|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search | ||||
The fully linked HTML version of this article has now been published.
Lateral inhibition, wherein a single cell signals to its neighbors to prevent them from adopting its own fate, is the best-known setting for cell-cell communication via the Notch (N) pathway. During peripheral neurogenesis in Drosophila, sensory organ precursor (SOP) cells arise within proneural clusters (PNCs), small groups of cells endowed with SOP fate potential by their expression of proneural transcriptional activators. SOPs use N signaling to activate in neighboring PNC cells the expression of multiple genes that inhibit the SOP fate. These genes respond transcriptionally to direct regulation by both the proneural proteins and the N pathway transcription factor Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)], and their activation is generally highly asymmetric; i.e. only in the inhibited (non-SOP) cells of the PNC, and not in SOPs. We show that the substantially higher proneural protein levels in the SOP put this cell at risk of inappropriately activating the SOP-inhibitory genes, even without input from N-activated Su(H). We demonstrate that this is prevented by direct 'default' repression of these genes by Su(H), acting through the same binding sites it uses for activation in non-SOPs. We show that de-repression of even a single N pathway target gene in the SOP can extinguish the SOP cell fate. Finally, we define crucial roles for the adaptor protein Hairless and the co-repressors Groucho and CtBP in conferring repressive activity on Su(H) in the SOP. Our work elucidates the regulatory logic by which N signaling and the proneural proteins cooperate to create the neural precursor/epidermal cell fate distinction during lateral inhibition.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Development ePress online publication date 23 Jun 2005
doi: 10.1242/dev.01920
This Article ![]()
![]()
Full Text (PDF)
![]()
All Versions of this Article:
dev.01920v1
132/15/3333
most recent![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
![]()
Citing Articles ![]()
![]()
Citing Articles via HighWire
![]()
Citing Articles via Google Scholar
![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Castro, B. ![]()
Articles by Posakony, J. W. ![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Castro, B.
![]()
Articles by Posakony, J. W.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?
Research article
Lateral inhibition in proneural clusters: cis-regulatory logic and default repression by Suppressor of Hairless
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jposakony{at}ucsd.edu)
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
S. Chanet, N. Vodovar, V. Mayau, and F. Schweisguth
Genome Engineering-Based Analysis of Bearded Family Genes Reveals Both Functional Redundancy and a Nonessential Function in Lateral Inhibition in Drosophila
Genetics,
August 1, 2009;
182(4):
1101 - 1108.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
N. Nikolaou, T. Watanabe-Asaka, S. Gerety, M. Distel, R. W. Koster, and D. G. Wilkinson
Lunatic fringe promotes the lateral inhibition of neurogenesis
Development,
August 1, 2009;
136(15):
2523 - 2533.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
A. Garcia-Bellido and J. F. de Celis
The Complex Tale of the achaete-scute Complex: A Paradigmatic Case in the Analysis of Gene Organization and Function During Development
Genetics,
July 1, 2009;
182(3):
631 - 639.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
D. del Alamo and M. Mlodzik
Self-modulation of Notch signaling during ommatidial development via the Roughened eye transcriptional repressor
Development,
September 1, 2008;
135(17):
2895 - 2904.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
U.-M. Fiuza and A. M. Arias
Cell and molecular biology of Notch
J. Endocrinol.,
September 1, 2007;
194(3):
459 - 474.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
A. Krejci and S. Bray
Notch activation stimulates transient and selective binding of Su(H)/CSL to target enhancers
Genes & Dev.,
June 1, 2007;
21(11):
1322 - 1327.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
B. J. Hwang, A. D. Meruelo, and P. W. Sternberg
C. elegans EVI1 proto-oncogene, EGL-43, is necessary for Notch-mediated cell fate specification and regulates cell invasion
Development,
February 15, 2007;
134(4):
669 - 679.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005