The fully linked HTML version of this article has now been published.
Development ePress online publication date 24 Jan 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.02779
Research article
Nuclear reorganisation and chromatin decondensation are conserved, but distinct, mechanisms linked to Hox gene activation
Céline Morey,
Nelly R. Da Silva,
Paul Perry,
and
Wendy A. Bickmore*
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: W.Bickmore{at}hgu.mrc.ac.uk)
The relocalisation of some genes to positions outside chromosome territories, and the visible decondensation or unfolding of interphase chromatin, are two striking facets of nuclear reorganisation linked to gene activation that have been assumed to be related to each other. Here, in a study of nuclear reorganisation around the Hoxd cluster, we suggest that this may not be the case. Despite its very different genomic environment from Hoxb, Hoxd also loops out from its chromosome territory, and unfolds, upon activation in differentiating embryonic stem (ES) cells and in the tailbud of the embryo. However, looping out and decondensation are not simply two different manifestations of the same underlying change in chromatin structure. We show that, in the limb bud of the embryonic day 9.5 embryo, where Hoxd is also activated, there is visible decondensation of chromatin but no detectable movement of the region out from the chromosome territory. During ES cell differentiation, decondensed alleles can also be found inside of chromosome territories, and loci that have looped out of the territories can appear to still be condensed. We conclude that evolutionarily conserved chromosome remodelling mechanisms, predating the duplication of mammalian Hox loci, underlie Hox regulation along the rostrocaudal embryonic axis. However, we suggest that separate modes of regulation can modify Hoxd chromatin in different ways in different developmental contexts.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Morey, C. Kress, and W. A. Bickmore
Lack of bystander activation shows that localization exterior to chromosome territories is not sufficient to up-regulate gene expression
Genome Res.,
July 1, 2009;
19(7):
1184 - 1194.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Abou El Hassan and R. Bremner
A rapid simple approach to quantify chromosome conformation capture
Nucleic Acids Res.,
April 1, 2009;
37(5):
e35 - e35.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Brown, J. Green, R. P. das Neves, H. A.C. Wallace, A. J.H. Smith, J. Hughes, N. Gray, S. Taylor, W. G. Wood, D. R. Higgs, et al.
Association between active genes occurs at nuclear speckles and is modulated by chromatin environment
J. Cell Biol.,
September 22, 2008;
182(6):
1083 - 1097.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Morey, N. R. Da Silva, M. Kmita, D. Duboule, and W. A. Bickmore
Ectopic nuclear reorganisation driven by a Hoxb1 transgene transposed into Hoxd
J. Cell Sci.,
March 1, 2008;
121(5):
571 - 577.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Schneider and R. Grosschedl
Dynamics and interplay of nuclear architecture, genome organization, and gene expression
Genes & Dev.,
December 1, 2007;
21(23):
3027 - 3043.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. Matarazzo, S. Boyle, M. D'Esposito, and W. A. Bickmore
Chromosome territory reorganization in a human disease with altered DNA methylation
PNAS,
October 16, 2007;
104(42):
16546 - 16551.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007