|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search | ||||
The fully linked HTML version of this article has now been published.
Functional diversification of body parts is dependent on the formation of specialized structures along the various body axes. In animals, region-specific morphogenesis along the anteroposterior axis is controlled by a group of conserved transcription factors encoded by the Hox genes. Although it has long been assumed that Hox proteins carry out their function by regulating distinct sets of downstream genes, only a small number of such genes have been found, with very few having direct roles in controlling cellular behavior. We have quantitatively identified hundreds of Hox downstream genes in Drosophila by microarray analysis, and validated many of them by in situ hybridizations on loss- and gain-of-function mutants. One important finding is that Hox proteins, despite their similar DNA-binding properties in vitro, have highly specific effects on the transcriptome in vivo, because expression of many downstream genes respond primarily to a single Hox protein. In addition, a large fraction of downstream genes encodes realizator functions, which directly affect morphogenetic processes, such as orientation and rate of cell divisions, cell-cell adhesion and communication, cell shape and migration, or cell death. Focusing on these realizators, we provide a framework for the morphogenesis of the maxillary segment. As the genomic organization of Hox genes and the interaction of Hox proteins with specific co-factors are conserved in vertebrates and invertebrates, and similar classes of downstream genes are regulated by Hox proteins across the metazoan phylogeny, our findings represent a first step toward a mechanistic understanding of morphological diversification within a species as well as between species.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Development ePress online publication date 13 Dec 2006
doi: 10.1242/dev.02746
This Article ![]()
![]()
Full Text (PDF)
![]()
All Versions of this Article:
dev.02746v1
134/2/381
most recent![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
![]()
Citing Articles ![]()
![]()
Citing Articles via HighWire
![]()
Citing Articles via Google Scholar
![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Hueber, S. D. ![]()
Articles by Lohmann, I. ![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Hueber, S. D.
![]()
Articles by Lohmann, I.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?
Research article
Comparative analysis of Hox downstream genes in Drosophila
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: ingrid.lohmann{at}tuebingen.mpg.de)
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
S. J. Elgar, J. Han, and M. V. Taylor
mef2 activity levels differentially affect gene expression during Drosophila muscle development
PNAS,
January 22, 2008;
105(3):
918 - 923.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
D. Coiffier, B. Charroux, and S. Kerridge
Common functions of central and posterior Hox genes for the repression of head in the trunk of Drosophila
Development,
January 15, 2008;
135(2):
291 - 300.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006