QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 13 December 2006
doi: 10.1242/dev.02746

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material All Versions of this Article: dev.02746v1 134/2/381    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in Development Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hueber, S. D. Articles by Lohmann, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hueber, S. D. Articles by Lohmann, I. Pubmed/NCBI databases Gene GEO Profiles HomoloGene UniGene Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Comparative analysis of Hox downstream genes in Drosophila

Stefanie D. Hueber^1,*, Daniela Bezdan^1,*, Stefan R. Henz², Martina Blank¹, Haijia Wu¹ and Ingrid Lohmann^1,

¹ Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Spemanstrasse 37-39, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.
² Department of Molecular Biology, Spemanstrasse 37-39, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Author for correspondence (e-mail: ingrid.lohmann{at}tuebingen.mpg.de)

Accepted 1 November 2006

Functional diversification of body parts is dependent on the formation of specialized structures along the various body axes. In animals, region-specific morphogenesis along the anteroposterior axis is controlled by a group of conserved transcription factors encoded by the Hox genes. Although it has long been assumed that Hox proteins carry out their function by regulating distinct sets of downstream genes, only a small number of such genes have been found, with very few having direct roles in controlling cellular behavior. We have quantitatively identified hundreds of Hox downstream genes in Drosophila by microarray analysis, and validated many of them by in situ hybridizations on loss- and gain-of-function mutants. One important finding is that Hox proteins, despite their similar DNA-binding properties in vitro, have highly specific effects on the transcriptome in vivo, because expression of many downstream genes respond primarily to a single Hox protein. In addition, a large fraction of downstream genes encodes realizator functions, which directly affect morphogenetic processes, such as orientation and rate of cell divisions, cell-cell adhesion and communication, cell shape and migration, or cell death. Focusing on these realizators, we provide a framework for the morphogenesis of the maxillary segment. As the genomic organization of Hox genes and the interaction of Hox proteins with specific co-factors are conserved in vertebrates and invertebrates, and similar classes of downstream genes are regulated by Hox proteins across the metazoan phylogeny, our findings represent a first step toward a mechanistic understanding of morphological diversification within a species as well as between species.

Key words: Drosophila, Deformed, Morphogenesis, Realizators, Microarray, Hox downstream target genes

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in Development:

Targeting Hox targets

Development 2007 134: e204. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Elgar, J. Han, and M. V. Taylor mef2 activity levels differentially affect gene expression during Drosophila muscle development PNAS, January 22, 2008; 105(3): 918 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Coiffier, B. Charroux, and S. Kerridge Common functions of central and posterior Hox genes for the repression of head in the trunk of Drosophila Development, January 15, 2008; 135(2): 291 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]