|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online 19 December 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.016253
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4370, USA.
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: wumin{at}bio.fsu.edu)
Accepted 6 November 2007
Specification of the anteroposterior (AP) axis in Drosophila oocytes requires proper organization of the microtubule and actin cytoskeleton. The establishment and regulation of cytoskeletal polarity remain poorly understood, however. Here, we show important roles for the tumor suppressor Lethal (2) giant larvae (Lgl) and atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) in regulating microtubule polarity and setting up the AP axis of the oocyte. Lgl in the germline cells regulates the localization of axis-specifying morphogens. aPKC phosphorylation of Lgl restricts Lgl activity to the oocyte posterior, thereby dividing the cortex into different domains along the AP axis. Active Lgl promotes the formation of actin-rich projections at the oocyte cortex and the posterior enrichment of the serine/threonine kinase Par-1, a key step for oocyte polarization. Our studies suggest that Lgl and its phosphorylation by aPKC may form a conserved regulatory circuitry in polarization of various cell types.
Key words: Lethal (2) giant larvae (Lgl), Atypical protein kinase C (aPKC), Oocyte polarity, Par-1, Microtubule, Oogenesis, Drosophila
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in Development:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Kim, I. Gailite, B. Moussian, S. Luschnig, M. Goette, K. Fricke, M. Honemann-Capito, H. Grubmuller, and A. Wodarz Kinase-activity-independent functions of atypical protein kinase C in Drosophila J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2009; 122(20): 3759 - 3771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Roth and J. A. Lynch Symmetry Breaking During Drosophila Oogenesis Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, August 1, 2009; 1(2): a001891 - a001891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Jansen, J. P. ten Klooster, G. J. Offerhaus, and H. Clevers LKB1 and AMPK Family Signaling: The Intimate Link Between Cell Polarity and Energy Metabolism Physiol Rev, July 1, 2009; 89(3): 777 - 798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Masuda-Hirata, A. Suzuki, Y. Amano, K. Yamashita, M. Ide, T. Yamanaka, M. Sakai, M. Imamura, and S. Ohno Intracellular polarity protein PAR-1 regulates extracellular laminin assembly by regulating the dystroglycan complex Genes Cells, July 1, 2009; 14(7): 835 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gervais, S. Claret, J. Januschke, S. Roth, and A. Guichet PIP5K-dependent production of PIP2 sustains microtubule organization to establish polarized transport in the Drosophila oocyte Development, December 1, 2008; 135(23): 3829 - 3838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chabu and C. Q. Doe Dap160/intersectin binds and activates aPKC to regulate cell polarity and cell cycle progression Development, August 15, 2008; 135(16): 2739 - 2746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Development in press Par-sing the regulatory circuitry of oocyte polarity J. Cell Sci., February 1, 2008; 121(3): e308 - e308. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||