Pthrp
mRNA levels were only slightly reduced in Smad1/5CKO
cartilage, but Ihh and PPR mRNAs were not detected
(Fig. 7B). These results
confirm that Ihh is a BMP target in the growth plate, and suggest
that PPR is as well.
Pthrp transcripts are present in chondrocytes underlying the
articular surface in WT elements at E165, as reported previously
(Chen et al., 2006
)
(Fig. 7G,H). Pthrp
mRNA was also seen in Smad1/5CKO mutants
(Fig. 7I,J). Ihh is
expressed in the prehypertrophic zone of WT growth plates; however, no
Ihh mRNA was detectable in mutants
(Fig. 7C-F). Retention of
Pthrp expression in the apparent absence of Ihh in
Smad1/5CKO mutants was unexpected, as it has been shown
that Ihh is normally required to maintain Pthrp expression
(Vortkamp et al., 1996
;
Lanske et al., 1996
;
Chung et al., 1998
;
St Jacques et al., 1999
;
Chung et al., 2001
). Hence, we
examined Ihh expression at E14.5 in mutants to test the possibility
that Ihh might be present at higher levels at earlier stages. Cells
resembling prehypertrophic and hypertrophic chondrocytes were present in
Smad1/5CKO mutants (see Fig. S2A-D in the supplementary
material). Low levels of Ihh expression were detectable in the E14.5
mutant tibia, and Pthrp was expressed in periarticular cells (see
Fig. S2C,D in the supplementary material). Ihh mRNA was also detected
in E14.5 WT and mutant digits (see Fig. S3 in the supplementary material). We
conclude that Ihh is expressed in mutants, but that the level of
expression declines during development, most likely owing to the gradual loss
of the prehypertrophic cells that had formed prior to complete Cre-mediated
recombination. Ihh expression might be too restricted and/or
disorganized to detect at E16.5, but still present at a sufficient level to
maintain Pthrp expression. To test this latter possibility, we
performed in situ hybridization for patched 1 (Ptch1), a sensitive
readout of Ihh signaling. In WT growth plates, Ptch1 is
expressed in proliferating chondrocytes, as well as in adjacent perichondrium
(Fig. 7M,N). Consistent with
decreased Ihh signaling, Ptch1 mRNA was detectable, albeit at much
lower levels, in the mutant growth plate
(Fig. 7O,P).
PPR was not expressed at detectable levels in
Smad1/5CKO growth plates
(Fig. 7K,L), but was readily
detected in mutant osteoblasts. Hence, Ihh and PPR, which are highly
induced by BMPs in vitro (Fig.
7A), require canonical Smads for expression in cartilage in vivo.
The greatly diminished expression of PPR and Ihh, which are expressed
in late columnar and prehypertrophic chondrocytes
(MacLean and Kronenberg,
2005
), is consistent with a block in chondrocyte differentiation
beyond the resting phase in mutants.
Canonical Smad signaling is required for BMP and FGF antagonism in chondrocytes
FGF signaling is elevated when BMP signaling is blocked through ablation of
Bmpr1a and Bmpr1b (Yoon
et al., 2006
). The domain of Fgfr1 expression was expanded in
Smad1/5CKO cartilage
(Fig. 8A,B), as is the case in
Bmpr1a/bCKO mice (Yoon
et al., 2006
). FGF receptor expression was also analyzed by RT-PCR
(Fig. 6J). Fgfr1
levels were increased in Smad1/5CKO cartilage, but
Fgfr2 and Fgfr3 levels were decreased. Fgfr1 mRNA
is expressed in resting/periarticular and hypertrophic chondrocytes,
Fgfr2 is expressed in proliferating chondrocytes, and Fgfr3
is expressed in proliferating and prehypertrophic chondrocytes
(Minina et al., 2005
). Hence,
the absence of Fgfr2 and Fgfr3 expression in
Smad1/5CKO mutants is consistent with defective formation
of proliferating, prehypertrophic and hypertrophic chondrocytes. Elevated
expression of Fgfr1 mRNA and protein
(Fig. 6J;
Fig. 8B) and of Ucma
mRNA (Fig. 6I) in mutant
chondrocytes indicates that they retain characteristics of resting cells.
|
FGF signaling exhibits functional antagonism with BMP signaling through ERK-mediated pathways
BMPs and FGFs are antagonistic in the growth plate. To investigate
potential mechanisms, we used a 1.8 kb Msx2 promoter fragment
(Brugger et al., 2004
) linked
to luciferase (1.8 kb Msx2-luc) as reporter in chondrocytic RCS cells
(Fig. 9A). Levels of
BMP-mediated induction varied from 5-fold to 28-fold in different experiments.
Various factors may contribute to this variability, including the passage
number of the RCS cells and the batch of BMP used. BMP-mediated induction of
the 1.8 kb Msx2 promoter was also antagonized by FGF2 in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig.
9A). An ERK inhibitor (PD98059) had no effect on basal (not shown)
or BMP-mediated expression of 1.8 kb Msx2-luc, but was able to block
the ability of FGF2 to antagonize BMP2 induction of the promoter
(Fig. 9B). In fact, treatment
with PD98059 led to a synergistic increase in promoter activity in the
presence of BMP2 plus FGF2 (55-fold) as compared with BMP2 alone (6.5-fold).
The basis for this synergy is unknown, but might reflect an effect of PD98059
on other signaling pathways, and/or the ability of non-ERK/MAPK pathways
activated by FGF2 to synergize with BMP pathways to induce the 1.8 kb
Msx2 promoter. A p38 MAPK inhibitor (SB202190) had no effect on
BMP2-mediated induction. These experiments indicate that FGFs can antagonize
canonical BMP signals via ERK/MAPK pathways.
ERK/MAPK can phosphorylate the linker regions of Smads, leading to Smad
degradation (Fuentealba et al.,
2007
; Pera et al.,
2003
; Sapkota et al.,
2007
). We overexpressed constructs encoding a WT Smad1 (Smad1WT),
or a version in which the Erk1/2 phosphorylation sites in the linker region
have been mutated so that they cannot be phosphorylated (Smad1LM)
(Fig. 9C), to test whether this
mechanism might account for ERK/MAPK-mediated inhibition of Msx2
promoter activity (Fig. 9D).
Smad1WT and Smad1LM enhanced BMP-mediated Msx2 promoter activity
2-fold (Fig. 9D). FGF2
treatment led to a slight induction in the experiment shown, but in other
cases no induction was seen (Fig.
9A,B, and data not shown). The presence of Smad1WT and Smad1LM did
not alter the effects of FGF (Fig.
9D). As expected, both Smad1WT and Smad1LM led to enhanced
responsiveness to BMP2, and no significant difference was noted in the ability
of either Smad construct to enhance this responsiveness. Moreover, both Smad
constructs antagonized the effects of FGF2 on BMP2-mediated induction of the
Msx2 promoter. In fact, the presence of Smad1LM led to a synergistic
activation of Msx2 promoter activity by FGF2 and BMP2 as compared
with BMP2 alone (Fig. 9D). This
result provides additional evidence that FGF-mediated pathways may have
positive effects on Msx2 promoter activity when ERK-mediated effects
on linker phosphorylation are prevented.
Ihh is a target of the BMP and FGF pathways in chondrocytes
(Naski et al., 1998
;
Minina et al., 2002
), and the
Ihh promoter contains Smad binding sites
(Seki and Hata, 2004
;
Yoon et al., 2006
). We
therefore examined whether Ihh induction might be antagonized by FGFs
via Smad linker phosphorylation. A 430 bp Ihh proximal promoter
fragment (2HC8-luc) that is Smad1/5-responsive in some cell types
(Seki and Hata, 2004
) was
poorly responsive in primary and RCS chondrocytes (data not shown). However, a
longer, 994 bp Ihh promoter was responsive to BMP2, and was
antagonized by FGF (Fig. 9E).
Cells expressing Smad1WT or Smad1LM showed enhanced BMP2-mediated induction.
Higher Ihh promoter activity was seen in response to BMP in the
presence of Smad1LM than Smad1WT, and, in the case of Smad1LM, this induction
was resistant to FGF antagonism (Fig.
9E). Thus, BMP-mediated induction of Ihh might be
negatively regulated by ERK/MAPK through Smad linker phosphorylation.
Smad proteins are phosphorylated at both the C-terminus and the linker region in chondrocytes
The above results suggest that Smad1/5 linker phosphorylation accounts for
the antagonistic effects of FGFs. However, whether this occurs in the growth
plate is unclear. Therefore, we analyzed whether FGFs antagonize BMP signaling
at the level of Smad activity in cultured limbs. Levels of activated
(C-terminal-phosphorylated) nuclear Smads were highest in proliferating
chondrocytes and at the edges of the growth plate in unstimulated limbs
(Fig. 10A,C). FGF18 treatment
reduced C-terminal phosphorylation throughout the growth plate
(Fig. 10B), whereas inhibition
of endogenous FGF signaling using the FGF receptor antagonist SU5402 led to
activation (C-terminal phosphorylation) of Smad1/5
(Fig. 10D). Thus, FGFs inhibit
C-terminal phosphorylation of Smads.
|
Western blot analysis of primary chondrocytes confirmed that FGF
stimulation does not induce linker phosphorylation, even though Erk1/2
activity is elevated (Fig.
10I). Linker and C-terminal Smad1 phosphorylation was observed
only after BMP stimulation (Fig.
10I). These data are consistent with recent demonstrations that
BMP signaling directly induces Smad linker phosphorylation following
C-terminal phosphorylation and nuclear translocation
(Fuentealba et al., 2007
;
Sapkota et al., 2007
).
If Smad linker phosphorylation is catalyzed primarily by BMP pathways in chondrocytes, then nuclear colocalization of C-terminal- and linker-phosphorylated Smads is expected. Consistent with this prediction, Smad1 linker phosphorylation occurred primarily in the nucleus (Fig. 10J). Collectively, these data indicate that Smad linker phosphorylation is primarily a consequence of BMP-mediated canonical pathway activation in cartilage, and most likely represents a feedback mechanism to control the duration of BMP signaling. Moreover, despite widespread pSmad1/5 localization, modulation of pathway activity by linker phosphorylation appears to be restricted to the proliferative zone.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
transcriptional complex that has a function distinct
from Smad2-Smad3-Smad4 heterotrimers (He
et al., 2006
(Trim33) as a Smad4 E3 ubiquitin ligase
(Dupont et al., 2005
Even less is known about the requirement for Smad4 in canonical BMP
pathways. Genetic studies reveal that some BMP receptor Smad-dependent
processes occur in the absence of Smad4
(Chu et al., 2004
;
Wisotzkey et al., 1998
). BMPs
induce R-Smad nuclear translocation in Smad4-null colon cancer cells
(Liu et al., 1997
). A recent
report demonstrated that BMPs transduce signals in a Smad4-independent manner
through interaction of Smad1 with the Drosha complex, which promotes microRNA
(miRNA) processing (Davis et al.,
2008
). The roles of specific miRNAs in chondrogenesis are unknown,
however, and loss of the major miRNA processor, dicer 1, in cartilage leads to
a less severe chondrodysplasia than is observed in
Smad1/5CKO mice
(Kobayashi et al., 2008
),
indicating that other mechanisms underlie the Smad4-independent effects in
Smad1/5CKO mice.
C-terminal-phosphorylated Smad1/5/8 staining is most prominent at the
lateral edges of the growth plate (e.g.
Fig. 10A,C,D). This is
consistent with studies demonstrating lateral expression of Bmp2, 4 and 7, and
medial expression of the BMP inhibitor noggin
(Minina et al., 2005
). Taken
together, these findings suggest that BMP ligands produced in the
perichondrium signal through canonical pathways in a lateral-to-medial
gradient.
Antagonism between BMP and FGF signaling pathways
This study demonstrates that canonical Smad signaling is required for
growth plate formation and cross-talk with FGF and Ihh/PTHrP pathways, and
that FGFs target canonical pathways by affecting the phosphorylation status of
Smads. C-terminal Smad1/5 phosphorylation is reduced by FGF stimulation and
elevated by FGF inhibition in limb cultures
(Fig. 10). We demonstrate that
FGF signaling can activate ERK/MAPK pathways, which antagonize canonical Smad
signaling in chondrocytes. On the other hand, we found that Msx2
promoter activity can be activated by non-ERK/MAPK pathways downstream of FGF.
Hence, the interaction between BMP and FGF pathways can be both positive and
negative for some target genes. The Ihh promoter is also a target of
canonical Smads, and mutation of Smad linker phosphorylation sites attenuated
FGF-mediated antagonism of Ihh in vitro. However, we saw no
difference in the levels or localization of linker-phosphorylated Smad1 upon
FGF stimulation (Fig. 10G-I),
suggesting that although ERK/MAPK-mediated linker phosphorylation limits BMP
signaling in vitro, FGFs might antagonize canonical pathways through a
different mechanism in the growth plate. For example, FGFs might inhibit
expression of BMP ligands and/or receptors, or activate a phosphatase that
inactivates C-terminal-phosphorylated Smads in the growth plate.
Recent findings have shown that BMPs induce sequential Smad
phosphorylations, first at the C-terminus and then in the linker region
(Fuentealba et al., 2007
;
Sapkota et al., 2007
).
BMP-induced linker phosphorylation occurs independently of MAPK, and localizes
to the nucleus, in contrast to MAPK-induced linker phosphorylation, which is
seen mainly in the cytosol (Sapkota et
al., 2007
). The predominantly nuclear localization of
linker-phosphorylated Smads in the growth plate, and the lack of a clear
effect on this localization in response to FGF stimulation or inhibition, thus
suggest that the majority of linker phosphorylation in the growth plate is
mediated directly by BMPs. The high levels of nuclear linker-phosphorylated
Smad1 in the growth plate are thus most likely to reflect rapid Smad turnover
associated with active BMP signaling.
BMP canonical Smad signaling regulates the Ihh/PTHrP signaling loop
The Smad1/5CKO phenotype demonstrates that loss of BMP
receptor Smad signaling disrupts Ihh/PTHrP signaling in the growth plate.
Although Ihh levels are reduced, Ptch1 expression can be
detected, revealing that Ihh signaling does occur in mutants. Moreover,
Pthrp transcripts have been detected in Ihh-deficient mice
generated using a tamoxifen-inducible Col2-Cre allele
(Maeda et al., 2007
). Our
findings, along with those of Maeda et al., raise the possibility that
although Ihh is required for induction of Pthrp expression,
Ihh-independent mechanisms might participate in the maintenance of
Pthrp expression.
Loss of Ihh leads to premature hypertrophy, growth plate
disorganization and a lack of osteoblasts in endochondral elements
(St Jacques et al., 1999
).
Loss of PPR is also associated with accelerated differentiation
(Lanske et al., 1996
).
Although Smad1/5 mutants exhibit diminished Ihh expression and
undetectable PPR, chondrocyte differentiation is impaired. We have shown
previously that loss of Bmpr1a and Bmpr1b leads to defects
in the transition of chondrocytes from a resting to a columnar proliferating
state, and to an inability of hypertrophic chondrocytes to complete terminal
differentiation (Yoon et al.,
2006
). Hence, the diminished expression of PPR in Smad1/5
mutants might reflect a role for BMPs in commitment to differentiation. In
this scenario, the absence of PPR does not lead to accelerated
differentiation, owing to an earlier requirement for BMPs to permit
differentiation. Our results are also consistent with the possibility that
loss of PPR expression contributes to the growth plate defects in
Smad1/5 mutants. Although accelerated differentiation is seen in
PPR-/- mice at E18.5, chondrocytes in
PPR-/- mice become hypertrophic later than in WT mice
(Lanske et al., 1999
),
consistent with the differentiation defect in Smad1/5 mutants at
midgestation stages. Moreover, in PPR-/- mice,
chondrocytes are replaced by invading blood vessels and osteoblasts more
slowly than in WT mice (Lanske et al.,
1999
), but loss of PPR ultimately leads to excess bone formation
(Chung et al., 1998
;
Lanske et al., 1996
), similar
to the ossification phenotype in Smad1/5 mutants. A third possibility
is that BMPs have selective effects on signaling pathways independently of
PPR. It has been shown that phospholipase C (PLC)-dependent signaling
restrains chondrocyte proliferation and stimulates hypertrophic
differentiation; these actions are opposite to the responses mediated by the
cAMP/PKA (Prkaca) pathway downstream of PPR
(Guo et al., 2002
). Hence,
BMPs may impact the balance between PLC and PKA pathway activation in
chondrocytes. Finally, we cannot rule out the possibility that there is a low
level of PPR expression in Smad1/5 mutant growth plates.
The greatly diminished expression of PPR in the growth plate raises the
possibility that canonical BMP pathways act directly on the PPR
promoter. Previous studies indicate that the highly conserved P2 promoter is
the major PPR promoter in skeletal tissues
(Bettoun et al., 1997
;
McCuaig et al., 1995
). This
promoter region contains multiple putative Smad-binding elements (data not
shown). Additional studies are needed to determine whether these sites are
active in chondrocytes.
Collectively, these studies demonstrate that canonical Smad signaling is the major BMP signal transduction pathway in chondrogenesis. If noncanonical BMP pathways play a role, they must do so in the context of active canonical signaling. Smads 1 and 5 are required to transduce canonical signals, are functionally redundant, required for all aspects of chondrogenesis, and do not require Smad4. Finally, our studies provide evidence that differential phosphorylation of canonical BMP receptor Smads might be an essential point of regulation of pathway activity in the proliferative zone of the growth plate.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material for this article is available at
http://dev.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/136/7/1093/DC1
| Footnotes |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Arnold, S. J., Maretto, S., Islam, A., Bikoff, E. K. and
Robertson, E. J. (2006). Dose-dependent Smad1, Smad5 and
Smad8 signaling in the early mouse embryo. Dev. Biol.
296,104
-118.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bell, D. M., Leung, K. K., Wheatley, S. C., Ng, L. J., Zhou, S.,
Ling, K. W., Sham, M. H., Koopman, P., Tam, P. P. and Cheah, K. S.
(1997). SOX9 directly regulates the type-II collagen gene.
Nat. Genet. 16,174
-178.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bettoun, J. D., Minagawa, M., Kwan, M. Y., Lee, H. S., Yasuda,
T., Hendy, G. N., Goltzman, D. and White, J. H. (1997).
Cloning and characterization of the promoter regions of the human parathyroid
hormone (PTH)/PTH-related peptide receptor gene: analysis of deoxyribonucleic
acid from normal subjects and patients with pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1b.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
82,1031
-1040.
Bi, W., Deng, J. M., Zhang, Z., Behringer, R. R. and de
Crombrugghe, B. (1999). Sox9 is required for cartilage
formation. Nat. Genet.
22, 85-89.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brugger, S. M., Merrill, A. E., Torres-Vazquez, J., Wu, N.,
Ting, M. C., Cho, J. Y., Dobias, S. L., Yi, S. E., Lyons, K., Bell, J. R. et
al. (2004). A phylogenetically conserved cis-regulatory
module in the Msx2 promoter is sufficient for BMP-dependent transcription in
murine and Drosophila embryos. Development
131,5153
-5165.
Brunet, L. J., McMahon, J. A., McMahon, A. P. and Harland, R.
M. (1998). Noggin, cartilage morphogenesis, and joint
formation in the mammalian skeleton. Science
280,1455
-1457.
Chacko, B. M., Qin, B., Correia, J. J., Lam, S. S., de
Caestecker, M. P. and Lin, K. (2001). The L3 loop and
C-terminal phosphorylation jointly define Smad protein trimerization.
Nat. Struct. Biol. 8,248
-253.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chen, L., Li, C., Qiao, W., Xu, X. and Deng, C.
(2001). A Ser(365)
Cys mutation of fibroblast growth
factor receptor 3 in mouse downregulates Ihh/PTHrP signals and causes severe
achondroplasia. Hum. Mol. Genet.
10,457
-465.
Chen, X., Macica, C. M., Dreyer, B. E., Hammond, V. E., Hens, J.
R., Philbrick, W. M. and Broadus, A. E. (2006). Initial
characterization of PTH-related protein gene-driven lacZ expression
in the mouse. J. Bone Miner. Res.
21,113
-123.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chu, G. C., Dunn, N. R., Anderson, D. C., Oxburgh, L. and
Robertson, E. J. (2004). Differential requirements for Smad4
in TGFbeta-dependent patterning of the early mouse embryo.
Development 131,3501
-3512.
Chung, U. I., Lanske, B., Lee, K., Li, E. and Kronenberg, H.
(1998). The parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related
peptide receptor coordinates endochondral bone development by directly
controlling chondrocyte differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 95,13030
-13035.
Chung, U., Schipani, E., McMahon, A. P. and Kronenberg, H.
M. (2001). Indian hedgehog couples chondrogenesis to
osteogenesis in endochondral bone development. J. Clin.
Invest. 107,295
-304.[Medline]
Davis, B. N., Hilyard, A. C., Lagna, G. and Hata, A.
(2008). SMAD proteins control DROSHA-mediated microRNA
maturation. Nature 454,289
-294.
Drissi, M. H., Li, X., Sheu, T. J., Zuscik, M. J., Schwarz, E.
M., Puzas, J. E., Rosier, R. N. and O'Keefe, R. J. (2003).
Runx2/Cbfa1 stimulation by retinoic acid is potentiated by BMP2 signaling
through interaction with Smad1 on the collagen X promoter in chondrocytes.
J. Cell. Biochem. 90,1287
-1298.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dupont, S., Zacchigna, L., Cordenonsi, M., Soligo, S., Adorno,
M., Rugge, M. and Piccolo, S. (2005). Germ-layer
specification and control of cell growth by Ectodermin, a Smad4 ubiquitin
ligase. Cell 121,87
-99.[CrossRef][Medline]
Duprez, D., Bell, E. J., Richardson, M. K., Archer, C. W.,
Wolpert, L., Brickell, P. M. and Francis-West, P. H. (1996).
Overexpression of BMP-2 and BMP-4 alters the size and shape of developing
skeletal elements in the chick limb. Mech. Dev.
57,145
-157.[CrossRef][Medline]
Feng, X.-H. and Derynck, R. (2005). Specificity
and versatility in TGF-β signaling through Smads. Annu. Rev.
Cell Dev. Biol. 21,659
-693.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fuentealba, L. C., Eivers, E., Ikeda, A., Hurtado, C., Kuroda,
H., Pera, E. M. and De Robertis, E. M. (2007). Integrating
patterning signals: Wnt/GSK3 regulates the duration of the BMP/Smad1 signal.
Cell 131,980
-993.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fujii, M., Takeda, K., Imamura, T., Aoki, H., Sampath, T. K.,
Enomoto, S., Kawabata, M., Kato, M., Ichijo, H. and Miyazono, K.
(1999). Roles of bone morphogenetic protein type I receptors and
Smad proteins in osteoblast and chondroblast differentiation. Mol.
Biol. Cell 10,3801
-3813.
Grimsrud, C. D., Romano, P. R., D'Souza, M., Puzas, J. E.,
Schwarz, E. M., Reynolds, P. R., Roiser, R. N. and O'Keefe, R. J.
(2001). BMP signaling stimulates chondrocyte maturation and the
expression of Indian hedgehog. J. Orthop. Res.
19, 18-25.[CrossRef][Medline]
Guo, J., Chung, U. I., Kondo, H., Bringhurst, F. R. and
Kronenberg, H. M. (2002). The PTH/PTHrP receptor can delay
chondrocyte hypertrophy in vivo without activating phospholipase C.
Dev. Cell 3,183
-194.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gustafsson, E., Aszodi, A., Ortega, N., Hunziker, E. B., Denker,
H. W., Werb, Z. and Fassler, R. (2003). Role of collagen type
II and perlecan in skeletal development. Ann. New York Acad.
Sci. 995,140
-150.[Medline]
Haas, A. R. and Tuan, R. S. (1999).
Chondrogenic differentiation of murine C3H10T1/2 multipotential mesenchymal
cells: II. Stimulation by bone morphogenetic protein-2 requires modulation of
N-cadherin expression and function. Differentiation
64, 77-89.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hatakeyama, Y., Tuan, R. S. and Shum, L.
(2004). Distinct functions of BMP4 and GDF5 in the regulation of
chondrogenesis. J. Cell. Biochem.
91,1204
-1217.[CrossRef][Medline]
He, W., Dorn, D. C., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., Moore,
M. A. and Massague, J. (2006). Hematopoiesis controlled by
distinct TIF1gamma and Smad4 branches of the TGFbeta pathway.
Cell 125,929
-941.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hoffmann, A., Preobrazhenska, O., Wodarczyk, C., Medler, Y.,
Winkel, A., Shahab, S., Huylebroeck, D., Gross, G. and Verschueren, K.
(2005). Transforming growth factor-beta-activated kinase-1
(TAK1), a MAP3K, interacts with Smad proteins and interferes with osteogenesis
in murine mesenchymal progenitors. J. Biol. Chem.
280,27271
-27283.
Huang, S., Tang, B., Usoskin, D., Lechleider, R. J., Jamin, S.
P., Li, C., Anzano, M. A., Ebendal, T., Deng, C. and Roberts, A. B.
(2002). Conditional knockout of the Smad1 gene.
Genesis 32,76
-79.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ivkovic, S., Yoon, B. S., Popoff, S. N., Safadi, F. F., Libuda,
D. E., Stephenson, R. C., Daluiski, A. and Lyons, K. M.
(2003). Connective tissue growth factor coordinates
chondrogenesis and angiogenesis during skeletal development.
Development 130,2779
-2791.
Kimura, N., Matsuo, R., Shibuya, H., Nakashima, K. and Taga,
T. (2000). BMP2-induced apoptosis is mediated by activation
of the TAK1-p38 kinase pathway that is negatively regulated by Smad6.
J. Biol. Chem. 275,17647
-17652.
Kobayashi, T., Lu, J., Cobb, B. S., Rodda, S. J., McMahon, A.
P., Schipani, E., Merkenschlager, M. and Kronenberg, H. M.
(2008). Dicer-dependent pathways regulate chondrocyte
proliferation and differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 105,1949
-1954.
Kretzschmar, M., Doody, J. and Massague, J.
(1997). Opposing BMP and EGF signalling pathways converge on the
TGF-beta family mediator Smad1. Nature
389,618
-622.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kronenberg, H. M. (2003). Developmental
regulation of the growth plate. Nature
423,332
-336.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lanske, B., Karaplis, A. C., Lee, K., Luz, A., Vortkamp, A.,
Pirro, A., Karperien, M., Defize, L. H., Ho, C., Mulligan, R. C. et al.
(1996). PTH/PTHrP receptor in early development and Indian
hedgehog-regulated bone growth. Science
273,663
-666.[Abstract]
Lanske, B., Amling, M., Neff, L., Guiducci, J., Baron, R. and
Kronenberg, H. M. (1999). Ablation of the PTHrP gene or the
PTH/PTHrP receptor gene leads to distinct abnormalities in bone development.
J. Clin. Invest. 104,399
-407.[Medline]
Leboy, P., Grasso-Knight, G., D'Angelo, M., Volk, S. W., Lian,
J. V., Drissi, H., Stein, G. S. and Adams, S. L. (2001).
Smad-Runx interactions during chondrocyte maturation. J. Bone Joint
Surg. Am. 83A Suppl.
1, S15-S22.
Lefebvre, V., Garofalo, S., Zhou, G., Metsaranta, M., Vuorio, E.
and De Crombrugghe, B. (1994). Characterization of primary
cultures of chondrocytes from type II collagen/beta-galactosidase transgenic
mice. Matrix Biol. 14,329
-335.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lefebvre, V., Huang, W., Harley, V. R., Goodfellow, P. N. and de
Crombrugghe, B. (1997). SOX9 is a potent activator of the
chondrocyte-specific enhancer of the pro alpha1(II) collagen gene.
Mol. Cell. Biol. 17,2336
-2346.[Abstract]
Legeai-Mallet, L., Benoist-Lasselin, C., Munnich, A. and
Bonaventure, J. (2004). Overexpression of FGFR3, Stat1, Stat5
and p21Cip1 correlates with phenotypic severity and defective chondrocyte
differentiation in FGFR3-related chondrodysplasias.
Bone 34,26
-36.[CrossRef][Medline]
Li, H. and Schwartz, N. B. (1995). Gene
structure of chick cartilage chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (aggrecan) core
protein. J. Mol. Evol.
41,878
-885.[Medline]
Liu, F., Pouponnot, C. and Massague, J. (1997).
Dual role of the Smad4/DPC4 tumor suppressor in TGFbeta-inducible
transcriptional complexes. Genes Dev.
11,3157
-3167.
Luna, L. G. (1992). Histopathologic
Methods and Color Atlas of Special Stains and Tissue Artifacts.
Gaithersburg, MD: American Histolabs.
MacLean, H. E. and Kronenberg, H. M. (2005).
Localization of Indian hedgehog and PTH/PTHrP receptor expression in relation
to chondrocyte proliferation during mouse bone development. Dev.
Growth Differ. 47,59
-63.[CrossRef][Medline]
Maeda, Y., Nakamura, E., Nguyen, M.-T., Suva, L. J., Swain, F.
L., Razzaque, M. S., Mackem, S. and Lanske, B. (2007). Indian
Hedgehog produced by postnatal chondrocytes is essential for maintaining a
growth plate and trabecular bone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 104,6382
-6387.
Massague, J., Seoane, J. and Wotton, D. (2005).
Smad transcription factors. Genes Dev.
19,2783
-2810.
McCuaig, K. A., Lee, H. S., Clarke, J. C., Assar, H., Horsford,
J. and White, J. H. (1995). Parathyroid hormone/parathyroid
hormone related peptide receptor gene transcripts are expressed from
tissue-specific and ubiquitous promoters. Nucleic Acids
Res. 23,1948
-1955.
Minina, E., Wenzel, H. M., Kreschel, C., Karp, S., Gaffield, W.,
McMahon, A. P. and Vortkamp, A. (2001). BMP and Ihh/PTHrP
signaling interact to coordinate chondrocyte proliferation and
differentiation. Development
128,4523
-4534.
Minina, E., Kreschel, C., Naski, M. C., Ornitz, D. M. and
Vortkamp, A. (2002). Interaction of FGF, Ihh/Pthlh, and BMP
signaling integrates chondrocyte proliferation and hypertrophic
differentiation. Dev. Cell
3, 439-449.[CrossRef][Medline]
Minina, E., Schneider, S., Rosowski, M., Lauster, R. and
Vortkamp, A. (2005). Expression of Fgf and Tgfbeta signaling
related genes during embryonic endochondral ossification. Gene
Expr. Patterns 6,102
-109.[CrossRef][Medline]
Murakami, S., Balmes, G., McKinney, S., Zhang, Z., Givol, D. and
de Crombrugghe, B. (2004). Constitutive activation of MEK1 in
chondrocytes causes Stat1-independent achondroplasia-like dwarfism and rescues
the Fgfr3-deficient mouse phenotype. Genes Dev.
18,290
-305.
Naski, M. C., Colvin, J. S., Coffin, J. D. and Ornitz, D. M.
(1998). Repression of hedgehog signaling and BMP4 expression in
growth plate cartilage by fibroblast growth factor receptor 3.
Development 125,4977
-4988.[Abstract]
Ornitz, D. M. (2005). FGF signaling in the
developing endochondral skeleton. Cytokine Growth Factor
Rev. 16,205
-213.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ovchinnikov, D. A., Deng, J. M., Ogunrinu, G. and Behringer, R.
R. (2000). Col2a1-directed expression of Cre recombinase in
differentiating chondrocytes in transgenic mice.
Genesis 26,145
-146.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pateder, D. B., Rosier, R. N., Schwarz, E. M., Reynolds, P. R.,
Puzas, J. E., D'Souza, M. and O'Keefe, R. J. (2000). PTHrP
expression in chondrocytes, regulation by TGF-beta, and interactions between
epiphyseal and growth plate chondrocytes. Exp. Cell
Res. 256,555
-562.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pathi, S., Rutenberg, J. B., Johnson, R. L. and Vortkamp, A.
(1999). Interaction of Ihh and BMP/Noggin signaling during
cartilage differentiation. Dev. Biol.
209,239
-253.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pera, E. M., Ikeda, A., Eivers, E. and De Robertis, E. M.
(2003). Integration of IGF, FGF, and anti-BMP signals via Smad1
phosphorylation in neural induction. Genes Dev.
17,3023
-3028.
Qiao, B., Padilla, S. R. and Benya, P. D.
(2005). Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta-activated kinase 1
mimics and mediates TGF-beta-induced stimulation of type II collagen synthesis
in chondrocytes independent of Col2a1 transcription and Smad3 signaling.
J. Biol. Chem. 280,17562
-17571.
Raucci, A., Laplantine, E., Mansukhani, A. and Basilico, C.
(2004). Activation of the ERK1/2 and p38 mitogen-activated
protein kinase pathways mediates fibroblast growth factor-induced growth
arrest of chondrocytes. J. Biol. Chem.
279,1747
-1756.
Reilly, G. C., Golden, E. B., Grasso-Knight, G. and Leboy, P.
S. (2005). Differential effects of ERK and p38 signaling in
BMP-2 stimulated hypertrophy of cultured chick sternal chondrocytes.
Cell Commun. Signal. 3,3
.[CrossRef][Medline]
Retting, K. N. and Lyons, K. M. (2006). BMP
signaling and the regulation of endochondral bone formation. Cell
Sci. Rev. 3,67
-88.
Ross, S. and Hill, C. S. (2008). How the Smads
regulate transcription. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.
30,383
-408.
Sahni, M., Ambrosetti, D. C., Mansukhani, A., Gertner, R., Levy,
D. and Basilico, C. (1999). FGF signaling inhibits
chondrocyte proliferation and regulates bone development through the STAT-1
pathway. Genes Dev. 13,1361
-1366.
Sahni, M., Raz, R., Coffin, J. D., Levy, D. and Basilico, C.
(2001). STAT1 mediates the increased apoptosis and reduced
chondrocyte proliferation in mice overexpressing FGF2.
Development 128,2119
-2129.
Sapkota, G., Alarcon, C., Spagnoli, F. M., Brivanlou, A. H. and
Massague, J. (2007). Balancing BMP signaling through
integrated inputs into the Smad1 linker. Mol. Cell
25,441
-454.[CrossRef][Medline]
Seki, K. and Hata, A. (2004). Indian hedgehog
gene is a target of the bone morphogenetic protein signaling pathway.
J. Biol. Chem. 279,18544
-18549.
Shukunami, C., Akiyama, H., Nakamura, T. and Hiraki, Y.
(2000). Requirement of autocrine signaling by bone morphogenetic
protein-4 for chondrogenic differentiation of ATDC5 cells. FEBS
Lett. 469,83
-87.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sirard, C., Kim, S., Mirtsos, C., Tadich, P., Hoodless, P. A.,
Itié, A., Maxson, R., Wrana, J. L. and Mak, T. W.
(2000). Targeted disruption in murine cells reveals variable
requirement for Smad4 in transforming growth factor beta-related signaling.
J. Biol. Chem. 275,2063
-2070.
Solloway, M. J., Dudley, A. T., Bikoff, E. K., Lyons, K. M.,
Hogan, B. L. and Robertson, E. J. (1998). Mice lacking Bmp6
function. Dev. Genet.
22,321
-339.[CrossRef][Medline]
Song, B., Haycraft, C. J., Seo, H. S., Yoder, B. K. and Serra,
R. (2007). Development of the post-natal growth plate
requires intraflagellar transport proteins. Dev. Biol.
305, 22-16.
Stanton, L. A., Sabari, S., Sampaio, A. V., Underhill, T. M. and
Beier, F. (2004). p38 MAP kinase signalling is required for
hypertrophic chondrocyte differentiation. Biochem. J.
378, 53-62.[CrossRef][Medline]
St Jacques, B., Hammerschmidt, M. and McMahon, A. P.
(1999). Indian hedgehog signaling regulates proliferation and
differentiation of chondrocytes and is essential for bone formation.
Genes Dev. 13,2072
-2086.
Subramanian, G., Schwarz, R. E., Higgins, L., McEnroe, G.,
Chakravarty, S., Dugar, S. and Reiss, M. (2004). Targeting
endogenous transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling in
SMAD4-deficient human pancreatic carcinoma cells inhibits their invasive
phenotype. Cancer Res.
64,5200
-5211.
Surmann-Schmitt, C., Dietz, U., Kireva, T., Adam, N., Park, J.,
Tagariello, A., Onnerfjord, P., Heinegård, D.,
Schlötzer-Schrehardt, U., Deutzmann, R. et al. (2008).
Ucma, a novel secreted cartilage-specific protein with implications in
osteogenesis. J. Biol. Chem.
283,7082
-7093.
Tagariello, A., Luther, J., Streiter, M., Didt-Koziel, L.,
Wuelling, M., Surmann-Schmitt, C., Stock, M., Adam, N., Vortkamp, A. and
Winterpacht, A. (2008). Ucma-A novel secreted factor
represents a highly specific marker for distal chondrocytes. Matrix
Biol. 27,3
-11.[CrossRef][Medline]
Umans, L., Vermeire, L., Francis, A., Chang, H., Huylebroeck, D.
and Zwijsen, A. (2003). Generation of a floxed allele of
Smad5 for cre-mediated conditional knockout in the mouse.
Genesis 37,5
-11.[CrossRef][Medline]
Valcourt, U., Gouttenoire, J., Moustakas, A., Herbage, D. and
Mallein-Gerin, F. (2002). Functions of transforming growth
factor-beta family type I receptors and Smad proteins in the hypertrophic
maturation and osteoblastic differentiation of chondrocytes. J.
Biol. Chem. 277,33545
-33558.
Vortkamp, A., Lee, K., Lanske, B., Segre, G. V., Kronenberg, H.
M. and Tabin, C. (1996). Regulation of rate of cartilage
differentiation by Indian hedgehog and PTH-related protein.
Science 273,663
-666.[Abstract]
Watanabe, H. and Yamada, Y. (1999). Mice
lacking link protein develop dwarfism and craniofacial abnormalities.
Nat. Genet. 21,225
-229.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wijgerde, M., Karp, S., McMahon, J. and McMahon, A. P.
(2005). Noggin antagonism of BMP4 signaling controls development
of the axial skeleton in the mouse. Dev. Biol.
286,149
-157.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wisotzkey, R. G., Mehra, A., Sutherland, D. J., Dobens, L. L.,
Liu, X., Dohrmann, C., Attisano, L. and Raftery, L. A.
(1998). Medea is a Drosophila Smad4 homolog that is
differentially required to potentiate DPP responses.
Development 125,1433
-1445.[Abstract]
Wu, R. Y., Zhang, Y., Feng, X. H. and Derynck, R.
(1997). Heteromeric and homomeric interactions correlate with
signaling activity and functional cooperativity of Smad3 and Smad4/DPC4.
Mol. Cell. Biol. 17,2521
-2528.[Abstract]
Yoon, B. S. and Lyons, K. M. (2004). Multiple
functions of BMPs in chondrogenesis. J. Cell. Biochem.
93, 93-103.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yoon, B. S., Ovchinnikov, D. A., Yoshii, I., Mishina, Y.,
Behringer, R. R. and Lyons, K. M. (2005). Bmpr1a and Bmpr1b
have overlapping functions and are essential for chondrogenesis in vivo.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102,5062
-5067.
Yoon, B. S., Pogue, R., Ovchinnikov, D. A., Yoshii, I., Mishina,
Y., Behringer, R. R. and Lyons, K. M. (2006). BMPs regulate
multiple aspects of growth-plate chondrogenesis through opposing actions on
FGF pathways. Development
133,4667
-4678.
Yoshida, C. A., Yamamoto, H., Fujita, T., Furuichi, T., Ito, K.,
Inoue, K., Yamana, K., Zanma, A., Takada, K., Ito, Y. et al.
(2004). Runx2 and Runx3 are essential for chondrocyte maturation,
and Runx2 regulates limb growth through induction of Indian hedgehog.
Genes Dev. 18,952
-963.
Zhang, J., Tan, X., Li, W., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Cheng, X. and
Yang, X. (2005). Smad4 is required for the normal
organization of the cartilage growth plate. Dev. Biol.
284,311
-322.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Gao, G. Yang, T. Weng, J. Du, X. Wang, J. Zhou, S. Wang, and X. Yang Disruption of Smad4 in Odontoblasts Causes Multiple Keratocystic Odontogenic Tumors and Tooth Malformation in Mice Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2009; 29(21): 5941 - 5951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||