|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 9 April 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.020891
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Report |

1 Stockholm University, Wenner-Gren Institute, Developmental Biology, Svante
Arrhenius Väg 16-18, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
2 Institute of Microbiology, Department of Biology, Swiss Federal Institute of
Technology, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
3 Max-Planck Institut für Entwicklungsbiologie, Abteilung Genetik,
Spemannstraße 35, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Author for correspondence (e-mail:
mannervik{at}devbio.su.se)
Accepted 25 March 2008
SUMMARY
N-linked glycosylation is a prevalent protein modification in eukaryotic
cells. Although glycosylation plays an important role in cell signaling during
development, a role for N-linked glycosylation in embryonic patterning has not
previously been described. In a screen for maternal factors involved in embryo
patterning, we isolated mutations in Drosophila ALG5, a
UDP-glucose:dolichyl-phosphate glucosyltransferase. Based on the embryonic
cuticle phenotype, we designated the ALG5 locus wollknäuel
(wol). Mutations in wol result in posterior segmentation
phenotypes, reduced Dpp signaling, as well as impaired mesoderm invagination
and germband elongation at gastrulation. The segmentation phenotype can be
attributed to a post-transcriptional effect on expression of the transcription
factor Caudal, whereas wol acts upstream of Dpp signalin by
regulating dpp expression. The wol/ALG5 cDNA was
able to partially complement the hypoglycosylation phenotype of alg5
mutant S. cerevisiae, whereas the two wol mutant alleles
failed to complement. We show that reduced glycosylation in wol
mutant embryos triggers endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein
response (UPR). As a result, phosphorylation of the translation factor
eIF2
is increased. We propose a model in which translation of a few
maternal mRNAs, including caudal, are particularly sensitive to
increased eIF2
phosphorylation. According to this view, inappropriate
UPR activation can cause specific patterning defects during embryo
development.
Key words: Drosophila, Glycosylation, Patterning, Unfolded protein response
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in Development:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. G. T. Hagen, L. Zhang, E Tian, and Y. Zhang Glycobiology on the fly: Developmental and mechanistic insights from Drosophila Glycobiology, February 1, 2009; 19(2): 102 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||