QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 23 January 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.011569

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material A corrigendum has been published All Versions of this Article: dev.011569v1 135/5/889    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Basson, M. A. Articles by Martin, G. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Basson, M. A. Articles by Martin, G. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Specific regions within the embryonic midbrain and cerebellum require different levels of FGF signaling during development

M. Albert Basson^1,2,3,*, Diego Echevarria^4,*, Christina Petersen Ahn^1,*, Anamaria Sudarov⁵, Alexandra L. Joyner⁵, Ivor J. Mason², Salvador Martinez⁴ and Gail R. Martin^1,

¹ Department of Anatomy and Program in Developmental Biology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
² MRC Centre for Developmental Neurobiology, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK.
³ Department of Craniofacial Development, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.
⁴ Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante, UMH-CSIC, 03550-San Juan de Alicante, Spain.
⁵ Developmental Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.

Author for correspondence (e-mail: gail.r.martin{at}ucsf.edu)

Accepted 30 November 2007

Prospective midbrain and cerebellum formation are coordinated by FGF ligands produced by the isthmic organizer. Previous studies have suggested that midbrain and cerebellum development require different levels of FGF signaling. However, little is known about the extent to which specific regions within these two parts of the brain differ in their requirement for FGF signaling during embryogenesis. Here, we have explored the effects of inhibiting FGF signaling within the embryonic mouse midbrain (mesencephalon) and cerebellum (rhombomere 1) by misexpressing sprouty2 (Spry2) from an early stage. We show that such Spry2 misexpression moderately reduces FGF signaling, and that this reduction causes cell death in the anterior mesencephalon, the region furthest from the source of FGF ligands. Interestingly, the remaining mesencephalon cells develop into anterior midbrain, indicating that a low level of FGF signaling is sufficient to promote only anterior midbrain development. Spry2 misexpression also affects development of the vermis, the part of the cerebellum that spans the midline. We found that, whereas misexpression of Spry2 alone caused loss of the anterior vermis, reducing FGF signaling further, by decreasing Fgf8 gene dose, resulted in loss of the entire vermis. Our data suggest that cell death is not responsible for vermis loss, but rather that it fails to develop because reducing FGF signaling perturbs the balance between vermis and roof plate development in rhombomere 1. We suggest a molecular explanation for this phenomenon by providing evidence that FGF signaling functions to inhibit the BMP signaling that promotes roof plate development.

Key words: FGF, Midbrain, Cerebellum, Sprouty, Apoptosis, Vermis, Roof plate

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Sato and A. L. Joyner The duration of Fgf8 isthmic organizer expression is key to patterning different tectal-isthmo-cerebellum structures Development, November 1, 2009; 136(21): 3617 - 3626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Martinez-Ferre and S. Martinez The Development of the Thalamic Motor Learning Area Is Regulated by Fgf8 Expression J. Neurosci., October 21, 2009; 29(42): 13389 - 13400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Mishima, A. G. Lindgren, V. V. Chizhikov, R. L. Johnson, and K. J. Millen Overlapping Function of Lmx1a and Lmx1b in Anterior Hindbrain Roof Plate Formation and Cerebellar Growth J. Neurosci., September 9, 2009; 29(36): 11377 - 11384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Paek, G. Gutin, and J. M. Hebert FGF signaling is strictly required to maintain early telencephalic precursor cell survival Development, July 15, 2009; 136(14): 2457 - 2465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Lagha, T. Sato, L. Bajard, P. Daubas, M. Esner, D. Montarras, F. Relaix, and M. Buckingham Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cell Behavior by Pax3 and Pax7 Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, November 6, 2008; (2008) sqb.2008.73.006v1. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. J. Park, Y. Watanabe, G. Smyth, S. Miyagawa-Tomita, E. Meyers, J. Klingensmith, T. Camenisch, M. Buckingham, and A. M. Moon An FGF autocrine loop initiated in second heart field mesoderm regulates morphogenesis at the arterial pole of the heart Development, November 1, 2008; 135(21): 3599 - 3610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Aranda, M. Alvarez, S. Turro, A. Laguna, and S. de la Luna Sprouty2-Mediated Inhibition of Fibroblast Growth Factor Signaling Is Modulated by the Protein Kinase DYRK1A Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2008; 28(19): 5899 - 5911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Lagha, J. D. Kormish, D. Rocancourt, M. Manceau, J. A. Epstein, K. S. Zaret, F. Relaix, and M. E. Buckingham Pax3 regulation of FGF signaling affects the progression of embryonic progenitor cells into the myogenic program Genes & Dev., July 1, 2008; 22(13): 1828 - 1837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]