spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 28 September 2005
doi: 10.1242/dev.02048


Development 132, 4883-4894 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
dev.02048v1
132/21/4883    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takaesu, N. T.
Right arrow Articles by Newfeld, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takaesu, N. T.
Right arrow Articles by Newfeld, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

DNA-binding domain mutations in SMAD genes yield dominant-negative proteins or a neomorphic protein that can activate WG target genes in Drosophila

Norma T. Takaesu1, Eric Herbig1,*, David Zhitomersky2, Michael B. O'Connor2 and Stuart J. Newfeld1,{dagger}

1 School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA
2 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

{dagger} Author for correspondence (e-mail: newfeld{at}asu.edu)

Accepted 18 August 2005

Mutations in SMAD tumor suppressor genes are involved in approximately 140,000 new cancers in the USA each year. At this time, how the absence of a functional SMAD protein leads to a tumor is unknown. However, clinical and biochemical studies suggest that all SMAD mutations are loss-of-function mutations. One prediction of this hypothesis is that all SMAD mutations cause tumors via a single mechanism. To test this hypothesis, we expressed five tumor-derived alleles of human SMAD genes and five mutant alleles of Drosophila SMAD genes in flies. We found that all of the DNA-binding domain mutations conferred gain-of-function activity, thereby falsifying the hypothesis. Furthermore, two types of gain-of-function mutation were identified – dominant negative and neomorphic. In numerous assays, the neomorphic allele SMAD4100T appears to be capable of activating the expression of WG target genes. These results imply that SMAD4100T may induce tumor formation by a fundamentally different mechanism from other SMAD mutations, perhaps via the ectopic expression of WNT target genes – an oncogenic mechanism associated with mutations in Adenomatous Polyposis Coli. Our results are likely to have clinical implications, because gain-of-function mutations may cause tumors when heterozygous, and the life expectancy of individuals with SMAD4100T is likely to be different from those with other SMAD mutations. From a larger perspective, our study shows that the genetic characterization of missense mutations, particularly in modular proteins, requires experimental verification.

Key words: Drosophila, SMAD genes, TGFß, Tumorigenesis, Pancreatic cancer, Colon cancer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
P. Kahlem and S. J. Newfeld
Informatics approaches to understanding TGF{beta} pathway regulation
Development, November 15, 2009; 136(22): 3729 - 3740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. T. Eade and D. W. Allan
Neuronal Phenotype in the Mature Nervous System Is Maintained by Persistent Retrograde Bone Morphogenetic Protein Signaling
J. Neurosci., March 25, 2009; 29(12): 3852 - 3864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. K. Lim and F. M. Hoffmann
Smad4 cooperates with lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1/T cell-specific factor to increase c-myc expression in the absence of TGF-beta signaling
PNAS, December 5, 2006; 103(49): 18580 - 18585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
N. T. Takaesu, C. Hyman-Walsh, Y. Ye, R. G. Wisotzkey, M. J. Stinchfield, M. B. O'Connor, D. Wotton, and S. J. Newfeld
dSno Facilitates Baboon Signaling in the Drosophila Brain by Switching the Affinity of Medea Away From Mad and Toward dSmad2
Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1299 - 1313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005