The fully linked HTML version of this article has now been published.
Development ePress online publication date 1 Sep 2005
doi: 10.1242/dev.02009
Research article
Specification and maintenance of the spinal cord stem zone
Mariana Delfino-Machín,
J. Simon Lunn,
Dorette N. Breitkreuz,
Jun Akai,
and
Kate G. Storey*
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: k.g.storey{at}dundee.ac.uk)
Epiblast cells adjacent to the regressing primitive streak behave as a stem zone that progressively generates the entire spinal cord and also contributes to paraxial mesoderm. Despite this fundamental task, this cell population is poorly characterised, and the tissue interactions and signalling pathways that specify this unique region are unknown. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) is implicated but it is unclear whether it is sufficient and/or directly required for stem zone specification. It is also not understood how establishment of the stem zone relates to the acquisition of spinal cord identity as indicated by expression of caudal Hox genes.
Here, we show that many cells in the chick stem zone express both early neural and mesodermal genes; however, stem zone-specific gene expression can be induced by signals from underlying paraxial mesoderm without concomitant induction of an ambivalent neural/mesodermal cell state. The stem zone is a site of FGF/MAPK signalling and we show that although FGF alone does not mimic paraxial mesoderm signals, it is directly required in epiblast cells for stem zone specification and maintenance. We further demonstrate that caudal Hox gene expression in the stem zone also depends on FGF and that neither stem zone specification nor caudal Hox gene onset requires retinoid signalling. These findings thus support a two step model for spinal cord generation - FGF-dependent establishment of the stem zone in which progressively more caudal Hox genes are expressed, followed by the retinoid-dependent assignment of spinal cord identity.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
V. Wilson, I. Olivera-Martinez, and K. G. Storey
Stem cells, signals and vertebrate body axis extension
Development,
May 15, 2009;
136(10):
1591 - 1604.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Ribes, I. Le Roux, M. Rhinn, B. Schuhbaur, and P. Dolle
Early mouse caudal development relies on crosstalk between retinoic acid, Shh and Fgf signalling pathways
Development,
February 15, 2009;
136(4):
665 - 676.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. McGrew, A. Sherman, S. G. Lillico, F. M. Ellard, P. A. Radcliffe, H. J. Gilhooley, K. A. Mitrophanous, N. Cambray, V. Wilson, and H. Sang
Localised axial progenitor cell populations in the avian tail bud are not committed to a posterior Hox identity
Development,
July 1, 2008;
135(13):
2289 - 2299.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Olivera-Martinez and K. G. Storey
Wnt signals provide a timing mechanism for the FGF-retinoid differentiation switch during vertebrate body axis extension
Development,
June 1, 2007;
134(11):
2125 - 2135.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.-P. Liu
The function of growth/differentiation factor 11 (Gdf11) in rostrocaudal patterning of the developing spinal cord
Development,
August 1, 2006;
133(15):
2865 - 2874.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Alexandre, I. Bachy, M. Marcou, and M. Wassef
Positive and negative regulations by FGF8 contribute to midbrain roof plate developmental plasticity
Development,
August 1, 2006;
133(15):
2905 - 2913.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Akai, P. A. Halley, and K. G. Storey
FGF-dependent Notch signaling maintains the spinal cord stem zone
Genes & Dev.,
December 1, 2005;
19(23):
2877 - 2887.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005
