Transcriptional repression by the Drosophila giant protein: cis element positioning provides an alternative means of interpreting an effector gradient

QUICK SEARCH:

[advanced]

	Author:		Keyword(s):

Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents

This Article

	Summary
	Full Text (PDF)
	Alert me when this article is cited
	Alert me if a correction is posted

Services

	Email this article to a friend
	Similar articles in this journal
	Similar articles in PubMed
	Alert me to new issues of the journal
	Download to citation manager


Citing Articles

	Citing Articles via HighWire
	Citing Articles via Google Scholar

Google Scholar

	Articles by Hewitt, G. F.
	Articles by Arnosti, D. N.
	Search for Related Content

PubMed

	PubMed Citation
	Articles by Hewitt, G. F.
	Articles by Arnosti, D. N.


Social Bookmarking

	What's this?

Arnosti, D. N., Gray, S., Barolo, S., Zhou, J. and Levine, M (1996). The gap protein knirps mediates both quenching and direct repression in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J 15, 36599-3666.

Arnosti, D. N., Barolo, S., Levine, M. and Small, S (1996). The eve stripe 2 enhancer employs multiple modes of transcriptional synergy. Development 122, 205-214.[Abstract]

Barolo, S. and Levine, M (1997). Hairy mediates dominant repression in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J 16, 2883-2891.[Medline]

Cai, H. N., Arnosti, D. N. and Levine, M (1996). Long-range repression in the Drosophila embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 9309-9314.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Capovilla, M., Eldon, E. D. and Pirrotta, V (1992). The giant gene of Drosophila encodes a b-ZIP DNA-binding protein that regulates the expression of other gap genes. Development 114, 99-112.[Abstract]

Chi, T., Lieberman, P., Ellwood, K. and Carey, M (1995). A general mechanism for transcriptional synergy by eukaryotic activators. Nature 377, 254-257.[Medline]

Cooper, J. P., Roth, S. Y. and Simpson, R. T (1994). The global transcriptional regulators, SSN6 and TUP1, play distinct roles in the establishment of a repressive chromatin structure. Genes Dev 8, 1400-1410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Driever, W. and Nusslein-Volhard, C (1988). The bicoid Protein Determines Position in the Drosophila Embryo in a Concentration-Dependent Manner. Cell 54, 95-104.[Medline]

Driever, W., Thoma, G. and Nusslein-Volhard, C (1989). Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo by the affinity of binding sites for the bicoid morphogen. Nature 340, 363-367.[Medline]

Dubnicoff, T., Valentine, S. A., Chen, G., Shi, T., Lengyel, J. A., Paroush, Z. and Courey, A. J (1997). Conversion of dorsal from an activator to a repressor by the global corepressor Groucho. Genes Dev 11, 2952-2957.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Edmondson, D. G., Smith, M. M. and Roth, S. Y (1996). Repression domain of the yeast global repressor Tup1 interacts directly with histones H3 and H4. Genes Dev 10, 1247-1259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eldon, E. D. and Pirrotta, V (1991). Interactions of the Drosophila gap gene giant with maternal and zygotic pattern-forming genes. Development 111, 367-378.[Abstract]

Gray, S., Szymanski, P. and Levine, M (1994). Short-range repression permits multiple enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter. Genes Dev 8, 1829-1838.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gray, S. and Levine, M (1996). Short-range transcriptional repressors mediate both quenching and direct repression within complex loci in Drosophila. Genes Dev 10, 700-710.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gray, S. and Levine, M (1996). Transcriptional repression in development. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 8, 358-364.[Medline]

Hanes, S. D., Riddihough, G., Ish-Horowicz, D. and Brent, R (1994). Specific DNA recognition and intersite spacing are critical for action of the bicoid morphogen. Mol. Cell. Biol 14, 3364-3375.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ip, Y. T., Levine, M. and Small, S. J (1992). The bicoid and dorsal morphogens use a similar strategy to make stripes in the Drosophila embryo. J. Cell Sci. Suppl 16, 33-38.

Jiang, J., Kosman, D., Ip, Y. T. and Levine, M (1991). The dorsal morphogen gradient regulates the mesoderm determinant twist in early Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev 5, 1881-1891.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jiang, J. and Levine, M (1993). Binding Affinities and Cooperative Interactions with bHLH Activators Delimit Threshold Responses to the Dorsal Gradient Morphogen. Cell 72, 741-752.[Medline]

Keleher, C. A., Redd, M. J., Schultz, J., Carlson, M. and Johnson, A. D (1992). Ssn6-Tup1 is a general repressor of transcription in yeast. Cell 68, 709-719.[Medline]

Kirov, N., Zhelnin, L., Shah, J. and Rushlow, C (1993). Conversion of a silencer into an enhancer: evidence for a co-repressor in dorsal -mediated repression in Drosophila. EMBO J 12, 3193-3199.[Medline]

Kosman, D. and Small, S (1997). Concentration-dependent patterning by an ectopic expression domain of the Drosophila gap gene knirps. Development 124, 1343-1354.[Abstract]

Kraut, R. and Levine, M (1991). Mutually repressive interactions between the gap genes giant and Kruppel define middle body regions of the Drosophila embryo. Development 111, 611-621.[Abstract]

Li, C. and Manley, J. L (1998). Even-skipped represses transcription by binding TATA binding protein and blocking the TFIID-TATA box interaction. Mol. Cell. Biol 18, 3771-3781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ludwig, M. Z., Patel, N. H. and Kreitman, M (1998). Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila : rules governing conservation and change. Development 125, 949-958.[Abstract]

Neer, E. J., Schmidt, C. J., Nambudripan, R. and Smith, T. F (1994). The ancient regulatory-protein family of WD-repeat proteins. Nature 371, 297-300.[Medline]

Nibu, Y, Zhang, H. and Levine, M (1998). Interaction of Short-Range Repressors with Drosophila CtBP in the Embryo. Science 280, 101-104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nibu, Y., Zhang, H., Bajor, E., Barolo S., Small, S. and Levine, M (1998). dCtBP mediates transcriptional repression by Knirps, Kruppel and Snail in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J 17, 7009-7020.[Medline]

Nusslein-Volhard, C. and Wieshaus, E (1980). Mutations affecting segment number and identity in Drosophila. Nature 287, 795-801.[Medline]

Nusslein-Volhard, C., Kluding, H. and Jurgens, G (1985). Genes affecting the segmental subdivision of the Drosophila embryo. Cold Spring Har. Symp. Quant. Biol 50, 145-154.[Medline]

Nusslein-Volhard, C., Frohnh\232fer, H. G. and Lehmann, R (1987). Determination of anteroposterior polarity in Drosophila. Science 238, 1675-1681.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pan, D. and Courey, A. J (1992). The same dorsal binding site mediates both activation and repression in a context-dependent manner. EMBO J 11, 1837-1842.[Medline]

Perrimon, N., Lanjuin, A., Arnold, C. and Noll, E (1996). Zygotic lethal mutations with maternal effect phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster . II. Loci on the second and third chromosomes identified by P -element-induced mutations. Genetics 144, 1681-1692.[Abstract]

Petschek, J. P., Perrimon, N. and Mahowald, A. P (1987). Region specific effects in l(1) giant embryos of Drosophila. Dev. Biol 119, 177-189.

Poortinga, G., Watanabe, M. and Parkhurst, S. M (1998). Drosophila CtBP: a Hairy-interacting protein required for embryonic segmentation and Hairy-mediated transcriptional repression. EMBO J 17, 2067-2078.[Medline]

Redd, M. J., Arnaud, M. B. and Johnson, A. D (1997). A complex composed of Tup1 and Ssn6 represses transcription in vitro. J. Biol. Chem 272, 1193-1197.

Rivera-Pomar, R. and J\212ckle, H (1996). From gradients to stripes in Drosophila embryogenesis: filling in the gaps. Trends Genet 12, 478-483.[Medline]

Rundlett, S. E., Carmen, A. A., Suka, N., Turner, B. M. and Grunstein, M (1998). Transcriptional repression by UME6 involves deacetylation of lysine 5 of histone H4 by RPD3. Nature 392, 831-835.[Medline]

Sauer, F. and J\212ckle, H (1991). Concentration-dependent transcriptional activation or repression by Kruppel from a single binding site. Nature 353, 563-566.[Medline]

Schaeper, U., Boyd, J. M., Verma, S., Uhlmann, E., Subramanian, T., and Chinnadurai, G (1995). Molecular cloning and characterization of a cellular phosphoprotein that interacts with a conserved C-terminal domain of adenovirus E1A involved in negative modulation of oncogenic transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 10467-10471.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Small, S., Kraut, R., Hoey, T., Warrior, R. and Levine, M (1991). Transcriptional regulation of a pair-rule stripe in Drosophila. Genes Dev 5, 827-839.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Small, S., Blair, A. and Levine, M (1992). Regulation of the even-skipped stripe 2 in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J 11, 4047-4057.[Medline]

Small, S., Arnosti, D. N. and Levine, M (1993). Spacing ensures autonomous expression of different stripe enhancers in the even-skipped promoter. Development 119, 767-772.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stanojevic, D., Small, S. and Levine, M (1991). Regulation of a Segmentation Stripe by Overlapping Activators and Repressors in the Drosophila Embryo. Science 254, 1385-1388.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Struhl, G., Struhl, K. and Macdonald, P. M (1989). The Gradient Morphogen bicoid is a Concentration-Dependent Transcriptional Activator. Cell 57, 1259-1273.[Medline]

Szymanski, P. and Levine, M (1995). Multiple modes of dorsal-bHLH transcriptional synergy in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J 14, 2229-2238.[Medline]

Tanaka, M (1996). Modulation of promoter occupancy by cooperative DNA binding and activation-domain function is a major determinant of transcriptional regulation by activators in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 93, 4311-4315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thanos, D. and Maniatis, T (1995). Virus induction of human IFN beta gene expression requires the assembly of an enhanceosome. Cell 83, 1091-1100.[Medline]

Tolkunova, E. N., Fujioka, M., Kobayashi, M., Deka, D. and Jaynes, J. B (1998). Two distinct types of repression domain in engrailed: one interacts with the groucho corepressor and is preferentially active on integrated target genes. Mol. Cell. Biol 18, 2804-2814.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Turner, J. and Crossley, M (1998). Cloning and characterization of mCtBP2, a co-repressor that associates with basic Kruppel-like factor and other mammalian transcriptional regulators. EMBO J 17, 5129-5140.[Medline]

Vashee, S. and Kodadek, T (1995). The activation domain of GAL4 protein mediates cooperative promoter binding with general transcription factors in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 10683-10687.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vavra, S. H. and Carroll, S. B (1989). The zygotic control of Drosophila pair-rule gene expression. I. A search for new pair-rule regulatory loci. Development 107, 663-672.[Abstract]

Vinson, C. R., Sigler, P. B. and McKnight, S. L (1989). Scissors-grip model for DNA recognition by a family of leucine zipper proteins. Science 246, 911-916.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wahi, M. and Johnson, A. D (1995). Identification of genes required for2 repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 140, 79-90.[Abstract]

Wharton, K. A. Jr. and Crews, S. T (1993). CNS midline enhancers of the Drosophila slit and Toll genes. Mech. Dev 40, 141-154.[Medline]

Wolpert, L (1989). Positional information revisited. Development 107, 3-12.

Wu, X., Vakani, R. and Small, S (1998). The gap protein giant uses distinct mechanisms for differential positioning of gene expression borders in the Drosophila embryo. Development 125, 3765-3774.[Abstract]

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us Add to Digg

Digg

Technorati

Twitter What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

S. Payankaulam and D. N. Arnosti
Groucho corepressor functions as a cofactor for the Knirps short-range transcriptional repressor
PNAS, October 13, 2009; 106(41): 17314 - 17319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

L.-C. Yao, S. Phin, J. Cho, C. Rushlow, K. Arora, and R. Warrior
Multiple modular promoter elements drive graded brinker expression in response to the Dpp morphogen gradient
Development, June 15, 2008; 135(12): 2183 - 2192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

L. R. Sanders, M. Patel, and J. W. Mahaffey
The Drosophila Gap Gene giant Has an Anterior Segment Identity Function Mediated Through disconnected and teashirt
Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 441 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

C. A. Martinez and D. N. Arnosti
Spreading of a Corepressor Linked to Action of Long-Range Repressor Hairy
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2008; 28(8): 2792 - 2802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

A. E. Brent, G. Yucel, S. Small, and C. Desplan
Permissive and Instructive Anterior Patterning Rely on mRNA Localization in the Wasp Embryo
Science, March 30, 2007; 315(5820): 1841 - 1843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

P. Struffi and D. N. Arnosti
Functional Interaction between the Drosophila Knirps Short Range Transcriptional Repressor and RPD3 Histone Deacetylase
J. Biol. Chem., December 9, 2005; 280(49): 40757 - 40765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

S. E. Winter and G. Campbell
Repression of Dpp targets in the Drosophila wing by Brinker
Development, December 15, 2004; 131(24): 6071 - 6081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

M. Sutrias-Grau and D. N. Arnosti
CtBP Contributes Quantitatively to Knirps Repression Activity in an NAD Binding-Dependent Manner
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2004; 24(13): 5953 - 5966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

P. Struffi, M. Corado, M. Kulkarni, and D. N. Arnosti
Quantitative contributions of CtBP-dependent and -independent repression activities of Knirps
Development, May 15, 2004; 131(10): 2419 - 2429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

G. Bucher and M. Klingler
Divergent segmentation mechanism in the short germ insect Tribolium revealed by giant expression and function
Development, April 15, 2004; 131(8): 1729 - 1740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

M. M. Kulkarni and D. N. Arnosti
Information display by transcriptional enhancers
Development, December 29, 2003; 130(26): 6569 - 6575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

J.-R. Ryu and D. N. Arnosti
Functional similarity of Knirps CtBP-dependent and CtBP-independent transcriptional repressor activities
Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2003; 31(15): 4654 - 4662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

A. J. Courey and S. Jia
Transcriptional repression: the long and the short of it
Genes & Dev., November 1, 2001; 15(21): 2786 - 2796.
[Full Text] [PDF]

J.-R. Ryu, L. K. Olson, and D. N. Arnosti
Cell-type specificity of short-range transcriptional repressors
PNAS, October 25, 2001; (2001) 231394998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

B. L. Keplinger, X. Guo, J. Quine, Y. Feng, and D. R. Cavener
Complex Organization of Promoter and Enhancer Elements Regulate the Tissue- and Developmental Stage-Specific Expression of the Drosophila melanogaster Gld Gene
Genetics, February 1, 2001; 157(2): 699 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

S. A. Keller, Y. Mao, P. Struffi, C. Margulies, C. E. Yurk, A. R. Anderson, R. L. Amey, S. Moore, J. M. Ebels, K. Foley, et al.
dCtBP-Dependent and -Independent Repression Activities of the Drosophila Knirps Protein
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2000; 20(19): 7247 - 7258.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Y. Nibu and M. S. Levine
CtBP-dependent activities of the short-range Giant repressor in the Drosophila embryo
PNAS, May 22, 2001; 98(11): 6204 - 6208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

J.-R. Ryu, L. K. Olson, and D. N. Arnosti
Cell-type specificity of short-range transcriptional repressors
PNAS, November 6, 2001; 98(23): 12960 - 12965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Summary

Full Text (PDF)

Alert me when this article is cited

Alert me if a correction is posted

Services

Email this article to a friend

Similar articles in this journal

Similar articles in PubMed

Alert me to new issues of the journal

Download to citation manager

Citing Articles

Citing Articles via HighWire

Citing Articles via Google Scholar

Google Scholar

Articles by Hewitt, G. F.

Articles by Arnosti, D. N.

Search for Related Content

PubMed

PubMed Citation

Articles by Hewitt, G. F.

Articles by Arnosti, D. N.

Social Bookmarking

What's this?

				L.-C. Yao, S. Phin, J. Cho, C. Rushlow, K. Arora, and R. Warrior Multiple modular promoter elements drive graded brinker expression in response to the Dpp morphogen gradient Development, June 15, 2008; 135(12): 2183 - 2192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. R. Sanders, M. Patel, and J. W. Mahaffey The Drosophila Gap Gene giant Has an Anterior Segment Identity Function Mediated Through disconnected and teashirt Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 441 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Martinez and D. N. Arnosti Spreading of a Corepressor Linked to Action of Long-Range Repressor Hairy Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2008; 28(8): 2792 - 2802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Brent, G. Yucel, S. Small, and C. Desplan Permissive and Instructive Anterior Patterning Rely on mRNA Localization in the Wasp Embryo Science, March 30, 2007; 315(5820): 1841 - 1843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Struffi and D. N. Arnosti Functional Interaction between the Drosophila Knirps Short Range Transcriptional Repressor and RPD3 Histone Deacetylase J. Biol. Chem., December 9, 2005; 280(49): 40757 - 40765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Winter and G. Campbell Repression of Dpp targets in the Drosophila wing by Brinker Development, December 15, 2004; 131(24): 6071 - 6081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sutrias-Grau and D. N. Arnosti CtBP Contributes Quantitatively to Knirps Repression Activity in an NAD Binding-Dependent Manner Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2004; 24(13): 5953 - 5966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Struffi, M. Corado, M. Kulkarni, and D. N. Arnosti Quantitative contributions of CtBP-dependent and -independent repression activities of Knirps Development, May 15, 2004; 131(10): 2419 - 2429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Bucher and M. Klingler Divergent segmentation mechanism in the short germ insect Tribolium revealed by giant expression and function Development, April 15, 2004; 131(8): 1729 - 1740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Kulkarni and D. N. Arnosti Information display by transcriptional enhancers Development, December 29, 2003; 130(26): 6569 - 6575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-R. Ryu and D. N. Arnosti Functional similarity of Knirps CtBP-dependent and CtBP-independent transcriptional repressor activities Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2003; 31(15): 4654 - 4662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Courey and S. Jia Transcriptional repression: the long and the short of it Genes & Dev., November 1, 2001; 15(21): 2786 - 2796. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-R. Ryu, L. K. Olson, and D. N. Arnosti Cell-type specificity of short-range transcriptional repressors PNAS, October 25, 2001; (2001) 231394998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. L. Keplinger, X. Guo, J. Quine, Y. Feng, and D. R. Cavener Complex Organization of Promoter and Enhancer Elements Regulate the Tissue- and Developmental Stage-Specific Expression of the Drosophila melanogaster Gld Gene Genetics, February 1, 2001; 157(2): 699 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. A. Keller, Y. Mao, P. Struffi, C. Margulies, C. E. Yurk, A. R. Anderson, R. L. Amey, S. Moore, J. M. Ebels, K. Foley, et al. dCtBP-Dependent and -Independent Repression Activities of the Drosophila Knirps Protein Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2000; 20(19): 7247 - 7258. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Y. Nibu and M. S. Levine CtBP-dependent activities of the short-range Giant repressor in the Drosophila embryo PNAS, May 22, 2001; 98(11): 6204 - 6208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]